Abstract
The temporary storage of serial order information in working memory (WM) has been demonstrated to be crucial to higher order cognition. The previous studies have shown that the maintenance of serial order can be a consequence of the construction of position markers to which to-be-remembered information will be bound. However, the nature of these position markers remains unclear. In this study, we demonstrate the crucial involvement of time in the construction of these markers by establishing a bidirectional relationship. First, results of the first experiment show that the initial items in WM result in faster responding after shorter time presentations, while we observe the opposite for items stored further in WM. Second, in the next experiment, we observe an effect of temporal cueing on WM retrieval; longer time cues facilitate responding to later WM items compared with items stored at the beginning of WM. These findings are discussed in the context of position marker theories, reviewing the functional involvement of time in the construction of these markers and its association with space.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamse, E., van Dijck, J. P., Majerus, S., & Fias, W. (2014). Finding the answer in space: The mental whiteboard hypothesis on serial order in working memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 932.
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.
Baddeley, A. D., & Lewis, V. (1984). When does rapid presentation enhance digit span? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 5.
Brown, G. D., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107(1), 127.
Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (1996). A connectionist model of STM for serial order. In S. Gathercol (Ed.) Models of short-term memory (p. 51–72). UK: Psychology Press.
Cui, X., Stetson, C., Montague, P. R., & Eagleman, D. M. (2009). Ready… go: amplitude of the fMRI signal encodes expectation of cue arrival time. PLOS Biology, 7, e1000167.
De Belder, M., Abrahamse, E., Kerckhof, E., Fias, W., & van Dijck, J. P. (2015). Serial position markers in space: Visuospatial priming of serial order working memory retrieval. PLoS One, 10(1), e0116469.
Eagleman, D. M. (2009). The objectification of overlearned sequences: A new view of spatial sequence synesthesia. Cortex, 45(10), 1266–1277.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Dover. (original work published 1885).
Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F. & d’Ydewalle, G. (1996) The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2(1), 95–110.
Farrell, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2007). Short-term recognition memory for serial order and timing. Memory and Cognition, 35(7), 1724–1734.
Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2005). Individual differences in time estimation related to cognitive ability, speed of information processing and working memory. Intelligence, 33(1), 5–26.
Hale, J., Thompson, J. M., Morgan, H. M., Cappelletti, M., & Cohen Kadosh, R. (2014). Better together? The cognitive advantages of synaesthesia for time, numbers, and space. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(7–8), 545–564.
Henson, R. N. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The start-end model. Cognitive Psychology, 36(2), 73–137.
Henson, R. N. A., & Burgess, N. (1998). Representations of serial order. In 4th neural computation and psychology workshop, London, 9–11 April 1997 (pp. 283–300). London: Springer.
Hurlstone, M. J., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2014). Memory for serial order across domains: An overview of the literature and directions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 339.
Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(1), 149.
Neath, I., & Crowder, R. G. (1990). Schedules of presentation and temporal distinctiveness in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 316.
Nelson, T. O., & Chaiklin, S. (1980). Immediate memory for spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(5), 529.
Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 133.
Page, M., & Norris, D. (1998). The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall. Psychological Review, 105(4), 761.
Pan, Y., & Luo, Q. Y. (2012). Working memory modulates the perception of time. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(1), 46–51.
Slamecka, N. (1985). Ebbinghaus: some associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 414–435.
Tang, J., Ward, J., & Butterworth, B. (2008). Number forms in the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(9), 1547–1556.
Vallesi, A. (2010). Neuroanatomical substrates of foreperiod effects. In: A. C. Nobre, & J. T. Coull (Eds.) Attention and time (p. 303–316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vallesi, A., Shallice, T., & Walsh, V. (2007). Role of the prefrontal cortex in the foreperiod effect: TMS evidence for dual mechanisms in temporal preparation. Cerebral Cortex, 17(2), 466–474.
van Dijck, J. P., Abrahamse, E. L., Acar, F., Ketels, B., & Fias, W. (2014). A working memory account of the interaction between numbers and spatial attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1500–1513.
van Dijck, J. P., Abrahamse, E. L., Majerus, S., & Fias, W. (2013). Spatial attention interacts with serial-order retrieval from verbal working memory. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1854–1859.
van Dijck, J. P., & Fias, W. (2011). A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations. Cognition, 119(1), 114–119.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by Grant G.O226.13N by FWO (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics
The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of Ghent University and in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written consent prior to participation to any of the experiments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Belder, M., van Dijck, JP., Cappelletti, M. et al. How serially organized working memory information interacts with timing. Psychological Research 81, 1255–1263 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0816-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0816-8