Abstract
The handle-to-hand correspondence effect refers to faster and more accurate responses when the responding hand is aligned with the graspable part of an object tool, compared to when they lay on opposite sides. We performed four behavioral experiments to investigate whether this effect depends on the activation of grasping affordances (affordance activation account) or is to be traced back to a Simon effect, resulting from the spatial coding of stimuli and responses and from their dimensional overlap (location coding account). We manipulated the availability of a response alternative by requiring participants to perform either a unimanual go/no-go task (absence of a response alternative) or a joint go/no-go task (available response alternative) and the type of response required (button-press or grasping response). We found no handle-to-hand correspondence effect in the individual go/no-go task either when a button-press (Experiment 1A) or a grasping (Experiment 2A) response was required, whereas a significant effect emerged in the joint go/no-go task, irrespective of response modality (Experiments1B and 2B). These results do not support the idea that complex motor affordances are activated for meaningful objects, but are rather consistent with the more parsimonious location coding account.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akçay, Ç, & Hazeltine, E. (2007). Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: Two sources of sequential modulations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 742–748.
Alluisi, E. A., & Warm, J. S. (1990). Things that go together: A review of stimulus-response compatibility and related effects. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 3–30). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.2.365.
Baroni, G., Pellicano, A., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., & Proctor, R. W. (2012). Influence of Temporal Overlap on Time Course of the Simon Effect. Experimental Psychology, 59, 88–98.
Berlucchi, G., Crea, F., Di Stefano, M., & Tassinari, G. (1977). Influence of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized light stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 505–517.
Borghi, A. M., & Riggio, L. (2015). Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00351.
Bub, D. B., & Masson, M. E. J. (2010). Grasping beer mugs: On the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017606.
Bub, D. B., Masson, M. E. J., & Kumar, R. (2018). Time Course of Motor Affordances Evoked by Pictured Objects and Words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000431.
Buccino, G., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Rodà, F., & Riggio, L. (2009). Broken affordances, broken objects: a TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 47, 3074–3078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.003.
Cho, D. T., & Proctor, R. W. (2013). Object-based correspondence effects for action-relevant and surface-property judgments with keypress responses: Evidence for a basis in spatial coding. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 77, 618–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0458-4.
Cho, D. T., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). The object-based Simon effect: Grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 853–861. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019328.
Cho, D. T., & Proctor, R. W. (2011). Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 737–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021934.
Ciardo, F., Lugli, L., Nicoletti, R., Rubichi, S., & Iani, C. (2016). Action-space coding in social contexts. Scientific Reports, 6, 22673. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22673.
Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Tieri, G., Sinigaglia, C., & Committeri, G. (2010). Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Experimental Brain Research, 207, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2435-8.
Couth, S., Gowen, E., & Poliakoff, E. (2014). Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3798-4.
De Stefani, E., Innocenti, A., De Marco, D., Busiello, M., Ferri, F., Costantini, M., & Gentilucci, M. (2014). The spatial alignment effect in near and far space: a kinematic study. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 2431–2438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-3943-8.
Dittrich, K., Dolk, T., Rothe-Wulf, A., Klauer, K. C., & Prinz, W. (2013). Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint Simon effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 1725–1736. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0524-z.
Dittrich, K., Rothe, A., & Klauer, K. C. (2012). Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: A response coding account of spatial compatibility effects. Attention Perception and Psychophysics, 74, 911–929. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0304-1.
Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2014). The Joint Simon Effect: A review and theoretical integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 974.
Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2013). The (not so) Social Simon effect: a referential coding account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1248–1260. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031031.
Dolk, T., & Prinz, W. (2016). What it takes to share a task: Sharing versus shaping task representations. In S. S. Obhi & E. S. Cross (Eds.), Shared representations: Sensorimotor foundations of social life (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Intentional control of attention: Action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 71, 22–29.
Ferraro, L., Iani, C., Mariani, M., Milanese, N., & Rubichi, S. (2011). Facilitation and interference components in the joint Simon effect. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 337–343.
Ferraro, L., Iani, C., Mariani, M., Nicoletti, R., Gallese, V., & Rubichi, S. (2012). Look what I am doing: Does observational learning take place in evocative task-sharing situations? PLoS One, 7(8), e43311. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043311.
Goslin, J., Dixon, T., Fischer, M. H., Cangelosi, A., & Ellis, R. (2012). Electrophysiological examination of embodiment in vision and action. Psychological Science, 23, 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429578.
Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755643.
Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.
Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 68, 1–17.
Iani, C., Baroni, G., Pellicano, A., & Nicoletti, R. (2011). On the relationship between Affordance and Simon effects: Are the effects really independent? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.467251.
Iani, C., Ricci, F., Baroni, G., & Rubichi, S. (2009). Attention control and susceptibility to hypnosis. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 856–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.07.002.
Iani, C., Rubichi, S., Gherri, E., & Nicoletti, R. (2009). Co-occurrence of sequential and practice effects in the Simon task: Evidence for two independent mechanisms affecting response selection. Memory & Cognition, 37, 358–367. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.3.358.
Iani, C., Stella, G., & Rubichi, S. (2014). Response inhibition and adaptations to response conflict in 6- to 8-year-old children: Evidence from the Simon effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1234–1241. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0656-9.
Iani, C., Ferraro, L., Maiorana, N.V., Gallese, V., & Rubichi, S. (2018). Do already grasped objects activate motor affordances? Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1004-9
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253.
Lien, M.-C., Gray, D., Jardin, E., & Proctor, R. W. (2014). Correspondence effects are primarily modulated by object location not grasping affordance: An event-related potentials study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26,, 679–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.940959.
Lien, M.-C., Jardin, E., & Proctor, R. (2013). An electrophysiological study of the object-based correspondence effect: Is the effect triggered by the intended grasping action? Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 75, 1862–1882. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0523-0.
Liepelt, R., Wenke, D., & Fischer, R. (2013). Effects of feature integration in a hands-crossed version of the Social Simon paradigm. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 77, 240–248.
Liepelt, R., Wenke, D., Fischer, R., & Prinz, W. (2011). Trial-to-trial sequential dependencies in a social and non-social Simon task. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 75, 366–375.
Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 174–207. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210959.
Lugli, L., Iani, C., Milanese, N., Sebanz, N., & Rubichi, S. (2015). Spatial parameters at the basis of social transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(3), 840–849. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000047.
Lugli, L., Iani, C., Nicoletti, R., & Rubichi, S. (2013). Emergence of the go/no-go Simon effect by means of practice and mixing paradigms. Acta Psychologica, 144, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.04.021.
Masaki, H., Takasawa, N., & Yamazaki, K. (2000). An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. Psychophysiology, 37, 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3740464.
Masson, M. E., Bub, D. N., & Breuer, A. T. (2011). Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception and Performance, 37, 1470–1484. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023509.
Milanese, N., Iani, C., & Rubichi, S. (2010). Shared learning shapes human performance: Transfer effects in task sharing. Cognition, 116, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.010.
Ottoboni, G., Iani, C., Tessari, A., & Rubichi, S. (2013). Modulation of the affordance effect through transfer of learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2295–2302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.863370.
Pappas, Z. (2014). Dissociating Simon and affordance compatibility effects: silhouettes and photographs. Cognition, 133, 716–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.018.
Pavese, A., & Buxbaum, L. (2002). Action matters: The role of action plans and object affordances in selection for action. Visual Cognition, 9, 559–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280143000584.
Pellicano, A., Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2017a). Editorial: Bridging the theories of affordances and limb apraxia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00148.
Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Borghi, A. M., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2010b). Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: the effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2190–2201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.486903.
Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Rubichi, S., Ricciardelli, P., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2010a). Real life motor training modifies spatial performance: The advantage of being drummers. American Journal of Psychology, 123, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.2.0169.
Pellicano, A., Koch, I., & Binkofski, F. (2017b). Location-Coding Account Versus Affordance-Activation Account in Handle-to-Hand Correspondence Effects: Evidence of Simon-Like Effects Based on the Coding of Action Direction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1647–1666. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000414.
Pellicano, A., Lugli, L., Baroni, G., & Nicoletti, R. (2009). The Simon effect with conventional signals. A time-course analysis. Experimental Psychology, 56, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.219.
Pellicano, A., Thill, S., Ziemke, T., & Binkofski, F. (2011). Affordances, adaptive tool use and grounded cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00053.
Prinz, W. (2015). Task representation in individual and joint settings. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 268. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00268.
Proctor, R. W., & Miles, J. D. (2014). Does the concept of affordance add anything to explanations of stimulus-response compatibility effects? In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 60, pp. 227–266). San Diego: Academic Press.
Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory and application. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Ricciardelli, P., Bonfiglioli, C., Iani, C., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2007). Spatial coding and central patterns: Is there something special about the eyes? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep2007_2_79.
Riddoch, J. M., Edwards, M. G., Humphreys, G. W., West, R., & Heafield, T. (1998). Visual affordances direct action: neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 645–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432998381041.
Riggio, L., Iani, C., Gherri, E., Benatti, F., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2008). The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect. Acta Psychologica, 127, 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.008.
Ristic, J., & Kingstone, A. (2006). Attention to arrows: Pointing to a new direction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1921–1930. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210500416367.
Roest, S. A., Pecher, D., Naeije, L., & Zeelenberg, R. (2016). Alignment effects in beer mugs: Automatic action activation or response competition? Attention Perception and Psychophysics, 78(6), 1665–1680.
Rounis, E., & Humphreys, G. (2015). Limb apraxia and the “affordance competition hypothesis”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00429
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint actions: bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005. 12.009.
Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x.
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own? Cognition, 88, B11–B21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00043-X.
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How to share a task: Co-representing stimulus-response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1234.
Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus–response compatibility. An integrated perspective (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Song, X., Chen, J., & Proctor, R. W. (2014). Correspondence effects with torches: Grasping affordance or visual feature asymmetry? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.824996.
Tipper, S. P., Paul, M. A., & Hayes, A. E. (2006). Vision for action: the effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 493–498. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193875.
Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830.
Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8, 769–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280042000144.
Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2007). A Simon effect in memory retrieval: Evidence for the response discrimination account. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 984–988.
Wühr, P., Biebl, R., & Ansorge, U. (2008). The impact of stimulus and response variability on S-R correspondence effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34, 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.533.
Funding
A.P. was supported by the START Programme der Medizinischen Fakultät der RWTH-Aachen (START Projekt 691240, 144/12). C.I. was supported by a grant from the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Fondo di Ateneo per la Ricerca (FAR2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
A. P. declares that he has no conflict of interest. L. L. declares that she has no conflict of interest. F. B. declares that he has no conflict of interest. S. R. declares that he has no conflict of interest. C. I. declares that she has no conflict of interest. R. N. declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pellicano, A., Lugli, L., Binkofski, F. et al. The unimanual handle-to-hand correspondence effect: evidence for a location coding account. Psychological Research 83, 1383–1399 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1009-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1009-4