Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relevance of surgery in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Upper GI bleeding remains one of the most common emergencies with a substantial overall mortality rate of up to 30%. In severe ill patients, death does not occur due to failure of hemostasis, either medical or surgical, but mainly from comorbidities, treatment complications, and decreased tolerated blood loss. Management strategies have changed dramatically over the last two decades and include primarily endoscopic intervention in combination with acid-suppressive therapy and decrease in surgical intervention. Herein, we present one of the largest patient-based analysis assessing clinical parameters and outcome in patients undergoing endoscopy with an upper GI bleeding. Data were further analyzed to identify potential new risk factors and to investigate the role of surgery.

Patients and methods

In this retrospective study, we aimed to analyze outcome of patients with an UGIB and data were analyzed to identify potential new risk factors and the role of surgery. Data collection included demographic data, laboratory results, endoscopy reports, and details of management including blood administration, and surgery was carried out. Patient events were grouped and defined as “overall” events and “operated,” “non-operated,” and “operated and death” as well as “non-operated and death” where appropriate. Blatchford, clinical as well as complete Rockall-score analysis, risk stratification, and disease-related mortality rate were calculated for each group for comparison.

Results

Overall, 253 patients were eligible for analysis: endoscopy was carried out in 96% of all patients, 17% needed surgical intervention after endoscopic failure of bleeding control due to persistent bleeding, and the remaining 4% of patients were subjected directly to surgery. The median length of stay to discharge was 26 days. Overall mortality was 22%; out of them, almost 5% were operated and died. Anticoagulation was associated with a high in-hospital mortality risk (23%) and was increased once patients were taken to surgery (43%). Patients taking steroids presented with a risk of death of 26%, once taken to surgery the risk increased to 80%. Patients with liver cirrhosis had a risk of death of 42%; we observed a better outcome for these patients once taken to theater. Clinically, once scored with Blatchford score, statistical correlation was found for initial need for blood transfusion and surgical intervention. Clinical as well as complete Rockall score revealed a correlation between need for blood transfusion as well as surgical intervention in addition with a decreased outcome with increasing Rockall scores. Risk factor analysis including comorbidity, drug administration, and anticoagulation therapy introduced the combination of tumor and non-steroidal antirheumatic medication as independent risk factors for increased disease-related mortality.

Conclusion

UGIB remains challenging and endoscopy is the first choice of intervention. Care must be taken once a patient is taking antirheumatic non-steroidal pain medication and suffers from cancer. In patients with presence of liver cirrhosis, an earlier surgical intervention may be considered, in particular for patients with recurrent bleeding. Embolization is not widely available and carries the risk of necrosis of the affected organ and should be restricted to a subgroup of patients not primarily eligible for surgery once endoscopy has failed. Taken together, an interdisciplinary approach including gastroenterologists as well as surgeons should be used once the patient is admitted to the hospital to define the best treatment option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lassen A, Hallas J, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB (2006) Complicated and uncomplicated peptic ulcers in a Danish county 1993-2002: a population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 101(5):945–953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis JD, Bilker WB, Brensinger C, Farrar JT, Strom BL (2002) Hospitalization and mortality rates from peptic ulcer disease and GI bleeding in the 1990s: relationship to sales of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acid suppression medications. Am J Gastroenterol 97(10):2540–2549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blatchford O, Davidson LA, Murray WR, Blatchford M, Pell J (1997) Acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in west of Scotland: case ascertainment study. BMJ 315(7107):510–514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC (1995a) Incidence of and mortality from acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. Steering committee and members of the National Audit of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. BMJ 311(6999):222–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC (1995b) Variation in outcome after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The National Audit of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet 346(8971):346–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenspoon J, Barkun A, Bardou M, Chiba N, Leontiadis GI, Marshall JK, Metz DC, Romagnuolo J, Sung J (2012) Management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 10(3):234–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hearnshaw SA, Logan RF, Lowe D, Travis SP, Murphy MF, Palmer KR (2011) Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit. Gut 60(10):1327–1335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Laing CJ, Tobias T, Rosenblum DI, Banker WL, Tseng L, Tamarkin SW (2007) Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: emerging role of multidetector CT angiography and review of current imaging techniques. Radiographics 27(4):1055–1070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Longstreth GF (1995) Epidemiology of hospitalization for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 90(2):206–210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stromdahl M, Helgeson J and Kalaitzakis E (2016) "Emergency readmission following acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding." Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol

  11. van Leerdam ME (2008) Epidemiology of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 22(2):209–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lahiff C, Shields W, Cretu I, Mahmud N, McKiernan S, Norris S, Silke B, Reynolds JV, O'Toole D (2012) Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: predictors of risk in a mixed patient group including variceal and nonvariceal haemorrhage. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24(2):149–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bardou M, Benhaberou-Brun D, Le Ray I, Barkun AN (2012) Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(2):97–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barkun A, Bardou M, Marshall JK (2003) Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 139(10):843–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sung JJ, Chan FK, Chen M, Ching JY, Ho KY, Kachintorn U, Kim N, Lau JY, Menon J, Rani AA, Reddy N, Sollano J, Sugano K, Tsoi KK, Wu CY, Yeomans N, Vakil N, Goh KL (2011) Asia-Pacific working group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut 60(9):1170–1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC (1996a) Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut 38(3):316–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC (1996b) Selection of patients for early discharge or outpatient care after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. National Audit of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet 347(9009):1138–1140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aquarius M, Smeets FG, Konijn HW, Stassen PM, Keulen ET, Van Deursen CT, Masclee AA, Keulemans YC (2015) Prospective multicenter validation of the Glasgow Blatchford bleeding score in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting at an emergency department. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27(9):1011–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, H. M., S. W. Jeon, J. T. Jung, D. W. Lee, C. Y. Ha, K. S. Park, S. H. Lee, C. H. Yang, J. H. Park and Y. S. Park (2015). "Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study." J Gastroenterol Hepatol.

  20. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC (1997) Influencing the practice and outcome in acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Steering Committee of the National Audit of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut 41(5):606–611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Crooks CJ, West J, Card TR (2012) Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage and deprivation: a nationwide cohort study of health inequality in hospital admissions. Gut 61(4):514–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van Leerdam ME, Tytgat GN (2008) Acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 22(2):207–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lau JY, Barkun A, Fan DM, Kuipers EJ, Yang YS, Chan FK (2013) Challenges in the management of acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Lancet 381(9882):2033–2043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sreedharan A, Martin J, Leontiadis GI, Dorward S, Howden CW, Forman D, Moayyedi P (2010) Proton pump inhibitor treatment initiated prior to endoscopic diagnosis in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD005415

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hsu PI, Lai KH, Liu CP (2011) Esomeprazole with clopidogrel reduces peptic ulcer recurrence, compared with clopidogrel alone, in patients with atherosclerosis. Gastroenterology 140(3):791–798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu CP, Chen WC, Lai KH, Mar GY, Lin SY, Ger LP, Hsu PI (2012) Esomeprazole alone compared with esomeprazole plus aspirin for the treatment of aspirin-related peptic ulcers. Am J Gastroenterol 107(7):1022–1029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Teles Sampaio E, Maia L, Salgueiro P, Marcos-Pinto R, Dinis-Ribeiro M and Pedroto I (2016) "Antiplatelet agents and/or anticoagulants are not associated with worse outcome following nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding." Rev Esp Enferm Dig 108

  28. Hsu YC, Lin JT, Chen TT, Wu MS, Wu CY (2012) Long-term risk of recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis: a 10-year nationwide cohort study. Hepatology 56(2):698–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuo MT, Yang SC, Lu LS, Hsu CN, Kuo YH, Kuo CH, Liang CM, Kuo CM, Wu CK, Tai WC, Chuah SK (2015) Predicting risk factors for rebleeding, infections, mortality following peptic ulcer bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and the impact of antibiotics prophylaxis at different clinical stages of the disease. BMC Gastroenterol 15:61

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosa H, Silverio AO, Perini RF, Arruda CB (2000) Bacterial infection in cirrhotic patients and its relationship with alcohol. Am J Gastroenterol 95(5):1290–1293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gianturco C, Anderson JH, Wallace S (1975) Mechanical devices for arterial occlusion. Am J Roentgenol Radium Therapy, Nucl Med 124(3):428–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cherian MP, Mehta P, Kalyanpur TM, Hedgire SS, Narsinghpura KS (2009) Arterial interventions in gastrointestinal bleeding. Semin Intervent Radiol 26(3):184–196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Navuluri R, Patel J, Kang L (2012) Role of interventional radiology in the emergent management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Semin Intervent Radiol 29(3):169–177

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Eriksson LG, Ljungdahl M, Sundbom M, Nyman R (2008) Transcatheter arterial embolization versus surgery in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding after therapeutic endoscopy failure. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19(10):1413–1418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Defreyne L, Vanlangenhove P, De Vos M, Pattyn P, Van Maele G, Decruyenaere J, Troisi R, Kunnen M (2001) Embolization as a first approach with endoscopically unmanageable acute nonvariceal gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Radiology 218(3):739–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ripoll C, Banares R, Beceiro I, Menchen P, Catalina MV, Echenagusia A, Turegano F (2004) Comparison of transcatheter arterial embolization and surgery for treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer after endoscopic treatment failure. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15(5):447–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Alatise OI, Aderibigbe AS, Adisa AO, Adekanle O, Agbakwuru AE, Arigbabu AO (2014) Management of overt upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a low resource setting: a real world report from Nigeria. BMC Gastroenterol 14:210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Boyapati R, Ong SY, Ye B, Kruavit A, Lee N, Vaughan R, Nandurkar S, Gibson P, Garg M (2014) One fifth of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer-related bleeding are potentially preventable. World J Gastroenterol 20(30):10504–10511

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Dango.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Dango S and Beißbarth T contributed equally to this work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dango, S., Beißbarth, T., Weiss, E. et al. Relevance of surgery in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402, 509–519 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1552-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1552-2

Keywords

Navigation