Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring the emotion-specificity of rapid stimulus-driven attraction of attention to fearful faces: evidence from emotion categorization and a comparison with disgusted faces

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the current study, we tested whether a fear advantage—rapid attraction of attention to fearful faces that is more stimulus-driven than to neutral faces—is emotion specific. We used a cueing task with face cues preceding targets. Cues were non-predictive of the target locations. In two experiments, we found enhanced cueing of saccades towards the targets with fearful face cues than with neutral face cues: Saccades towards targets were more efficient with cues and targets at the same position (under valid conditions) than at opposite positions (under invalid conditions), and this cueing effect was stronger with fearful than with neutral face cues. In addition, this cueing effect difference between fearful and neutral faces was absent with inverted faces as cues, indicating that the fear advantage is face-specific. We also show that emotion categorization of the face cues mirrored these effects: Participants were better at categorizing face cues as fearful or neutral with upright than with inverted faces (Experiment 1). Finally, in alternative blocks including disgusted faces instead of fearful faces, we found more similar cueing effects with disgusted faces and neutral faces, and with upright and inverted faces (Experiment 2). Jointly, these results demonstrate that the fear advantage is emotion-specific. Results are discussed in light of evolutionary explanations of the fear advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 485–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bannerman, R. L., Milders, M., & Sahraie, A. (2010). Attentional bias to brief threat-related faces revealed by saccadic eye movements. Emotion, 10, 733–738.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, D. V., Anderson, U. S., Mortensen, C. R., Neufeld, S. L., & Neel, R. (2011). The face in the crowd effect unconfounded: happy faces, not angry faces, are more efficiently detected in single-and multiple-target visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 637–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boll, S., Gamer, M., Kalisch, R., & Büchel, C. (2011). Processing of facial expressions and their significance for the observer in subregions of the human amygdala. Neuroimage, 56(1), 299–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carretié, L., Ruiz-Padial, E., López-Martín, S., & Albert, J. (2011). Decomposing unpleasantness: differential exogenous attention to disgusting and fearful stimuli. Biological Psychology, 86, 247–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, H. A., & Anderson, A. K. (2012). Understanding disgust. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1251, 62–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, H. A., Johannes, K., Poppenk, J. L., Moscovitch, M., & Anderson, A. K. (2013). Evidence for the differential salience of disgust and fear in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1100–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cisler, J. M., & Olatunji, B. O. (2010). Components of attentional biases in contamination fear: evidence for difficulty in disengagement. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 74–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cisler, J. M., Olatunji, B. O., Lohr, J. M., & Williams, N. L. (2009). Attentional bias differences between fear and disgust: implications for the role of disgust in disgust-related anxiety disorders. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 675–687.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. C., Somerville, L. H., Ruberry, E. J., Berry, A. B., Shin, L. M., & Whalen, P. J. (2011). A tale of two negatives: differential memory modulation by threat-related facial expressions. Emotion, 11, 647–655.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827–1837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood, J. D., Smilek, D., & Merikle, P. M. (2001). Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 1004–1013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, B., & Weber, H. (1993). Express saccades and visual attention. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 533–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., Russo, R., & Dutton, K. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 355–379.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fridlund, A. (1994). Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischen, A., Eastwood, J. D., & Smilek, D. (2008). Visual search for faces with emotional expressions. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 662–676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 787–795.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horstmann, G. (2003). What do facial expressions convey: feeling states, behavioral intentions, or action requests? Emotion, 3, 150–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horstmann, G. (2009). Visual search for schematic affective faces: stability and variability of search slopes with different instances. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 355–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horstmann, G., & Ansorge, U. (2009). Visual search for facial expressions of emotion: a comparison of dynamic and static faces. Emotion, 9, 29–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horstmann, G., & Bauland, A. (2006). Search asymmetries with real faces: testing the anger-superiority effect. Emotion, 6, 193–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horstmann, G., Scharlau, I., & Ansorge, U. (2006). More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1067–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Z., & Reeves, A. (2009). Attentional release in the saccadic gap effect. Vision Research, 49, 2045–2055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koster, E. H., Crombez, G., Van Damme, S., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2004). Does imminent threat capture and hold attention? Emotion, 4, 312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., & Blaser, E. (1995). The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research, 35, 1897–1916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krusemark, E. A., & Li, W. (2011). Do all threats work the same way? Divergent effects of fear and disgust on sensory perception and attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 3429–3434.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, pp 39–58.

  • Laux, L., Glanzmann, P., Schaffner, P., & Spielberger, C. D. (1981). Das State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory (STAI) [The state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI)]. German version. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces—KDEF [CD ROM]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology Section.

    Google Scholar 

  • N’Diaye, K., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2009). Self-relevance processing in the human amygdala: gaze direction, facial expression, and emotion intensity. Emotion, 9, 798–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A. (1993). Fear and anxiety as emotional phenomenon: Clinical phenomenology, evolutionary perspectives, and information-processing mechanisms. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 511–536). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 466–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32A, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (1993). Disgust. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 575–594). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saslow, M. G. (1967). Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57, 1024–1029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, R. A., Lipp, O. V., Craig, B. M., Becker, S. I., & Horstmann, G. (2013). In search of the emotional face: anger versus happiness superiority in visual search. Emotion, 13, 758–768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, J. M., Lee, D. H., Cusi, A., Feiman, R., Grabski, W., & Anderson, A. K. (2008). Expressing fear enhances sensory acquisition. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 843–850.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Hooff, J. C., Devue, C., Vieweg, P. E., & Theeuwes, J. (2013). Disgust-and not fear-evoking images hold our attention. Acta Psychologica, 143, 1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, N., Godefroid, J., & Mermillod, M. (2009). Emotional modulation of attention: fear increases but disgust reduces the attentional blink. PLoS ONE, 4(11), e7924.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, J., Lozo, L., Koster, E. H., & De Houwer, J. (2011). On the role of goal relevance in emotional attention: disgust evokes early attention to cleanliness. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 466–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, P. J. (1998). Fear, vigilance, and ambiguity: initial neuroimaging studies of the human amygdala. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, E., Zald, D. H., & Blake, R. (2007). Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression. Emotion, 7, 882–886.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant KH 341/1-1 to Shah Khalid. We thank Erica Krcal and Julia Riedl for help with the data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shah Khalid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khalid, S., Horstmann, G., Ditye, T. et al. Measuring the emotion-specificity of rapid stimulus-driven attraction of attention to fearful faces: evidence from emotion categorization and a comparison with disgusted faces. Psychological Research 81, 508–523 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0743-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0743-8

Keywords

Navigation