Skip to main content
Log in

Virtual reality for intravenous placement in the emergency department—a randomized controlled trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study sought to determine whether adding virtual reality (VR) was superior to standard of care alone in facilitating reduction in pain and anxiety among children who underwent intravenous catheterization in the emergency department (ED). Sixty-six children aged 6–16 years who needed intravenous placement received VR, or standard of care in the ED (videos, television, iPad, child life specialist). Outcome measures included change in pain score, level of anxiety, patient and parent satisfaction (pain and anxiety), number of trials, and procedure time. Compared with controls, the intervention group had similar age, sex, number of trials, and anesthetic use. Time of procedure was shorter in the VR group (median 5 min) but this was not statistically significant compared with 7 min for the control group. Pain in the intervention group was lower, even before the procedure. Difference in pain (before and after) and anxiety (after the procedure) were similar in both groups. Satisfaction from anxiety management was higher for the VR group (p < 0.007) and children rated VR significantly more “fun” (p < 0.024).

Conclusion: VR was an effective distraction tool and increased satisfaction from anxiety management for this common pediatric procedure, and should be incorporated in management of anxiety in children in the ED setting.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT03681730, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03681730

What is Known:

Virtual reality is an evolving computer technology that shows some promise in the areas of acute and chronic pain management due to its ability to create effective distraction.

What is New:

We report that among children in the emergency setting with intravenous catheterization, satisfaction from the use of VR for anxiety management should support implementation of VR systems for this procedure

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CAS:

Colored Analogue Scale

ED:

Emergency department

EMLA:

Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics

FPS-R:

Faces Pain Scale – Revised

IRB:

Institutional Review Board

IQR:

Interquartile range

IV:

Intravenous catheter

VR:

Virtual reality

VAS:

Visual Analogue Scale

References

  1. Catudal JP (1999) Pediatric IV therapy: actual practice. J Assoc Vasc Access 4(1):27–29. https://doi.org/10.2309/108300899775703652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Birnie KA, Noel M, Chambers CT, Uman LS, Parker JA (2018) Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005179.pub4

  3. MacLean SBA, Obsipo J, Young KD (2007) The gap between pediatric emergency department procedural pain management treatments available and actual practice. Pediatr Emerg Care 23(2):87–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0b013e31803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Olsen K, Weinberg E (2017) Pain-less practice: techniques to reduce procedural pain and anxiety in pediatric acute care. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med 18(1):32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpem.2017.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zempsky WT, Cravero JP (2004) Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems. Pediatrics 114(5):1348–1356. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arane K, Behboudi A, Goldman RD (2017) Virtual reality for pain and anxiety management in children. Can Fam Physician 63(12):932–934

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffman HG, Chambers GT, Meyer WJ 3rd, Arceneaux LL, Russell WJ, Seibel EJ, Richards TL, Sharar SR, Patterson DR (2011) Virtual reality as an adjunctive non-pharmacologic analgesic for acute burn pain during medical procedures. Ann Behav Med 41(2):183–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9248-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman HG, Richards TL, Coda B, Bills AR, Blough D, Richards AL, Sharar SR (2004) Modulation of thermal pain-related brain activity with virtual reality: evidence from fMRI. Neuroreport 25(7):2013–2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000127826.73576.91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pryszard Android / iOS Gameplay Walkthrough. Short Play #572 VR Roller Coaster Android Gameplay. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QnZpNYLqsg. Published January 4th 2015. Accessed 30 July 2020

  10. International Association for the Study of Pain. Faces Pain Scale -Revised Home. International Association for the Study of Pain. http://www.iasp-pain.org/Education/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1519. Accessed 30 July 2020

  11. Venham LL, Gaulin-Kremer E (1979) A self-report measure of situational anxiety for young children. Pediatr Dent 1(2):93–96

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bowman DA, McMahan PR (2007) Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Computer 40:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffman HG, Richards TL, Van Oostrom T, Coda BA, Jensen MP, Blough DK, Sharar SR (2007) The analgesic effects of opioids and immersive virtual reality distraction: evidence from subjective and functional brain imaging assessments. Anesth Analg 105(6):1776–1783. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000270205.45146.db

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Triberti S, Repetto C, Riva G (2014) Psychological factors influencing the effectiveness of virtual reality-based analgesia: a systematic review. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 17:335–345. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider SM, Workman ML (1999) Effects of virtual reality on symptom distress in children receiving chemotherapy. CyberPsychol Behav 2:125–134. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1999.2.125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahlquist LM, McKenna KD, Jones KK, Dillinger L, Weiss KE, Ackerman CS (2007) Active and passive distraction using a head-mounted display helmet: effects on cold pressor pain in children. Health Psychol 26:794–801. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wender R, Hoffman HG, Hunner HH, Seibel EJ, Patterson DR, Sharar SR (2009) Interactivity influences the magnitude of virtual reality analgesia. J Cyber Ther Rehabil 2:27–33

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Gutierrez-Maldonado J, Gutierrez-Martinez O, Cabas-Hoyos K (2011) Interactive and passive virtual reality distraction: effects on presence and pain intensity. Stud Health Technol Inform 167:69–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Law EF, Dahlquist LM, Sil S, Weiss KE, Herbert LJ, Wohlheiter K, Horn SB (2011) Videogame distraction using virtual reality technology for children experiencing cold pressor pain: the role of cognitive processing. J Pediatr Psychol 36:84–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsq063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vagnoli L, Bettini A, Amore E, De Masi S, Messeri A (2019) Relaxation-guided imagery reduces perioperative anxiety and pain in children: a randomized study. Eur J Pediatr 178(6):913–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gold JI, Kim SH, Kant AJ, Joseph MH, Rizzo AS (2006) Effectiveness of virtual reality for pediatric pain distraction during I.V. placement. CyberPsychol Behav 9:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gold JI, Mahrer NE (2017) Is virtual reality ready for prime time in the medical space? A randomized control trial of pediatric virtual reality for acute procedural pain management. J Pediatr Psychol 43(3):266–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsx129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Piskorz J, Czub M (2018) Effectiveness of a virtual reality intervention to minimize pediatric stress and pain intensity during venipuncture. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 23:e12201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jspn.12201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoffman HG, Seibel EJ, Richards TL, Furness TA, Patterson DR, Sharar SR (2006) Virtual reality helmet display quality influences the magnitude of virtual reality analgesia. J Pain 7:843–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2006.04.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dumoulin S, Bouchard S, Ellis J, Lavoie KL, Vézina MP, Charbonneau P, Tardif J, Hajjar A (2019) A randomized controlled trial on the use of virtual reality for needle-related procedures in children and adolescents in the emergency department. Games Health J 8(4):285–293. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2018.0111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan E, Hovenden M, Ramage E, Ling N, Pham JH, Rahim A, Lam C, Liu L, Foster S, Sambell R, Jeyachanthiran K, Crock C, Stock A, Hopper SM, Cohen S, Davidson A, Plummer K, Mills E, Craig SS, Deng G, Leong P (2019) Virtual reality for pediatric needle procedural pain: two randomized clinical trials. J Pediatr 209:160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sinha M, Christopher NC, Fenn R, Reeves L (2006) Evaluation of nonpharmacologic methods of pain and anxiety management for laceration repair in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics 117:1162–1168. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the patients that participated in this study. A special acknowledgement to Paul Clerc, Charlotte Zwimpfer, Jennifer Ham, Clare Lambert, Isabelle Khalifa, and Nancy Lum who collected data for this study.

Contributors’ contributions

Dr. Goldman and Dr. Behboudi conceptualized and designed the study, submitted to ethics approval, and monitored collection of data. Dr. Goldman and Dr. Behboudi drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

Funded by the Peace Arch Hospital, as part of an improvement project. Funds were allocated for a research assistant and all other administrative measures related to presentation and publication of the trial results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ran D. Goldman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board, H17-02711) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Disclaimer

The funding agency had no influence on the design of the study, its conduct or publication of data from this project.

Additional information

Communicated by Gregorio Paolo Milani

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goldman, R.D., Behboudi, A. Virtual reality for intravenous placement in the emergency department—a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr 180, 725–731 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03771-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03771-9

Keywords

Navigation