Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carcinosarcoma of the stomach: four cases that expand the morphologic spectrum of gastric cancer with a primitive phenotype

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carcinosarcoma of the stomach is a rare neoplasm characterized by the presence of both epithelial and mesenchymal malignant components. We describe four examples with a focus on the characterization of the epithelial components and the histogenetic implications for this unique tumor. All patients were men aged 40–79 years. All patients developed metastatic disease, and three of them died 4–19 months after the diagnosis. Sarcomatous elements included poorly differentiated spindle cell sarcoma without distinctive differentiation (n = 4), chondrosarcoma (n = 2), and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 1). In two cases, the sarcomatous component was recognized only in metastatic lesions. Notably, carcinomatous components were characterized by multilineage and primitive cellular differentiation, including carcinoma with enteroblastic (n = 4), hepatoid (n = 3), yolk sac tumor-like (n = 1), trophoblastic (n = 1), and neuroendocrine (n = 1) differentiation, as well as conventional tubular adenocarcinoma (n = 4). On immunohistochemistry, all four cases showed varying degrees of positive expression of primitive phenotypic markers, including alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), glypican-3, or SALL4. All tumors showed mutant patterns of p53 staining, exhibiting either diffusely positive or completely negative staining. On the basis of these findings, at least some gastric carcinosarcomas are likely to be derived from carcinoma with a primitive phenotype, including AFP-producing adenocarcinoma. Our observations suggest that sarcomatous differentiation, as well as multilineage differentiation of epithelial components, may represent increased cellular plasticity of gastric carcinoma with a primitive phenotype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Nie L, Zhou X, Peng L, Fu Y, Cheng Y, Huang Q (2018) Histological heterogeneity and distributional difference of gastric carcinosarcoma: report of 4 cases and literature review Pol. J Pathol 69:366–375. https://doi.org/10.5114/pjp.2018.81696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Palacios J AR, Carlson JW (2020) Carcinosarcoma of the uterine corpus. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (ed) WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs, 5th ed., International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, pp 266–267

  3. Cherniack AD, Shen H, Walter V, Stewart C, Murray BA, Bowlby R, Hu X, Ling S, Soslow RA, Broaddus RR, Zuna RE, Robertson G, Laird PW, Kucherlapati R, Mills GB, Weinstein JN, Zhang J, Akbani R, Levine DA (2017) Integrated molecular characterization of uterine carcinosarcoma. Cancer Cell 31:411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2017.02.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Carneiro F, Fukayama M, Grabsch H, Yasui W (2019) Gastric adenocarcinoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (ed) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system 5th ed., International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, pp 85–95

  5. Mahul BA et al (eds) (2017) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bartley AN, Washington MK, Colasacco C, Ventura CB, Ismaila N, Benson AB 3rd, Carrato A, Gulley ML, Jain D, Kakar S, Mackay HJ, Streutker C, Tang L, Troxell M, Ajani JA (2017) HER2 testing and clinical decision making in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 35:446–464. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.69.4836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuchs CS, Doi T, Jang RW, Muro K, Satoh T, Machado M, Sun W, Jalal SI, Shah MA, Metges J-P, Garrido M, Golan T, Mandala M, Wainberg ZA, Catenacci DV, Ohtsu A, Shitara K, Geva R, Bleeker J, Ko AH, Ku G, Philip P, Enzinger PC, Bang Y-J, Levitan D, Wang J, Rosales M, Dalal RP, Yoon HH (2018) Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: phase 2 clinical KEYNOTE-059 trial JAMA Oncol 4:e180013–e180013. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0013

  8. Yamazawa S, Ushiku T, Shinozaki-Ushiku A, Hayashi A, Iwasaki A, Abe H, Tagashira A, Yamashita H, Seto Y, Aburatani H, Fukayama M (2017) Gastric cancer with primitive enterocyte phenotype: an aggressive subgroup of intestinal-type adenocarcinoma Am. J Surg Pathol 41:989–997. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000000869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sato Y, Shimozono T, Kawano S, Toyoda K, Onoe K, Asada Y, Hayashi T (2001) Gastric carcinosarcoma, coexistence of adenosquamous carcinoma and rhabdomyosarcoma: a case report Histopathology 39:543–544. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2559.2001.1301e.x

  10. Gohongi T, Iida H, Gunji N, Orii K, Ogata T (2015) Postsurgical radiation therapy for gastric carcinosarcoma with c-kit expression: a case report World. J Gastroenterol 21:2830–2835. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i9.2830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsuneyama K, Sasaki M, Sabit A, Yokoi K, Arano Y, Imai T, Nakanuma Y (1999) A case report of gastric carcinosarcoma with rhabdomyosarcomatous and neuroendocrinal differentiation Pathol. Res Pract 195:93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0344-0338(99)80077-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shioya A, Kurose N, Mizutani K, Kumagai M, Kawaura K, Nakamura N, Kosaka T, Motono N, Uramoto H, Yamada S (2020) Early-stage multi-differentiated gastric carcinosarcoma and post-resection local recurrence: a case report Diagn. Pathol 15:118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-020-01037-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Z, Zhou Q, Lu J, Zhang H, Teng L (2021) Carcinosarcoma of the stomach with alpha-fetoprotein-producing hepatoid adenocarcinoma: an unexpected combination of two rare subtypes of gastric cancer in one tumor. J Int Med Res 49:3000605211037422. https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605211037422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Furukawa K, Niihara M, Kawata T, Mayanagi S, Tsubosa Y (2020) Adenocarcinosarcoma at the esophagogastric junction with long esophageal invasion: a case report. Surg Case Rep 6:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-0785-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshida H, Tanaka N, Tochigi N, Suzuki Y (2012) Rapidly deforming gastric carcinosarcoma with osteoblastic component: an autopsy case report World. J Gastroenterol 18:4064–4068. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i30.4064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R Cirocchi S Trastulli J Desiderio V Grassi I Barillaro A Santoro C Boselli N Avenia G Noya DE Sol A 2012 Gastric carcinosarcoma: a case report and review of the literature OncolLett 4 53 57 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.699

  17. Kawaguchi R, Furukawa N, Yamada Y, Ooi H, Kobayashi H (2011) Carcinosarcoma of the uterine corpus with alpha-fetoprotein-producing hepatoid adenocarcinoma: a report of two cases Case Rep. Oncol 4:358–362. https://doi.org/10.1159/000330239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen F, Yu C, You X, Mi B, Wan W (2014) Carcinosarcoma of the uterine corpus on 18F-FDG PET/CT in a postmenopausal woman with elevated AFP Clin. Nucl Med 39:803–805. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182a77b90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Takahashi Y, Inoue T (2003) Hepatoid carcinoma of the uterus that collided with carcinosarcoma Pathol. Int 53:323–326. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1827.2003.01467.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakatani Y, Miyagi Y, Takemura T, Oka T, Yokoi T, Takagi M, Yokoyama S, Kashima K, Hara K, Yamada T, Nozawa A, Inayama Y, Sakamoto K, Ogawa N, Kitamura H, Resl M, Cho SH, Koss MN, Mark EJ (2004) Aberrant nuclear/cytoplasmic localization and gene mutation of beta-catenin in classic pulmonary blastoma: beta-catenin immunostaining is useful for distinguishing between classic pulmonary blastoma and a blastomatoid variant of carcinosarcoma Am. J Surg Pathol 28:921–927. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200407000-00012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rebischung C, Pautier P, Morice P, Lhomme C, Duvillard P (2000) Alpha-fetoprotein production by a malignant mixed Müllerian tumor of the ovary Gynecol. Oncol 77:203–205. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1999.5653

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shimada K, Iwase K, Aono T, Nakai S, Takeda S, Fujii M, Koma M, Nishikawa K, Matsuda C, Hirota M, Fushimi H, Tanaka Y (2009) Carcinosarcoma of the gallbladder producing alpha-fetoprotein and manifesting as leukocytosis with elevated serum granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: report of a case Surg. Today 39:241–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-3833-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang Y, Gu X, Li Z, Xiang J, Chen Z (2013) Gallbladder carcinosarcoma accompanied with bile duct tumor thrombi: a case report Oncol. Lett 5:1809–1812. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Radi MF, Gray GF Jr, Scott HW Jr (1984) Carcinosarcoma of ileum in regional enteritis Hum. Pathol 15:385–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0046-8177(84)80038-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Howitt BE, Magers MJ, Rice KR, Cole CD, Ulbright TM (2015) Many postchemotherapy sarcomatous tumors in patients with testicular germ cell tumors are sarcomatoid yolk sac tumors: a study of 33 cases Am. J Surg Pathol 39:251–259. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000000322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Magers MJ, Kao CS, Cole CD, Rice KR, Foster RS, Einhorn LH, Ulbright TM (2014) “Somatic-type” malignancies arising from testicular germ cell tumors: a clinicopathologic study of 124 cases with emphasis on glandular tumors supporting frequent yolk sac tumor origin Am. J Surg Pathol 38:1396–1409. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000000262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kinjo T, Taniguchi H, Kushima R, Sekine S, Oda I, Saka M, Gotoda T, Kinjo F, Fujita J, Shimoda T (2012) Histologic and immunohistochemical analyses of α-fetoprotein–producing cancer of the stomach Am. J Surg Pathol 36:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e31823aafec

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. He F, Fu Y, Sun Q, Geng P, Zheng Z, Pu X, Shi J, Fan X (2021) Integrated clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of gastric adenocarcinoma with hepatoid differentiation: an exploration of histogenesis, molecular characteristics, and prognostic markers Human Pathol 115:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2021.02.003

  29. (2014) The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma Nature 513:202–209. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13480

  30. Malagon HD, Valdez AM, Moran CA, Suster S (2007) Germ cell tumors with sarcomatous components: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 46 cases Am. J Surg Pathol 31:1356–1362. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e318033c7c4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kawamura T, Suzuki J, Wang YV, Menendez S, Morera LB, Raya A, Wahl GM, Izpisua Belmonte JC (2009) Linking the p53 tumour suppressor pathway to somatic cell reprogramming Nature 460:1140–1144. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08311

  32. Yi L, Lu C, Hu W, Sun Y, Levine AJ (2012) Multiple roles of p53-related pathways in somatic cell reprogramming and stem cell differentiation Cancer Res. 72:5635–5645. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-1451

  33. Yamazaki K (2003) A gastric carcinosarcoma with neuroendocrine cell differentiation and undifferentiated spindle-shaped sarcoma component possibly progressing from the conventional tubular adenocarcinoma; an immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study Virchows Arch. 442:77–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-002-0725-7

  34. Teramachi K, Kanomata N, Hasebe T, Ishii G, Sugito M, Ochiai A (2003) Carcinosarcoma (pure endocrine cell carcinoma with sarcoma components) of the stomach Pathol. Int 53:552–556

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fujiie M, Yamamoto M, Taguchi K, Iwanaga A, Ohgaki K, Egashira A, Minami K, Toh Y, Oda Y, Okamura T (2016) Gastric carcinosarcoma with rhabdomyosarcomatous differentiation: a case report and review. Surg Case Rep 2:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-016-0176-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lauwers GY, Carneiro F, Graham DY, Curado MP, Fanceschi S, Montgomery E, Tatematsu M, Hattori T (2010) Gastric carcinoma. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro FC, Hruban RH, Theise ND (ed) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system 4th ed., Int Agency Res Cancer, Lyon, France, pp 48–58

  37. Agaimy A (2019) Gastric undifferentiated carcinoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (ed) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system 5th ed., Int Agency Res Cancer, Lyon, France, pp 100–101

  38. Hruban RH, Adsay NV, Esposito I, Fukushima N, Furukawa T, Klöppel G, Maitra A, Notohara K, Offerhaus GJA, Ohike N, Pitman MB, Zamboni G (2019) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (ed) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system 5th ed., Int Agency Res Cancer, Lyon, France, pp 322–332

  39. Nagtegaal ID, Arends MJ, Salto-Tellez M (2019) Colorectal adenocarcinoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (ed) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system 5th ed., Int Agency Res Cancer, Lyon, France, pp 177–187

  40. Fujimoto M, Matsuzaki I, Nishino M, Iwahashi Y, Warigaya K, Kojima F, Ono K, Murata SI (2018) HER2 is frequently overexpressed in hepatoid adenocarcinoma and gastric carcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation: a comparison of 35 cases to 334 gastric carcinomas of other histological types. J Clin Pathol 71:600–607. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Akazawa Y, Saito T, Hayashi T, Yanai Y, Tsuyama S, Akaike K, Suehara Y, Takahashi F, Takamochi K, Ueyama H, Murakami T, Watanabe S, Nagahara A, Yao T (2018) Next-generation sequencing analysis for gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation: emphasis on the relationship with hepatoid adenocarcinoma Hum. Pathol 78:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2018.04.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim ST, Cristescu R, Bass AJ, Kim KM, Odegaard JI, Kim K, Liu XQ, Sher X, Jung H, Lee M, Lee S, Park SH, Park JO, Park YS, Lim HY, Lee H, Choi M, Talasaz A, Kang PS, Cheng J, Loboda A, Lee J, Kang WK (2018) Comprehensive molecular characterization of clinical responses to PD-1 inhibition in metastatic gastric cancer Nat. Med 24:1449–1458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0101-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Shimizu Y, Suzuki T, Yoshikawa T, Endo I, Nakatsura T (2019) Next-generation cancer immunotherapy targeting glypican-3 Front. Oncol 9:248. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu BH, Jobichen C, Chia CSB, Chan THM, Tang JP, Chung TXY, Li J, Poulsen A, Hung AW, Koh-Stenta X, Tan YS, Verma CS, Tan HK, Wu CS, Li F, Hill J, Joy J, Yang H, Chai L, Sivaraman J, Tenen DG (2018) Targeting cancer addiction for SALL4 by shifting its transcriptome with a pharmacologic peptide Proc. Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:e7119–e7128. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801253115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (grant no. 19K16581 and 21K06882) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (to Sho Yamazawa and Tetsuo Ushiku).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sho Yamazawa: methodology, investigation, resources, writing-original draft, visualization, and funding acquisition. Tetsuo Ushiku: conceptualization, writing-reviewing and editing, visualization, supervision, and funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuo Ushiku.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Our study was approved by the institutional review board of Tokyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan (protocol no. 10461; 21 April 2014).

Consent to participate

The study plan is disclosed on our website with a notification to patients for the opportunity to opt out of the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 309 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamazawa, S., Ushiku, T. Carcinosarcoma of the stomach: four cases that expand the morphologic spectrum of gastric cancer with a primitive phenotype. Virchows Arch 480, 1051–1062 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03307-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03307-6

Keywords

Navigation