Abstract
The renal renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in the development of chronic kidney disease. Here, we investigated whether mice with reduced renal angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE−/−) are protected against aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN). To further elucidate potential molecular mechanisms, we assessed the renal abundances of several major RAS components. AAN was induced using aristolochic acid I (AAI). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined using inulin clearance and renal protein abundances of renin, angiotensinogen, angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) 2, and Mas receptor (Mas) were determined in ACE−/− and C57BL/6J control mice by Western blot analyses. Renal ACE activity was determined using a colorimetric assay and renal angiotensin (Ang) (1–7) concentration was determined by ELISA. GFR was similar in vehicle-treated mice of both strains. AAI decreased GFR in controls but not in ACE−/− mice. Furthermore, AAI decreased renal ACE activity in controls but not in ACE−/− mice. Vehicle-treated ACE−/− mice had significantly higher renal ACE2 and Mas protein abundances than controls. AAI decreased renal ACE2 protein abundance in both strains. Furthermore, AAI increased renal Mas protein abundance, although the latter effect did not reach statistical significance in the ACE−/− mice. Renal Ang(1–7) concentration was similar in vehicle-treated mice of both strains. AAI increased renal Ang(1–7) concentration in the ACE−/− mice but not in the controls. Mice with reduced renal ACE are protected against AAN. Our data suggest that in the face of renal ACE deficiency, AAI may activate the ACE2/Ang(1–7)/Mas axis, which in turn may deploy its reno-protective effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In the second half of the twentieth century, regional outbreaks of progressive interstitial nephritis were reported in several countries worldwide including China, the Balkan states, and Belgium; the etiology of which could later be identified as being associated with the ingestion of aristolochic acid (AA) [17, 34]. The compound is contained in several plants or plant products. The AA-induced renal disease was initially named according to the source of the compound as Chinese herb nephropathy (CHN) or to the region of disease outbreak as Balkan-endemic nephropathy (BEN) and is now generally referred to as aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN). Although AAN can be prevented by avoiding products containing AA, intoxications with this compound are still frequently reported worldwide [17, 34, 70, 74].
Plant-derived AA is a mixture of two similar components, AAI and AAII. Chemically, AAI differs from AAII by the presence of an O-methyl group in position 8 of the molecular tetracyclic structure. In an experimental study on mice [60], only AAI, but not AAII, was capable of inducing nephrotoxicity. Upon oral ingestion, AAI is readily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. In blood plasma, albumin-bound AAI escapes glomerular filtration [21, 60] and reaches proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTEC) on their abluminal side. The compound is then taken up into the cytoplasm via organic anion transporters (OATs), where it may accumulate. Intracellular AAI has been shown to form DNA adducts and to activate various signal transduction pathways [8, 28, 37,38,39] that may ultimately lead to cellular damage and cell death. Although there has been considerable progress in recent years toward a better understanding of these pathways [2, 46, 53, 59, 69], the molecular mechanisms mediating the cytotoxic effects of AAI are currently not well understood.
There is ample clinical [19, 30, 40, 43, 50, 54] and experimental [41, 45, 55] evidence that the renal renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a major role in several forms of renal insufficiency. Thus, the renal RAS mediates pro-inflammatory, pro-fibrotic, and pro-atherosclerotic effects that may not only promote renal disease but may have pathophysiological consequences beyond the kidney to affect systemic conditions such as arterial hypertension. In this regard, it has recently been shown that mice with renal angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) deficiency but normal plasma ACE activity were protected against angiotensin II-induced [26] as well as N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)-induced hypertension [25].
According to the classical paradigm, angiotensin (Ang) II, acting mostly via the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), is the only effector peptide of the RAS. More recently, a second effector peptide, Ang(1–7), acting via the Mas receptor (Mas), has been described that appears to counteract many of the classical AngII effects, including those mentioned above, thus conferring essentially beneficial effects on the kidney and other organs [57]. The heptapeptide Ang(1–7) is derived from the octapeptide AngII by the action of a monocarboxypeptidase named ACE2. Alternatively, ACE2 may convert the decapeptide AngI [Ang(1–10)] to the nonapeptide Ang(1–9), which in turn is converted to Ang(1–7) by classical ACE.
Given the well-known detrimental effects of the classical ACE/Ang II/AT1R axis on the kidney and the emerging reno-protective effects of the alternative ACE2/Ang(1–7)/Mas axis, the present study was designed to investigate whether renal ACE deficiency may convey a protective effect against experimentally induced renal insufficiency. To address this question, we used the C57BL/6 J-tm(ACE3/3) mouse strain (ACE−/− mice), which is a genetically engineered strain with severe ACE deficiency in the kidney and most other organs. As ACE gene transcription was set under the control of the albumin promoter, these mice show high ACE expression in hepatic tissue and virtually normal serum ACE activity [9, 26]. Of note, ACE−/− mice have been reported to have normal blood pressure and normal urinary concentrating ability [9].
As an experimental paradigm, we opted for AAN, since this form of renal insufficiency has only emerged quite recently and its pathophysiological mechanisms are not yet sufficiently understood. Furthermore, to elucidate potential molecular mechanisms, we assessed the renal abundances of major components of the two alternative RAS axes.
Materials and methods
Experimental animals
The renal ACE-deficient C57BL/6J-tm(ACE3/3) mouse strain (ACE−/− mice) was kindly provided by Dr. R. A. Gonzalez-Villalobos (Los Angeles, CA, USA). The generation of ACE−/− mice has been described elsewhere [9]. Briefly, ACE gene expression was set under the control of the albumin promoter, resulting in ACE gene expression being restricted mainly to the liver. Nevertheless, there was some minor renal ACE expression in the ACE−/− mice (about 14% of that in wildtype controls) [47], which may be due to some residual activity of the albumin promoter cassette in the kidney. The ACE−/− mice had been backcrossed to C57BL/6J (wildtype) mice that were used as controls. Experiments were conducted on 10- to 12-week-old wildtype and ACE−/− mice.
Induction of chronic kidney damage with AAI
Chronic kidney damage was induced using 3 mg AAI (Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany) per kg body weight (i.p.) every 3 days for 6 weeks followed by 6 weeks without treatment [29] (Fig. 1). The mice were randomized to four groups. Groups 1 (wildtype mice) and 3 (ACE−/− mice) received vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide) only, whereas groups 2 (wildtype mice) and 4 (ACE−/− mice) received AAI as described above. At the end of the protocol, GFR was determined and kidneys were harvested for further analyses.
Glomerular filtration rate
For measurements of GFR using inulin clearance, the mice were anesthetized with a combination of ketamine and xylazine (12.5 mg mL−1 and 2.5 mg mL−1, respectively, i.p.). During the protocol for GFR measurements, ketamine was supplemented as needed. After a median skin incision and separation of the subcutaneous fatty tissue of the ventral neck region, polyethylene catheters were implanted into the trachea, carotid artery, and jugular vein. After a second small skin incision in the abdominal region, a catheter was implanted into the urinary bladder. The mice were mechanically ventilated (tidal volume: 160 μL, breathing frequency: 160 min−1) and continuously infused via the jugular vein catheter (infusion rate: 2.5 µL min−1) [5] with an isotonic sodium chloride solution containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.5% inulin. Blood pressure and heart rate were monitored via the carotid artery catheter with a PowerLab™ data acquisition system (ADInstruments, Oxford, UK), and urine was collected via the bladder catheter. After a stabilization period of at least 30 min, a 30-min urine collection was performed. At the end of the protocol, 500 µL of blood was collected from the carotid artery catheter for measuring serum inulin concentration. Inulin clearance (Cinulin) was calculated according to the following formula:
where \(\dot{\text{V}}\) = urine flow given in µL min−1, \({\text{[inulin]}}_{\text{urine}}\) = urinary inulin concentration given in mmol L urinary inulin−1, \({\text{[inulin]}}_{\text{serum}}\) = serum inulin concentration given in mmol L−1 and kidney weight was given in g.
Serum and urinary inulin concentrations
Serum and urinary inulin concentrations were measured photometrically. Samples of 150 µL of undiluted serum were mixed with the same amount of trichloroacetic acid for protein precipitation and centrifuged (8 min, 14,000 g, room temperature); 200 µL of the supernatant was mixed with the same amount of resorcinol, and 300 µL hydrochloric acid was added. After 25 min at 80 °C, the reaction was stopped by cooling the samples on ice. The samples were analyzed in triplicate. Optical density was detected at 492 nm using a microplate reader (FLUOstar OPTIMA; BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany). Serum inulin concentration was determined by linear regression based on a standard curve. To determine urinary inulin concentration, the samples were heated (4 min, 60 °C) and diluted (1:10, 1:20, 1:40, or 1:50). Otherwise, the assay procedure was the same as described above for serum inulin concentration.
Histology, immunohistochemistry, and quantitative image analysis
After completion of the GFR protocol, kidneys were perfused with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and removed for further investigation. One half from each horizontally sectioned kidney was fixed at room temperature in a Bouin solution for 24 h. The other half remained unfixed and was used for determination of specific protein species (see below). After fixation, the kidneys were washed three times for 1 h in 70% ethanol. The kidneys were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin according to standard protocols, and 4-µm sections were cut on a microtome (SM 2000 R; Leica Microsystems, Nussloch, Germany), mounted on glass slides (SuperFrost; Menzel, Braunschweig, Germany), and deparaffinized in xylene and descending ethanol series. The sections were stained either with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) or Masson’s trichrome. Light microscopy was performed using an Olympus BX 50 microscope equipped with a digital camera, UC 30 (Olympus Europe GmbH, Hamburg, Germany).
For immunohistochemistry, the sections were subjected to heat-induced epitope retrieval by boiling sections for 5 min in a 10-mM citric acid buffer (pH 6). Endogenous peroxidase was blocked using the BLOXALL blocking solution (Vector Laboratories). The sections were blocked in 2.5% normal horse serum. Primary polyclonal rabbit anti KIM-1 [LSBio (LifeSpan) Cat# LS-B2103-50, RRID:AB_1508933] antibody diluted to 5 µg mL−1 was incubated at 4 °C overnight. The sections were extensively washed in 1 × PBS. Bound primary antibodies were visualized using Vectastain Elite ABC-HRP Kit, peroxidase (Vector Laboratories) with Vectastain DAB Substrate Kit, peroxidase (Vector Laboratories). The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, cleared in xylene, and mounted in Eukitt (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany).
Sirius red staining was performed according to Puchtler: 5-µm sections were dehydrated as described above. The sections were incubated for 1 h in 0.1% Sirius red dissolved in a saturated picric acid solution. After two washes in 50% acetic acid, an ascending ethanol series, and clearing in xylene, the sections were mounted in Eukitt (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany).
Whole-slide images of kidney cross-sections were acquired on a Leica SCN-400 slide scanner using the × 40 objective and exported as.scn files. The whole-slide data was imported to QuPath (v.0.3.0). The respective channel of interest (DAB) was isolated using color deconvolution. Thresholding-based pixel classification was used to quantify the DAB positive and DAB negative areas. The percentage of decellularized tubular segments, meaning tubules with denuded basement membranes without cellular coverage, was evaluated in Sirius red-stained sections and quantified for every kidney section in five individual high-power magnification fields of view.
Renal AGT, renin, ACE, ACE2, and Mas protein
To determine the abundance of specific proteins, renal tissue was homogenized in liquid nitrogen and lysed in a radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer [containing 0.05 mol L−1 Tris–HCl, 0.3 mol L−1 NaCl, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1% NP-40, 0.001 mol L−1 phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1% sodium pyrophosphate decahydrate, and 10 μL mL−1 protease inhibitor] or in a 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer (containing 0.1 mol L−1 HEPES, 0.1 mol L−1 NaF, 0.1 mol L−1 ethylene diamine tetraacetate (EDTA), 0.01 mol L−1 sodium metavanadate, 1% triton X-100, 0.002 mol L−1 PMSF, 0.1 mol L−1 sodium pyrophosphate decahydrate, 10 μL mL−1 protease inhibitor). Protein concentration was determined by the bicinchoninic acid assay method (Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit; Thermo Scientific™, Schwerte, Germany). For immunoblotting of AGT, renin, ACE, ACE2, or Mas, equal amounts of protein (40 µg) was denatured in a sample buffer (5 min, 95 °C). Total protein was separated on 4–15% SDS polyacrylamide gel (Criterion TGX Stain-Free Precast Gels; Bio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, Munich, Germany). After separation, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin or Roti Block (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), and incubated with antibodies against AGT (1:4000, R and D Systems Cat# AF6966, RRID:AB_10971952, Inc., Minneapolis, USA), renin (1:2000, ABIN301824, antibodies-online, Aachen, Germany), ACE (1:1000, orb216086; Biorbyt Ltd., Cambridge, UK), ACE2 (1:1000, Abnova Cat# PAB13443, RRID:AB_10549736, Taipei City, Taiwan) and Mas (1:2000, Novus Cat# NBP1-78,444, RRID:AB_11039164, Wiesbaden-Nordenstadt, Germany), respectively, followed by a secondary horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated antibody (goat anti-rabbit HRP Conjugate, Bio-Rad Cat# 170–6515, RRID:AB_11125142, Munich, Germany or rabbit anti-goat HRP Conjugate, Millipore Cat# AP106P, RRID:AB_9241, Darmstadt, Germany).
Immunoreactive bands were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (ECL Plus; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, UK) and quantified using an imaging system and software (ChemiDoc™ XRS + and Image Lab; Bio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, Munich, Germany). Abundances of specific protein species were determined relative to total protein abundance normalized to the relative protein abundance of vehicle-treated wildtype mice.
Renal and serum enzymatic ACE activities
Renal and serum enzymatic ACE activities were determined using a commercially available kit (ACE Color; Fujirebio, Hannover, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and adapted to 96-well plates. To determine the renal ACE activity, 10–36 mg of renal tissue was suspended in a lysis buffer [containing 50 mmol L HEPES, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.025 mmol L ZnCl2, 150 mmol L−1 NaCl, 1 mmol L−1 PMSF, 1 tablet EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (cOmplete Mini, Roche, Basel, Switzerland); 10 µL Lysis buffer/1 mg tissue]. Samples were homogenized, incubated for 60 min at 4 °C, and centrifuged (15 min, 8000 g, room temperature). The supernatant was removed and assayed undiluted. To determine the serum ACE activity, samples were diluted (1:3).
Renal Ang(1–7) concentration
Renal Ang(1–7) concentration was determined using a commercially available kit [Mouse Angiotensin 1–7 (Ang1–7) ELISA Kit; Cusabio Technology Llc, Houston, TX, USA] according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To determine renal Ang(1–7) concentration, 30 mg of renal tissue was suspended in 300 µL of PBS and stored overnight at −20 °C. After two freeze–thaw cycles, the homogenates were centrifuged (5 min, 5000 g, 4 °C). The supernatant was removed, diluted (1:20 or 1:40), and assayed immediately.
Statistical analyses
The results are expressed as means ± SEM. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses and graphs were performed with Prism 9.2.0 (®1992–2021; GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
Results
Renal ACE in ACE−/− mice
As expected, renal ACE protein abundance in the ACE−/− mice was only a fraction of that in the wildtype mice (Fig. 2a, white columns, 2b). Specifically, in the ACE−/− mice, renal ACE protein abundance was down to about 15% of that in the wildtype mice. In accordance with the low renal ACE protein abundance in the ACE−/− mice, renal ACE activity was also reduced to about 10% of that in the wildtype mice (Fig. 2c, white columns). In contrast to the local ACE activity in the renal tissue, serum ACE activity was similar in both strains (Fig. 2d, white columns).
a Renal angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) protein abundance normalized to total protein, b Western blot from kidney tissue using an antibody against ACE, c renal ACE activity, and d serum ACE activity in the wildtype and ACE−/− mice treated with vehicle or aristolochic acid I (AAI). ACE−/− = C57BL/6J-tm(ACE3/3) mice, n = 6–8 per group, two-way ANOVA: a treatment p < 0.05; strain p < 0.001; interaction n.s.; c treatment p < 0.01; strain p < 0.0001; interaction p < 0.01; d treatment n.s.; strain p < 0.05; interaction n.s.; Bonferroni test: *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 vs. vehicle; #p < 0.05 vs. wildtype
Effects of AAI on renal morphology and function
Kidneys from the vehicle-treated wildtype and ACE−/− mice were similar with respect to macroscopic and histological appearance (Fig. 3a–d) as well as renal weight (wildtype 0.39 ± 0.02 g, ACE−/− 0.38 ± 0.02 g, n.s.). In contrast, kidneys from AAI-treated wildtype mice appeared paler on macroscopic inspection and showed more severe histological lesions than kidneys from AAI-treated ACE−/− mice. Thus, kidneys from the AAI-treated wildtype mice exhibited profound tubular cell loss and luminal dilation (Fig. 3e and 3f), whereas these structures appeared to be essentially intact except for some minor proliferation of connective tissue in the AAI-treated ACE−/− mice (Fig. 3g and 3h). Specifically, the percentage of decellularized tubular segments, meaning tubules with denuded basement membranes without cellular coverage, was 16.4 ± 1.8% in kidneys from the AAI-treated wildtype mice vs. only 4.7 ± 1.1% in kidneys from the AAI-treated ACE−/− mice (p < 0.001).
Kidney paraffin sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) or Masson’s trichrome (magnification × 40). Kidneys were obtained from wildtype or ACE−/− mice that had been treated with vehicle or aristolochic acid I (AAI). ACE−/−, C57BL/6J-tm(ACE3/3) mice. Arrows mark tubular cell loss and asterisks mark luminal dilation
In general, kidneys from the AAI-treated mice were significantly smaller than kidneys from the vehicle-treated mice (wildtype: 0.39 ± 0.02 g vs. 0.22 ± 0.01 g, ACE−/−: 0.38 ± 0.02 g vs. 0.23 ± 0.01 g; all p < 0.001), without statistically significant differences between the two strains (wildtype 0.22 ± 0.01 g, ACE−/− 0.23 ± 0.01 g; n.s.).
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as measured by inulin clearance, was similar in the vehicle-treated wildtype and ACE−/− mice (Fig. 4). AAI significantly decreased GFR by about 55% in the wildtype but not in the ACE−/− mice, where it remained essentially unaltered.
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the wildtype and ACE−/− mice treated with vehicle or aristolochic acid I (AAI). ACE−/−, C57BL/6J-tm(ACE3/3) mice, KW, kidney weight, n = 6–8 per group, two-way ANOVA: treatment p < 0.05; strain p < 0.01; interaction p < 0.05; Bonferroni test: **p < 0 .01 vs. vehicle; ###p < 0.001 vs. wildtype
In our model of chronic renal failure, the expression of the acute injury marker, kidney injury molecule (KIM)-1, was similar in kidneys from the vehicle-treated wildtype and ACE−/− mice (Fig. 5a and 5b). AAI led to a statistically significant reduction of KIM-1 expression in the wildtype but not in the ACE−/− mice (Fig. 5c and 5d; wildtype: 63.18 ± 1.08% vs. 33.68 ± 2.66% KIM-1-positive area, p < 0.05; ACE−/−: 62.55 ± 1.25% vs. 34.45 ± 2.48% KIM-1-positive area, n.s.).
Effects of AAI on renal angiotensinogen, renin, and ACE
Renal angiotensinogen (AGT) protein abundance was similar in kidneys from the vehicle-treated wildtype and ACE−/− mice (Fig. 6a and 6c). AAI significantly increased renal AGT protein abundance in the ACE−/− mice. There was also a slight increase in renal AGT protein abundance in the AAI-treated wildtype mice, but this effect did not reach statistical significance.
a Renal angiotensinogen (AGT) protein abundance, b renal renin protein abundance normalized to total protein, and c Western blot from kidney tissue using an antibody against AGT and d against renin in the wildtype and ACE−/− mice treated with vehicle or aristolochic acid I (AAI). ACE−/−, C57BL/6J-tm(ACE3/3) mice, n = 6–10 per group, two-way ANOVA: a treatment p < 0.001; strain n.s.; interaction n.s.; b treatment p < 0.001; strain p < 0.001; interaction p < 0.05; Bonferroni test: ***p < 0.0001 vs. vehicle; ##p < 0.01 vs. wildtype
Renal renin protein abundance was similar in the vehicle-treated wildtype and ACE−/− mice (Fig. 6b and 6d). AAI significantly increased renal renin protein abundance in the ACE−/− mice but not in the wildtype mice.
As intended and as mentioned above, the ACE−/− mice showed only minor renal ACE protein abundance compared to the wildtype mice (Fig. 2a and 2b). AAI strongly and significantly decreased renal ACE protein abundance in the wildtype mice, whereas it did not significantly affect the already very low renal ACE protein abundance in the ACE−/− mice. In accordance with these results, AAI also significantly decreased renal ACE activity in the wildtype mice but did not significantly affect renal ACE activity in the ACE−/− mice (Fig. 2c). Furthermore, AAI did not significantly affect serum ACE activity in either strain (Fig. 2d).
Effects of AAI on the renal ACE2/Ang(1–7)/Mas axis
Renal ACE2 protein abundance was significantly higher in the vehicletreated ACE−/− mice than in the vehicle-treated wildtype mice (Fig. 7a and 7b). AAI similarly and significantly decreased renal ACE2 protein abundance in both strains.
a Renal angiotensin I-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) protein abundance normalized to total protein, b Western blot from kidney tissue using an antibody against ACE2, c renal angiotensin (Ang) (1–7) concentration, d renal Mas protein abundance normalized to total protein, and e Western blot from kidney tissue using an antibody against Mas in the wildtype and ACE−/− mice treated with vehicle or aristolochic acid I (AAI). ACE−/−, C57BL/6 J-tm(ACE3/3) mice, n = 6–10 per group, two-way ANOVA: a treatment p < 0.0001; strain p < 0.001; interaction n.s.; c treatment p < 0.05; strain n.s.; interaction n.s.; d treatment p < 0.01; strain p < 0.05; interaction n.s.; Bonferroni test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. vehicle; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. wildtype
Renal Ang(1–7) concentration was similar in the vehicle-treated wildtype and ACE−/− mice (Fig. 7c). AAI significantly increased renal Ang(1–7) concentration in the ACE−/− mice but not in the wildtype mice.
Renal Mas protein abundance was significantly higher in the vehicle-treated ACE−/− mice than in the vehicle-treated wildtype mice (Fig. 7d and 7e). AAI increased renal Mas protein abundance in the wildtype mice, roughly to that in the vehicle-treated ACE−/− mice. AAI also slightly increased renal Mas protein abundance in the ACE−/− mice, but this effect did not reach statistical significance.
Discussion
The present study shows that renal ACE deficiency protects against AAN, a new type of nephropathy that has recently evoked major research efforts due to its widespread occurrence and its often malignant course [11, 15, 17, 18, 20, 33, 65, 66, 72, 73]. It is currently widely accepted that the renal RAS plays a major role in the pathophysiology of many types of kidney disease and of systemic arterial hypertension [19, 35, 40, 41, 43, 45, 50, 54, 55]. Thus, not only are ACE inhibitors indispensable drugs for the clinical treatment of kidney diseases [71], but the selective experimental removal of components of the renal RAS, including renal ACE and renal AT1R, was also shown to protect mice against experimentally induced arterial hypertension [26, 25, 13,1 2]. Whether renal ACE deficiency also protects against nephropathy has not yet been investigated.
For our study, we used a strain of renal ACE-deficient mice, kindly provided by Dr. Romer Gonzalez-Villalobos, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. In keeping with previous reports[9, 26], these mice had essentially normal renal histology and function, while renal ACE abundance was reduced to only about 15% of that in the wildtype controls. Furthermore, reflecting the low renal ACE abundance, renal ACE activity was also dramatically reduced in the ACE−/− mice to as low as about 10 percent of that in the wildtype mice. Nevertheless, due to liver-derived ACE as ACE gene transcription was set under the control of the albumin promoter, serum ACE activity in the ACE−/− mice was normal, confirming previous reports from the literature [9, 10, 26].
When challenged with AAI at 3 mg kg−1, i.p., every third day for 6 weeks, the wildtype mice developed severe nephropathy with profound tubular cell loss and luminal dilation as well as significantly reduced GFR. The dose regimen for AAI applied in the present study was deployed previously by another group [29] obtaining similar results with respect to the development of nephropathy. Apparently, the nephrotoxic effects of AAI on mice strongly depend on dosage and application regime and may range from minor alterations to end-stage renal insufficiency [29]. Whereas many studies investigating the effects of AAI on renal function in experimental animals relied on plasma creatinine concentration or proteinuria alone or in combination as a method to assess renal function [14, 67, 68], we chose to apply the more robust and meaningful technique of measuring inulin clearances.
In contrast to the severe effects of AAI on renal morphology and function seen in the wildtype mice, there were only limited signs of histological renal lesions, including minor proliferation of connective tissue, and there was no statistically significant reduction in GFR in the ACE−/− mice. Our immunohistochemical data on the kidney injury marker KIM-1 may appear counterintuitive on first sight as AAI-induced renal damage was associated with a decrease rather than an increase in KIM-1 expression in both strains. It should be noted, however, that KIM-1 is a fast reacting marker of acute rather than chronic renal damage, which can only be detected in renal tubular cells as long as they remain vital [31]. Thus, the decreased KIM-1 expression in our model of chronic renal failure may be explained by the AAI-induced loss of vital tubular cells. In keeping with our histological and functional results, the AAI-induced reduction of KIM-1 expression was statistically significant in the wildtype but not in the ACE−/− mice, albeit the absolute differences between both strains were small.
Thus, it appears that renal ACE deficiency may convey protective effects against aristolochic acid-induced nephropathy, triggering the question as to the underlying molecular mechanisms. In this respect, specific interventions with several molecular signaling pathways outside the renal RAS have been identified that may convey reno-protective effects on AAN, including inhibition of p53 [73], blockade of the TGF-β-mediated signaling pathway [48, 72], and increase in NO bioavailability [18, 33].
On the other hand, in an experimental study on rats by Debelle et al. [16], pharmacological RAS blockade with the combination of an ACE inhibitor and an AT1R antagonist failed to improve renal function in AAI-induced nephropathy. Whereas this result appears to be in contrast to our present findings, there are several differences concerning experimental design and species between the two studies that may explain the discrepancy. Thus, in the study by Debelle et al. [16], the RAS blockers were administrated in drinking water during the course of the study, whereas in our study, there was genetically induced and therefore lifelong renal ACE deficiency. Furthermore, Debelle et al. [16] applied AAI at a single dose of 10 mg kg−1 body weight, a dose regimen that in our hands resulted in acute and rapidly progressive nephropathy (data not shown) with high mortality in contrast to the more chronic type of kidney disease as elicited with repeated applications of AAI in smaller doses (3 mg kg−1 body weight) in our study. Finally, species differences between rats and mice, with rats being more susceptible to kidney disease than mice [24, 32, 36, 42, 44, 49], may have contributed to the divergent results between the two studies.
It is currently well accepted that in many tissues, including the kidney, the classical ACE/AngII/AT1R axis is complemented by the alternative ACE2/Ang(1–7)/Mas axis [3, 56,57,58]. In contrast to the former, which tends to worsen ensuing renal damage, the latter axis may entail predominantly protective effects on the kidney [1, 22, 52, 61]. We therefore hypothesized that in the face of renal ACE deficiency more of locally generated AngI may be converted by renal ACE2 to Ang(1–7), thus shifting the balance away from the “detrimental” ACE/AngII/AT1R axis to the “beneficial” ACE2/Ang(1–7)/Mas axis. Our finding that renal ACE2 and Mas abundances were significantly increased under baseline conditions in the ACE−/− compared to the wildtype mice supports this hypothesis, although renal Ang(1–7) concentration was initially not significantly different between the two strains.
Further hints toward a possible shift of balance between the two RAS axes away from the renal disease-promoting toward the reno-protective pathway in the ACE−/− mice were obtained after the induction of AAI-induced nephropathy. Under these conditions, the beginning of the local RAS cascade was activated in the ACE−/− but not in the wildtype mice as indicated by significantly increased renal AGT and renin abundances in the former strain. As renin cleaves AngI from AGT, and the ACE−/− mice were, by design, deficient of renal ACE but not of renal ACE2, which was in fact elevated in the ACE−/− compared to the wildtype mice, these effects ultimately resulted in a significantly increased renal Ang(1–7) concentration in the ACE−/− compared to the wildtype mice. Since baseline renal Mas abundance was significantly higher in the ACE−/− than in the wildtype mice, the increased renal Ang(1–7) concentration after AAI coincides with increased renal levels of its specific receptor. While these findings support the hypothesis that the protection of renal ACE-deficient mice from AAI-induced nephropathy may have been partly due to the activation of the local ACE2/Ang(1–7)/Mas axis in the kidney, parts of our data are not equally suggestive in this respect. Thus, in agreement with a previous report also using C57BL/6J mice [63], renal ACE2 protein abundance was downregulated in response to AAI in both strains. Furthermore, renal Mas protein abundance was similar in the AAI-treated wildtype and ACE−/− mice. Further studies, including those involving pharmacological Mas receptor antagonists, may help to clarify these issues.
The molecular mechanisms by which activation of the ACE2/Ang(1–7)/Mas pathway may protect the kidney from AAI-induced nephropathy are currently not completely understood. In this respect, Mas activation has been reported to inhibit signal transduction pathways that are known to promote AAI-induced detrimental effects on the kidney, such as apoptosis and fibrosis [2, 46, 53, 59, 69]. These pathways may include MAP kinases [53] such as ERK1/2, p38, and JNK, as well as the TGF-β/NFκB axis [69] and other mechanisms [2, 46, 59]. The inhibition of some of these pathways has been shown to provide reno-protective effects on AAI-induced nephropathy [46, 48].
While with AGT and renin the renal abundances of two major components of the local RAS increased in AAI-induced nephropathy, matching similar experimental [23, 27, 51, 62] and clinical observations [4, 23, 64] in other types of chronic nephropathy, renal ACE abundance, and activity in wildtype mice decreased to about half of their baseline values. Given the fact that PTECs are a major source of local ACE in the kidney [7], the latter effect agrees well with our histological findings showing substantial tubular cell loss after AAI in the wildtype mice.
The notion that the AAI-induced decrease in renal ACE abundance and activity is due to tubular cell loss is supported by the lack of a similar effect in the ACE−/− mice, which showed only minor histological lesions and essentially normal tubular structures, although it needs to be taken into account that in the ACE−/− mice renal ACE abundance and activity were already very low to begin with.
In contrast to local ACE activity in the kidney, which was significantly reduced after AAI, serum ACE activity was not significantly affected by the nephrotoxic agent. In this respect, several studies [6, 29] showed that AAI predominantly affects the kidney and has minor toxic effects on hepatic functions, including the synthesis and release of ACE in the ACE−/− mice.
Taken together, our data show that renal ACE deficiency protects against AAI-induced nephropathy. While the molecular mechanisms underlying this effect are currently not completely understood, our data suggest that in the face of renal ACE deficiency, AAI may activate the ACE2/Ang(1–7)/Mas pathway, which in turn may deploy its well-known reno-protective effects.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Anguiano L, Riera M, Pascual J, Valdivielso JM, Barrios C, Betriu A, Mojal S, Fernandez E, Soler MJ (2015) Circulating angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 activity in patients with chronic kidney disease without previous history of cardiovascular disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 30:1176–1185. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfv025
Bunel V, Antoine MH, Stevigny C, Nortier J, Duez P (2016) New in vitro insights on a cell death pathway induced by magnolol and honokiol in aristolochic acid tubulotoxicity. Food Chem Toxicol 87:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2015.11.020
Burrell LM, Johnston CI, Tikellis C, Cooper ME (2004) ACE2, a new regulator of the renin–angiotensin system. Trends Endocrinol Metab 15:166–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2004.03.001
Cao W, Jin L, Zhou Z, Yang M, Wu C, Wu L, Cui S (2016) Overexpression of intrarenal renin-angiotensin system in human acute tubular necrosis. Kidney Blood Press Res 41:746–756. https://doi.org/10.1159/000450564
Cervenka L, Mitchell KD, Navar LG (1999) Renal function in mice: effects of volume expansion and angiotensin II. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:2631–2636
Chang SY, Weber EJ, Sidorenko VS, Chapron A, Yeung CK, Gao C, Mao Q, Shen D, Wang J, Rosenquist TA, Dickman KG, Neumann T, Grollman AP, Kelly EJ, Himmelfarb J, Eaton DL (2017) Human liver-kidney model elucidates the mechanisms of aristolochic acid nephrotoxicity. JCI Insight 2(22):e95978. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.95978
Chen L, Chou CL, Knepper MA (2021) A comprehensive map of mRNAs and their isoforms across all 14 renal tubule segments of mouse. J Am Soc Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2020101406
Chen M, Gong L, Qi X, Xing G, Luan Y, Wu Y, Xiao Y, Yao J, Li Y, Xue X, Pan G, Ren J (2011) Inhibition of renal NQO1 activity by dicoumarol suppresses nitroreduction of aristolochic acid I and attenuates its nephrotoxicity. Toxicol Sci 122:288–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfr138
Cole J, Quach DL, Sundaram K, Corvol P, Capecchi MR, Bernstein KE (2002) Mice lacking endothelial angiotensin-converting enzyme have a normal blood pressure. Circ Res 90:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1161/hh0102.102360
Cole JM, Xiao H, Adams JW, Disher KM, Zhao H, Bernstein KE (2003) New approaches to genetic manipulation of mice: tissue-specific expression of ACE. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 284:F599-607. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00308.2002
Cosyns JP, Jadoul M, Squifflet JP, De Plaen JF, Ferluga D, van Ypersele de Strihou C, (1994) Chinese herbs nephropathy: a clue to Balkan endemic nephropathy? Kidney Int 45:1680–1688. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1994.220
Crowley SD, Gurley SB, Herrera MJ, Ruiz P, Griffiths R, Kumar AP, Kim HS, Smithies O, Le TH, Coffman TM (2006) Angiotensin II causes hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy through its receptors in the kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:17985–17990. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605545103
Crowley SD, Gurley SB, Oliverio MI, Pazmino AK, Griffiths R, Flannery PJ, Spurney RF, Kim HS, Smithies O, Le TH, Coffman TM (2005) Distinct roles for the kidney and systemic tissues in blood pressure regulation by the renin-angiotensin system. J Clin Invest 115:1092–1099. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI23378
Dai XY, Huang XR, Zhou L, Zhang L, Fu P, Manthey C, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Lan HY (2016) Targeting c-fms kinase attenuates chronic aristolochic acid nephropathy in mice. Oncotarget 7:10841–10856. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7460
Dai XY, Zhou L, Huang XR, Fu P, Lan HY (2015) Smad7 protects against chronic aristolochic acid nephropathy in mice. Oncotarget 6:11930–11944. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.3718
Debelle FD, Nortier JL, Husson CP, De Prez EG, Vienne AR, Rombaut K, Salmon IJ, Deschodt-Lanckman MM, Vanherweghem JL (2004) The renin-angiotensin system blockade does not prevent renal interstitial fibrosis induced by aristolochic acids. Kidney Int 66:1815–1825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00905.x
Debelle FD, Vanherweghem JL, Nortier JL (2008) Aristolochic acid nephropathy: a worldwide problem. Kidney Int 74:158–169. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2008.129
Decleves AE, Jadot I, Colombaro V, Martin B, Voisin V, Nortier J, Caron N (2016) Protective effect of nitric oxide in aristolochic acid-induced toxic acute kidney injury: an old friend with new assets. Exp Physiol 101:193–206. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP085333
Del Prete D, Gambaro G, Lupo A, Anglani F, Brezzi B, Magistroni R, Graziotto R, Furci L, Modena F, Bernich P, Albertazzi A, D’Angelo A, Maschio G (2003) Precocious activation of genes of the renin-angiotensin system and the fibrogenic cascade in IgA glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 64:149–159. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00065.x
Depierreux M, Van Damme B, Vanden Houte K, Vanherweghem JL (1994) Pathologic aspects of a newly described nephropathy related to the prolonged use of Chinese herbs. Am J Kidney Dis 24:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80178-8
Dickman KG, Sweet DH, Bonala R, Ray T, Wu A (2011) Physiological and molecular characterization of aristolochic acid transport by the kidney. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 338:588–597. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.111.180984
Dilauro M, Zimpelmann J, Robertson SJ, Genest D, Burns KD (2010) Effect of ACE2 and angiotensin-(1–7) in a mouse model of early chronic kidney disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 298:F1523-1532. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00426.2009
Eriguchi M, Yotsueda R, Torisu K, Kawai Y, Hasegawa S, Tanaka S, Noguchi H, Masutani K, Kitazono T, Tsuruya K (2016) Assessment of urinary angiotensinogen as a marker of podocyte injury in proteinuric nephropathies. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 310:F322-333. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00260.2015
Gava AL, Freitas FP, Balarini CM, Vasquez EC, Meyrelles SS (2012) Effects of 5/6 nephrectomy on renal function and blood pressure in mice. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol 4:167–173
Giani JF, Janjulia T, Kamat N, Seth DM, Blackwell WL, Shah KH, Shen XZ, Fuchs S, Delpire E, Toblli JE, Bernstein KE, McDonough AA, Gonzalez-Villalobos RA (2014) Renal angiotensin-converting enzyme is essential for the hypertension induced by nitric oxide synthesis inhibition. J Am Soc Nephrol 25:2752–2763. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2013091030
Gonzalez-Villalobos RA, Janjoulia T, Fletcher NK, Giani JF, Nguyen MT, Riquier-Brison AD, Seth DM, Fuchs S, Eladari D, Picard N, Bachmann S, Delpire E, Peti-Peterdi J, Navar LG, Bernstein KE, McDonough AA (2013) The absence of intrarenal ACE protects against hypertension. J Clin Invest 123:2011–2023. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI65460
Gonzalez-Villalobos RA, Satou R, Ohashi N, Semprun-Prieto LC, Katsurada A, Kim C, Upchurch GM, Prieto MC, Kobori H, Navar LG (2010) Intrarenal mouse renin-angiotensin system during ANG II-induced hypertension and ACE inhibition. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 298:F150-157. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00477.2009
Hagos Y, Wolff NA (2010) Assessment of the role of renal organic anion transporters in drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Toxins (Basel) 2:2055–2082. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins2082055
Huang L, Scarpellini A, Funck M, Verderio EA, Johnson TS (2013) Development of a chronic kidney disease model in C57BL/6 mice with relevance to human pathology. Nephron Extra 3:12–29. https://doi.org/10.1159/000346180
Huang XR (2003) Chymase is upregulated in diabetic nephropathy: implications for an alternative pathway of angiotensin II-mediated diabetic renal and vascular disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 14:1738–1747. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.asn.0000071512.93927.4e
Humphreys BD, Xu F, Sabbisetti V, Grgic I, Movahedi Naini S, Wang N, Chen G, Xiao S, Patel D, Henderson JM, Ichimura T, Mou S, Soeung S, McMahon AP, Kuchroo VK, Bonventre JV (2013) Chronic epithelial kidney injury molecule-1 expression causes murine kidney fibrosis. J Clin Invest 123:4023–4035. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI45361
Ishola DA Jr, van der Giezen DM, Hahnel B, Goldschmeding R, Kriz W, Koomans HA, Joles JA (2006) In mice, proteinuria and renal inflammatory responses to albumin overload are strain-dependent. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:591–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfi303
Jadot I, Colombaro V, Martin B, Habsch I, Botton O, Nortier J, Decleves AE, Caron N (2017) Restored nitric oxide bioavailability reduces the severity of acute-to-chronic transition in a mouse model of aristolochic acid nephropathy. Plos One 12:e0183604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183604
Jadot I, Decleves AE, Nortier J, Caron N (2017) An integrated view of aristolochic acid nephropathy: update of the literature. Int J Mol Sci 18(2):297. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18020297
Juretzko A, Steinbach A, Hannemann A, Endlich K, Endlich N, Friedrich N, Lendeckel U, Stracke S, Rettig R (2017) Urinary angiotensinogen and renin excretion are associated with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Blood Press Res 42:145–155. https://doi.org/10.1159/000474932
Kren S, Hostetter TH (1999) The course of the remnant kidney model in mice. Kidney Int 56:333–337. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00527.x
Krumbiegel G, Hallensleben J, Mennicke WH, Rittmann N, Roth HJ (1987) Studies on the metabolism of aristolochic acids I and II. Xenobiotica 17:981–991. https://doi.org/10.3109/00498258709044197
Leung EM, Chan W (2014) Noninvasive measurement of aristolochic acid-DNA adducts in urine samples from aristolochic acid-treated rats by liquid chromatography coupled tandem mass spectrometry: evidence for DNA repair by nucleotide-excision repair mechanisms. Mutat Res 766–767:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2014.05.004
Leung EM, Chan W (2015) Quantification of aristolochic acid-RNA adducts in the urine of aristolochic acid-treated rats by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Chem Res Toxicol 28:567–569. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00021
Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, Berl T, Pohl MA, Lewis JB, Ritz E, Atkins RC, Rohde R, Raz I (2001) Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 345:851–860. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011303
Liu F, Brezniceanu ML, Wei CC, Chenier I, Sachetelli S, Zhang SL, Filep JG, Ingelfinger JR, Chan JS (2008) Overexpression of angiotensinogen increases tubular apoptosis in diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol 19:269–280. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2007010074
Ma LJ, Fogo AB (2003) Model of robust induction of glomerulosclerosis in mice: importance of genetic background. Kidney Int 64:350–355. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00058.x
Mezzano S, Droguett A, Burgos ME, Ardiles LG, Flores CA, Aros CA, Caorsi I, Vio CP, Ruiz-Ortega M, Egido J (2003) Renin-angiotensin system activation and interstitial inflammation in human diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int 64(Suppl 86):S64-70. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.64.s86.12.x
Mohammed-Ali Z, Cruz GL, Lu C, Carlisle RE, Werner KE, Ask K, Dickhout JG (2015) Development of a model of chronic kidney disease in the C57BL/6 mouse with properties of progressive human CKD. Biomed Res Int 2015:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/172302
Nishiyama A, Seth DM, Navar LG (2002) Renal interstitial fluid angiotensin I and angiotensin II concentrations during local angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. J Am Soc Nephrol 13:2207–2212. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.asn.0000026610.48842.cb
Okada H, Watanabe Y, Inoue T, Kobayashi T, Kanno Y, Shiota G, Nakamura T, Sugaya T, Fukamizu A, Suzuki H (2003) Transgene-derived hepatocyte growth factor attenuates reactive renal fibrosis in aristolochic acid nephrotoxicity. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18:2515–2523. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfg440
Pinkert CA, Ornitz DM, Brinster RL, Palmiter RD (1987) An albumin enhancer located 10 kb upstream functions along with its promoter to direct efficient, liver-specific expression in transgenic mice. Genes Dev 1:268–276. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1.3.268
Pozdzik AA, Giordano L, Li G, Antoine MH, Quellard N, Godet J, De Prez E, Husson C, Decleves AE, Arlt VM, Goujon JM, Brocheriou-Spelle I, Ledbetter SR, Caron N, Nortier JL (2016) Blocking TGF-beta signaling pathway preserves mitochondrial proteostasis and reduces early activation of PDGFRbeta + pericytes in aristolochic acid induced acute kidney injury in wistar male rats. Plos One 11:e0157288. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157288
Rabe M, Schaefer F (2016) Non-transgenic mouse models of kidney disease. Nephron 133:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445171
Remuzzi G, Perico N, Macia M, Ruggenenti P (2005) The role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the progression of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 68(Suppl 99):S57–S65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09911.x
Reverte V, Gogulamudi VR, Rosales CB, Musial DC, Gonsalez SR, Parra-Vitela AJ, Galeas-Pena M, Sure VN, Visniauskas B, Lindsey SH, Katakam PVG, Prieto MC (2020) Urinary angiotensinogen increases in the absence of overt renal injury in high fat diet-induced type 2 diabetic mice. J Diabetes Complicat 34:107448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2019.107448
Roberts MA, Velkoska E, Ierino FL, Burrell LM (2013) Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 activity in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 28:2287–2294. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft038
Romanov V, Whyard TC, Waltzer WC, Grollman AP, Rosenquist T (2015) Aristolochic acid-induced apoptosis and G2 cell cycle arrest depends on ROS generation and MAP kinases activation. Arch Toxicol 89:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-014-1249-z
Rüster C, Wolf G (2006) Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and progression of renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 17:2985–2991. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2006040356
Sachetelli S, Liu Q, Zhang SL, Liu F, Hsieh TJ, Brezniceanu ML, Guo DF, Filep JG, Ingelfinger JR, Sigmund CD, Hamet P, Chan JS (2006) RAS blockade decreases blood pressure and proteinuria in transgenic mice overexpressing rat angiotensinogen gene in the kidney. Kidney Int 69:1016–1023. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5000210
Santos RA, Ferreira AJ, Verano-Braga T, Bader M (2013) Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, angiotensin-(1–7) and Mas: new players of the renin-angiotensin system. J Endocrinol 216:R1–R17. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-12-0341
Santos RAS, Oudit GY, Verano-Braga T, Canta G, Steckelings UM, Bader M (2019) The renin-angiotensin system: going beyond the classical paradigms. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 316:H958–H970. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00723.2018
Santos RAS, Sampaio WO, Alzamora AC, Motta-Santos D, Alenina N, Bader M, Campagnole-Santos MJ (2018) The ACE2/angiotensin-(1–7)/MAS axis of the renin-angiotensin system: focus on angiotensin-(1–7). Physiol Rev 98:505–553. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00023.2016
Shi H, Feng JM (2011) Aristolochic acid induces apoptosis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells in vitro by suppressing PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Acta Pharmacol Sin 32:1025–1030. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2011.74
Shibutani S, Dong H, Suzuki N, Ueda S, Miller F, Grollman AP (2007) Selective toxicity of aristolochic acids I and II. Drug Metab Dispos 35:1217–1222. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.107.014688
Soler MJ, Wysocki J, Batlle D (2013) ACE2 alterations in kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 28:2687–2697. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft320
Tang J, Wysocki J, Ye M, Valles PG, Rein J, Shirazi M, Bader M, Gomez RA, Sequeira-Lopez MS, Afkarian M, Batlle D (2019) Urinary renin in patients and mice with diabetic kidney disease. Hypertens 74:83–94. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12873
Tsukamoto S, Wakui H, Azushima K, Yamaji T, Urate S, Suzuki T, Abe E, Tanaka S, Taguchi S, Yamada T, Kinguchi S, Kamimura D, Yamashita A, Sano D, Nakano M, Hashimoto T, Tamura K (2021) Tissue-specific expression of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, in mouse models of chronic kidney disease. Sci Rep 11:16843. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96294-8
van den Heuvel M, Batenburg WW, Jainandunsing S, Garrelds IM, van Gool JM, Feelders RA, van den Meiracker AH, Danser AH (2011) Urinary renin, but not angiotensinogen or aldosterone, reflects the renal renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity and the efficacy of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade in the kidney. J Hypertens 29:2147–2155. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834bbcbf
Vanhaelen M, Vanhaelen-Fastre R, But P, Vanherweghem JL (1994) Identification of aristolochic acid in chinese herbs. Lancet 343:174. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90964-4
Vanherweghem JL, Depierreux M, Tielemans C, Abramowicz D, Dratwa M, Jadoul M, Richard C, Vandervelde D, Verbeelen D, Vanhaelen-Fastre R et al (1993) Rapidly progressive interstitial renal fibrosis in young women: association with slimming regimen including Chinese herbs. Lancet 341:387–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(93)92984-2
Xiao Y, Ge M, Xue X, Wang C, Wang H, Wu X, Li L, Liu L, Qi X, Zhang Y, Li Y, Luo H, Xie T, Gu J, Ren J (2008) Hepatic cytochrome P450s metabolize aristolochic acid and reduce its kidney toxicity. Kidney Int 73:1231–1239. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2008.103
Xue X, Xiao Y, Zhu H, Wang H, Liu Y, Xie T, Ren J (2008) Induction of P450 1A by 3-methylcholanthrene protects mice from aristolochic acid-I-induced acute renal injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:3074–3081. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfn262
Yang L, Li X, Wang H (2007) Possible mechanisms explaining the tendency towards interstitial fibrosis in aristolochic acid-induced acute tubular necrosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22:445–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfl556
Zhang HM, Zhao XH, Sun ZH, Li GC, Liu GC, Sun LR, Hou JQ, Zhou W (2019) Recognition of the toxicity of aristolochic acid. J Clin Pharm Ther 44:157–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12789
Zhang Y, He D, Zhang W, Xing Y, Guo Y, Wang F, Jia J, Yan T, Liu Y, Lin S (2020) ACE inhibitor benefit to kidney and cardiovascular outcomes for patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease stages 3–5: a network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Drugs 80:797–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-020-01290-3
Zhou L, Fu P, Huang XR, Liu F, Chung AC, Lai KN, Lan HY (2010) Mechanism of chronic aristolochic acid nephropathy: role of Smad3. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 298:F1006-1017. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00675.2009
Zhou L, Fu P, Huang XR, Liu F, Lai KN, Lan HY (2010) Activation of p53 promotes renal injury in acute aristolochic acid nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 21:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2008111133
Zhou Q, Pei J, Poon J, Lau AY, Zhang L, Wang Y, Liu C, Huang L (2019) Worldwide research trends on aristolochic acids (1957–2017): suggestions for researchers. PLoS One 14:e0216135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216135
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. R. A. Gonzalez-Villalobos, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA for providing the C57BL/6J-tm(ACE3/3) mouse strain.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AJ, AS, JW, and RR conceived and designed the study. AJ, AS, JW, RR, and FS wrote the manuscript. AJ, FS, and CW performed the experiments. AJ, FS, CW, and BM analyzed the data. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All studies involving experimental animals were performed in accordance with the German Animal Protection Act. Permission for the conduction of the animal experiments reported herein was obtained from the committee on animal welfare of the federal state Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Juretzko, A., Steinbach, A., Witte, J. et al. Renal angiotensin I-converting enzyme-deficient mice are protected against aristolochic acid nephropathy. Pflugers Arch - Eur J Physiol 475, 391–403 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-022-02779-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-022-02779-4