Abstract
Sexual dimorphism is common in animals and derives from two mechanisms: sexual selection and sexual niche divergence. These mechanisms may work together as determinants of wing shape in pigmented wings of Odonata. On the one hand, sexual selection by females tends to enlarge the wing areas of males that host pigments; on the other hand, sex-specific flight behaviours, due to differential niche selection, may promote sexual dimorphism. Both sexes of Sympetrum pedemontanum have ornamented wings with bands, but their function is poorly understood. Therefore, we studied shape and size of wings and wing bands of S. pedemontanum using geometric morphometrics to quantify the extent of sexual dimorphism. We also investigated whether sexual dimorphism in wing shape derives from the effect of sexual selection on wing ornamentation or from sexual niche separation. We found sexual dimorphism in wing shape and in the shapes of the bands, but the absence and misdirection of sexual size dimorphism and wing shape dimorphism of bands do not support the hypothesis that wings and wing bands in S. pedemontanum are subjected to sexual selection. Instead, the pattern of sexual dimorphism in wing shape seems more likely to be caused by sex-specific flight requirements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams DC, Otárola-Castillo E (2013) Geomorph: an r package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods Ecol Evol 4:393–399. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12035
Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (2004) Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the “revolution”. Ital J Zool 71:5–16. doi:10.1080/11250000409356545
Anderson CN, Grether GF (2010) Character displacement in the fighting colours of Hetaerina damselflies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 277:3669–3675. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0935
Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368. doi:10.1038/hdy.1948.21
Berwaerts K, Van Dyck H, Aerts P (2002) Does flight morphology relate to flight performance? An experimental test with the butterfly Pararge aegeria. Funct Ecol 16:484–491. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00650.x
Betts CR, Wootton RJ (1988) Wing shape and flight behaviour in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea): a preliminary analysis. J Exp Biol 138:271–288
Bonduriansky R (2007) The evolution of condition-dependent sexual dimorphism. Am Nat 169:9–19. doi:10.1086/510214
Bookstein FL (1997) Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cigognini R, Gallesi MM, Mobili S et al (2014) Does character displacement demonstrate density-dependent expression in females? A test on the wing shape of two species of European damselflies. Evol Ecol 28:941–956. doi:10.1007/s10682-014-9711-1
Claude J (2008) Morphometrics with R. Springer, New York
Contreras-Garduño J, Buzatto BA, Serrano-Meneses MA et al (2008) The size of the red wing spot of the American rubyspot as a heightened condition-dependent ornament. Behav Ecol 19:724–732. doi:10.1093/beheco/arn026
Córdoba-Aguilar A (2002) Wing pigmentation in territorial male damselflies, Calopteryx haemorrhoidalis: a possible relation to sexual selection. Anim Behav 63:759–766. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1974
Córdoba-Aguilar A, Cordero-Rivera A (2005) Evolution and ecology of Calopterygidae (Zygoptera: Odonata): status of knowledge and research perspectives. Neotropical Entomol 34:861–879
Córdoba-Aguilar A, Salamanca-Ocaña JC, Lopezaraiza M (2003) Female reproductive decisions and parasite burden in a calopterygid damselfly (Insecta: Odonata). Anim Behav 66:81–87. doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2198
Córdoba-Aguilar A, González-Tokman D, Nava-Bolaños Á et al (2015) Female choice in damselflies and dragonflies. In: Peretti AV, Aisenberg A (eds) Cryptic female choice in arthropods. Springer, New York, pp 239–253
Cotton S, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A (2004) Condition dependence of sexual ornament size and variation in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis Dalmanni (diptera: Diopsidae). Evolution 58:1038–1046. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00437.x
Darwin CR (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London
Debat V, Bégin M, Legout H, David JR (2003) Allometric and nonallometric components of Drosophila wing shape respond differently to developmental temperature. Evolution 57:2773–2784. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01519.x
Dryden IL, Mardia KV (1998) Statistical shape analysis. Wiley, New York
Fairbairn DJ (1997) Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:659–687. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.659
Fitzstephens DM, Getty T (2000) Colour, fat and social status in male damselflies, Calopteryx maculata. Anim Behav 60:851–855. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1548
Grether GF (1996) Intrasexual competition alone favors a sexually dimorphic ornament in the rubyspot damselfly Hetaerina americana. Evolution 50:1949–1957. doi:10.2307/2410753
Grether GF, Grey RM (1996) Novel cost of a sexually selected trait in the rubyspot damselfly Hetaerina americana: conspicuousness to prey. Behav Ecol 7:465–473. doi:10.1093/beheco/7.4.465
Hunger H, Schiel F-J, Röske W (1998) Artenschutzprogramm/Umsetzung: Sympetrum pedemontanum (Allioni, 1776) und Sympetrum fonscolombii (Sélys, 1840)—Gutachten im Auftrag der Schutzgemeinschaft Libellen in Baden—Württemberg (SGL), 4:1
Johansson F, Söderquist M, Bokma F (2009) Insect wing shape evolution: independent effects of migratory and mate guarding flight on dragonfly wings. Biol J Linn Soc 97:362–372. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01211.x
Kuchta SR, Svensson EI (2014) Predator-mediated natural selection on the wings of the damselfly Calopteryx splendens: differences in selection among trait types. Am Nat 184:91–109. doi:10.1086/676043
Moore AJ (1990) The evolution of sexual dimorphism by sexual selection: the separate effects of intrasexual selection and intersexual selection. Evolution 44:315–331. doi:10.2307/2409410
Outomuro D, Johansson F (2011) The effects of latitude, body size, and sexual selection on wing shape in a damselfly. Biol J Linn Soc 102:263–274. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01591.x
Outomuro D, Johansson F (2015) Bird predation selects for wing shape and coloration in a damselfly. J Evol Biol 28:791–799. doi:10.1111/jeb.12605
Outomuro D, Ocharan FJ (2011) Wing pigmentation in Calopteryx damselflies: a role in thermoregulation? Biol J Linn Soc 103:36–44. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01641.x
Outomuro D, Bokma F, Johansson F (2012) Hind wing shape evolves faster than front wing shape in Calopteryx damselflies. Evol Biol 39:116–125. doi:10.1007/s11692-011-9145-4
Outomuro D, Adams DC, Johansson F (2013a) Wing shape allometry and aerodynamics in calopterygid damselflies: a comparative approach. BMC Evol Biol 13:118. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-118
Outomuro D, Adams DC, Johansson F (2013b) The evolution of wing shape in ornamented-winged damselflies (Calopterygidae, Odonata). Evol Biol 40:300–309. doi:10.1007/s11692-012-9214-3
Popova ON (2004) Infraspecific taxonomy of Sympetrum pedemontanum Muller, 1766) (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 33:207–216
R Development Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput, Vienna
Rantala MJ, KoskimÌki J, Taskinen J et al (2000) Immunocompetence, developmental stability and wingspot size in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens L. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:2453–2457. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1305
Rohlf FJ (2010) tpsDig2. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook
Rohlf FJ, Corti M (2000) Use of two-block partial least-squares to study covariation in shape. Syst Biol 49:740–753. doi:10.1080/106351500750049806
Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF (1993) A revolution morphometrics. Trends Ecol Evol 8:129–132. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90024-J
Rohlf FJ, Slice D (1990) Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Biol 39:40–59. doi:10.2307/2992207
Sacchi R, Hardersen S (2013) Wing length allometry in Odonata: differences between families in relation to migratory behaviour. Zoomorphology 132:23–32. doi:10.1007/s00435-012-0172-1
Sampson PD, Streissguth AP, Barr HM, Bookstein FL (1989) Neurobehavioral effects of prenatal alcohol: Part II. Partial least squares analysis. Neurotoxicol Teratol 11:477–491. doi:10.1016/0892-0362(89)90025-1
Serrano-Meneses MA, Córdoba-Aguilar A, Azpilicueta-Amorín M et al (2008) Sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism and Rensch’s rule in Odonata. J Evol Biol 21:1259–1273. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01567.x
Shine R (1989) Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Q Rev Biol 64:419–461. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2830103?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Siva-Jothy MT (1999) Male wing pigmentation may affect reproductive success via female choice in a calopterygid damselfly (zygoptera). Behaviour 136:1365–1377. doi:10.1163/156853999500776
Slatkin M (1984) Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:622–630. doi:10.2307/2408711
Streissguth AP, Bookstein FL, Sampson PD, Barr HM (1993) The enduring effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on child development: birth through seven years, a partial least squares solution. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Svensson EI, Friberg M (2007) Selective predation on wing morphology in sympatric damselflies. Am Nat 170:101–112. doi:10.1086/518181
Svensson EI, Waller JT (2013) Ecology and sexual selection: evolution of wing pigmentation in calopterygid damselflies in relation to latitude, sexual dimorphism, and speciation. Am Nat 182:E174–E195. doi:10.1086/673206
Svensson EI, Karlsson K, Friberg M, Eroukhmanoff F (2007) Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation. Curr Biol 17:1943–1947. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.038
Tsubaki Y, Samejima Y, Siva-Jothy MT (2010) Damselfly females prefer hot males: higher courtship success in males in sunspots. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1547–1554. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-0968-2
Tynkkynen K, Rantala MJ, Suhonen J (2004) Interspecific aggression and character displacement in the damselfly Calopteryx splendens. J Evol Biol 17:759–767. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00733.x
Tynkkynen K, Kotiaho JS, Luojumäki M, Suhonen J (2005) Interspecific aggression causes negative selection on sexual characters. Evolution 59:1838–1843. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01830.x
Waage JK (1979) Reproductive character displacement in Calopteryx (Odonata: calopterygidae). Evolution 33:104–116. doi:10.2307/2407369
Wildermuth H, Martens A (2014) Taschenlexikon der Libellen Europas. Quelle & Meyer Verlag, Wiebelsheim
Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3
Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N et al (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York
Acknowledgments
We thank an anonymous reviewer that helped to improve the final version of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Animal rights
All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by A. Schmidt-Rhaesa.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gallesi, M.M., Mobili, S., Cigognini, R. et al. Sexual dimorphism in wings and wing bands of Sympetrum pedemontanum (Müller in Allioni 1776). Zoomorphology 134, 531–540 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-015-0280-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-015-0280-9