Abstract
Purpose
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed worldwide and the third most common cancer among men in India. This study's objective was to characterise the mutational landscape of Indian prostate cancer using whole-exome sequencing to identify population-specific polymorphisms.
Methods
Whole-exome sequencing was performed of 58 treatment-naive primary prostate tumors of Indian origin. Multiple computational and statistical analyses were used to profile the known common mutations, other deleterious mutations, driver genes, prognostic biomarkers, and gene signatures unique to each clinical parameter. Cox analysis was performed to validate survival-associated genes. McNemar test identified genes significant to recurrence and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine its accuracy. OncodriveCLUSTL algorithm was used to deduce driver genes. The druggable target identified was modeled with its known inhibitor using Autodock.
Results
TP53 was the most commonly mutated gene in our cohort. Three novel deleterious variants unique to the Indian prostate cancer subtype were identified: POLQ, FTHL17, and OR8G1. COX regression analysis identified ACSM5, a mitochondrial gene responsible for survival. CYLC1 gene, which encodes for sperm head cytoskeletal protein, was identified as an unfavorable prognostic biomarker indicative of recurrence. The novel POLQ mutant, also identified as a driver gene, was evaluated as the druggable target in this study. POLQ, a DNA repair enzyme implicated in various cancer types, is overexpressed and is associated with a poor prognosis. The mutant POLQ was subjected to structural analysis and modeled with its known inhibitor novobiocin resulting in decreased binding efficiency necessitating the development of a better drug.
Conclusion
In this pilot study, the molecular profiling using multiple computational and statistical analyses revealed distinct polymorphisms in the Indian prostate cancer cohort. The mutational signatures identified provide a valuable resource for prognostic stratification and targeted treatment strategies for Indian prostate cancer patients. The DNA repair enzyme, POLQ, was identified as the druggable target in this study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated for this study are available in the NCBI BioProject database with accession number: PRJNA838939.
References
Arnedo-Pac C, Mularoni L, Muiños F, Gonzalez-Perez A, Lopez-Bigas N (2019) Oncodrive CLUSTL: a sequence-based clustering method to identify cancer drivers. Bioinformatics [internet] 35(22):4788–4790
Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T (2006) The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics [internet] 22(2):195–201
Barbieri CE, Baca SC, Lawrence MS, Demichelis F, Blattner M, Theurillat JP et al (2012) Exome sequencing identifies recurrent SPOP, FOXA1 and MED12 mutations in prostate cancer. Nat Genet 44(6):685–689
Bawa PS, Ravi S, Paul S, Chaudhary B, Srinivasan S (2018) A novel molecular mechanism for a long non-coding RNA PCAT92 implicated in prostate cancer. Oncotarget [internet] 9(65):32419–32434
Bian X, Zhu B, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen Q, Nguyen C et al (2018) Comparing the performance of selected variant callers using synthetic data and genome segmentation. BMC Bioinformatics 19(1):429
Brooke GN, Bevan CL (2009) The role of androgen receptor mutations in prostate cancer progression. Curr Genomics 10(1):18
Cancer today [Internet]. [Cited 2021 Dec 29]. Available from: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home
Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Casadio R (2005) I-Mutant20: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Res 33(Web Server):W306
Chang TC, Yang Y, Yasue H, Bharti AK, Retzel EF, Liu WS (2011) The expansion of the PRAME gene family in eutheria. PLoS ONE 6(2):e16867
Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L et al (2012a) A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6(2):80
Cingolani P, Patel VM, Coon M, Nguyen T, Land SJ, Ruden DM et al (2012b) Using drosophila melanogaster as a model for genotoxic chemical mutational studies with a new program SnpSift. Front Genet. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2012.00035
Dorsam RT, Gutkind JS (2007) G-protein-coupled receptors and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 7(2):79–94
Dzamba M, Ramani AK, Buczkowicz P, Jiang Y, Yu M, Hawkins C et al (2017) Identification of complex genomic rearrangements in cancers using CouGaR. Genome Res 27(1):107–117
Eliasziw M, Donner A (1991) Application of the McNemar test to non-independent matched pair data. Stat Med [internet] 10(12):1981–1991
Giri VN, Beebe-Dimmer JL (2016) Familial prostate cancer. Semin Oncol [internet] 43(5):560–565
Grasso CS, Wu YM, Robinson DR, Cao X, Dhanasekaran SM, Khan AP et al (2012) The mutational landscape of lethal castrate resistant prostate cancer. Nature 487(7406):239
Gupta A, Shukla N, Nehra M, Gupta S, Malik B, Mishra AK et al (2020) A pilot study on the whole exome sequencing of prostate cancer in the Indian phenotype reveals distinct polymorphisms. Front Genet 11:874
Hieronymus H, Schultz N, Gopalan A, Carver BS, Chang MT, Xiao Y et al (2014) Copy number alteration burden predicts prostate cancer relapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(30):11139–11144
Huang FW, Mosquera JM, Garofalo A, Oh C, Baco M, Amin-Mansour A et al (2017a) Exome sequencing of African-American prostate cancer reveals loss-of-function ERF mutations. Cancer Discov 7:73–83. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-16-0960
Huang FW, Mosquera JM, Garofalo A, Oh C, Baco M, Amin-Mansour A et al (2017b) Exome sequencing of African-American prostate cancer reveals loss-of-function mutations. Cancer Discov 7(9):973–983
Huang MY, Liu XY, Shao Q, Zhang X, Miao L, Wu XY et al (2022) Phosphoserine phosphatase as a prognostic biomarker in patients with gastric cancer and its potential association with immune cells. BMC Gastroenterol 22(1):1–10
Huey R, Morris GM, Olson AJ, Goodsell DS (2007) A semi empirical free energy force field with charge-based desolvation. J Comput Chem 28(6):1145–1152
Jain S, Saxena S, Kumar A (2014) Epidemiology of prostate cancer in India. Meta Gene 2:596
Jiang Z, Zhang Y, Chen X, Wu P, Chen D (2019) Inactivation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway underlies inhibitory role of microRNA-129–5p in epithelial–mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis of prostate cancer by targeting ZIC2. Cancer Cell Int. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0977-9
Jillson LK, Yette GA, Laajala TD, Tilley WD, Costello JC, Cramer SD (2021) Androgen receptor signalling in prostate cancer genomic subtypes. Cancers [internet] 13(13):3272. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13133272
Kaneko A (2013) The neural basis of early vision. Springer Science and Business Media.
Kazutoshi Fujita NN (2019) Role of androgen receptor in prostate cancer: a review. World J Mens Health 37(3):288
Khazaei Z, Sohrabivafa M, Momenabadi V, Moayed L, Goodarzi E (2019) Global cancer statistics 2018: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide prostate cancers and their relationship with the human development index. Adv Human Biol 9(3):245
Kim DE, Chivian D, Baker D (2004) Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res 32(Web Server):W526
Krishnamoorthy Hariharan VP (2016) Demography and disease characteristics of prostate cancer in India. Indian J Urol 32(2):103
Kuei CH, Lin HY, Lin MH et al (2020) DNA polymerase theta repression enhances the docetaxel responsiveness in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Mol Basis Dis 1866(12):165954
Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9(4):357–359
Laskowski RA, Swindells MB (2011) LigPlot+: multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model [internet] 51(10):2778–2786
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N et al (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAM tools. Bioinformatics [internet] 25(16):2078–2079
Liang C, Niu L, Xiao Z, Zheng C, Shen Y, Shi Y et al (2020) Whole-genome sequencing of prostate cancer reveals novel mutation-driven processes and molecular subgroups. Life Sci 254:117218
Liao C, Wang Q, An J, Zhang M, Chen J, Li X et al (2022) SPINKs in tumors: potential therapeutic targets. Front Oncol [internet]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.833741
Liu W (2016) DNA alterations in the tumor genome and their associations with clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Asian J Androl 18(4):533–542
Liu J, Yan J, Mao R, Ren G, Liu X, Zhang Y et al (2020) Exome sequencing identified six copy number variations as a prediction model for recurrence of primary prostate cancers with distinctive prognosis. Transl Cancer Res [internet] 9(4):2231–2242
Liu C, Tu C, Wang L, Wu H, Houston BJ et al (2021) Deleterious variants in X-linked CFAP47 induce asthenoteratozoospermia and primary male infertility. Am J Hum Genet 108(2):309–323
Love MI, Myšičková A, Sun R, Kalscheuer V, Vingron M, Haas SA (2011) Modeling read counts for CNV detection in exome sequencing data. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1732
Lu WC, Saha A, Yan W, Garrison K, Lamb C, Pandey R et al (2020) Enzyme-mediated depletion of serum l-Met abrogates prostate cancer growth via multiple mechanisms without evidence of systemic toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117(23):13000–13011
Lv Z, Qi L, Hu X, Mo M, Jiang H, Fan B et al (2021) Zic family Member 2 (ZIC2): a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for pan-cancer. Front Mol Biosci [internet]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.631067
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A et al (2010) The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 20(9):1297
Obinata D, Lawrence MG, Takayama K, Choo N, Risbridger GP, Takahashi S et al (2020) Recent discoveries in the androgen receptor pathway in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Front Oncol [internet]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.581515
Ogbu SC, Rojas S, Weaver J, Musich PR, Zhang J, Yao ZQ et al (2021) DSTYK enhances chemo resistance in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Cells 11(1):97
Piovesan D, Minervini G, Tosatto SCE (2016) The RING 2.0 web server for high quality residue interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Res 44(W1):W367–W374
Quinlan AR, Hall IM (2010) BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26(6):841–842
Richard D, Wood SD (2016) DNA polymerase θ (POLQ), double-strand break repair, and cancer. DNA Repair 44:22
Ruan X, Tian M, Kang N, Ma W, Zeng Y, Zhuang G et al (2021) Genome-wide identification of m6A-associated functional SNPs as potential functional variants for thyroid cancer. Am J Cancer Res 11(11):5402
Schrempf A, Slyskova J, Loizou JI (2021) Targeting the DNA repair enzyme polymerase θ in cancer therapy. Trends Cancer Res 7(2):98–111
Seki M, Marini F, Wood RD (2003) POLQ (Pol θ), a DNA polymerase and DNA-dependent ATPase in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 31(21):6117
Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D et al (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13(11):2498–2504
Skidmore ZL, Wagner AH, Lesurf R, Campbell KM, Kunisaki J, Griffith OL et al (2016) GenVisR: Genomic visualizations in R. Bioinformatics [internet] 32(19):3012–3014
Song C, Chen H (2018) Predictive significance of TMRPSS2-ERG fusion in prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Cell Int 18(1):1–12
Sun X, Wang L, Li H, Jin C, Yu Y, Hou L et al (2021) Identification of microenvironment related potential biomarkers of biochemical recurrence at 3 years after prostatectomy in prostate adenocarcinoma. Aging [internet] 13(12):16024–16042
Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C, Zhang Z (2017) GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res 45(W1):W98-102
Tang R, Liu X, Pan L, Chen R (2019) Novel mutation in FTHL17 gene in pedigree with 46. XY Pure Gonadal Dysgenesis Fertil Steril 111(6):1226–35.e1
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2015) The molecular taxonomy of primary prostate cancer. Cell 163(4):1011
The human protein Atlas [Internet]. [Cited 2022 May 21]. Available from: https://www.proteinatlas.org
Therneau TM, Grambsch PM (2000) Modeling survival data: extending the cox model. Stat Biol Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8
Uhlen M, Zhang C, Lee S, Sjöstedt E, Fagerberg L, Bidkhori G et al (2017) A pathology atlas of the human cancer transcriptome. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan2507
Wang L, Jin G, He C, Guo X, Zhou X, Li M et al (2014) Gαs protein expression is an independent predictor of recurrence in prostate cancer. J Immunol Res 2014:1–9
Wang W, Chen ZX, Guo DY, Tao YX (2018) Regulation of prostate cancer by hormone-responsive G protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacol Ther 191:135–147
Website [Internet]. Available from: https://saves.mbi.ucla.edu/
Website [Internet] (2014) Available from: Eng J. ROC analysis: web-based calculator for ROC curves. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University [updated 2014 March 19]. Available from: http://www.jrocfit.org
Wedge DC, Gundem G, Mitchell T, Woodcock DJ, Martincorena I, Ghori M et al (2018) Sequencing of prostate cancers identifies new cancer genes, routes of progression and drug targets. Nat Genet 50(5):682–692
Yazdani B, Jazini M, Jabbari N, Karami M et al (2021) Altered expression level of ACSM5 in breast cancer: an integrative analysis of tissue biomarkers with diagnostic potential. Gene Rep 22:100992
Zhou J, Gelot C, Pantelidou C, Li A, Yücel H, Davis RE et al (2021) A first-in-class polymerase theta inhibitor selectively targets homologous-recombination-deficient tumors. Nature Cancer 2(6):598–610
Acknowledgements
We thank the sequencing facility and BIO-IT center of IBAB, Bangalore, Karnataka, India for conducting this study.
Funding
This work was supported by the Department of Science & Technology Fund for Improvement of S&T Infrastructure in Higher Educational Institutions (No. SR/FST/LSI-5361/2012), and The Departments of Information Technology, Biotechnology, and Science and Technology, Government of Karnataka, India. SD is supported by the Department of Biotechnology (Ref. no BT/PR13458/COE/34/33/2015 and BT/PR13616/GET/119/9/2015), Govt. of India, India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FR: investigation, methodology, formal analysis, design, and writing—original draft; AJ: investigation, formal analysis, and bioinformatic analysis; SD: bioinformatic analysis; NM: bioinformatic analysis; KS: bioinformatic analysis; PSB: methodology and investigation; SK: resources; SN: resources; RSK: resources and data curation; SS: formal analysis; BC: conceptualization, design, formal analysis, supervision, and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee HCG (HCG Institute Ethics Committee/41/21/08). Informed consent from all the patients was obtained for this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ravindran, F., Jain, A., Desai, S. et al. Whole-exome sequencing of Indian prostate cancer reveals a novel therapeutic target: POLQ. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149, 2451–2462 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04111-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04111-0