Abstract
One of the most unique coat color patterns in the domestic dog is merle (also known as dapple in the dachshund breed), characterized by patches of normal pigmentation surrounded by diluted eumelanin pigment. In dogs, this striking variegated pattern is caused by an insertion of a SINE element into the PMEL gene. Differences in the length of the SINE insertion [due to a variable-length poly(A)-tail] has been associated with variation in the merle coat color and patterning. We previously performed a systematic evaluation of merle in 175 Australian shepherds and related breeds and correlated the length of the merle insertion variants with four broad phenotypic clusters designated as “cryptic”, “atypical”, “classic”, and “harlequin” merle. In this study, we evaluated the SINE insertions in 140 dachshunds and identified the same major merle phenotypic clusters with only slight variation between breeds. Specifically, we identified numerous cases of true “hidden” merle in dachshunds with light/red (pheomelanin) coats with little to no black/brown pigment (eumelanin) and thus minimal or no observable merle phenotype. In addition, we identified somatic and gonadal mosaicism, with one dog having a large insertion in the harlequin size range of M281 that had no merle phenotype and unintentionally produced a double merle puppy with anophthalmia. The frequent identification of cryptic, hidden, and mosaic merle variants, which can be undetectable by phenotypic inspection, should be of particular concern to breeders and illustrates the critical need for genetic testing for merle prior to breeding to avoid producing dogs with serious health problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
All relevant data generated in this study are included in this published article.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Ballif BC, Ramirez CJ, Carl CR, Sundin K, Krug M, Zahand A, Shaffer LG, Flores-Smith H (2018) The PMEL gene and merle in the domestic dog: a continuum of insertion lengths leads to a spectrum of coat color variations in Australian shepherds and related breeds. Cytogenet Genome Res 156:22–34. https://doi.org/10.1159/000491408
Clark LA, Wahl JM, Rees CA, Murphy KE (2006) Retrotransposon insertion in SILV is responsible for merle patterning of the domestic dog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:1376–1381. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506940103
Clark LA, Tsai KL, Starr AN, Nowend KL, Murphy KE (2011) A missense mutation in the 20S proteasome β2 subunit of Great Danes having harlequin coat patterning. Genomics 97:2440248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.01.003
Drögemüller C, Philipp U, Haase B, Günzel-Apel AR, Leeb T (2007) A noncoding melanophilin gene (MLPH) SNP at the splice donor of exon 1 represents a candidate causal mutation for coat color dilution in dogs. J Hered 98:468–473. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esm021
Gelatt KN, Powell NG, Huston K (1981) Inheritance of microphthalmia with coloboma in the Australian shepherd dog. Am J Vet Res 42:1686–1690
Karlsson EK, Baranowska I, Wade CM, Salmon Hillbertz NH, Zody MC, Anderson N, Biagi TM, Patterson N, Pielberg GR, Kulbokas EJ 3rd, Comstock KE, Keller ET, Mesirov JP, von Euler H, Kampe O, Hedhammar A, Lander ES, Andersson G, Andersson L, Lindblad-Toh K (2007) Efficient mapping of mendelian traits in dogs through genome-wide association. Nat Genet 39(11):1321–1328. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2007.10
Kerje S, Sharma P, Gunnarsson U, Kim H, Bagchi S, Fredriksson R, Schütz K, Jensen P, von Heijne G, Okimoto R, Andersson L (2004) The Dominant white, dun and smoky color variants in chicken are associated with insertion/deletion polymorphisms in the PMEL17 gene. Genetics 168(3):1507–1518. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.027995
Langevin M, Synkova H, Jancuskova T, Pekova S (2018) Merle phenotypes in dogs—SILV SINE insertions from Mc to Mh. PLoS One 13:e0198536. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198536
Murphy SC, Evans JM, Tsai KL, Clark LA (2018) Length variations within the merle retrotransposon of canine PMEL: correlating genotype with phenotype. Mob DNA 9:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-018-0131-6
Pelles Z, Gaspardy A, Zoldag L, Lenart X, Ninausz N, Varga L, Zenke P (2019) Merle allele variations in the mudi dog breed and their effects on the phenotypes. Acta Vet Hung 67:259–173. https://doi.org/10.1556/004.2019.018
Pingault V, Ente D, Dastot-Le Moal F, Goossens M, Marlin S, Bondurand N (2010) Review and update of mutations causing Waardenburg syndrome. Hum Mutat 31(4):391–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.21211
Platt S, Freeman J, di Stefani A, Wieczorek L, Henley W (2006) Prevalence of unilateral and bilateral deafness in border collies and association with phenotype. J Vet Intern Med 20:1355–1362. https://doi.org/10.1892/0891-6640(2006)20[1355:pouabd]2.0.co;2
Shaffer LG, Ramirez CJ, Phelps P, Aviram M, Walczak M, Bar-Gal GK, Ballif BC (2017) An international genetic survey of breed-specific diseases in working dogs from the United States, Israel, and Poland. Cytogenet Genome Res 153:198–204. https://doi.org/10.1159/000486774
Shaffer LG, Ramirez CJ, Sundin K, Connell LB, Ballif BC (2015) Genetic screening and mutation identification in a rare canine breed, the Drentsche patrijshond. Vet Rec Case Rep 3:e000185
Shaffer LG, Ramirez CJ, Sundin K, Connell LB, Ballif BC (2016) Genetic screening and mutation identification in a rare canine breed, the cesky fousek. Vet Rec Case Rep 4:e000346
Theos AC, Truschel ST, Raposo G, Marks MS (2005) The silver locus product Pmel17/gp100/Silv/ME20: controversial in name and in function. Pigment Cell Res 18(5):322–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0749.2005.00269.x
Varga L, Lenart X, Zenke P, Orban L, Hudak P, Ninausz N, Pelles Z, Szoke A (2020) Being merle: the molecular genetic background of the canine merle mutation. Genes 11:660. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11060660
Acknowledgements
The authors express their appreciation to all of the dogs and their owners who participated in this study, and special thanks to Rob Westra and Daniela Flores for their critical reading of the manscript and helpful discussions.
Funding
Funding for this study was provided by Genetic Veterinary Sciences, Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LGS, BCB, and LJE contributed to the study conceptualization and design. Sample recruitment, photo collection, and pedigree chart construction were performed by LJE for the large six-generation pedigree. PMEL testing, laboratory supervision, and results analysis was performed by HFS, CJR, CRC, KS, and BCB. BCB performed the final analysis of the combined dataset and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors commented on and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
LGS is the owner of Genetic Veterinary Sciences, Inc., DBA Paw Print Genetics which provides genetic testing on a fee-for-service basis. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethics approval
Informed consent was obtained from the owners of dogs specifically recruited for this study. The remaining samples were anonymized from samples that would have been otherwise discarded following routine diagnostic testing.
Consent to participate
All canine samples included in this study were obtained through consent of the individual owners or were obtained from otherwise-discarded DNA samples after clinical testing at Paw Print Genetics.
Consent for publication
All photographs included in this study were used with permission from the dog owners.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ballif, B.C., Emerson, L.J., Ramirez, C.J. et al. The PMEL gene and merle (dapple) in the dachshund: cryptic, hidden, and mosaic variants demonstrate the need for genetic testing prior to breeding. Hum Genet 140, 1581–1591 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-021-02330-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-021-02330-y