Abstract
The aim of this study was to systematically review the measurement properties of instruments which assess cervical spine function in infants with torticollis. Electronic searches were performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, combining three constructs (‘torticollis’, ‘cervical spine assessment’ and ‘measurement properties’). Two reviewers independently rated the methodological quality and the quality of measurement properties of identified articles, using both the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments) checklist and quality criteria for measurement properties. Five studies, using six instruments, met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. Included instruments were the goniometer, electronic pendular goniometer, protractor, still photography, Muscle Function Scale and a range of motion limitation scale. All studies assessed reliability, and one study also assessed content validity and hypothesis testing. The methodological quality of the studies varied from poor to excellent according to the COSMIN checklist. Two instruments were found to have good measurement properties from high-quality studies: still photography for the assessment of habitual head tilt in supine and the Muscle Function Scale for the assessment of side-flexor muscle function in lateral head righting.
Conclusion: This systematic review identified two reliable tools for the assessment of cervical spine function in infants with torticollis. Further research is required to assess the measurement properties of tools already described in the literature and to develop further tools for use in this population.
What is known? • A thorough assessment of the infant presenting with torticollis is essential, in order to correctly diagnose, rule out ‘red flags’ and manage appropriately • Assessment tools need to have robust measurement properties in order to be of value for clinical practice and research | |
What is new? • This systematic review identified two valid and reliable tools for the assessment of cervical spine function in infants with torticollis • Further research is required to assess the measurement properties of tools already described in the literature and to develop further tools for use in infants with torticollis |
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CMT:
-
Congenital muscular torticollis
- COSMIN:
-
COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments
- CSp:
-
Cervical spine
- HRPRO:
-
Health-related patient-reported outcomes
- MIC:
-
Minimal important change
- PoT:
-
Postural torticollis
- ROM:
-
Range of motion
- Rot :
-
Rotation
- SCM:
-
Sternocleidomastoid muscle
- SDC:
-
Smallest detectable change
- SEM:
-
Standard error of measurement
- SF:
-
Side flexion
References
Aarnivala HE, Valkama AM, Pirttiniemi PM (2014) Cranial shape, size and cervical motion in normal new-borns. Early Hum Dev 90:425–430
Aarnivala H, Vuollo V, Harila V, Heikkinen T, Pirttiniemi P, Holmström L, Valkama AM (2016) The course of positional cranial deformation from 3 to 12 months of age and associated risk factors: a follow-up with 3D imaging. Eur J Pediatr 175:1893–1903
Antonaci F, Ghirmai S, Bono G, Nappi G (2000) Current methods for cervical spine movement evaluation: a review. Clin Exp Rheumatol 18:S-45
Arbogast KB, Gholve PA, Friedman JE, Maltese MR, Tomasello MF, Dormans JP (2007) Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3–12 years old. Spine 32:E309–E315
Barske E, Draeger D, Keck K (2014) Comparison of 2-dimensonal and 3-dimensional motion analysis to measure infant cervical range of motion. Wisconsin physical therapy association, Wisconsin, USA
Bartels B, De Groot JF, Terwee CB (2013) The six-minute walk test in chronic paediatric conditions: a systematic review of measurement properties. Phys Ther 93:529–541
Captier G, Dessauge D, Picot MC, Bigorre M, Gossard C, El Ammar J, Leboucq N (2011) Classification and pathogenic models of unintentional postural cranial deformities in infants: plagiocephalies and brachycephalies. J Craniofac Surg 22:33–41
de Chalain TM, Park S (2005) Torticollis associated with positional plagiocephaly: a growing epidemic. J Craniofac Surg 16:411–418
Chen TMK (1995) Infantile muscular torticollis: efficacy of conservative treatment with active programme and manual stretching. Chapter 4: pilot study on the measurement of passive rotation of the neck. Master of Philosophy Dissertation, Chinese University of Hong Kong (personal communication)
Chen MM, Chang HC, Hsieh CF, Yen MF, Chen TH (2005) Predictive model for congenital muscular torticollis: analysis of 1021 infants with sonography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:2199–2203
Cheng JC, Au AW (1994) Infantile torticollis: a review of 624 cases. J Pediatr Orthop 14:802–808
Cheng JC, Tang SP, Chen TMK (1999) Sternocleidomastoid pseudotumor and congenital muscular torticollis in infants: a prospective study of 510 cases. J Pediatr 134:712–716
Cheng J, Tang S, Chen TMK, Wong E (2000) The clinical presentation and outcome of treatment of congenital muscular torticollis in infants—1086 cases. J Pediatr Surg 35:1091–1096
Cheng JC, Wong MW, Tang SP, Chen TMK, Shum SL, Wong EM (2001) Clinical determinants of the outcome of manual stretching in the treatment of congenital muscular torticollis in infants: a prospective study of 821 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:679–687
Christensen C, Landsettle A, Antoszewski S, Ballard B, Carey H, Pax Lowes L (2013) ConservaPhys Occup Ther Pediatrtive management of congenital muscular torticollis: an evidence-based algorithm and preliminary treatment parameter recommendations. 33:453–466
Christensen E, Castle KB, Hussey E (2015) Clinical feasibility of 2-dimensional video analysis of active cervical motion in congenital muscular torticollis. Pediatr Phys Ther 27:276–283
Cooperman D (1997) The differential diagnosis of torticollis in children. Phys Occup Ther Paediatr 17:1–11
Dobson F, Hinman RS, Hall M, Terwee CB, Roos EM, Bennell KL (2012) Measurement properties of performance-based measures to assess physical function in hip and knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil 20:1548–1562
Emery C (1994) The determinants of treatment duration for congenital muscular torticollis. Phys Ther 74:921–928
Feipel V, Rondelet B, Le Pallec JP, Rooze M (1999) Normal global motion of the cervical spine: an electrogoniometric study. Clin Biomech 14:462–470
Fortin C, Ehrmann Feldman D, Cheriet F, Labelle H (2011) Clinical methods for quantifying body segment posture: a literature review. Disabil Rehabil 33:367–383
Fradette J, Gagnon I, Kennedy E, Snider L, Majnemer A (2011) Clinical decision-making regarding intervention needs of infants with torticollis. Pediatr Phys Ther 23:249–256
Giray E, Karadag-Saygi E, Mansiz-Kaplan B, Tokgoz D, Bayindir O, Kayhan O (2017) A randomised, single-blinded pilot study evaluating the effects of kinesiology taping and the tape application techniques in addition to therapeutic exercises in the treatment of congenital muscular torticollis. Clin Rehabil 31:1098–1106
Hald ES, Hertle RW, Yang D (2011) Application of a digital head-posture measuring system in children. Am J Ophthalmol 151:66–70, 70.e2
Hautopp L, Wester S, Bang B, Buus L, Grindsted J, Christensen K, Vinther A (2014) Benefit of physiotherapeutic treatment in children with torticollis. Dan Med J 61:A4970
He L, Yan X, Li J, Guan B, Ma L, Chen Y, Xu K (2017) Comparison of two dosages of stretching treatment in infants with congenital muscular torticollis: a randomised trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 96:333–340
Herman MJ (2006) Torticollis in infants and children: common and unusual causes. Instr Course Lect 55:647–653
Hylton N (1997) Infants with torticollis: the relationship between asymmetric head and neck positioning and postural development. Phys Occ Ther Ped 17:91–117
Jordan K (2000) Assessment of published reliability studies for cervical spine range-of-motion measurement tools. J Manip Physiol Ther 23:180–195
Jung AY, Kang EY, Lee SH, Nam DH, Cheon JH, Kim HJ (2015) Factors that affect the rehabilitation duration in patients with congenital muscular torticollis. Ann Rehabil Med 39:18–24
Kaplan S, Coulter C, Fetters L (2013) Physical therapy management of congenital muscular torticollis: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Pediatr Phys Ther 25:348–394
Kiwak KJ (1984) Establishing an etiology for torticollis. Postgrad Med 75:126–134
Klackenberg E, Elfving B, Haglund-Akerlind Y, Brogren Carlberg E (2005) Intra-rater reliability in measuring range of motion in infants with congenital muscular torticollis. Adv Phys 7:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14038190510010331
de Koning CH, van den Heuvel SP, Staal JB, Smits-Engelsman BC, Hendriks EJ (2008) Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 17:905–921
Kwon DR, Park Y (2014) Efficacy of microcurrent therapy in infants with congenital muscular torticollis involving the entire sternocleidomastoid muscle: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 28:983–991
Lal S, Abbasi AS, Jamro S (2011) Response of primary torticollis to physiotherapy. J Surg Pak (Intl) 16:153–156
Laughlin J, Luerssen TG, Dias MS (2011) Prevention and management of positional skull deformities in infants. Pediatrics 128:1236–1241
Lee YT, Yoon K, Kim YB, Chung PW, Hwang JH, Park YS, Han BH (2011) Clinical features and outcome of physiotherapy in early presenting congenital muscular torticollis with severe fibrosis on ultrasonography: a prospective study. J Pediatr Surg 46:1526–1531
Lee JY, Koh SE, Lee IS, Jung H, Lee J, Kang JI, Bang H (2013) The cervical range of motion as a factor affecting outcome in patients with congenital muscular torticollis. Ann Rehabil Med 37:183–90
Leung AY, Mandrusiak A, Watter P, Gavranich J, Johnston LM (2016) Clinical assessment of head orientation profile development and its relationship with positional plagiocephaly in healthy term infants—a prospective study. Early Hum Dev 96:31–38
Lewandowski J, Szulc P (2003) The range of motion of the cervical spine in children aged from 3 to 7 years-an electrogoniometric study. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 62:459–461
Luxford B, Hale L, Piggott J (2009) The physiotherapy management of infants with congenital muscular torticollis: a survey of current practice in New Zealand. N Z J Physiother 37:127–135
Lynch-Caris T, Majeske KD, Brelin-Fornari J, Nashi S (2008) Establishing reference values for cervical spine range of motion in pre-pubescent children. J Biomech 41:2714–2719
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, De Vet HC (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 19:539–549
Murgia M, Venditto T, Paoloni M, Hodo B, Alcuri R, Bernetti A, Mangone M (2016) Assessing the cervical range of motion in infants with positional plagiocephaly. J Craniofac Surg 27:1060–1064. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002644
Nucci P, Kushner BJ, Seragino M (2005) A multi-disciplinary study of the ocular, orthopaedic and neurological causes of abnormal head postures. Am J Opthalmol 140:65–68
Nuysink J, van Haastert IC, Takken T, Helders P (2008) Symptomatic asymmetry in the first six months of life: differential diagnosis. Eur J Pediatr 167:613–619
Nuysink J, van Haastert IC, Takken T, Helders PJ (2011) Symptomatic asymmetry in very young infants: a Delphi study on the development of a screening instrument. Physiother Theory Pract 27:194–212
Öhman AM (2009) Are infants with torticollis at risk of a delay in early motor milestones compared with a control group of healthy infants? Dev Med Child Neurol 51:545–550
Öhman A (2012) The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of a modified “severity scale for assessment of plagiocephaly” among physical therapists. Physiother Theory Pract 28:402–406
Öhman AM, Beckung E (2008) Reference values for range of motion and muscle function of the neck in infants. Pediatr Phys Ther 20:53–57
Öhman AM, Nilsson S, Beckung E (2009) Validity and reliability of muscle function scale, aimed to assess the lateral flexors of the neck in infants. Physiother Theory Pract 25:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593980802686904
Öhman AM, Nilsson S, Beckung E (2010) Stretching treatment for infants with congenital muscular torticollis: physiotherapist or parents? A randomised pilot study. Phys Med Rehabil 2:1073–1079
Öhman AM, Mårdbrink EL, Stensby J, Beckung E (2011) Evaluation of treatment strategies for muscle function in infants with congenital muscular torticollis. Physiother Theory Pract 27:463–470
Öhman AM, Mårdbrink EL, Orefelt C, Seager A, Tell L, Klackenberg E (2013) The physical therapy assessment and management of infants with congenital muscular torticollis: a survey and suggested assessment protocol for congenital muscular torticollis. J Nov Physiother 3:165
Oledzka MM, Kaplan SL, Sweeney JK, Coulter C, Evans-Rogers DL (2018) Interrater and intrarater reliability of the congenital muscular torticollis severity classification system. Pediatr Phys Ther 30:176–182
Oleszek JL, Chang N, Apkon SD, Wilson PE (2005) Botulinum toxin type a in the treatment of children with congenital muscular torticollis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 84:813–816
Persing J, James H, Swanson J, Kattwinkel J (2003) Prevention and management of positional skull deformities in infants. Pediatrics 112:199–202
Petronic I, Brdar R, Cirovic D, Nikolic D, Lukac M, Janic D, Pavicevic P, Golubovic Z, Knezevic T (2010) Congenital muscular torticollis in children: distribution, treatment duration and outcome, Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 46:153–158
Philippi H, Faldum A, Bergmann H, Jung T, Pabst B, Schleupen A (2004) Idiopathic infantile asymmetry, proposal of a measurement scale. Early Hum Dev 80:79–90
Rahlin M, Sarmiento B (2010) Reliability of still photography measuring habitual head deviation from midline in infants with congenital muscular torticollis. Pediatr Phys Ther 22:399–406. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181f9d72d
Rogers GF, Oh AK, Mulliken JB (2009) The role of congenital muscular torticollis in the development of deformational plagiocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:643–652
Rubio AS, Griffet JR, Caci H, Bérard E, El Hayek T, Boutté P (2009) The moulded baby syndrome: incidence and risk factors regarding 1,001 neonates. Eur Journal Ped 168:605–611
Schaufele MK, Boden SD (2003) Physical function measurements in neck pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 14:569–588
Schertz M, Luk L, Green D (2013) Long term neurodevelopmental follow up of children with congenital muscular torticollis. J Child Neurol 28:1215–1221
Seager A (2017) Assessment and management of torticollis in infancy: a survey of current physiotherapy practice. Physiother Prac Res 38:59–66
Sforza C, Grassi G, Fragnito N, Turci M, Ferrario VF (2002) Three-dimensional analysis of active head and cervical spine range of motion: effect of age in healthy male subjects. Clin Biomech 17:611–614
Stellwagen L, Hubbard E (2008) Torticollis, facial asymmetry and plagiocephaly in normal new-borns. Arch Dis Child 93:827–831
Tatli B, Aydinli N, Çalıskan M, Ozmen M, Bılır F, Acar G (2006) Congenital muscular tortıcollis: evaluation and classification. Pediatr Neurol 34:41–44
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42
Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2012) Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 21:651–657
Tessner A, Mooney P, Pellard L (2010) A developmental perspective on congenital muscular torticollis: a critical appraisal of the evidence. Pediatr Phys Ther 22:378–383
Tyson S (2003) A systematic review of methods to measure posture. Phys Ther Rev 8:45–50
Viikari-Juntura E (1987) Inter-examiner reliability of observations in physical examinations of the neck. Phys Ther 67:1526–1532
van Vlimmeren LA, Helders PJ, van Adrichem LN, Engelbert RH (2004) Diagnostic strategies for the evaluation of asymmetry in infancy—a review. Eur J Pediatr 163:185–191
van Vlimmeren LA, Helders PJ, van Adrichem LN, Engelbert RH (2006) Torticollis and plagiocephaly in infancy: therapeutic strategies. Pediatr Rehabil 9:40–46
Whitcroft KL, Massouh L, Amirfeyz R, Bannister G (2010) Comparison of methods of measuring active cervical range of motion. Spine 35:E976–E980
Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR (1991) Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion—comparison of three methods. Phys Ther 71:98–104
Yu C, Wong F, Lo L, Chen Y (2004) Cranio-facial deformities in patients with uncorrected congenital muscular torticollis—an assessment from 3D imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:24–33
Zachman ZJ, Traina AD, Keating JJ, Bolles ST, Braun-Porter L (1989) Inter-examiner reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for the measurement of cervical ranges of motion. J Manip Physiol Ther 12:205–210
Funding
This study was funded by the Temple Street Foundation (grant number 13.032).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AS, HF and DM conceived the research idea and developed the protocol; AS did the database searches; AS and HF screened studies for eligibility; AS performed data extraction; AS and HF performed COSMIN assessment and DM arbitrated in the case of disagreement; AS drafted the manuscript; All authors contributed to the manuscript and approved the final version for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Communicated by Mario Bianchetti
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 266 kb)
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seager, A., French, H. & Meldrum, D. Measurement properties of instruments for assessment of cervical spine function in infants with torticollis: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr 178, 657–671 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03338-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03338-3