Skip to main content
Log in

Cell cycle progression score improves risk stratification in prostate cancer patients with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy

  • Original Article – Clinical Oncology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the use of the cell cycle progression (CCP) score versus actual risk stratification practice in making treatment decisions for prostate cancer patients with locally adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Patients and methods

Men with adverse pathologic features, pT3 or positive surgical margins who underwent RP in 2010–2014 at Renji hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP. RNA was quantified from paraffin-embedded RP specimens. The CCP score was calculated as average expression of 31 CCP genes, normalized to 15 housekeeper genes. The prognostic utility of the CCP score was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Among the 100 men identified, 5-year BCR-free survival for the low- (< 0), intermediate- (0–1) and high- (> 1) CCP score groups was 89.3%, 38.8%, and 12.9%, respectively. In multivariable models adjusting for clinical and pathological variables with the cancer of the prostate risk assessment post-surgical (CAPRA-S) score, both continuous CCP score [hazard ratio (HR) 1.373 per unit score, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.006–1.874; p = 0.046) and the categorized CCP score (p < 0.001)were independent predictors of BCR.

Conclusions

The present study provides insights into the role the CCP score plays in risk stratification of this cohort and in determining candidacy for deferred secondary treatment. From our perspective, the CCP score allows better stratification and can help identifying patients at lower risk of disease recurrence who could benefit from a wait-and-see policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishoff JT, Freedland SJ, Gerber L, Tennstedt P, Reid J, Welbourn W, Graefen M, Sangale Z, Tikishvili E, Park J, Younus A, Gutin A, Lanchbury JS, Sauter G, Brawer M, Stone S, Schlomm T (2014) Prognostic utility of the cell cycle progression score generated from biopsy in men treated with prostatectomy. J Urol 192(2):409–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolla M, van Poppel H, Collette L, van Cangh P, Vekemans K, Da Pozzo L, de Reijke TM, Verbaeys A, Bosset JF, van Velthoven R, Marechal JM, Scalliet P, Haustermans K, Pierart M (2005) Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet (London, England) 366(9485):572–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67101-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolla M, van Poppel H, Tombal B, Vekemans K, Da Pozzo L, de Reijke TM, Verbaeys A, Bosset JF, van Velthoven R, Colombel M, van de Beek C, Verhagen P, van den Bergh A, Sternberg C, Gasser T, van Tienhoven G, Scalliet P, Haustermans K, Collette L (2012) Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet (London, England) 380(9858):2018–2027. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61253-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buscariollo DL, Drumm M, Niemierko A, Clayman RH, Galland-Girodet S, Rodin D, Feldman AS, Dahl MD, McGovern FJ, Olumi AF, Eidelman A, Shipley WU, Zietman AL, Efstathiou JA (2017) Long-term results of adjuvant versus early salvage postprostatectomy radiation: a large single-institutional experience. Pract Radiat Oncol 7(2):e125–e133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2016.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooperberg MR, Hilton JF, Carroll PR (2011) The CAPRA-S score: a straightforward tool for improved prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 117(22):5039–5046. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26169

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cooperberg MR, Simko JP, Cowan JE, Reid JE, Djalilvand A, Bhatnagar S, Gutin A, Lanchbury JS, Swanson GP, Stone S, Carroll PR (2013) Validation of a cell-cycle progression gene panel to improve risk stratification in a contemporary prostatectomy cohort. J Clin Oncol 31(11):1428–1434. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.46.4396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuzick J, Swanson GP, Fisher G, Brothman AR, Berney DM, Reid JE, Mesher D, Speights VO, Stankiewicz E, Foster CS, Moller H, Scardino P, Warren JD, Park J, Younus A, Flake DD 2nd, Wagner S, Gutin A, Lanchbury JS, Stone S (2011) Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 12(3):245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70295-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cuzick J, Berney DM, Fisher G, Mesher D, Moller H, Reid JE, Perry M, Park J, Younus A, Gutin A, Foster CS, Scardino P, Lanchbury JS, Stone S (2012) Prognostic value of a cell cycle progression signature for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort. Br J Cancer 106(6):1095–1099. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cuzick J, Stone S, Fisher G, Yang ZH, North BV, Berney DM, Beltran L, Greenberg D, Moller H, Reid JE, Gutin A, Lanchbury JS, Brawer M, Scardino P (2015) Validation of an RNA cell cycle progression score for predicting death from prostate cancer in a conservatively managed needle biopsy cohort. Br J Cancer 113(3):382–389. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dalela D, Loppenberg B, Sood A, Sammon J, Abdollah F (2016) Contemporary role of the decipher(R) test in prostate cancer management: current practice and future perspectives. Rev Urol 18(1):1–9

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Forgues A, Rozet F, Audenet F, Ouzzane A, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, Galiano M, Prapotnich D, Cathelineau X (2014) Oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) without adjuvant therapy. World J Urol 32(2):519–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1133-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu JC, Elkin EP, Krupski TL, Gore J, Litwin MS (2006) The effect of postprostatectomy external beam radiotherapy on quality of life: results from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor. Cancer 107(2):281–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MA, Partin AW, Mangold LA, Epstein JI, Walsh PC (2003) Probability of biochemical recurrence by analysis of pathologic stage, Gleason score, and margin status for localized prostate cancer. Urology 62(5):866–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lavallee LT, Fergusson D, Mallick R, Grenon R, Morgan SC, Momoli F, Witiuk K, Morash C, Cagiannos I, Breau RH (2013) Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: treatment recommendations differ between urologists and radiation oncologists. PLoS One 8(11):e79773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez IH, Parada D, Gallardo P, Gascon M, Besora A, Pena K, Riu F, Arquez Pianetta M, Abuchaibe O, Torres Royo L, Arenas M (2017) Prognostic correlation of cell cycle progression score and Ki-67 as a predictor of aggressiveness, biochemical failure, and mortality in men with high-risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 22(3):251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2017.02.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mithal P, Howard LE, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Cooperberg MR, Kane CJ, Amling C, Freedland SJ (2016) Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy patients do not predict long-term oncological outcomes: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) cohort. BJU Int 117(2):244–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Secin FP, Bianco FJ Jr, Vickers AJ, Reuter V, Wheeler T, Fearn PA, Eastham JA, Scardino PT (2006) Cancer-specific survival and predictors of prostate-specific antigen recurrence and survival in patients with seminal vesicle invasion after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 106(11):2369–2375. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shangguan X, Dong B, Wang Y, Xu F, Shao X, Sha J, Zhu Y, Pan J, Xue W (2017) Management of prostate cancer patients with locally adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy: feasibility of active surveillance for cases with Gleason grade 3 + 4 = 7. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 143(1):123–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-016-2262-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sommariva S, Tarricone R, Lazzeri M, Ricciardi W, Montorsi F (2016) Prognostic value of the cell cycle progression score in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 69(1):107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AJ, Wood DP, Kattan MW, Klein EA, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, Carver BS (2009a) Location, extent and number of positive surgical margins do not improve accuracy of predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 182(4):1357–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AJ, Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Bianco FJ Jr, Yossepowitch O, Vickers AJ, Klein EA, Wood DP, Scardino PT (2009b) Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era. J Clin Oncol 27(26):4300–4305. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.18.2501

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson IM Jr, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, Lucia MS, Miller G, Troyer D, Messing E, Forman J, Chin J, Swanson G, Canby-Hagino E, Crawford ED (2006) Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296(19):2329–2335. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.19.2329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, Lucia MS, Miller G, Troyer D, Messing E, Forman J, Chin J, Swanson G, Canby-Hagino E, Crawford ED (2009) Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol 181(3):956–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.032

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tosoian JJ, Chappidi MR, Bishoff JT, Freedland SJ, Reid J, Brawer M, Stone S, Schlomm T, Ross AE (2017) Prognostic utility of biopsy-derived cell cycle progression score in patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network low-risk prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy: implications for treatment guidance. BJU Int 120(6):808–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13911

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegel T, Bottke D, Steiner U, Siegmann A, Golz R, Storkel S, Willich N, Semjonow A, Souchon R, Stockle M, Rube C, Weissbach L, Althaus P, Rebmann U, Kalble T, Feldmann HJ, Wirth M, Hinke A, Hinkelbein W, Miller K (2009) Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in pT3 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95. J Clin Oncol 27(18):2924–2930. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.18.9563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers: 81572536, 81672850), Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (Grant number: 20152215). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XS and HQ: protocol/project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. ZJ: data collection or management, data analysis. ZX: data analysis. JP: data collection or management. BD and WX: protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Baijun Dong or Wei Xue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shangguan, X., Qian, H., Jiang, Z. et al. Cell cycle progression score improves risk stratification in prostate cancer patients with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 146, 687–694 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-03089-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-03089-6

Keywords

Navigation