Skip to main content
Log in

Crossmodal spatial congruence effects: visual dominance in conditions of increased and reduced selection difficulty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated crossmodal spatial congruence effects in the cued modality-switching paradigm of Lukas, Philipp, and Koch (Psychol Res 74:255–267, 2010). Bimodal auditory and visual spatial-location stimuli were presented simultaneously, and participants responded with a left or right key press to the left or right location of the stimulus in the cued modality. Results replicated the asymmetric spatial congruence effects reported by Lukas et al. for a compatible mapping of stimulus locations to responses, with higher performance cost for spatially incongruent stimuli when the relevant modality was auditory and the irrelevant modality visual than when the relation was opposite. A similar result pattern was found when the stimulus–response mapping was incompatible and when the responses differed along an orthogonal vertical axis, consistent with the view that the visual dominance effect depends on correspondence between the auditory and visual stimulus locations. Blocking the relevant modality to remove uncertainty reduced but did not eliminate the visual dominance effect, even with brief stimulus durations. The findings provide broad support for crossmodal visual dominance, even when participants know to direct attention to the auditory modality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Adapted from Lukas et al. (2010)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Colavita, F. B. (1974). Human sensory dominance. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 409–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colavita, F. B. (1982). Visual dominance and attention in space. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 261-262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeth, H. E., & Sager, L. C. (1977). On the locus of visual dominance. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khine, S. Z. K., New, T. L., & Li, H. (2007). On timbre based perceptual feature for singer identification. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Association, 484–487.

  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus–response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liefooghe, B., Wenke, D., & Houwer, J. D. (2012). Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1325–1335.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loy, D. G. (2006). Musimathics, volume 1: A guided tour of the mathematics of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukas, S., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Switching attention between modalities: Further evidence for visual dominance. Psychological Research, 74, 255–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lukas, S., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2014). Crossmodal attention switching: Auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks. Acta Psychologica, 153, 139–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746–748.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, N., & Hermelin, B. (1972). Seeing and hearing and space and time. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 46–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (1998). Lateralized warning tones produce typical irrelevant-location effects on choice reactions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (2003). Display-control arrangement correspondence and logical recoding in the Hedge and Marsh reversal of the Simon effect. Acta Psychologica, 112, 259–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ragot, R., Cave, C., & Fano, M. (1988). Reciprocal effects of visual and auditory stimuli in a spatial compatibility situation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 350–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. R., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Effects of an irrelevant auditory stimulus on visual choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 272–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnett, S., Spence, C., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2007). Visual dominance and attention: The Colavita effect revisited. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 673–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurlow, W. R., & Jack, C. E. (1973). Certain determinants of the “ventriloquism effect”. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36, 1171–1184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638–667.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wenke, D., Gaschler, R., & Nattkemper, D. (2007). Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychological Research, 71, 92–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winckell, F. (1967). Music, sound and sensation: A modern exposition (T. Binkley, Trans.). New York: Dover.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Tomko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomko, L., Proctor, R.W. Crossmodal spatial congruence effects: visual dominance in conditions of increased and reduced selection difficulty. Psychological Research 81, 1035–1050 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0801-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0801-2

Keywords

Navigation