Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perceptual grouping in complex rhythmic patterns

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perception of simple temporal patterns has been shown to rely on accentuations in terms of intensity, pitch, or timbre, but also on grouping according to runs of the same events (intervals between successive sounds or light flashes) or significant gaps between them (Garner in The processing of information and structure. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1974; Preusser et al. in Am J Psychol 83(2):151–170 in 1970; Royer and Garner in Percept Psychophys 1(1):41–47, 1966; Royer and Garner in Percept Psychophys 7(2):115–120, 1970; Yu et al. in Atten Percept Psychophys 77(8):2728–2739, 2015). Here we investigate whether the run and gap principles can also account for participants' perceived start of complex rhythmic patterns. We also investigated the role of participants' musical training. Sixteen novices and 16 amateur musicians listened to rhythmic patterns and indicated perceived starting points by a single tap with a drumstick on electronic pads. Auditory patterns contained prominent gaps, runs, or a combination of the two for target intervals. We systematically varied task complexity in terms of the target durations of intervals constituting the patterns and overall tempos. Overall, run and gap principles proved to be useful grouping principles accounting for a large proportion (59.2%) of the selected starting positions underlining the universal relevance of these principles. Grouping principles were not as successful in predicting the perceived start of a rhythmic pattern compared to previous studies. Results indicate that additional grouping principles must be at play. Predictive power of the grouping principles varied depending on the structure of rhythmic patterns. For rhythmic patterns including longer intervals (i.e., longer gaps) the gap principle alone or in combination with the run principle showed the strongest predictive power. Novices and amateur musicians were similar in their usage of grouping principles suggesting that the underlying principles might be equally at the dispositions of performers and listeners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bouwer, F. L., Burgoyne, J. A., Odijk, D., Honing, H., & Grahn, J. A. (2018). What makes a rhythm complex? The influence of musical training and accent type on beat perception. PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0190322.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. W. (2006). Timing and executive function: Bidirectional interference between concurrent temporal production and randomization tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34(7), 1464–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collyer, C. E., Boatright-horowitz, S. S., & Hooper, S. (1997). A motor timing experiment implemented using a musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) approach. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29(3), 346–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collyer, C. E., Broadbent, H. A., & Church, R. M. (1992). Categorical time production: Evidence for discrete timing in motor control. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(2), 134–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collyer, C. E., Broadbent, H. A., & Church, R. M. (1994). Preferred rates of repetitive tapping and categorical time production. Perception & Psychophysics, 55(4), 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, C. (1998). Psychological processes involved in the temporal organization of complex auditory sequences: universal and acquired processes. Music Perception; Berkeley, California, 16(1), 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essens, P. J. (1986). Hierarchical organization of temporal patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(2), 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P. (1946). II.—Mouvements rythmiques et arythmiques. L’année Psychologique, 47(1), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P. (1974). Psychologie du rythme. PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P. (1982). 6—Rhythm and tempo. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), Psychology of music (pp. 149–180). Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P. (1984). Perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 1–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. R., & Clement, D. E. (1963). Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertainty. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2(5), 446–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. R., & Gottwald, R. L. (1967). Some perceptual factors in the learning of sequential patterns of binary events. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6(4), 582–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. R., & Gottwald, R. L. (1968). The perception and learning of temporal patterns. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(2), 97–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2019). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind (5th ed.). W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grondin, S. (2010). Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 561–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grondin, S., Meilleur-Wells, G., & Lachance, R. (1999). When to start explicit counting in a time-intervals discrimination task: A critical point in the timing process of humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 993–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, S. (1989). Listening: An introduction to the perception of auditory events. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, S. (1992). The differentiation of rhythmic structure. Perception & Psychophysics, 52(5), 497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handel, S. (1993). The effect of tempo and tone duration on rhythm discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 54(3), 370–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handel, S. (1998). The interplay between metric and figural rhythmic organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(5), 1546–1561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestermann, L. D., Wagemans, J., & Krampe, R. T. (2019). Task-set control, chunking, and hierarchical timing in rhythm production. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 83(8), 1685–1702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ivry, R. B., & Hazeltine, R. E. (1995). Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: Evidence for a common timing mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 3–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R., & Lerdahl, F. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S. W., & Hawkins, H. L. (1982). Explorations of individual differences relevant to high level skill. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14(1), 3–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, P. (1999). Attending in complex musical interactions: The adaptive dual role of meter. Australian Journal of Psychology, 51(3), 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krampe, R. T., Doumas, M., Lavrysen, A., & Rapp, M. (2010). The costs of taking it slowly: Fast and slow movement timing in older age. Psychology & Aging, 25(4), 980–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krampe, R. T., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2002). the effects of expertise and age on rhythm production: Adaptations to timing and sequencing constraints. Brain and Cognition, 48(1), 179–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krampe, R. T., & Ericsson, K. A. (1996). Maintaining excellence: Deliberate practice and elite performance in young and older pianists. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 125(4), 331–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krampe, R. T., Kliegl, R., Mayr, U., Engbert, R., & Vorberg, D. (2000). The fast and the slow of skilled bimanual rhythm production: Parallel versus integrated timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(1), 206–233.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krampe, R. T., Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Timing, sequencing, and executive control in repetitive movement production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 379–397.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010). Music training for the development of auditory skills. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(8), 599–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kubovy, M. (1988). Should we resist the seductiveness of the space:time: Vision:audition analogy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 318–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubovy, M., Holcombe, A. O., & Wagemans, J. (1998). On the lawfulness of grouping by proximity. Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 71–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kubovy, M., & van den Berg, M. (2008). The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: A probabilistic model of grouping by proximity and similarity in regular patterns. Psychological Review, 115(1), 131–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kubovy, M., & Wagemans, J. (1995). Grouping by proximity and multistability in dot lattices: A quantitative Gestalt theory. Psychological Science, 6(4), 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Large, E. W., & Palmer, C. (2002). Perceiving temporal regularity in music. Cognitive Science, 26(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1996). A generative theory of tonal music (repr). MIT.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C., & Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Mental representations for musical meter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(4), 728–741.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Povel, D.-J., & Essens, P. (1985). Perception of temporal patterns. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(4), 411–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preusser, D., Garner, W. R., & Gottwald, R. L. (1970). Perceptual organization of two-element temporal patterns as a function of their component one-element patterns. The American Journal of Psychology, 83(2), 151–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rammsayer, T., & Altenmüller, E. (2006). Temporal information processing in musicians and nonmusicians. Music Perception: an Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(1), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repp, B. H. (1999). Detecting deviations from metronomic timing in music: Effects of perceptual structure on the mental timekeeper. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(3), 529–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repp, B. H. (2001). Phase correction, phase resetting, and phase shifts after subliminal timing perturbations in sensorimotor synchronization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 600–621.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 969–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repp, B. H., & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royer, F. L., & Garner, W. R. (1966). Response uncertainty and perceptual difficulty of auditory temporal patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 1(1), 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royer, F. L., & Garner, W. R. (1970). Perceptual organization of nine-element auditory temporal patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 7(2), 115–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheurich, R., Zamm, A., & Palmer, C. (2018). Tapping into rate flexibility: Musical training facilitates synchronization around spontaneous production rates. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00458

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sloboda, J. A. (1986). The musical mind: The cognitive psychology of music (reprint edition). Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Hoopen, G. (1992). Temporal processing of fast auditory patterns. In: Paper presented at the 2nd international conference on music perception and cognition, Los Angeles.

  • Wagemans, J. (2018). Perceptual organization. In J. T. Wixted & J. Serences (Eds.), In: The Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Sensation, perception and attention (Vol. 2, pp. 803–872). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M., Getz, L., & Kubovy, M. (2015). Perceiving the initial note: Quantitative models of how listeners parse cyclical auditory patterns. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(8), 2728–2739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zatorre, R. J., Chen, J. L., & Penhune, V. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: Auditory–motor interactions in music perception and production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(7), 547–558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Discussions during study development and assistance during data collection by Benjamin Ganschow and Thomas Kramer are gratefully acknowledged.

Funding

L. Dietmar Hestermann, Johan Wagemans and Ralf T. Krampe, University of Leuven, Belgium. Completion of his work was possible through FWO grant (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Belgium) G.0379.06 to Ralf Krampe and by a long-term structural grant from the Flemish government to Johan Wagemans (METH/08/02 and METH/14/02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brain and Cognition, University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, PO box 3711, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Lars Dietmar Hestermann, Johan Wagemans & Ralf T. Krampe

Authors
  1. Lars Dietmar Hestermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Johan Wagemans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ralf T. Krampe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Dietmar Hestermann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hestermann, L.D., Wagemans, J. & Krampe, R.T. Perceptual grouping in complex rhythmic patterns. Psychological Research 87, 1293–1305 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01717-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01717-4

Search

Navigation