Abstract
Gastrointestinal nematodes are ubiquitous parasites of grazing equines with Parascaris spp., and strongyles being the most relevant ones regarding the prevalence and potential disease severity. Despite their importance, epidemiological data regarding the presence and egg-shedding intensities of these parasites are scarce. Data from 1067 horse samples collected on German horse farms initially to compare diagnostic methods were used for epidemiological analyses. Due to its higher sensitivity, presence/absence data were based on a combined sedimentation/flotation technique while faecal egg counts were based on Mini-FLOTAC. For strongyles, 46.5% of the samples were positive and the median egg-shedding intensity was 40 (range 5–2590). In multivariate analyses, prevalence and egg-shedding intensity were significantly influenced by season, age group and sample type. The drug used for the last treatment and the number of foals on the yard only affected prevalence while the number of horses on the yard and sex were only significant for egg-shedding intensity. For Parascaris spp., a prevalence of 4.6% and a median egg-shedding intensity of 0 (range 5–905) were observed. In multivariate analyses, the age group, the time since the last anthelmintic treatment, presence and number of foals had significant effects on ascarid prevalence whereas egg-shedding intensity was significantly influenced by age group and season only. Parascaris occurred only on yards with foals, but with an increasing number of foals, Parascaris egg-shedding intensity decreased. Prevalence and egg-shedding intensity were influenced by different but partially overlapping variables for Parascaris and strongyles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Like all grazing animals, horses are infected with a diverse number of pasture-borne gastrointestinal parasites among which the parasitic nematodes are the most important (Kaplan 2002; Matthews 2014; von Samson-Himmelstjerna 2012; Nielsen et al. 2010a). The reproductive stages of many of these parasites are shed in the faeces of horses, but the actual parasites and their frequencies that can be found in horses are influenced by environmental, host-specific and management factors (Corning 2009; von Samson-Himmelstjerna 2012; Nielsen et al. 2014b; von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al. 2009; Zanet et al. 2021). The environmental factors include abiotic and biotic variables such as humidity, temperature, soil type and plant communities on pasture while the most important management factors include treatment frequencies, the anthelmintic that was used and the access to pasture. The presence or absence of anthelmintic resistance is also related to management aspects. The most important host-specific factor is the age of the host but other factors such as sex, breed and general health (e.g. co-infections) may also be of relevance (Nielsen et al. 2010b, 2014b; Relf et al. 2013). The impact of environmental factors on the prevalence and abundance of gastrointestinal nematodes depends on the life cycle of the parasites, since different environmental stages differ in their susceptibility to effects such as evaporation and elevated temperature. In horses, the most frequently observed parasites in faecal samples belong to the groups of the strongyles and the ascarides (von Samson-Himmelstjerna 2012; Reinemeyer and Nielsen 2009) that exhibit strong differences in their life cycles (Nielsen et al. 2010b; Rehbein et al. 2013).
Strongyle nematodes of horses include the Strongylinae with the highly pathogenic Strongylus species and a large number of species (> 50) belonging to the Cyathostominae. These parasites almost always occur as coinfection of multiple species and up to 29 have already been identified in a single host individual (Bredtmann et al. 2017a; Johnson and Biddle 2021; Bucknell et al. 1995). Identification of these species is impossible using eggs, and only limited differentiation is possible based on third-stage larvae (L3). All these parasites share a similar non-parasitic phase of their life cycle with the development of infective third-stage larvae from eggs in the environment, which depends on many exogenic factors such as temperature, humidity and the type of ground the horses are kept on (e.g. amount of grass available, soil type, etc.). Infection occurs through oral uptake of L3. Although young horses are expected to be more susceptible to strongyles, these parasites frequently occur in all age groups.
In contrast to strongyles, the ascarids of equines (Parascaris spp.) undergo development to L3 in ovo and are well protected from many environmental stressors by their thick egg shell (Clayton and Duncan 1979b; Reinemeyer 2009; Clayton 1986; Lyons et al. 2011). Under suitable conditions such as in humid earth, ascarid eggs can survive for several years (Nielsen et al. 2019; Nielsen 2016; Reinemeyer 2012, 2009). The infection with Parascaris spp. occurs by oral uptake of eggs containing infective L3 (Reinemeyer 2009; Clayton and Duncan 1979b), and the parasites are highly pathogenic in foals and yearlings but are rarely found in older horses (Fritzen et al. 2010; Southwood et al. 1998; Rehbein et al. 2013; von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al. 2007; Hautala et al. 2019; Clayton and Duncan 1979a; von Samson-Himmelstjerna 2012).
Data about the prevalence and intensity of strongyle and ascarid egg shedding in Germany are scarce, and risk factor analyses are often based on a limited number of samples (Nielsen et al. 2014b, 2014a; Raue et al. 2017). Using a recently published dataset that was employed to compare different diagnostic methods for equine faecal samples (Boelow et al. 2022) and for which questionnaire data regarding the distribution of potential risk factors were available, the present study aims to identify risk factors for the presence of strongyle and ascarid eggs in equine faecal samples but also for egg-shedding intensity. In this study, all samples were analysed in parallel using combined sedimentation/flotation, Mini-FLOTAC and FECPAKG2. Since sedimentation/flotation was found to be the most sensitive of these methods (Boelow et al. 2022), data from this method were used to analyse data on the presence of parasites. Mini-FLOTAC was found to be the superior quantitative method in comparison to FECPAKG2 (Boelow et al. 2022), and thus, for statistical analysis of faecal egg count (FEC) data, the Mini-FLOTAC results were chosen.
Materials and methods
Faecal samples
All samples that were included were collected between 11/09/2017 and 13/08/2018 and originated from German horse farms. Samples were either sent to the diagnostics section of the Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine (n = 426) or were sent upon personal invitation specifically for the present study by horse owners (n = 469). Some of the samples (l = 172) have previously been used in a study by Jürgenschellert et al. (Jürgenschellert et al. 2020) and were reexamined for the present study. Since all samples were included in the method comparison study, only samples for which at least 35 g of faeces were available were included. For all samples, the answers to the standard questionnaire for diagnostic samples of the Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine (Supplementary Text S1) were available. Samples were refrigerated at 4–6 °C upon arrival and were analysed at the latest ten days after arrival.
Combined sedimentation/flotation
For the combined sedimentation/flotation method, 15 g of faeces were resuspended in 40 ml of tap water as described previously (Boelow et al. 2022). Briefly, the suspension was filtered through an 800-µm-mesh-size sieve and centrifuged at 400 × g for 10 min. The pellet was resuspended in saturated sucrose solution (specific density 1.26) and centrifuged at 200 × g for 10 min before a horizontal wire loop was used to transfer three drops to a glass slide. For each egg type the results were categorised as negative if no eggs were found, + for 1–10 eggs, + + for 11–40 eggs, + + + for 41 to 200 eggs and + + + + for more than 200 eggs. For all analyses on the prevalence of egg shedding in the sample population, only data from sedimentation/flotation were used since this diagnostic approach yielded the highest number of positive samples and was therefore considered to be the most sensitive (Boelow et al. 2022).
Mini-FLOTAC
Mini-FLOTAC was conducted as described recently (Boelow et al. 2022) using 5 g of faecal sample and 45 ml of saturated NaCl flotation solution (specific density 1.2) and counting all eggs in both counting chambers of the device. In order to calculate the number of eggs per gramme faeces, raw egg counts were multiplied by 5. For all analyses regarding egg-shedding intensity, results of the Mini-FLOTAC methods were used.
Statistical analyses
Descriptive statistics of data (means, quartiles) were calculated in R version 4.1.1 using RStudio 1.4. and applying the summary function. For proportions, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using the binom.wilson from the Epitools package. To determine if different levels of the same variable were observed with significantly different frequencies, binomial (binom.test) and multinomial (multinomial.test from the EMT 1.2 package) tests were conducted. Differences between proportions were analysed for significance using a mid-p exact test as implemented in the tab2by2.test function in the Epitools 0.5–10.1 package. Odds ratios were calculated using the exact mid-p method using oddsratio.midp from the same package. In a few cases, calculation with the exact mip-p method was impossible and exact Fisher’s method was applied using oddsratio.fisher from the same package. Distributions of quantitative variables between groups were compared using an unpaired Wilcoxon rank-sum test (wilcox.test) to compare two groups. For a comparison of more than two groups, a Kruskal–Wallis test (kruskal.test) was conducted followed by pairwise comparisons of all groups using Conover’s test (kwallPairsConoverTest from the PMCMRplus 1.9.3 package). Spearman correlations between two metric variables were calculated using the cor.test function from basic R. Effects of continuous and count variables on the prevalence of egg shedding were analysed using logistic regression analysis with a single explanatory variable. For this purpose, the glm function was used, and the family argument was set to “binomial”. Odds ratios and their 95% CIs were calculated from parameter estimates and standard errors by applying the confint function for the 95% CIs followed by exponentiation of estimates.
Multivariate analyses were conducted using the glm() function. For prevalence data, logistic regression analysis was used as described above but including all available variables in the initial model. This model was stepwise optimised by eliminating variables to decrease the Akaike information criterion (AIC). For the final model, Tjur’s D and Nagelkerke’s pseudo R2 were calculated using r2_tjur and r2_nagelkerke from the performance 0.4.4 package.
Regression models for egg-shedding intensity (egg counts in positive animals) were calculated using zero-truncated negative binomial regression using the vglm function from the VGAM package 1.1–6. Again, the initial model included all available variables and was stepwise reduced to optimise the AIC. For the final model, the Nagelkerke’s pseudo R2 was calculated using the PseudoR2 function implemented in the DescTools 0.99–45 package. Rate ratios were calculated as described above for odds ratios.
Results
Study population characteristics and potential explanatory variables
Table 1 summarises the information that was available for the 1067 horse samples included in the study. These horses came in total from 113 different sources with most of the sources representing yards but there were also a few equine clinics among the sources that sent-in samples of horses coming from different yards. The majority of the samples (64.9%) came from Brandenburg, the federal state surrounding Berlin, while 9.8% of the samples originated from Berlin. North Rhine-Westphalia, Lower Saxony and Bavaria contributed to 8.2%, 8.1% and 6.5% of the samples while only a few samples came from other federal states. With 23.0%, the proportion of foals in the study population was high. There were significantly more male horses in the study population (53.2%) than females (Table 1). No discrimination was made between stallions and geldings since according to the questionnaire responses only 178 of the 549 males had been neutered, which would correspond to a proportion of 67.6% of stallions among the males. This appeared to be unrealistic and data regarding the castration of male horses were therefore considered unreliable.
For 76.4% of the horses, the last treatment was more than 8 weeks ago (Table 1). The most frequently used anthelmintic that was used for the last treatment was ivermectin (56.3%), followed by moxidectin (20.3%), pyrantel (14.5%) and fenbendazole (6.1%). Noteworthy, five horses, all from the same yard, received doramectin as last treatment, a drug that is not licenced for treating horses in Germany (Table 1) but was also used, as in past studies (Fritzen et al. 2010; Matthee 2003), probably for cost reasons by some horse owners.
The vast majority of the samples were individual samples (93.3%) while the rest was collected from an individual horse but pooled from consecutive days (Table 1). Since samples were either brought directly to the Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine or sent by parcel services, the shipping time was also considered a relevant variable. The median shipping time was 1 day (range 0–22 days) but 79.1% of the samples had a shipping time of two days or less.
Prevalences of helminth species
Data regarding the prevalence of helminth species observed in this data set have already been published recently (Boelow et al. 2022) but are summarised here again in Table 2. For strongyle and Parascaris spp. enough samples were positive to perform risk factor analyses.
Strongyle egg shedding
Bivariate data analyses for prevalence of strongyle egg shedding according to sedimentation/flotation data
For categorial variables, mid-p exact tests were conducted to determine if the frequency of horses positive for strongyle egg shedding was different between the levels of the variable. If a variable had more than two levels, mid-p exact tests were conducted for each combination of the different levels. Results of these analyses are presented in Table 3.
The sex of the horses had no significant effect on the prevalence of strongyle egg shedding. Regarding the age groups, yearlings had a significantly higher prevalence than foals and adults. Although prevalence in foals was higher than in adults, this difference was not significant (Table 3). The effect of the drug used for the last treatment was significant. After treatment with moxidectin, the frequency of positive horses was the lowest (19.5%) followed by fenbendazole (38.5%), ivermectin (50.7%), the combination of ivermectin/pyrantel (76.9%) and pyrantel (82.3%). Five horses, all from the same yard, had been treated with doramectin, which is not licenced for the treatment of horses, and they were all positive for strongyle eggs. For information about which differences between individual drugs were significant, see Table 3. Whether the last treatment was more than eight weeks ago or not, had no significant influence on the frequency of positive horses (Table 3).
The presence of foals on the yard led to a significantly higher frequency of horses positive for strongyle-type eggs. The state in which the yard was located was also relevant with the highest prevalence observed in Berlin followed by Bavaria, Lower Saxony, Brandenburg and North Rhine-Westfalia (some states with low numbers of animals in the study population were excluded from the analysis) (see Table 3).
The highest number of positive samples was detected in autumn followed by summer, winter and spring. All comparisons were significant (Table 3).
Finally, individual and composite samples (from the same horse from successive days) were compared. Unexpectedly, composite samples were significantly less positive than individual samples (Table 3).
For continuous explanatory variables, logistic regression analyses were performed. The variables “number of horses” and “number of foals per farm” and the “shipping time” before the sample arrived in the laboratory were considered. A significant but small protective effect of an increasing number of horses on the yard was observed while numbers of foals and shipping time had no significant effects (Supplementary Table S1).
Bivariate analysis of intensity of strongyle egg shedding according to Mini-FLOTAC data
The distribution of strongyle egg counts is described in Table 4. Since the 25% quantile was almost always 0 and even for the vast majority of variables the medians were 0, the table provides the median, the 75% quantile and the maximum as well as the mean. On farms with foals, the eggs per gramme faeces (EPG) were significantly higher than on farms without foals. The age group also had a significant effect on the EPG, with the yearlings showing higher EPGs than foals and adults. The last treatment with moxidectin resulted in significantly lower EPGs than the treatment with any other drug. However, several other comparisons between drugs also found significant differences (see Table 4 for details). The season and the geographical origin also had a significant influence on egg count characteristics with many of the individual comparisons showing significant differences (Table 4). Finally, composite samples had significantly lower EPGs than individual samples. No effect was observed for the sex and the time since the last treatment with an anthelmintic. To investigate the effect of continuous variables on FECs, Spearman correlations between abundance and intensity and these variables were calculated. Regarding abundance, a high number of foals had a significant positive effect on the EPG, whereas an increasing number of horses and longer shipping times resulted in lower EPGs (Supplementary Table S2). In contrast, significant effects on egg-shedding intensity were only observed for shipping time (Supplementary Table S2).
Multivariate analysis to identify risk factors for the shedding of strongyle eggs
Multivariate analysis included all independent variables used in the bivariate analyses in the initial binomial regression model. The model was then optimised by stepwise elimination of variables aiming to improve (decrease) the AIC. Odds ratios of the final model are visualised in Fig. 1 while additional details of the model are summarised in Supplementary Table S3. There was a significant effect of the drug used for the last treatment with moxidectin resulting in significantly lower odds to be positive than the reference pyrantel. All other drugs did not significantly differ from pyrantel (Fig. 1). For doramectin, the odds ratio was very high, but the 95% CI was also very wide due to the very small number of horses treated with this drug and the facts that they were all positive and all came from the same farm leading to a correlation between explanatory variables on this farm. In spring, the odds to be positive were significantly lower than in any of the other seasons. Regarding the age of the animals, yearlings had significantly higher odds to be strongyle positive than adults, but there was no significant difference between adults and foals. Looking at the 95% CIs, the difference between yearlings and foals is obviously also significant. Despite that, the number of foals on the yard was associated with higher odds to be positive for strongyles. Finally, the sample type had a significant effect on the results with composite samples collected over several days having significantly lower odds to be positive than individual samples collected on a single day (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table S3).
Forest plot showing odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for being positive for strongyle egg shedding. Samples were analysed by sedimentation/flotation. OR, odds ratio; Ref, reference level; ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05 in t test
Multivariate analysis to identify risk factors for the intensity of strongyle egg shedding
To determine factors that influence egg-shedding intensity, only data from positive animals were included. Data were analysed using zero-truncated negative binomial regression. The final model is presented as a forest plot in Fig. 2 and in more detail in Supplementary Table S4. Variables such as season, age group and sample type that had a significant impact in the logistic regression model also had a significant influence on the intensity of egg shedding. While the effects of season and sample type were very similar in both models, this was only partially the case for the age group. Here, yearlings had both significantly higher odds to be positive than adults and higher egg-shedding intensity than adults. The situation for foals was different. Although foals had no higher odds to be positive for strongyle egg shedding, egg counts of positive foals were significantly higher than those of positive adult horses. The variables “anthelmintic used for last treatment” and “number of foals” significantly influenced the odds to be strongyle positive in faeces while they were not included in the final model for egg-shedding intensity. In contrast, the sex (with a higher rate ratio for females) and the number of horses on the yard had a significant influence on the egg-shedding intensity while they were not included in the final model for the presence/absence of strongyle eggs in the faeces.
Forest plot showing rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for a zero-truncated negative binomial regression analysis on data of horses positive for strongyle egg shedding to identify risk factors for intensity of strongyle egg shedding. Eggs per gramme faeces were determined by Mini-FLOTAC. Ref., reference level; ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05 in t test
Parascaris spp. egg shedding
Bivariate data analyses for prevalence of Parascaris spp. egg shedding according to sedimentation/flotation data
The number of samples positive for Parascaris spp. was about tenfold lower than for strongyles (Table 2). Nevertheless, quite a number of significant effects could be identified as detailed in Table 5.
As observed for strongyles, no significant difference between male and female horses was observed (Table 5). The age group had a clear effect on the frequency of positive horses and in contrast to the strongyles there was a clear age effect with by far the highest prevalence in the foal group (18.4%) followed by yearlings (3.4%) and adults (0.3%). Regarding the effect of the drug that was used for the last treatment, no Parascaris spp. positive samples were observed for the combination of ivermectin/pyrantel and for the not licenced doramectin, but the number of animals treated with these drugs was very small for both drugs. Among the more frequently used drugs, prevalence was lowest among the animals treated with ivermectin followed by moxidectin, pyrantel and fenbendazole. Numbers of positive animals for all of the treatment groups were small (maximum 11) which shows that all conclusions drawn from these should be considered carefully. Remarkably, the prevalence of Parascaris spp. egg shedding was significantly higher (almost twice as high) in horses for which the last treatment was less than eight weeks ago compared to animals treated at least eight weeks ago (Table 5).
The presence of foals was clearly associated with a higher prevalence of Parascaris spp. In fact, this parasite was exclusively observed on these farms (Table 5). Regarding the geographic origin of samples, only a few significant effects were observed, which is also explainable by the small number of positive horses. Only Berlin was found to have a significantly lower prevalence than Lower Saxony and North Rhine-Westfalia while all other differences were not significant (Table 5).
Neither the season when a sample was collected nor whether it was an individual or a composite sample had any significant effect on the frequency of Parascaris positive samples.
Fitting of bivariate logistic regression models for the variables “number of horses” and “foals per yard and shipping time”, as performed for strongyle egg shedding, was not possible due to the small number of positive horses.
Bivariate analysis of abundance and intensity of Parascaris spp. egg shedding according to Mini-FLOTAC data
Only a small number of independent variables had a significant effect on Parascaris spp. FECs. In terms of abundance, farms with foals had significantly higher EPGs since the parasite did not occur on any farm without foals (Table 6). Accordingly, there were also significant differences between the age groups with significantly higher FECs in foals than yearlings and adults. Although the parasite was not found in adult horses at all, the differences between yearlings and adults were not significant since in yearlings also only three positive horses with a maximum EPG of 25 were found. Regarding the last treatment, moxidectin- and ivermectin-treated animals had significantly lower EPGs than animals treated with fenbendazole (Table 6). Moreover, the EPG was significantly higher in horses for which the last treatment was less than eight weeks ago than for animals with the last anthelmintic treatment at least eight weeks ago. Neither sex, season, state of origin nor sample type had an effect on the intensity of Parascaris spp. egg shedding (Table 6).
Since the number of positive horses was only 43, the number of significant differences was even smaller for the intensity of egg shedding measured in EPG. In fact, the only variable with influence in the binomial analyses was the season, with FEC being significantly lower in Spring compared to all other seasons (Table 6).
For continuous independent variables, Spearman correlations were calculated. The number of foals had a significant positive effect on the abundance of Parascaris spp. FECs (Supplementary Table S5). In contrast, there was no significant correlation between the number of horses or shipping time and the Parascaris spp. EPG. None of the variables affected the intensity of egg shedding significantly (Supplementary Table S5).
Multivariate analysis to identify risk factors for the presence of Parascaris spp. eggs
In a multivariate analysis, only a few variables could be identified as risk or protective factors for the odds to be positive for Parascaris spp. as summarised in Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table S6. If at least eight weeks had passed since the last treatment, there was a significant increase in the odds to be positive. Moreover, adults and yearlings had significantly lower odds to be positive than foals. An increasing number of foals on a farm was slightly protective whereas the presence of foals on a farm led to a very high OR of 1.9 × 107, but this effect was not significant due to a very wide 95% CI.
Forest plot showing odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for being positive for Parascaris spp. egg shedding. Samples were analysed by sedimentation/flotation. OR, odds ratio; Ref., reference level; ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05 in t test
Multivariate analysis to identify risk factors for the intensity of Parascaris spp. egg shedding
Results of the zero-truncated negative binomial analysis of EPG data for Parascaris spp. are shown in Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table S7. As already observed in the bivariate analysis, a significant higher egg-shedding rate ratio was observed for summer, autumn and winter in comparison to spring. In contrast to the bivariate analysis results and despite the fact that only three and one animal were positive in the age groups of yearlings and adults respectively, these age groups were associated with significantly lower egg counts (Fig. 4). Other variables in the final model that improved the AIC but had no significant effect were the number of foals on the yard, which was associated with a lower egg-shedding intensity and the sex with a tendency of higher egg-shedding intensity in females than males.
Forest plot showing rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for zero-truncated negative binomial regression analysis to identify risk factors for intensity of Parascaris spp. egg shedding. Eggs per gramme faeces were determined by Mini-FLOTAC. RR, rate ratio; Ref., reference level; ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01 in t test
Discussion
The epidemiology of parasites of domestic horses depends on (i) host and parasite interactions leading, e.g. to a preference of certain host age groups or genotypes and (ii) environmental factors that in particular affect the survival of off-host stages of parasites but also (iii) on human/management factors such as pasture hygiene, treatment schemes and anthelmintic drug used. While human activity directly affects parasite prevalence and abundance, parasite populations also show considerable plasticity and respond by adaptation to human intervention for instance with the evolution of resistance to anthelmintics to mention just the best studied among these phenomena. This scenario predicts dynamic changes in abundance, intensity and prevalence of parasites in host populations depending on changes in environmental conditions, husbandry practices and available anthelmintics. Therefore, epidemiological data require frequent updates to make sure that recommendations for optimal husbandry are up to date.
Studies aiming to provide estimates for the prevalence and intensity of equine parasites are almost never conducted using a truly representative study design concerning, e.g. aspects of sample size or sample selection. To reduce these biases, there is an Australian metaanalysis that summarises epidemiological data from 51 different studies on gastrointestinal parasites in horses (Saeed et al. 2019). This study certainly gives a good cross-section, but again, it is only as good as the sample selection of the individual studies and could be biased in a certain direction. Since the study is limited to Australia, the results cannot be applied to other countries or continents. A more representative study, however, is Bellaw and Nielsen (2020), which summarises 37 study results from over 45 years in different countries.
For example, cross-sectional studies typically suffer from non-random selection of participating farms and often also non-random selection of horses within a farm since individual horses are often owned by different people who decide according to individual preferences if their animal should be sampled or not. Longitudinal studies are well suited to investigate seasonal or age-dependent factors but typically are conducted on only a few study sites in parallel and might therefore be biased. For a certain region such as Germany, the number of cross-sectional (Ertelt et al. 2015; Hinney et al. 2011; Schneider et al. 2014) and longitudinal (Rehbein et al. 2013; Scheuerle et al. 2016) studies that have been conducted in the last two decades is usually quite limited. Another source of relevant data can come from diagnostic samples (Raue et al. 2017). Such data are also subject to certain types of bias such as higher frequency of samples derived from clinically conspicuous animals, non-representative age structure and dependency on the attitude of owners regarding the importance of regular diagnostic checkups. In comparison to cross-sectional and longitudinal studies that involve visits of researchers to farms, data regarding management factors and husbandry in studies using sent-in diagnostic samples are often less complete. Furthermore, results of all these types of studies rely on the diagnostic tools that are used to examine the samples (Boelow et al. 2022). Herein, samples were partially derived from diagnostic samples sent to the Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine (n = 426), partially sent in directly for the purpose of method comparison study (n = 469) and partially from an ongoing cross-sectional study (n = 172). This heterogenous origin of the samples might well be able to introduce any kind of unpredictable bias. However, the large number of samples suggests that despite some bias meaningful epidemiological information can be obtained. For strongyle nematodes and Parascaris spp., the two most prevalent parasite groups, the influence of potential epidemiological risk factors but also of some factors related to faecal sampling and sample handling were analysed.
For strongyle nematode egg shedding, a prevalence of 46% was observed in the study population. This is similar to what others have observed in Germany. Raue et al. (2017) have reported that between 2003 and 2012 on average 30.1% of the equine samples sent to the diagnostic service of the Institute for Parasitology at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover were positive. Hinney et al. (2011) performed a cross-sectional study in Brandenburg, from where slightly more than two-thirds of the samples in the present study came and found strongyle eggs in 67% of the samples collected in 2006. Important to note is that in this study samples were collected from August to early December, i.e. mainly in autumn, which also in the present study was the season with highest strongyle prevalence of over 70%. In another German-wide cross-sectional study performed in 2012/2013, 44.6% of the horse samples were positive (Schneider et al. 2014). Wirtherle et al. (2004) detected strongyle eggs in 39.8% of all samples collected in Northern Germany in 2000/2001, while von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al. (2007) observed a prevalence of strongyle egg shedding of 49.1% in North Rhine-Westphalia in 2003/2004 and Traversa et al. (2009b) investigated faecal samples from 20 German yards in 2008 with 62.8% of the samples being positive. Considering the fact that some of these studies used sedimentation/flotation while others applied various modified McMaster techniques with different multiplication factors (= theoretical limit of detection as defined by Nielsen (2021) and that different flotation solutions such as saturated ZnSO4 (relative density 1.3) and saturated NaCl2 (relative density 1.2) were used, substantial variation due to technical differences can be expected. Even with the same technique, such data can be highly variable over the years as exemplified by the data from the diagnostics in Hannover, where the prevalence of strongyle eggs ranged between 14.3% and 38.6% (Raue et al. 2017).
In the multivariate analyses conducted to identify risk factors and protective factors for the prevalence of strongyle egg shedding, the use of moxidectin for the last treatment was highly significant from the reference (pyrantel). Resistance to benzimidazoles and pyrantel is known to be widespread in strongyle nematodes of horses (Raza et al. 2019; Dauparaitė et al. 2021; Matthews 2014; Rendle et al. 2021; Coles et al. 2006; von Samson-Himmelstjerna 2012; Kenealy 2019; Stratford et al. 2011; Tzelos and Matthews 2016; Tzelos et al. 2019; Kaplan and Vidyashankar 2012) and has also been reported from Germany (Traversa et al. 2009b; Wirtherle et al. 2004). In comparison, there are only a few reports of resistance to ivermectin in strongyles (Traversa et al. 2009a; Relf et al. 2014; Geurden et al. 2013; Kaplan et al. 2004; Johnson and Biddle 2021) and moxidectin (Abbas et al. 2021; Tzelos et al. 2017; Nielsen et al. 2020; Johnson and Biddle 2021), none of them from Germany. More often than clear resistance, longer egg reappearance periods have been reported for many regions of the world (Daniels and Proudman 2016; Tzelos et al. 2017; Johnson and Biddle 2021) including Germany (von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al. 2007); and this is considered to be a hint of a developing anthelmintic resistance. However, in Brandenburg, from where the majority of samples in this study came, no hints for resistance or a prolonged egg reappearance period were observed in 2007 (Fischer et al. 2015). The fact that moxidectin treatment is associated with the longest egg reappearance period among all licenced equine anthelmintics (Relf et al. 2014; Traversa et al. 2009b; Schumacher and Taintor 2008; Johnson and Biddle 2021) and that an increased egg reappearance period (Relf et al. 2014; Traversa et al. 2009b; Schumacher and Taintor 2008; Johnson and Biddle 2021) or even resistance (Abbas et al. 2021) were only rarely reported for moxidectin is the most likely explanation for the stronger or longer lasting protective effect of moxidectin in comparison to other anthelmintics in the present study. In contrast to moxidectin, ivermectin and fenbendazole treatments were only associated with significantly lower strongyle egg-shedding data than pyrantel in the bivariate analysis. The fact that fenbendazole also had a protective effect on the odds to be positive for strongyle egg shedding at least in comparison to pyrantel in the bivariate analysis was rather surprising since resistance against benzimidazoles is well known to be a frequent problem at least on West German horse farms (Traversa et al. 2009b; Wirtherle et al. 2004). However, among the 51 samples from horses with fenbendazole as last treatment for which the age was known 25 (48.1%) were from foals, which is significantly higher than the 18.5% (139/753) for the remaining drugs (p < 0.0001, mid-p exact test). None of the samples from horses treated with fenbendazole was derived from a yearling. Foals in general had a lower prevalence while prevalence in yearlings was the highest of the three age groups. The significant effect of the last treatment with fenbendazole might therefore be an artefact caused by the fact that fenbendazole was only used for foals and adults in the analysed data set. Indeed, fenbendazole is nowadays used particularly for the deworming of foals since it is recommended for the treatment of Strongyloides (Reinemeyer 2009; Lind and Christensson 2009) and benzimidazole resistance is very rare in Parascaris spp. (Reinemeyer 2009; Lind and Christensson 2009; Peregrine et al. 2014). In contrast to the odds to be positive for strongyle egg shedding, there was no effect of the drug used for the last treatment on egg-shedding intensity.
When looking at the age groups of the horses using multivariate analyses, yearlings were significantly more often positive than adults and also had significantly higher EPGs. The comparison between adults and foals revealed only significant differences between adults and foals. Moreover, the presence of foals on the farm significantly increased the overall FECs. It is well known that horses require several years to develop full immunity against infections with strongyle nematodes leading to lower FECs (von Samson-Himmelstjerna 2012; Reinemeyer and Nielsen 2017; Hinney et al. 2011). The fact that foals did not have a significantly higher prevalence than adults can, of course, not be explained by immunological protection but may be associated with the fact that foals, while still suckling during the first months on pasture, are only gradually taking up strongyle infections during their first grazing season. Furthermore, foals in Germany are typically treated very frequently (Becher et al. 2018; von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al. 2009; Fritzen et al. 2010)—not only to reduce the burden of strongyle nematodes but in particular to prevent losses due to the highly pathogenic foal parasites Parascaris spp. Since migrating larvae of these parasites can lead to considerable pathology already during the prepatency period, e.g. when penetrating the alveoli in the lungs, treatment frequencies in foals can be as high as 6–12/year and were reported to be on average 4.52/year (Fritzen et al. 2010; von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al. 2007). Such high treatment frequencies are expected to also reduce any prevalence of strongyle nematodes even though most of the time fenbendazole is used. Despite the widespread occurrence of benzimidazole resistance in strongyles, the efficacy is usually not zero but only reduced. For instance, Wirtherle et al. (2004) found resistance to fenbendazole on 10/10 farms from Northwest Germany, but the observed FECR was between 55 and 94% indicating that anthelmintic treatment usually still exerts some effects on farms with resistance.
The presence of foals on a farm significantly increased strongyle prevalence as well as egg-shedding intensity in the bivariate analyses. In contrast, the number of foals had a significant but small negative effect only on egg-shedding intensity. In the multivariate analyses, a small but significant positive effect of the number of foals on strongyle egg-shedding prevalence and a positive effect of the presence of foals on strongyle egg-shedding intensity were calculated. Obviously, the variable presence of foals and the number of foals are highly correlated, which might explain the complex pattern of results in bi- and multivariate analyses. In any case, foals on a farm overall led to a higher risk that strongyle eggs would be shed. Since the prevalence and egg-shedding intensity of foals themselves were not very high, it is likely that effects were indirect, e.g. by differences in management between stud farms and riding stables, high numbers of yearlings on farms that also had foals (Kuzmina et al. 2016; Nielsen et al. 2018).
In the bivariate analyses, clear differences between the seasons were found for both strongyle egg-shedding prevalence and intensity data. In both analyses, spring was the season with the lowest odds/risk of strongyle egg shedding while the highest prevalence and intensity were observed in autumn. In the multivariate analyses, this pattern was confirmed. In recent years, there have been two studies from Great Britain on the seasonality of strongyle egg shedding, one of which found an increased occurrence of strongyle eggs in the summer and a reduction in the winter months (Wood et al. 2013). A Swedish study confirmed the increased egg excretion in summer (Tydén et al. 2019). The other British study detected no seasonality of strongyle egg shedding (Lester et al. 2018; Steuer et al. 2022). A recent study by Nielsen et al. (2022) recommends that strongyles are best examined in spring or winter.
The variable sex had no significant effect in the analyses on the presence/absence of strongyle egg shedding nor in the bivariate analyses on egg-shedding intensity or abundance. In contrast, it turned out to have a significant influence on egg-shedding intensity in the multivariate analysis with females showing significantly higher strongyle EPGs than males. However, data about sex in the data set must be considered with a lot of care since horse owners obviously did not provide reliable information regarding the number of male horses that were neutered. Thus, the category “male” includes intact male foals and young yearlings before sexual maturity, presumably a few sexually mature stallions and a large number of neutered geldings. Without precise information about the status of the individual horses in the study population, any analysis of the effects of sex on nematode egg shedding cannot be considered to be reliable.
Similarly, the state of origin is a problematic variable since one state (Brandenburg) is highly overrepresented (64.9% of all samples) while four out of nine states are represented by six or less samples. Since the glm() function creates dummy variables for all the states, the inclusion of the variable “state” leads to a considerable decrease in the precision with which all other variables in the model can be estimated. Thus, although there are obviously significant differences in the bivariate analyses, the data set is simply ill-suited to analyse geographic differences and a sampling technique that results in representative sampling for each state included would be required.
Regarding the variable “number of horses”, which had a very weak negative influence on the egg-shedding intensity only in the multivariate analysis, it is difficult to find a convincing explanation. Intuitively, one would think that high numbers of horses might increase the infection pressure and thus lead to a higher prevalence and abundance of parasites. This consideration is obvious for natural populations of hosts such as wildlife (Slivinska et al. 2020; Harvey et al. 2019) but does not necessarily describe the situation in managed populations of domestic animals. One simple explanation why there was a tendency to find the opposite is that farms with larger numbers of animals have an overall better/more professional management including hygiene measures. However, published data do not support the latter explanation (von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al. 2009; Fritzen et al. 2010).
Finally, two technical aspects were shown to be relevant for the results. The way samples were collected had a significant impact on the odds to be positive and also on the observed strongyle egg-shedding intensity. In order to improve sensitivity to detect parasites showing unregular egg shedding, such as liver flukes but also some parasitic nematodes, it is often recommended to collect samples over several (typically three to five) consecutive days and perform the diagnosis on the pooled sample (Nielsen et al. 2021; Bracken et al. 2012; Bredtmann et al. 2017b). Surprisingly, however, composite samples showed significantly lower prevalence and egg-shedding intensity in both the bi- and multivariate analyses. This suggests that composite samples decrease the sensitivity of strongyle egg detection instead of increasing it. One simple explanation could be related to the storage of samples during the collection days. If the samples are not cooled during storage as recommended, it is expected that, depending on the environmental temperatures, a substantial fraction of the eggs develops into larvae that hatch and are only inefficiently floated (Nielsen et al. 2010c; Jagła et al. 2013). This is not expected to be relevant for eggs of trematodes, cestodes and ascarides that do not hatch spontaneously in faecal samples but might well be a problem for strongyles. In order to confirm such a negative impact of sampling over multiple days on the sensitivity to diagnose strongyle eggs, paired single and composite subsamples from the same faecal sample should be compared to obtain direct evidence and improve recommendations for sampling strategies.
The second variable related to technical aspects is the shipping time. Prolonged shipping time is also expected to have a negative effect on strongyle egg prevalence and counts since larvae might hatch during transport at ambient temperature. Indeed, bivariate analyses confirmed this expectation since shipping time had significant negative effects on the odds of samples to be positive for strongyle eggs and on the FECs. However, in the final logistic regression model, the shipping time was not included, and in the negative binomial regression model, the negative effect was not significant. This is most likely explainable by the fact that the vast majority of the samples had short shipping times and the power of the analyses to detect effects of shipping time on egg-shedding prevalence and intensity in a multivariate model was too low.
The analyses of the data for Parascaris spp. egg-shedding prevalence and intensity suffer from the problem that the overall number of positive samples was rather small and this led to large confidence intervals for odds and risk ratios of some influencing factors and a limited number of significant comparisons.
Parascaris spp. are well known to be predominantly parasites of foals and to some extent also of yearlings (Fritzen et al. 2010; Southwood et al. 1998; Rehbein et al. 2013; von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al. 2007; Hautala et al. 2019; Clayton and Duncan 1979a; von Samson-Himmelstjerna 2012). Thus, it was not surprising that several of the variables with influence on Parascaris spp. prevalence and egg-shedding intensity were related to the presence of foals. The facts that Parascaris spp. eggs were exclusively detected in samples originating from farms with foals and that prevalence observed in foals was approximately 5.4- and 61-fold higher than in yearlings and adults clearly demonstrate the high relevance of this parasite for very young horses. The analysis of data for Parascaris spp. clearly revealed that foals had much higher odds to be positive for Parascaris spp. eggs in both bivariate and multivariate analyses. Regarding FECs, there was also a higher abundance in foals than in the other age groups, but differences in intensity were not significant. Again, the variables “presence of foals” and “number of foals” are highly correlated in the multivariate analysis, and due to the small number of Parascaris spp. positive samples, this might lead to unexpected results of the statistical analyses. While the number of foals actually had a very small but significant negative effect on the odds to be Parascaris spp. positive in the multi-variate analysis, the odds ratio for “presence of foals” was very high but the 95% CI was also very wide. A completely different pattern was observed for egg-shedding intensity, with both variables “presence of foals” and “number of foals” having no effect in the multi-variate analysis.
In the bi- and multivariate analyses, there were also significant effects of the time since the last treatment of the horse. Surprisingly, it was protective if the last treatment was more than 8 weeks ago. However, this effect was only observed for prevalence data in the bivariate and for intensity data in the multi-variate analysis. This unexpected protective effect is presumably caused by the fact that almost all Parascaris spp. positive animals were foals and that foals had much higher treatment frequencies than yearlings and adults. Effects of different anthelmintics were only significant in the bivariate but not the multivariate analysis regarding the prevalence of Parascaris spp. Presumably, this is due to the small number of positive horses and the large number of six different drugs or drug combinations that were used. In the bivariate analysis, prevalence was highest for fenbendazole followed by pyrantel, moxidectin and ivermectin. No significant effects were found on egg-shedding intensity. Since resistance to ivermectin is well known to be widespread at least in Western Germany (von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al. 2007) and Central Europe (Traversa et al. 2009a; Relf et al. 2014; Geurden et al. 2013; Johnson and Biddle 2021), the finding that ivermection provides better protection than any of the other drugs is somewhat surprising, and on the farms with foals in the study population ivermectin resistance was apparently no major problem. Moreover, macrocyclic lactones are able to eliminate tissue migrating larval stages of Parascaris spp. (Reinemeyer and Nielsen 2017; Lyons and Tolliver 2012; Lindgren et al. 2008) and this property is expected to cause the better/longer lasting protection than pyrantel and fenbendazole, which are both only active against gut luminal stages of the parasite (Luksovsky et al. 2013; Armstrong et al. 2014; Lindgren et al. 2008).
The variables “sex” and “state of origin” also showed significant effects on the egg-shedding intensity in the multivariate model and the prevalence of Parascaris spp. egg shedding in the bivariate analysis, respectively. However, due to the reasons already explained above for strongyle data, the current data set is not suitable to analyse the effect of these variables.
In conclusion, the analysis of the present data set provides important information about prevalence and egg-shedding intensity of strongyle and ascarid nematodes in the German horse population. The identified risk factors varied considerably depending on whether data for strongyles or Parascaris spp. were analysed but also between prevalence and egg-shedding intensity. However, the season when samples were collected, the age group as well as the presence of foals on the yard were among the variables that often influenced the data. The drug used for the last treatment was only relevant for prevalence but not for egg-shedding intensity.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article and in the manuskript “Comparison of FECPAKG2, a modified Mini-FLOTAC technique and combined sedimentation and flotation for the coproscopic examination of helminth eggs in horses”. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05266-y
Abbreviations
- EPG:
-
Egg per gramme faeces
- FEC:
-
Faecal egg count
- AIC:
-
Akaike information criterion
References
Abbas G, Ghafar A, Hurley J, Bauquier J, Beasley A, Wilkes EJA, Jacobson C, El-Hage C, Cudmore L, Carrigan P, Tennent-Brown B, Gauci CG, Nielsen MK, Hughes KJ, Beveridge I, Jabbar A (2021) Cyathostomin resistance to moxidectin and combinations of anthelmintics in Australian horses. Parasit Vectors 14:597
Armstrong SK, Woodgate RG, Gough S, Heller J, Sangster NC, Hughes KJ (2014) The efficacy of ivermectin, pyrantel and fenbendazole against Parascaris equorum infection in foals on farms in Australia. Vet Parasitol 205:575–580
Becher AM, Van Doorn DC, Pfister K, Kaplan RM, Reist M, Nielsen MK (2018) Equine parasite control and the role of national legislation - a multinational questionnaire survey. Vet Parasitol 259:6–12
Bellaw JL, Nielsen MK (2020) Meta-analysis of cyathostomin species-specific prevalence and relative abundance in domestic horses from 1975–2020: emphasis on geographical region and specimen collection method. Parasit Vectors 13:509
Boelow H, Krücken J, Thomas E, Mirams G, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G (2022) Comparison of FECPAKG2, a modified Mini-FLOTAC technique and combined sedimentation and flotation for the coproscopic examination of helminth eggs in horses. Parasit Vectors 15:166
Bracken MK, Wøhlk CBM, Petersen SL, Nielsen MK (2012) Evaluation of conventional PCR for detection of Strongylus vulgaris on horse farms. Vet Parasitol 184:387–391
Bredtmann CM, Krücken J, Murugaiyan J, Kuzmina T, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G (2017a) Nematode species identification-current status, challenges and future perspectives for cyathostomins. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:283
Bredtmann CM, Krücken J, Murugaiyan J, Kuzmina T & Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G (2017b) Nematode species identification—current status, challenges and future perspectives for cyathostomins. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 7
Bucknell DG, Gasser RB, Beveridge I (1995) The prevalence and epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasites of horses in Victoria, Australia. Int J Parasitol 25:711–724
Clayton HM (1986) Ascarids. Recent advances. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2:313–328
Clayton HM, Duncan JL (1979) The development of immunity to Parascaris equorum infection in the foal. Res Vet Sci 26:383–384
Clayton HM, Duncan JL (1979) The migration and development of Parascaris equorum in the horse. Int J Parasitol 9:285–292
Coles GC, Jackson F, Pomroy WE, Prichard RK, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Silvestre A, Taylor MA, Vercruysse J (2006) The detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet Parasitol 136:167–185
Corning S (2009) Equine cyathostomins: a review of biology, clinical significance and therapy. Parasit Vectors 2:S1
Daniels SP, Proudman CJ (2016) Shortened egg reappearance after ivermectin or moxidectin use in horses in the UK. Vet J 218:36–39
Dauparaitė E, Kupčinskas T, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Petkevičius S (2021) Anthelmintic resistance of horse strongyle nematodes to ivermectin and pyrantel in Lithuania. Acta Vet Scand 63:5
Ertelt A, Merle R, Samson-Himmelstjerna GV, Wulke N, Demeler J, Gehlen H (2015) Management factors and their impact on helminthic fecal egg count in horses. Pferdeheilkunde Equine Medicine 31:332–339
Fischer JK, Hinney B, Denwood MJ, Traversa D, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Clausen PH (2015) Efficacy of selected anthelmintic drugs against cyathostomins in horses in the federal state of Brandenburg, Germany. Parasitol Res 114:4441–4450
Fritzen B, Rohn K, Schneider T, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G (2010) Endoparasite control management on horse farms – lessons from worm prevalence and questionnaire data. Equine Vet J 42:79–83
Geurden T, Betsch JM, Maillard K, Vanimisetti B, D’espois M, Besognet B (2013) Determination of anthelmintic efficacy against equine cyathostomins and Parascaris equorum in France. Equine Vet Educ 25:304–307
Harvey AM, Meggiolaro MN, Hall E, Watts ET, Ramp D, Šlapeta J (2019) Wild horse populations in south-east Australia have a high prevalence of Strongylus vulgaris and may act as a reservoir of infection for domestic horses. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 8:156–163
Hautala K, Näreaho A, Kauppinen O, Nielsen MK, Sukura A, Rajala-Schultz PJ (2019) Risk factors for equine intestinal parasite infections and reduced efficacy of pyrantel embonate against Parascaris sp. Vet Parasitol 273:52–59
Hinney B, Wirtherle NC, Kyule M, Miethe N, Zessin K-H, Clausen P-H (2011) Prevalence of helminths in horses in the state of Brandenburg Germany. Parasitol Res 108:1083
Jagła E, Śpiewak J, Zaleśny G, Popiołek M (2013) Effect of storage and preservation of horse faecal samples on the detectability and viability of strongylid nematode eggs and larvae. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 57:161–165
Johnson ACB & Biddle AS (2021) The use of molecular profiling to track equine reinfection rates of cyathostomin species following anthelmintic administration. 538kürzere Zeiträume für wiederauftreten von Eiern, 11
Jürgenschellert L, Krücken J, Austin CJ, Lightbody KL, Bousquet E & Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G (2020) Investigations on the occurrence of tapeworm infections in German horse populations with comparison of different antibody detection methods based on saliva and serum samples. Parasit Vectors, 13
Kaplan RM (2002) Anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of horses. Vet Res 33:491–507
Kaplan RM, Vidyashankar AN (2012) An inconvenient truth: global worming and anthelmintic resistance. Vet Parasitol 186:70–78
Kaplan RM, Klei TR, Lyons ET, Lester G, Courtney CH, French DD, Tolliver SC, Vidyashankar AN, Zhao Y (2004) Prevalence of anthelmintic resistant cyathostomes on horse farms. J Am Vet Med Assoc 225:903–910
Kenealy JS (2019) Anthelmintic resistance in equine parasites: mechanism and treatment approaches. 2019
Kuzmina TA, Dzeverin I, Kharchenko VA (2016) Strongylids in domestic horses: influence of horse age, breed and deworming programs on the strongyle parasite community. Vet Parasitol 227:56–63
Lester HE, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB (2018) Analysis of strongyle egg shedding consistency in horses and factors that affect it. J Equine Vet 60(113–119):e111
Lind EO, Christensson D (2009) Anthelmintic efficacy on Parascaris equorum in foals on Swedish studs. Acta Vet Scand 51:45
Lindgren K, Ljungvall Ö, Nilsson O, Ljungström BL, Lindahl C, Höglund J (2008) Parascaris equorum in foals and in their environment on a Swedish stud farm, with notes on treatment failure of ivermectin. Vet Parasitol 151:337–343
Luksovsky J, Craig TM, Bingham GM, Cyr T, Forrest D (2013) Determining treatment to control two multidrug-resistant parasites on a Texas horse farm. J Equine Vet 33:115–119
Lyons ET, Tolliver SC (2012) Macrocyclic lactones for parasite control in equids. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 13:1070–1077
Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Kuzmina TA, Collins SS (2011) Further evaluation in field tests of the activity of three anthelmintics (fenbendazole, oxibendazole, and pyrantel pamoate) against the ascarid Parascaris equorum in horse foals on eight farms in Central Kentucky (2009–2010). Parasitol Res 109:1193–1197
Matthee S (2003) Anthelmintic treatment in horses: the extra-label use of products and the danger of under-dosing. J S Afr Vet Assoc 74:53–56
Matthews JB (2014) Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 4:310–315
Nielsen MK (2016) Evidence-based considerations for control of Parascaris spp. infections in horses. Equine Vet Educ 28:224–231
Nielsen MK (2021) What makes a good fecal egg count technique? Vet Parasitol 296:109509
Nielsen MK, Baptiste KE, Tolliver SC, Collins SS, Lyons ET (2010) Analysis of multiyear studies in horses in Kentucky to ascertain whether counts of eggs and larvae per gram of feces are reliable indicators of numbers of strongyles and ascarids present. Vet Parasitol 174:77–84
Nielsen MK, Fritzen B, Duncan JL, Guillot J, Eysker M, Dorchies P, Laugier C, Beugnet F, Meana A, Lussot-Kervern I, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G (2010) Practical aspects of equine parasite control: a review based upon a workshop discussion consensus. Equine Vet J 42:460–468
Nielsen MK, Vidyashankar AN, Andersen UV, Delisi K, Pilegaard K, Kaplan RM (2010) Effects of fecal collection and storage factors on strongylid egg counts in horses. Vet Parasitol 167:55–61
Nielsen MK, Pfister K, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G (2014) Selective therapy in equine parasite control–application and limitations. Vet Parasitol 202:95–103
Nielsen MK, Reinemeyer CR, Donecker JM, Leathwick DM, Marchiondo AA, Kaplan RM (2014) Anthelmintic resistance in equine parasites—current evidence and knowledge gaps. Vet Parasitol 204:55–63
Nielsen MK, Branan MA, Wiedenheft AM, Digianantonio R, Scare JA, Bellaw JL, Garber LP, Kopral CA, Phillippi-Taylor AM, Traub-Dargatz JL (2018) Risk factors associated with strongylid egg count prevalence and abundance in the United States equine population. Vet Parasitol 257:58–68
Nielsen MK, Banahan M, Kaplan RM (2020) Importation of macrocyclic lactone resistant cyathostomins on a US thoroughbred farm. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 14:99–104
Nielsen MK, Facison C, Scare JA, Martin AN, Gravatte HS, Steuer AE (2021) Diagnosing Strongylus vulgaris in pooled fecal samples. Vet Parasitol 296:109494
Nielsen MK, Mittel L, Grice A, Erskine M, Graves E, Vaala W, Tully RC, Drench DD, Bowman R & M. K (2019). AAEP Internal Parasite Control Guidelines. In: Practitioners, American association of equine (ed.)
Nielsen MK, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Kuzmina TA, Van Doorn DCK, Meana A, Rehbein S, Elliott T & Reinemeyer CR (2022) World association for the advancement of veterinary parasitology (WAAVP): Third edition of guideline for evaluating the efficacy of equine anthelmintics. Vet Parasitol 303:109676
Peregrine AS, Molento MB, Kaplan RM, Nielsen MK (2014) Anthelmintic resistance in important parasites of horses: does it really matter? Vet Parasitol 201:1–8
Raue K, Heuer L, Böhm C, Wolken S, Epe C, Strube C (2017) 10-year parasitological examination results (2003 to 2012) of faecal samples from horses, ruminants, pigs, dogs, cats, rabbits and hedgehogs. Parasitol Res 116:3315–3330
Raza A, Qamar AG, Hayat K, Ashraf S, Williams AR (2019) Anthelmintic resistance and novel control options in equine gastrointestinal nematodes. Parasitology 146:425–437
Rehbein S, Visser M, Winter R (2013) Prevalence, intensity and seasonality of gastrointestinal parasites in abattoir horses in Germany. Parasitol Res 112:407–413
Reinemeyer CR (2009) Diagnosis and control of anthelmintic-resistant Parascaris equorum. Parasit Vectors 2:S8
Reinemeyer CR (2012) Anthelmintic resistance in non-strongylid parasites of horses. Vet Parasitol 185:9–15
Reinemeyer CR, Nielsen MK (2009) Parasitism and colic. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 25:233–245
Reinemeyer CR, Nielsen MK (2017) Control of helminth parasites in juvenile horses. Equine Veterinary Education 29:225–232
Relf VE, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB (2013) Helminth egg excretion with regard to age, gender and management practices on UK Thoroughbred studs. Parasitology 140:641–652
Relf VE, Lester HE, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB (2014) Anthelmintic efficacy on UK Thoroughbred stud farms. Int J Parasitol 44:507–514
Rendle D, Mountford D, Roberts C, Owers R, Mair T, Bowen M, Matthews J, Richards I, Hodgkinson J, Furtado T, Sharpe L, Frost R (2021) Anthelmintic resistance in equids. Vet Rec 188:230–231
Saeed MA, Beveridge I, Abbas G, Beasley A, Bauquier J, Wilkes E, Jacobson C, Hughes KJ, El-Hage C, O’handley R, Hurley J, Cudmore L, Carrigan P, Walter L, Tennent-Brown B, Nielsen MK & Jabbar A, (2019) Systematic review of gastrointestinal nematodes of horses from Australia. Parasit Vectors 12:188
Scheuerle MC, Stear MJ, Honeder A, Becher AM, Pfister K (2016) Repeatability of strongyle egg counts in naturally infected horses. Vet Parasitol 228:103–107
Schneider S, Pfister K, Becher AM, Scheuerle MC (2014) Strongyle infections and parasitic control strategies in German horses - a risk assessment. BMC Vet Res 10:262
Schumacher J, Taintor J (2008) A review of the use of moxidectin in horses. Equine Vet Educ 20:546–551
Slivinska K, Klich D, Yasynetska N, Żygowska M (2020) The effects of seasonality and group size on fecal egg counts in wild Przewalski’s Horses (Equus Ferus Przewalskii, Poljakov, 1881) in The Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, Ukraine During 2014–2018. Helminthologia 57:314–321
Southwood LL, Baxter GM, Bennett DG & Ragle CA (1998) Ascarid impaction in young horses. Compendium on continuing education for the practicing veterinarian 20:100-+
Steuer AE, Anderson HP, Shepherd T, Clark M, Scare JA, Gravatte HS, Nielsen MK (2022) Parasite dynamics in untreated horses through one calendar year. Parasit Vectors 15:50
Stratford CH, Mcgorum BC, Pickles KJ & Matthews JB (2011) An update on cyathostomins: anthelmintic resistance and diagnostic tools. Equine Vet J Suppl 133–139
Traversa D, Iorio R, Otranto D, Giangaspero A, Milillo P, Klei TRL (2009) Species-specific identification of equine cyathostomes resistant to fenbendazole and susceptible to oxibendazole and moxidectin by macroarray probing. Exp Parasitol 121(1):92–95
Traversa D, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Demeler J, Milillo P, Schürmann S, Barnes H, Otranto D, Perrucci S, Di Regalbono AF, Beraldo P, Boeckh A, Cobb R (2009) Anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomin populations from horse yards in Italy United Kingdom and Germany. Parasit Vectors 2(Suppl 2):S2
Tydén E, Jansson A & Ringmark S (2019) Parasites in Horses Kept in A 2.5 Year-Round Grazing System in Nordic Conditions without Supplementary Feeding. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 9:1156
Tzelos T, Matthews J (2016) Anthelmintic resistance in equine helminths and mitigating its effects. In Pract 38:489–499
Tzelos T, Barbeito JSG, Nielsen MK, Morgan ER, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB (2017) Strongyle egg reappearance period after moxidectin treatment and its relationship with management factors in UK equine populations. Vet Parasitol 237:70–76
Tzelos T, Morgan ER, Easton S, Hodgkinson JE, Matthews JB (2019) A survey of the level of horse owner uptake of evidence-based anthelmintic treatment protocols for equine helminth control in the UK. Vet Parasitol 274:108926
Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G (2012) Anthelmintic resistance in equine parasites - detection, potential clinical relevance and implications for control. Vet Parasitol 185:2–8
Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Fritzen B, Demeler J, Schürmann S, Rohn K, Schnieder T, Epe C (2007) Cases of reduced cyathostomin egg-reappearance period and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment as well as survey on pyrantel efficacy on German horse farms. Vet Parasitol 144:74–80
Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Traversa D, Demeler J, Rohn K, Milillo P, Schurmann S, Lia R, Perrucci S, Di Regalbono AF, Beraldo P, Barnes H, Cobb R, Boeckh A (2009) Effects of worm control practices examined by a combined faecal egg count and questionnaire survey on horse farms in Germany Italy and the UK. Parasit Vectors 2(Suppl 2):S3
Wirtherle N, Schnieder T, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G (2004) Prevalence of benzimidazole resistance on horse farms in Germany. Vet Rec 154:39–41
Wood EL, Matthews JB, Stephenson S, Slote M, Nussey DH (2013) Variation in fecal egg counts in horses managed for conservation purposes: individual egg shedding consistency, age effects and seasonal variation. Parasitology 140:115–128
Zanet S, Battisti E, Labate F, Oberto F & Ferroglio E (2021) Reduced efficacy of fenbendazole and pyrantel pamoate treatments against intestinal nematodes of stud and performance horses. Vet Sci 8
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Tanja Bartmann and Katharina Seidl for technical support and identifying suitable samples for the study among routine diagnostic samples and Laura Jürgenschellert (all Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin) for sharing of faecal samples collected in her own field study. Thanks also go to Mr. Niels Jensen, who made the English corrections to this article. Furthermore, we thank all horse owners who provided samples for the study.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Jürgen Krücken (JK), Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerns (GvSH) and Heike Boelow (HB) designed the study. HB performed laboratory analyses. JK and HB performed statistical analyses. HB and JK wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All samples were collected for diagnostic purposes. No ethical approval was required for the study.
Consent to participate
All animal owners signed a declaration stating that the material send in for diagnostics can be used for scientific purposes.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Una Ryan
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Boelow, H., Krücken, J. & von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G. Epidemiological study on factors influencing the occurrence of helminth eggs in horses in Germany based on sent-in diagnostic samples. Parasitol Res 122, 749–767 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07765-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07765-4