Skip to main content
Log in

Do alterations in mesofauna community affect earthworms?

  • Ecosystem ecology - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interactions between the saprotrophic animal groups that strongly control soil microbial activities and the functioning of detrital food webs, such as earthworms and mesofauna, are not well understood. Earthworm trophic and engineering activities strongly affect mesofauna abundance and diversity through various direct and indirect pathways. In contrast, mesofauna effects on earthworm populations are less evident; however, their importance may be high, considering the keystone significance of earthworms for the functioning of the soil system. We studied effects of a diverse mesofauna community of a deciduous forest on two earthworm species representing epigeic (Lumbricus rubellus) and endogeic (Aporrectodea caliginosa) ecological groups. In microcosms, the density of total mesofauna or its separate groups (enchytraeids, collembolans, gamasid mites) was manipulated (increased) and responses of earthworms and soil systems were recorded. A rise in mesofauna density resulted in a decrease of biomass and an increased mortality in L. rubellus, presumably due to competition with mesofauna for litter resources. In contrast, similar mesofauna manipulations promoted reproduction of A. caliginosa, suggesting a facilitated exploitation of litter resources due to increased mesofauna activities. Changes of microcosm respiration rates, litter organic matter content and microbial activities across the manipulation treatments indicate that mesofauna modify responses of soil systems in the presence of earthworms. However, similar mesofauna manipulations could induce different responses in soil systems with either epigeic or endogeic lumbricids, which suggests that earthworm/mesofauna interactions are species-specific. Thus, mesofauna impacts should be treated as a factor affecting the engineering activities of epigeic and endogeic earthworms in the soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1978) A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker FM, Feije R, Grove AJ, Hoogendoorn G, Jacobs G, Loose ED, van Stratum P (2003) A laboratory test protocol to evaluate effects of plant protection products on mortality and reproduction of the predatory mite Hypoaspis aculiefer Canestrini (Acari: Laelaptidae) in standard soil. J Soils Sediments 3:73–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck T, Joergensen RG, Kandeler E, Makeschin F, Nuss E, Oberholzer HR, Scheu S (1997) An inter-laboratory comparison of ten different ways of measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1023–1032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bohlen PJ, Scheu S, Hale CM, McLean MA, Migge S, Groffman PM, Parkinson D (2004) Non-native invasive earthworms as agents of change in northern temperate forests. Front Ecol Environ 2:427–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boström U, Lofs-Holmin A (1986) Growth of earthworms (Allolobophora caliginosa) fed on shoots and roots of barley, meadow fescue, and lucerne: studies in relation to particle size, protein, crude fiber and toxicity. Pedobiologia 29:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GG (1995) How do earthworms affect microfloral and faunal community diversity? Plant Soil 170:209–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byzov BA (2005) Zoomicrobial interactions in soil. GEOS Publ, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernova NM (1966) Zoological characterization of composts. Nauka Publ. House, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernova NM (1977) Zoological characterization of plant remains. Nauka Publ. House, Moscow (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole L, Dromph KM, Boaglio V, Bardgett RD (2004) Effect of density and species richness of soil mesofauna on nutrient mineralisation and plant growth. Biol Fertil Soils 39:337–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawod V, FitzPatrick EA (1993) Some population sizes and effects of the Enchytraeidae (Oligochaeta) on soil structure in a selection of Scottish soils. Geoderma 56:173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didden WAM, Fründ H-C, Graefe U (1997) Enchytraeids. In: Benckiser G (ed) Fauna in soil ecosystems: recycling processes, nutrient fluxes, and agricultural production. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 135–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ (1996) Biology and ecology of earthworms, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhauer N (2010) The action of an animal ecosystem engineer: identification of the main mechanisms of earthworm impacts on soil microarthropods. Pedobiologia 53:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhauer N, Partsch S, Parkinson D, Scheu S (2007) Invasion of a deciduous forest by earthworms: changes in soil chemistry, microflora, microarthropods and vegetation. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1099–1110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frelich LE, Hale CM, Scheu S, Holdsworth AR, Heneghan L, Bohlen PJ, Reich PB (2006) Earthworm invasion into previously earthworm-free temperate and boreal forests. Biol Invasions 8:1235–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérres López M, Jesús Lidón JB, Trigo Aza D, Rodríguez MN, Díaz Cosín DJ (2008) Is there food competition between Hormogaster elisae (Oligochaeta, Hormogastridae) and soil microarthropods at El Molar (Madrid)? Eur J Soil Biol 44:207–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding DJL, Stuttard RA (1974) Microarthropods. In: Dickinson CH, Pugh GJF (eds) Biology of plant litter decomposition, vol 2. Acadamic Press, London, pp 489–532

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haukka JK (1987) Growth and survival of Eisenia fetida (Sav.) (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae) in relation to temperature, moisture and presence of Enchytraeus albidus (Henle) (Enchytraeidae). Biol Fertil Soils 3:99–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhta V, Viberg K (1999) Competitive interactions between the earthworm Dendrobaena octaedra and the enchytraeid Cognettia sphagnetorum. Pedobiologia 43:886–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhta V, Persson T, Setälä H (1998) Functional implications of soil fauna diversity in boreal forests. Appl Soil Ecol 10:277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jänsch S, Amorim MJ, Römbke J (2005) Identification of the ecological requirements of important terrestrial ecotoxicological test species. Environ Rev 13:51–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jouquet P, Dauber J, Lagerlöf J, Lavelle P, Lepage M (2006) Soil invertebrates as ecosystem engineers: intended and accidental effects on soil and feedback loops. Appl Soil Ecol. 32:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaban K, Uvarov AV (2014) Non-trophic effects of earthworms on enchytraeids: an experimental investigation. Soil Biol Biochem 73:84–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kubiena WL (1955) Animal activity in soils as a decisive factor in establishment of humus forms. In: Kevan DKMcE (ed) Soil zoology. Butterworths, London, pp 73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle P, Bignell D, Lepage M, Wolters V, Roger P, Heal OW, Dhillion S (1997) Soil function in a changing world: the role of invertebrate ecosystem engineers. Eur J Soil Biol 33:159–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist EE, Krantz GW, Walter DE (2009) Order Mesostigmata. In: Krantz GW, Walter DE (eds) A manual of acarology. Texas Tech University Press, Texas, pp 124–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraun M, Alphei J, Beste P, Bonkowski M, Buryń R, Migge S, Peter M, Schaefer M, Scheu S (2001) Indirect effects of carbon and nutrient amendments on the soil meso- and microfauna of a beechwood. Biol Fertil Soils 34:222–229

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen H, Luxton M (1982) A comparative analysis of soil fauna populations and their role in decomposition processes. Oikos 39:287–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Potapov AM, Semenyuk II, Tiunov AV (2014) Seasonal and age-related changes in the stable isotope composition (15N/14N and 13C/12C) of millipedes and collembolans in a temperate forest soil. Pedobiologia 57:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruess L, Tiunov A, Haubert D, Richnow HH, Häggblom MM, Scheu S (2005) Carbon stable isotope fractionation and trophic transfer of fatty acids in fungal based soil food chains. Soil Biol Biochem 37:945–953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon S (2001) Earthworm excreta (mucus and urine) affect the distribution of springtails in forest soils. Biol Fertil Soils 34:304–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon S (2004) The impact of earthworms on the abundance of Collembola: improvement of food resources or of habitat? Biol Fertil Soils 40:323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandor M, Schrader S (2012) Interaction of earthworms and enchytraeids in organically amended soil. N-W J Zool 8:46–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (2002) The soil food web: structure and perspectives. Eur J Soil Biol 38:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (2003) Effects of earthworms on plant growth: patterns and perspectives. Pedobiologia 47:846–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S, Setälä H (2002) Multitrophic interactions in decomposer food-webs. In: Tscharntke T, Hawkins BA (eds) Multitrophic level interactions. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 223–264

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S, Theenhaus A, Jones TH (1999) Links between the detritivore and the herbivore system: effects of earthworms and collembolans on plant growth and aphid development. Oecologia 119:541–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt O, Curry JP, Dyckmans J, Rota E, Scrimgeour CM (2004) Dual stable isotope analysis (δ13C and δ15N) of soil invertebrates and their food sources. Pedobiologia 48:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilenkova OL (2014) Available carbon as a factor affecting interactions between zoosaprophages in soil. In: Striganova BR (ed) Problems in soil zoology, Materials of 17th All-Russian conference. Moscow, Syktyvkar, pp 258–259 (in Russian)

  • Tiunov AV (2007) Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in soil ecological studies. Biol Bull 34:395–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiunov AV, Hale CM, Holdsworth AR, Vsevolodova-Perel TS (2006) Invasion patterns of Lumbricidae into the previously earthworm-free areas of northeastern Europe and the western Great Lakes region of North America. Biol Invasions 7:1223–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uvarov AV (1995) Response of an earthworm species to constant and diurnally fluctuating temperature regime in laboratory microcosms. Eur J Soil Biol 31:111–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Uvarov AV, Tiunov AV, Scheu S (2011) Effects of seasonal and diurnal temperature fluctuations on population dynamics of two epigeic earthworm species in forest soil. Soil Biol Biochem 43:559–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zachariae G (1963) Was leisten Collembolen for den Waldhumus? In: Doeksen J, van der Drift J (eds) Soil organisms. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 109–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachariae G (1965) Spuren tierischer Tätigkeit im Boden des Buchenwaldes. Forstwiss. Forsch. 20:1–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd Edition. Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Jarosław Lasota and Maciej Zwydak (Uniwersytet Rolniczy w Krakowie) for soil description, Alexei Tiunov (Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS) for the performance of stable isotope analysis, Mikhail Potapov (Moscow State Pedagogical University) for checking the determination of Collembola species, Sergei Golovatch (Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS) for the language corrections, and two anonymous referees for valuable comments. Special gratitude is sent to Alexia Hoste-Danyłow, Paulina Gieros and Magdalena Śniżko for assistance in the experimental work. The work was supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Grant No 4023/B/P01/2010/38) and by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. The study was presented at the 16th Colloquium on Soil Zoology in Coimbra (2012), and we thank the participants for the discussion and comments.

Author contribution statement

AVU originally formulated the idea and developed the methodology, AVU and KK conducted fieldwork, performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexei V. Uvarov.

Additional information

Communicated by Stefan Scheu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uvarov, A.V., Karaban, K. Do alterations in mesofauna community affect earthworms?. Oecologia 179, 877–887 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3383-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3383-6

Keywords

Navigation