Skip to main content
Log in

In vivo efficacy of a biotherapic and eugenol formulation against Rhipicephalus microplus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The control of Rhipicephalus microplus is essential to prevent cattle discomfort and economic losses. However, increased resistance and acaricides inefficiency lead producers to adopt strategies that could result in the accumulation of chemical residues in meat and milk with possibilities of poisoning in animals and people. This scenario demonstrates the necessity of research into the identification of novel, effective and environmentally safe therapeutic options for cattle tick control. The objectives of this study were to develop and assess the efficacy of R. microplus biotherapic and of 5% eugenol for the control of R. microplus in artificially infested calves. Eighteen male 6-month-old Holstein calves were divided into three groups of six animals. In Group 1, the animals did not receive medication (control group); in Group 2, the animals received 1 mL of R. microplus biotherapic at dilution 6CH (centesimal Hahnemannian), orally administered twice daily. And in Group 3, they received a single application of eugenol 5% in the pour-on formulation. The median efficacy for biotherapy and eugenol 5% was respectively 10.13 and 13.97%; however, upon analyzing reproductive efficiency, it is noteworthy that the biotherapic had 45.86% efficiency and was superior to the action of eugenol (12.03%) after 37 days of treatment. The ultrastructural study provided information about the effects of R. microplus biotherapic on the ovaries of engorged females and showed disorganization in the deposition of the oocyte exochorion. The results suggest hatchability inhibition of larvae, interference in R. microplus reproduction and future possibilities for eco-friendly control of R. microplus with biotherapic 6CH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida LAB (2004) Avaliação do tratamento alopático e homeopático de mastite bovina em animais inoculados com Staphylococcus aureus. Dissertação, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo, 105 pp

  • Amaral NK (1993) Guidelines for the evaluation of ixodidicides against the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) (Acari: Ixodidae). Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2:144–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel MA, Ribeiro VLS, Bordignon SAL, Henriques AT, Poser GV (2009) Chemical composition and toxicity of the essential oils from Cunila species (Lamiaceae) on the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Parasitol Res 105:863–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arenales MC (2000) Homeopatia em gado de corte. Anais II Seminário Brasileiro sobre homeopatia na agropecuária orgânica, Espírito Santo do Pinhal, São Paulo, p. 53–90

  • Arenales MC (2002) Homeopatia em gado de corte. I Conferência Virtual Global sobre Produção Orgânica de Bovinos de Corte. http://www.cpap.embrapa.br/agencia/congressovirtual/02sumario.htm. Acessed 15 Apr 2011

  • Bastide M, Doucet-Jaboeuf M, Daurat V (1985) Activity and chronopharmacology of very low doses of physiological immune inducers. Immunol Today 6:234–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellavite P, Conforti A, Piasere A, Ortolani R (2005) Immunology and homeopathy. 1. Historical background. Evid Based Compl Alt 2:441–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellavite P, Ortolani R, Conforti A (2006) Immunology and homeopathy. 3. Experimental studies on animal models. Adv Access Publication 3:171–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Berchieri A Jr, Turco WCP, Paiva JB, Oliveira GH, Sterzo EV (2006) Evaluation of isopathic treatment of Salmonella enteritidis in poultry. Homeopathy 95:94–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borges LMF, Ferri PH, Silva WJ, Silva WC, Silva JG (2003) In vitro efficacy of extracts of Melia azedarach against the tick Boophilus microplus. Med Vet Entomol 17:228–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borges LMF, Sousa LAD, Barbosa CS (2011) Perspectives for the use of plants extracts to control the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 20:89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown HA, Minott DA, Ingram CW, Williams LAD (1998) Biological activities of the extracts and constituents of pimento, Pimenta dioica L. against the southern cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. Insect Sci Appl 18:9–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chagas ACS (2008) Metodologias in vitro para avaliação de fitoterápicos sobre parasitas e resultados de teste a campo. [CD-ROM]. Anais XV Congresso Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária, II Seminário de Parasitologia dos Países do Mercosul, Curitiba, Paraná, pp 13

  • Chagas ACS, Passos WM, Prates HT, Leite RC, Furlong J, Fortes ICP (2002) Efeito acaricida de Eucalyptus em Boophilus microplus: óleos essenciais e concentrados emulsionáveis. Braz J Vet Res An Sci 39:247–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagas ACS, de Barros LD, Continguiba F, Furlan M, Giglioti R, Oliveira MCS, Bizzo HR (2012) In vitro efficacy of plant extracts and synthesized substances on Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Parasitol Res 110:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Júnior LM, Furlong J (2011) Efficiency of sulphur in garlic extract and non-sulphur homeopathy in the control of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Med Vet Entomol 25:7–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denardi SE, Bechara GH, de Oliveira PR, Mathias MIC (2011) Ultrastructural analysis of the oocytes of female Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806) (Acari: Ixodidae) ticks subjected to the action of Azadirachta indica A. Juss (Neem). Ultrastruct Pathol. doi:10.3109/01913123.2011.588819

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond RO, Ernst SE, Trevino JL, Gladney WJ, Grahan OH (1973) Boophilus annulatus and B. microplus: laboratory tests of inseticides. J Econ Entomol 1:130–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmacopeia (2011) Farmacopeia Homeopática Brasileira. http://www.anvisa.gov.br/farmacopeiabrasileira/conteudo/3a_edicao.pdf. Accessed 7 Apr 2011

  • Ferraz FN, Simoni GK, do Nascimento A, Melo CS, Aleixo DL, Gomes DL, Spack M, de Araújo SM (2011) Different forms of administration of biotherapy 7DH in mice experimentally infected by Trypanosoma cruzi produce different effects. Homeopathy 100:237–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong J (1993) Controle do carrapato dos bovinos na região Sudeste do Brasil. Caderno Técnico da Escola de Veterinária da UFMG, Belo Horizonte 8:49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong J, Martins JRS, Prata MCA (2007) O carrapato dos bovinos e a resistência: temos o que comemorar? Hora Vet 159:26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Galun R (1975) Control de las plagas del ganado mediante reguladores del crecimiento del insecto. Anais Seminário sobre ectoparasitas: ecologia y control de los parasitos externos de importancia economica que afetan el ganado en America Latina, Cali, Colombia, 185–193

  • Gazim ZC, Ferreira FBP, Silva AV, Bolognese KC, Merlin E, Messa V, Jesus RA, Coutinho CA, Silva LCM (2010) Efficiency of tick biotherapic on the control of infestation by Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Dutch dairy cows. Int J High Dilution Res 9:156–164

    Google Scholar 

  • George JE, Pound JM, Davey RB (2004) Chemical control of ticks on cattle and the resistance of these parasites to acaricides. Parasitol 129:S353–S366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton HE (1982) Biology of insects. In: Saito KC, Bechara GH, Nunes ET, Oliveira PR, Denardi SE, Camargo-Mathias MI (2005) Morphological, histological and ultrastructural studies of the ovary of the cattle-tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) (Acari: Ixodidae). Vet Parasitol 129: 299–311

  • Isman MB (2000) Plant essential oils for pest and disease management. Crop Protect 19:603–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas WB (1999) Do homeopathic nosodes protect against infection? An experimental test. Altern Ther Health Med 5:36–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas WB, Dillner D (2000) Protection of mice from Tularemia infection with ultra-low, serial agitated dilutions prepared from Francisella tularensis-infected tissue. J Scient Explor 14:35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson NN (2004) Integrated control programs for ticks on cattle: an examination of some possible components. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper. School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Australia. pp 51–58

  • Kossak AR (2003) Homeopatia em 1000 conceitos, 2nd edn. Elcid, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Leite RC, Labruna MB, Oliveira PR (1995) In vitro susceptibility of engorged females from different populations of Boophilus microplus to commercial acaricides. Ver Bras Parasitol Vet 4:283–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima AS, Souza Filho JGN, Pereira SG, Guillon GMSP, Santos LS, Costa Júnior LM (2014) Acaricide activity of different extracts from Piper tuberculatum fruits against Rhipicephalus microplus. Parasitol Res 113:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maia R, Brant PC (1980) Resíduos de pesticidas clorados em carne bovina. Arq Esc Vet Univ Fed Minas Gerais 32:271–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamede KP (2013) Estudo das propriedades biológicas de bioterápicos homeopáticos obtidos por diferente metodologias farmacotécnicas sobre Leishmania (Viannia) brasiliensis. Tese, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

  • Marin Municipal Water District Vegetation Management Plan (2008) Herbicide risk assessment, http://www.marinwater.org/documents/Chap6_CloveOil_8_28_08.pdf. Accessed 24 Aug 2011

  • Martinez-Velazquez M, Castilho-Herrera GA, Rosario-Cruz R, Flores-Fernandez JM, Lopez-Ramirez J, Hernandez-Gutierrez R, Lugo-Cervantes EC (2011) Acaricidal effect and chemical composition of essential oils extracted from Cuminum cyminum, Pimenta dioica and Ocimum basilicum against the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Parasitol Res 108:108–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitidiero AMA (2002) Potencial do uso de homeopatia, bioterápicos e fitoterapia como opção na bovinocultura leiteira: Avaliação dos aspectos sanitários e de produção. Dissertação, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

  • Monteiro CM, Maturano R, Daemon E, Catunda-Junior FEA, Calmon F, Senra TS, Faza A, Carvalho MG (2012) Acaricidal activity of eugenol on Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) and Dermacentor nitens (Acari: Ixodidae) larvae. Parasitol Res 111:1295–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulla MS, Su T (1999) Activity and biological effects of neem products against arthropods of medical and veterinary importance. J Am Mosq Contr Assoc 15:133–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nasi AMTT, Ribeiro RD, Lopes RA (1994) Ativação de macrófagos de camundongos com o emprego de Bioterápico. Pesqui Homeopática 9:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan J (1990) Acaricide resistance in single and multi-host ticks and strategies for control. Parasitol 32:145–153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan J, Roulston WJ, Schnitzerling HJ (1979) The potential of some synthetic pyrethroids for control of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus. Aust Vet J 55:463–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira PR (1993) Controle estratégico do Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) em bovinos de propriedades rurais dos municípios de Lavras e Entre Rio de Minas, Dissertação de mestrado em Medicina Veterinária. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira TCG, Salcedo JHP, Massard CL (1986) Susceptibilidade de amostras de Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887), do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, à carrapaticidas organofosforados. Arq Bras Med Vet Zoo 38:205–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Real CM (2008) Homeopatia populacional- Fundamentos para ruptura de um paradigma. Hora Vet 28:13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro RD, Lopes RA, Garcia TA, Rissato TA, Toldo AS, Alonso PR (1987) Estudo comparativo dos índices de cura de camundongos tratados com quimioterápicos e Trypanosominum TC D30. Pesqui Homeopática 3:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro VLS, Avancini C, Gonçalves K, Toigo E, Von Poser GL (2008) Acaricidal activity of Calea serrata (Asteraceae) on Boophilus microplus and Rhipicephalus sanguineus. Vet Parasitol 151:351–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roulston WJ, Stone BF, Wilson JT, White LI (1968) Chemical control of an organophosphorus- and carbamate-resistant strain of Boophilus microplus (Can.) from Queensland. Bull Entomol Res 58:379–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saito KC, Bechara GH, Nunes ET, Oliveira PR, Denardi SE, Mathias MIC (2005) Morphological, histological and ultrastructural studies of the ovary of the cattle-tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) (Acari: Ixodidae). Vet Parasitol 129:299–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samish M, Alekseev EA, Glazer I (2000) Mortality rate of adult ticks due to infection by entomopathogenic nematodes. J Parasitol 86:679–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy R, Reyes O, Guajardo G (1995) Control of subclinical bovine mastitis. Utilization of a homoeopathic combination. Br Homeopath J 84:67–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva NL, Moletta JL, Minho AP, Filippsen LF (2008) Use of biotherapic in the control of natural infestation by Boophilus microplus: pilot study. Int J High Dilution Res 7:36–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh NK, Jyoti VB, Singh H, Prerna M, Daundkar OS, Sharma SK, Dumka VK (2015) In vitro acaricidal activity of Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng (Rutaceae) extracts against synthetic pyrethroid-resistant Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Parasitol Res 114:1531–1539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tahori AS (1975) Acaricidas y resistencia de las garrapatas a los acaricidas. Anais Seminário sobre ectoparasitas: ecologia y control de los parasitos externos de importancia economica que afetan el ganado en America Latina, Cali, Colombia, 163–175

  • Tarascou I, Souquet JM, Mazauric JP, Carrillo S, Coq S, Canon F, Fulcrand H, Cheynier V (2010) The hidden face of food phenolic composition. Arch Biochem Biophys 501:16–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MA (2001) Recent developments in ectoparasiticides. Vet J 161:253–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valente PP, Amorim JM, Castilho RO, Leite RC, Ribeiro MFB (2014) In vitro acaricidal efficacy of plant extracts from Brazilian flora and isolated substances against Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Parasitol Res 113:417–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veríssimo CJ (1988) Utilização de nosódio Carrapatinum em bovinos sensíveis ao carrapato Boophilus microplus (CANESTRINI). Pesqui Homeopática 5:21–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Veríssimo CJ, Lara MAC, Arcaro JRP, Deodato AP, Bechara GH (2004) Associação entre marcadores protéicos e grau de infestação pelo carrapato Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) Canestrini, 1887, em bovinos, http://www.abz.org.br/index.php?category=28&pg=309. Accessed 5 Oct 2012

  • Villares JB (1941) Climatologia zootécnica III Contribuição ao estudo da resistência e susceptibilidade genética dos bovinos ao Boophilus microplus. Bol Ind Anim 4:60–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H, Bladt S, Zgainski EM (1984) Plant drug analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wall R, Strong L (1987) Environmental consequences of treating cattle with the antiparasitic drug, ivermectin. Nature 327:418–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggleswort VB (1984) Reproduction. In: Insect Physiology. Chapman and Hall. New York

  • Wilkinson PR (1955) Observations on infestations of undipped cattle of British breeds with the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). Aust J Agric Res 6:655–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeringóta V, Senra TOS, Calmon F, Mathurano R, Faza AP, Catunda-Junior FEA, Monteiro CMO, de Carvalho MG, Daemon E (2013) Repellent activity of eugenol on larvae of Rhipicephalus microplus and Dermacentor nitens (Acari: Ixodidae). Parasitol Res 112:2675–2679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Elizabeth Ribeiro and Roberta Carvalho Assunção for their assistance with the processing of transmission electron microscopy samples in the Center of Microscopy of UFMG.

We thank all persons who contributed directly or indirectly to this work.

We thank CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) for providing aid through a scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Múcio Flávio Barbosa Ribeiro.

Ethics declarations

This project was authorized by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation, CETEA-UFMG number 276/10.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valente, P.P., Moreira, G.H.F.A., Serafini, M.F. et al. In vivo efficacy of a biotherapic and eugenol formulation against Rhipicephalus microplus . Parasitol Res 116, 929–938 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5366-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5366-x

Keywords

Navigation