Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring flatfeet morphology in children aged 6–12 years: relationships with body mass and body height through footprints and three-dimensional measurements

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between flatfoot morphology and body mass and height in children aged 6–12 years. A total of 6471 Chinese children (mean age 9.0 ± 1.9 years, 41% female) were assessed for foot morphometry, body height, and body mass index. Foot morphology, including foot length, width, girth, arch height, hallux valgus angle, and rearfoot valgus angle, was measured using a 3D laser scanner. Flatfoot evaluations were conducted using the Sztriter–Godunov index (KY) from footprints. All measurements were analyzed by age and sex using the mean values of the left and right sides. Comparisons were performed between flatfoot groups, between body mass index (BMI) groups, and between body height groups. The study revealed a significant decrease in the incidence of bipedal flatfoot with age (p < 0.001), whereas the prevalence of obesity remained consistent (p > 0.05). Bipedal flatfoot was associated with distinct morphological changes, including lower arches, reduced instep height, diminished ankle heights and a greater rearfoot valgus angle (p < 0.05). When comparing the BMI groups, overweight children had larger and thicker feet (p < 0.05), but no differences were found in arch height and ankle height (p > 0.05). When comparing the body height groups, short-statured children had a shorter feet girth, shorter arches, and shorter ankle height (p < 0.05), but no differences were found in the rearfoot valgus angle (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The main characteristics of flat feet include lower arches and instep heights and ankle heights but higher rearfoot valgus angles. In general, overweight children’s feet do not have the common features of flat feet. In contrast, short children had similar features of flatfoot except for rearfoot valgus. Assessment of posture, such as rearfoot valgus, can be critical in identifying children with flat feet.

What is Known:

• The morphology of children's feet is associated with body growth, but the relationship between flatfeet and body mass and height remains controversial.

What is New:

• Three-dimensional foot measurement shows that body mass is generally not associated with flatfeet, while short children have lower arches but no rearfoot valgus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ford SE, Scannell BP (2017) Pediatric flatfoot: pearls and pitfalls. Foot Ankle Clin 22(3):643–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2017.04.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu L, Gu H, Zhang Y, Sun T, Yu J (2022) Risk factors of flatfoot in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(14):8247. Published 2022 Jul 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148247

  3. Shin BJ, Lee KM, Chung CY et al (2021) Analysis of factors influencing improvement of idiopathic flatfoot. Medicine (Baltimore) 100(32):e26894. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Martínez-Nova A, Gijón-Noguerón G, Alfageme-García P, Montes-Alguacil J, Evans AM (2018) Foot posture development in children aged 5 to11 years: a three-year prospective study. Gait Posture 62:280–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen KC, Tung LC, Tung CH, Yeh CJ, Yang JF, Wang CH (2014) An investigation of the factors affecting flatfoot in children with delayed motor development. Res Dev Disabil 35(3):639–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.12.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yin J, Zhao H, Zhuang G et al (2018) Flexible flatfoot of 6–13-year-old children: a cross-sectional study. J Orthop Sci 23(3):552–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2018.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stolzman S, Irby MB, Callahan AB, Skelton JA (2015) Pes planus and paediatric obesity: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Obes 5(2):52–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mauch M, Grau S, Krauss I, Maiwald C, Horstmann T (2008) Foot morphology of normal, underweight and overweight children. Int J Obes (Lond) 32(7):1068–1075. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pourghasem M, Kamali N, Farsi M, Soltanpour N (2016) Prevalence of flatfoot among school students and its relationship with BMI. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 50(5):554–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2016.03.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jankowicz-Szymanska A, Mikolajczyk E, Wodka K (2017) Correlations among foot arching, ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, and obesity level in primary school children. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 107(2):130–136. https://doi.org/10.7547/15-150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Górna S, Pazdro-Zastawny K, Basiak-Rasała A, Kolator M, Krajewska J, Zatoński T (2022) Characteristics of paediatric foot arches according to body mass among primary school students in Wrocław, Poland. BMC Pediatr 22(1):656. Published 2022 Nov 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03699-z

  12. Mickle KJ, Steele JR, Munro BJ (2006) The feet of overweight and obese young children: are they flat or fat? Obesity (Silver Spring) 14(11):1949–1953. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2006.227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wearing SC, Hills AP, Byrne NM, Hennig EM, McDonald M (2004) The arch index: a measure of flat or fat feet? Foot Ankle Int 25(8):575–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070402500811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Riddiford-Harland DL, Steele JR, Baur LA (2011) Medial midfoot fat pad thickness and plantar pressures: are these related in children? Int J Pediatr Obes 6(3–4):261–266. https://doi.org/10.3109/17477166.2011.579974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wyszyńska J, Leszczak J, Podgórska-Bednarz J et al (2020) Body Fat and Muscle Mass in Association with foot structure in adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(3):811. Published 2020 Jan 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030811

  16. Riddiford-Harland DL, Steele JR, Baur LA (2011) Are the feet of obese children fat or flat? Revisiting the debate Int J Obes (Lond) 35(1):115–120. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2010.119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Catan L, Amaricai E, Onofrei RR et al (2020) The impact of overweight and obesity on plantar pressure in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(18):6600. Published 2020 Sep 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186600

  18. Villarroya MA, Esquivel JM, Tomás C, Moreno LA, Buenafé A, Bueno G (2009) Assessment of the medial longitudinal arch in children and adolescents with obesity: footprints and radiographic study. Eur J Pediatr 168(5):559–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-008-0789-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Escalona-Marfil C, Prats-Puig A, Ortas-Deunosajut X, Font-Lladó R, Ruiz-Tarrazo X, Evans AM (2023) Children’s foot parameters and basic anthropometry - do arch height and midfoot width change? Eur J Pediatr 182(2):777–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04715-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Evans AM, Karimi L (2015) The relationship between paediatric foot posture and body mass index: do heavier children really have flatter feet?. J Foot Ankle Res 8:46. Published 2015 Aug 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0101-x

  21. Gijon-Nogueron G, Martinez-Nova A, Alfageme-Garcia P, Montes-Alguacil J, Evans AM (2019) International normative data for paediatric foot posture assessment: a cross-sectional investigation. BMJ Open 9(4):e023341. Published 2019 Apr 14. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023341

  22. Chang CH, Yang WT, Wu CP, Chang LW (2022) Would foot arch development in children characterize a body maturation process? A prospective longitudinal study Biomed J 45(5):828–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2021.10.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tenenbaum S, Hershkovich O, Gordon B et al (2013) Flexible pes planus in adolescents: body mass index, body height, and gender–an epidemiological study. Foot Ankle Int 34(6):811–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100712472327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rogati G, Leardini A, Ortolani M, Caravaggi P (2019) Validation of a novel Kinect-based device for 3D scanning of the foot plantar surface in weight-bearing. J Foot Ankle Res 12:46. Published 2019 Sep 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-019-0357-7

  25. Lee YC, Wang MJ (2015) Taiwanese adult foot shape classification using 3D scanning data. Ergonomics 58(3):513–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.974683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Woźniacka R, Bac A, Matusik S, Szczygieł E, Ciszek E (2013) Body weight and the medial longitudinal foot arch: high-arched foot, a hidden problem? Eur J Pediatr 172(5):683–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-013-1943-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Szczepanowska-Wołowiec B, Sztandera P, Kotela I, Zak M (2021) Assessment of the foot’s longitudinal arch by different indicators and their correlation with the foot loading paradigm in school-aged children: a cross sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(10):5196. Published 2021 May 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105196

  28. Dzięcioł Z, Kuryliszyn-Moskal A, Dzięcioł J (2015) Application of plantography examination to the assessment of foot deformity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Med Sci 11(5):1015–1020. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.54856

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tong JW, Kong PW (2016) Medial longitudinal arch development of children aged 7 to 9 years: longitudinal investigation. Phys Ther 96(8):1216–1224. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dare DM, Dodwell ER (2014) Pediatric flatfoot: cause, epidemiology, assessment, and treatment. Curr Opin Pediatr 26(1):93–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Ledl T, Hauser G, Sluga M (2006) Prevalence of flat foot in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics 118(2):634–639. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-2126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chang JH, Wang SH, Kuo CL, Shen HC, Hong YW, Lin LC (2010) Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender, and age. Eur J Pediatr 169(4):447–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-009-1050-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mickle KJ, Steele JR, Munro BJ (2008) Is the foot structure of preschool children moderated by gender? J Pediatr Orthop 28(5):593–596. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e318173f782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gijon-Nogueron G, Montes-Alguacil J, Martinez-Nova A, Alfageme-Garcia P, Cervera-Marin JA, Morales-Asencio JM (2017) Overweight, obesity and foot posture in children: a cross-sectional study. J Paediatr Child Health 53(1):33–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bosch K, Gerss J, Rosenbaum D (2010) Development of healthy children’s feet–nine-year results of a longitudinal investigation of plantar loading patterns. Gait Posture 32(4):564–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Astolfi RS, de Novaes RCT, Dias Leite JA, Temoteo Ribeiro HC, Godoy Santos AL (2020) Lopes JR (2020) Foot structures and their correlations with body height. Forensic Science International: Reports 2:100153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gijon-Nogueron G, Marchena-Rodriguez A, Montes-Alguacil J, Evans AM (2020) Evaluation of the paediatric foot using footprints and foot posture index: a cross-sectional study. J Paediatr Child Health 56(2):201–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the help of those who participated in the study.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82374605), Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Guangdong Province, China (No. 20241199), and Innovation Team and Talents Cultivation Program of National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. ZYYCXTD-C-202003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZYF participated in the design of the study, contributed to data collection and data reduction/analysis and drafted the first draft; JYS, XYH participated in the design of the study and contributed to data collection; HSL, HJW contributed to data collection and analysis; LGZ, SZ participated in the design of the study and contributed to data collection; JYL, KRZ contributed to data collection; HJW contributed to data collection, revision of the manuscript; YKL participated in the design of the study, contributed to data collection, curation and supervision; CC participated in the design of the study, revision of the manuscript and project management. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript, and agree with the order of presentation of the authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yi-Kai Li or Chao Chen.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed with the order of presentation of the authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Gregorio Milani

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 288 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, ZY., She, JY., Hu, XY. et al. Exploring flatfeet morphology in children aged 6–12 years: relationships with body mass and body height through footprints and three-dimensional measurements. Eur J Pediatr 183, 1901–1910 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05471-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05471-0

Keywords

Navigation