Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic portal branch ligation of the right caudate lobe concomitant with portal vein embolization for planned right hemihepatectomy in advanced hepatobiliary cancers

  • How-I-Do-It articles
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The role of ligation of the portal venous branches to the caudate lobe (cPVL) as preparation for planned major hepatectomy is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic cPVL (Lap-cPVL) concomitant with transileocolic portal vein embolization of the right portal venous system (rTIPE), namely, Lap-cPVL/rTIPE, for planned right hemihepatectomy (rHx) in advanced hepatobiliary cancer patients.

Methods

Thirty-one patients who underwent rHx after rTIPE with/without Lap-cPVL between March 2013 and March 2020 were enrolled in this study. The Lap-cPVL was performed for the portal branches of the right caudate lobe.

Results

Eight of the 31 patients underwent Lap-cPVL/rTIPE. The degree of hypertrophy was significantly increased in Lap-cPVL/rTIPE (19.3%, range 6.5–25.6%) as compared to rTIPE (7.2%, range - 1.1 to 21.2%) (p=0.027). The functional kinetic growth rate was also significantly increased in Lap-cPVL/rTIPE (5.40%, range 2.17–5.97) than that in rTIPE (1.85%, range - 0.22 to 6.45%) (p=0.046). Postoperative liver failure ≧ grade B occurred in 21.7% of patients in rTIPE, while there was no postoperative liver failure ≧ grade B in Lap-cPVL/rTIPE. Mortality rates were zero after rHx in this study.

Conclusions

Lap-cPVL/rTIPE is safe and provides an additional effect on liver hypertrophy in advanced hepatobiliary cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adam R, Laurent A, Azoulay D, Castaing D, Bismuth H (2000) Two-stage hepatectomy: a planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors. Ann Surg 232:777–785. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200012000-00006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H et al (2012) Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg 255:405–414. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824856f5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaeck D, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E et al (2004) A two-stage hepatectomy procedure combined with portal vein embolization to achieve curative resection for initially unresectable multiple and bilobar colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 240:1037–1049; discussion 1049–1051. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000145965.86383.89

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Narita M, Oussoultzoglou E, Jaeck D et al (2011) Two-stage hepatectomy for multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 98:1463–1475. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 149:713–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abulkhir A, Limongelli P, Healey AJ et al (2008) Preoperative portal vein embolization for major liver resection: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 247:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815f6e5b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leung U, Simpson AL, Araujo RLC et al (2014) Remnant growth rate after portal vein embolization is a good early predictor of post-hepatectomy liver failure. J Am Coll Surg 219:620–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.04.022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Shindoh J, Truty MJ, Aloia TA et al (2013) Kinetic growth rate after portal vein embolization predicts posthepatectomy outcomes: toward zero liver-related mortality in patients with colorectal liver metastases and small future liver remnant. J Am Coll Surg 216:201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Couinaud C (1994) The paracaval segments of the liver. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 2:145–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01222238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN, Couinaud C (2002) The caudate lobe of the liver: implications of embryology and anatomy for surgery. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 11:835–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1055-3207(02)00035-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagino M, Kamiya J, Arai T et al (2006) “Anatomic” right hepatic trisectionectomy (extended right hepatectomy) with caudate lobectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 243:28–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000193604.72436.63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Miyagawa S, Hashikura Y, Miwa S et al (1998) Concomitant caudate lobe resection as an option for donor hepatectomy in adult living related liver transplantation. Transplantation. 66:661–663. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199809150-00021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kinoshita H, Sakai K, Hirohashi K et al (1986) Preoperative portal vein embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 10:803–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01655244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K et al (1990) Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery. 107:521–527

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Imanura H, Shimada R, Kubota M et al (1999) Preoperative portal vein embolization: an audit of 84 patients. Hepatology. 29:1099–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510290415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawabata Y, Hayashi H, Yano S, Tajima Y (2017) Liver parenchyma transection-first approach in hemihepatectomy with en bloc caudate lobectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a safe technique to secure favorable surgical outcomes. J Surg Oncol 115:963–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kondo S, Takada T, Miyazaki M et al (2008) Guidelines for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas: surgical treatment. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 15:41–54. https://doi.org/10.2152/jmi.65.37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawabata Y, Hayashi H, Yoshida R et al (2020) Hybrid transileocecal portal vein embolization associated with staging laparoscopy for planned major hepatectomy in advanced hepatobiliary cancers. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02034-3 Online ahead of print

  19. Sugioka A, Kato Y, Tanahashi Y (2017) Systematic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle isolation for anatomical liver resection based on Laennec’s capsule: proposal of a novel comprehensive surgical anatomy of the liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.410

  20. Kogure K, Kuwano H, Fujimaki N, Makuuchi M (2000) Relation among portal segmentation, proper hepatic vein, and external notch of the caudate lobe in the human liver. Ann Surg 231:223–228. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200002000-00011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ohshima S (2014) Volume analyzer SYNAPSE VINCENT for liver analysis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21:235–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004(240):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Takayama T, Tanaka T, Higaki T et al (1994) High dorsal resection of the liver. J Am Coll Surg 179:72–75

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yanaga Y, Matsumata T, Hayashi H et al (1994) Isolated hepatic caudate lobectomy. Surgery. 115:757–761

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kosuge T, Yamamoto J, Takayama T et al An isolated, complete resection of the caudate lobe, including the paracaval portion, for hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg 129:280–284. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.199401420270056013

  26. Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Shionoya S (1990) Hepatic segmentectomy with caudate lobe resection for bile duct carcinoma of the hepatic hilus. World J Surg 14:535–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF1658686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bartlett D, Fong Y, Blumgart LH (1996) Complete resection of the caudate lobe of the liver: technique and results. Br J Surg 83:1076–1081. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800830812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Kubota K et al (2000) Living-related transplantation of left liver plus caudate lobe. J Am Coll Surg 190:635–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00255-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kogure K, Kuwano H, Yorifuji H et al (2008) The caudate processus hepatic vein: a boundary hepatic vein between the caudate lobe and the right liver. Ann Surg 247:288–293. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815efd8d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumon M (1985) Portal vein and bile duct branches of the caudate lobe: analysis of liver cast and clinical cases. Acta Hepatol Jpn 26:1193–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Filipponi F, Romagnoli P, Mosca F, Couinaud C (2000) The dorsal sector of human liver: embryological, anatomical and clinical relevance. Hepatogastroenterology. 47:1726–1731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Benkö T, Sgourakis G, Molmenti EP et al (2017) Portal supply and venous drainage of the caudate lobe in the healthy human liver: virtual three-dimensional computed tomography volume study. World J Surg 41:817–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3791-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Broering DC, Hillert C, Krupski G et al (2002) Portal vein embolization vs. portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. J Gastrointest Surg 6:905–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1091-255x(02)00122-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: Kawabata Y; acquisition of data: Kawabata Y, Hayashi H, Yoshida R, Ando S, Nakamura K, Kishi T, Nishi T, Nakamura M; analysis and interpretation of data: Kawabata Y, Hayashi H, and Nishi T; drafting of the manuscript: Kawabata Y; critical revision: Kawabata Y and Tajima Y; final approval of the article: Kawabata Y, Hayashi H, Yoshida R, Ando S, Nakamura K, Kishi T, Nishi T, Nakamura M, and Tajima Y.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasunari Kawabata.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(MP4 3772 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawabata, Y., Hayashi, H., Yoshida, R. et al. Laparoscopic portal branch ligation of the right caudate lobe concomitant with portal vein embolization for planned right hemihepatectomy in advanced hepatobiliary cancers. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406, 917–926 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02147-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02147-3

Keywords

Navigation