Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utility and accuracy of transient elastography in determining liver fibrosis: a case-control study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 26 February 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

The objectives of this prospective case-control study were to determine liver stiffness (LSM) by transient elastography (TE) in children with newly diagnosed chronic liver disease (CLD) and to find out normal values in healthy Indian children. Two groups (A: 50 CLD who underwent liver biopsy and B: 50 healthy) aged 5–18 years were recruited prospectively. Liver biopsies were scored as per Metavir scoring and compared with TE. The median age of 100 recruited children was 13.6 years. In group B, normal LSM was 4.9 (2.5–7.3) kPa with significantly higher LSM in adolescent males (5.6 (4.1–7.3) kPa) as compared with females (4.3 (3.7–4.9) kPa), p = 0.001. In group A, TE was excellent in discriminating significant fibrosis (≥ F2) (P = 0.001) at a cut-off value of 10.6 kPa with area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96. Metavir fibrosis stage (β = 0.611; R2 = 0.586) and age (β = 0.230; R2 = 0.586) were independent variables associated with higher LSM in stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions: TE is an excellent non-invasive tool to assess significant liver fibrosis and can be used as an alternative to liver biopsy. Normative value of TE in adolescent males is higher than in females.

What is Known:

Transient elastography is a good non-invasive test for liver fibrosis assessment.

Normal liver stiffness depends on race, gender, and age.

What is New:

This is the first study from India to show the normative data of transient elastography in healthy Indian children.

We have documented that liver stiffness measurement by fibroscan in treatment naïve chronic liver disease has excellent correlation in significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 26 February 2020

    The author regrets that one of the author’s name was incorrectly presented in the published version of this article. The third author’s name original read as “<Emphasis Type="Bold">Tajwar Singh Negi</Emphasis>” this should have been “<Emphasis Type="Bold">Tajwer Singh Negi</Emphasis>”.

Abbreviations

AUROC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic

ANA:

Anti-nuclear antibody

Anti HBe:

Antibody to hepatitis B e-antigen

BMI:

Body mass index

CLD:

Chronic liver disease

CTP:

Child–Turcotte–Pugh

EGD:

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

HBsAg:

Hepatitis B surface antigen

HBeAg:

Hepatitis B e-antigen

HBV-DNA:

Hepatitis B deoxyribonucleic acid

HCV RNA:

Hepatitis C ribonucleic acid

IQR:

Interquartile range

LSM:

Liver stiffness measurement

LKM:

Liver kidney microsomal antibody

MELD:

Model for end-stage liver disease

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

PELD:

Pediatric end-stage liver disease

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

SMA:

Anti-smooth muscle antibody

TE:

Transient elastography

References

  1. Sokol RJ (2002) Liver cell injury and fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 35(1):S7–S10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanner MS (2002) Mechanisms of liver injury relevant to pediatric hepatology. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 39:1–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408360290795439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun Y, Zhou J, Wang L et al (2017 May) New classification of liver biopsy assessment for fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients before and after treatment. Hepatology. 65(5):1438–1450. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cadranel JF, Rufat P, Degos F (2000) Practices of liver biopsy in France: results of a prospective nationwide survey. For the Group of Epidemiology of the French Association for the Study of the liver (AFEF). Hepatology 32:477–481. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2000.16602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Poniachik J, Bernstein DE, Reddy KR, Jeffers LJ, Coelho-Little ME, Civantos F, Schiff ER (1996) The role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of cirrhosis. Gastrointest Endosc 43:568–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70192-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. CasteraL VJ, Foucher J, Le Bail B, Chanteloup E, Haaser M, Darriet M, Couzigou P, De Ledinghen V (2005) Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 128:343–350. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Corpechot C, El Naggar A, Poujol-Robert A, Ziol M, Wendum D, Chazouillères O, de Lédinghen V, Dhumeaux D, Marcellin P, Beaugrand M, Poupon R (2006) Assessment of biliary fibrosis by transient elastography in patients with PBC and PSC. Hepatology 43:1118–1124. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Foucher J, Chanteloup E, Vergniol J, Castéra L, Le Bail B, Adhoute X, Bertet J, Couzigou P, de Ledinghen V (2006) Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography (FibroScan): a prospective study. Gut 55:403–408. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2005.069153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kazemi F, Kettaneh A, N’kontchou G, Pinto E, Ganne-Carrie N, Trinchet JC, Beaugrand M (2006) Liver stiffness measurement selects patients with cirrhosis at risk of bearing large oesophageal varices. J Hepatol 45:230–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2006.04.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carrion JA, Navasa M, Bosch J, Bruguera M, Gilabert R, Forns X (2006) Transient elastography for diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and portal hypertension in patients with hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 12:17918. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.20857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. deLedinghen V, Le Bail B, Rebouissoux L, Fournier C, Foucher J, Miette V, Castéra L, Sandrin L, Merrouche W, Lavrand F, Lamireau T (2007) Liver stiffness measurement in children using FibroScan: feasibility study and comparison with Fibrotest, aspartate transaminase to platelets ratio index, and liver biopsy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 45:443–450. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e31812e56ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nobili V, Vizzutti F, Arena U, Abraldes JG, Marra F, Pietrobattista A, Fruhwirth R, Marcellini M, Pinzani M (2008) Accuracy and reproducibility of transient elastography for the diagnosis of fibrosis in pediatric nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 48:442–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alkhouri N, Sedki E, Alisi A, Lopez R, Pinzani M, Feldstein AE, Nobili V (2013) Combined pediatric NAFLD fibrosis index and transient elastography to predict clinically significant fibrosis in children with fatty liver disease. Liver Int 33:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.12024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fitzpatrick E, Quaglia A, Vimalesvaran S, Basso MS, Dhawan A (2013) Transient elastography is a useful noninvasive tool for the evaluation of fibrosis in pediatric chronic liver disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 56:72–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e31826f2760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Raizner A, Shillingford N, Mitchell PD, Harney S, Raza R, Serino J, Jonas MM, Lee CK (2017) Hepatic inflammation may influence liver stiffness measurements by transient elastography in children and young adults. J Pediatr GastroenterolNutr 64(4):512–517. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Engelmann G, Gebhardt C, Wenning D, Wühl E, Hoffmann GF, Selmi B, Grulich-Henn J, Schenk JP, Teufel U (2012) Feasibility study and control values of transient elastography in healthy children. Eur J Pediatr 171:353–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-011-1558-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldschmidt I, Streckenbach C, Dingemann C, Pfister ED, di Nanni A, Zapf A, Baumann U (2013) Application and limitations of transient liver elastography in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 57:109–113. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e31829206a0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lewindon PJ, Balouch F, Pereira TN, Puertolas-Lopez MV, Noble C, Wixey JA, Ramm GA (2016) Transient liver elastography in unsedated control children: impact of age and intercurrent illness. J Paediatr Child Health 52:637–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee CK, Mitchell PD, Raza R, Harney S, Wiggins SM, Jonas MM (2018) Validation of transient elastography cut points to assess advanced liver fibrosis in children and young adults: the Boston Children’s Hospital experience. J Pediatr 198:84–89.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.02.062

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mileti E, Rosenthal P, Peters MG (2012) Validation and modification of simplified diagnostic criteria for autoimmune hepatitis in children. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10:417–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2011.11.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lok AS, McMahon BJ (2007) Chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 45:507–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seeff LB, American Association for the study of Liver Disease (2009) Diagnosis, management andtreatment of hepatitis C: an update. Hepatology 49:1335–1374. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roberts EA, Schilsky ML (2008) Diagnosis and treatment of Wilson disease: an update. Hepatology 47:2089–2111. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Valla DC (2003) The diagnosis and management of the Budd-Chiari syndrome: consensus and controversies. Hepatology 38:793–803. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2003.50415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Foucher J, Castéra L, Bernard PH, Adhoute X, Laharie D, Bertet J, Couzigou P, de Lédinghen V (2006) Prevalence and factors associated with failure of liver stiffness measurement using FibroScan in a prospective study of 2114 examinations. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:411–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bedossa P, Poynard T (1996) An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology 24:289–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510240201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kalantri A, Karambelkar M, Joshi R, Kalantri S, Jajoo U (2010) Accuracy and reliability of pallor for detecting anaemia: a hospital-based diagnostic accuracy study. PLoS One 5(1):e8545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008545

  28. Yasuda M, Shimizu I, Shiba M, Ito S (1999) Suppressive effects of estradiol on dimethylnitrosamine-induced fibrosis of the liver in rats. Hepatology 29:719–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510290307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mederacke I, Wursthorn K, Kirschner J, Rifai K, Manns MP, Wedemeyer H, Bahr MJ (2009) Food intake increases liverstiffness in patients with chronic or resolved hepatitis C virus infection. Liver Int 29:1500–1506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02100.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cho Y, Tokuhara D, Morikawa H, Kuwae Y, Hayashi E, Hirose M, Hamazaki T, Tanaka A, Kawamura T, Kawada N, Shintaku H (2015) Transient elastography-based liver profiles in a hospital-based pediatric population in Japan. PLoS One 10:e0137239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Vikas Jain, Ujjal Poddar, Negi TS, Vivek A Saraswat, Narendra Krishnani, Surender K Yachha, and Anshu Srivastav. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Vikas Jain and Ujjal Poddar. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ujjal Poddar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. The study was conducted after obtaining clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC code: 2014-83-DM-77). Informed written consent was obtained from either parent before doing all invasive procedures and TE. Informed consent: Informed written consent was obtained from either parent before doing all invasive procedures and transient elastography.

Additional information

Communicated by Peter de Winter

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: The author regrets that one of the author’s name was incorrectly presented in the published version of this article. The third author’s name original read as “Tajwer Singh Negi”, this should have been “Tajwar Singh Negi”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, V., Poddar, U., Negi, T.S. et al. Utility and accuracy of transient elastography in determining liver fibrosis: a case-control study. Eur J Pediatr 179, 671–677 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03561-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03561-y

Keywords

Navigation