Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative bevacizumab and surgery for colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score analysis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Bevacizumab associated with conventional chemotherapy has become standard care in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer. However, its impact on outcomes after liver resections (LRs) remains debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant bevacizumab-based chemotherapy (BBC) on postoperative outcomes of LR for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) using a validated approach.

Methods

All patients who received neoadjuvant therapy for CLMs between January 2005 and May 2011 were included. Risk factors for major complications (Clavien ≥3) were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Evaluation of BBC’s impact on morbidity was conducted after a propensity score adjustment on factors identified to influence major complications (MCs).

Results

LR for CLMs after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 199 patients (127 men and 72 women). Major LR was performed on 111 patients (55.78%), and MCs occurred in 41 cases (20.6%). After multivariate analyses, major LR (OR 2.85; 95% CI 1.29–6.85; P = 0.013) and combined resections of both the primary tumor and CLMs (OR 7.12; 95% CI: 2.6–20.5; P < 0.001) were independent predictive factors for MCs. After a propensity score matching, 56 patients with a BBC regimen were compared to 112 patients without BBC. No difference in terms of biliary fistula occurrence (P = 0.94) or 90-day mortality (P = 0.66) was found. Both in the univariate and multivariate analyses, BBC was not associated with MCs (P = 0.95).

Conclusion

The present study using propensity score matching demonstrated that BBC did not impair outcomes of LR for CLM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CRC:

Colorectal cancer

CLM:

Colorectal liver metastasis

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

BBC:

Bevacizumab-based chemotherapy

BMI:

Body mass index

OR:

Odds ratio

SOS:

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome

RCT:

Randomized control trial

References

  1. Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J et al (2013) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990 49:1374–1403. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Sargent DJ et al (2010) Revised TN categorization for colon cancer based on national survival outcomes data. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 28:264–271. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ye L-C, Liu T-S, Ren L et al (2013) Randomized controlled trial of cetuximab plus chemotherapy for patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastases. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 31:1931–1938. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.44.8308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T et al (2014) FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1065–1075. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70330-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kopetz S, Chang GJ, Overman MJ et al (2009) Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 27:3677–3683. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5278

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fong Y, Cohen AM, Fortner JG et al (1997) Liver resection for colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 15:938–946

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Adam R, Delvart V, Pascal G et al (2004) Rescue surgery for unresectable colorectal liver metastases downstaged by chemotherapy. Ann Surg 240:644–658. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000141198.92114.f6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Adam R, Wicherts DA, de Haas RJ et al (2008) Complete pathologic response after preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: myth or reality? J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 26:1635–1641. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.13.7471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brouquet A, Abdalla EK, Kopetz S et al (2011) High survival rate after two-stage resection of advanced colorectal liver metastases: response-based selection and complete resection define outcome. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 29:1083–1090. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.32.6132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B et al (2013) Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:1208–1215. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70447-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Cutsem E, Lenz H-J, Köhne C-H et al (2015) Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 33:692–700. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A et al (2012) ESMO consensus guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO 23:2479–2516. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B et al (2008) Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 371:1007–1016. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60455-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wicherts DA, Miller R, de Haas RJ et al (2008) Long-term results of two-stage hepatectomy for irresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Ann Surg 248:994–1005. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181907fd9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanaka K, Takakura H, Takeda K et al (2009) Importance of complete pathologic response to prehepatectomy chemotherapy in treating colorectal cancer metastases. Ann Surg 250:935–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kabbinavar FF, Schulz J, McCleod M et al (2005) Addition of bevacizumab to bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II trial. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23:3697–3705. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W et al (2004) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2335–2342. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Okines A, Puerto OD, Cunningham D et al (2009) Surgery with curative-intent in patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer first BEAT and the randomised phase-III NO16966 trial. Br J Cancer 101:1033–1038. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Masi G, Loupakis F, Salvatore L et al (2010) Bevacizumab with FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinate) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:845–852. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70175-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scappaticci FA, Fehrenbacher L, Cartwright T et al (2005) Surgical wound healing complications in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab. J Surg Oncol 91:173–180. doi:10.1002/jso.20301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamandl D, Gruenberger B, Klinger M et al (2010) Liver resection remains a safe procedure after neoadjuvant chemotherapy including bevacizumab: a case-controlled study. Ann Surg 252:124–130. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181deb67f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Balzan S, Belghiti J, Farges O et al (2005) The ???50-50 criteria??? On postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy. Ann Surg 242:824–829. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000189131.90876.9e

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Folprecht G, Gruenberger T, Bechstein WO et al (2010) Tumour response and secondary resectability of colorectal liver metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab: the CELIM randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:38–47. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70330-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wong R, Cunningham D, Barbachano Y et al (2011) A multicentre study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab as perioperative treatment of patients with poor-risk colorectal liver-only metastases not selected for upfront resection. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO 22:2042–2048. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gruenberger B, Tamandl D, Schueller J et al (2008) Bevacizumab, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with potentially curable metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 26:1830–1835. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.13.7679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cutsem EV, Rivera F, Berry S et al (2009) Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab with FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI and fluoropyrimidines in metastatic colorectal cancer: the BEAT study. Ann Oncol 20:1842–1847. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gruenberger T, Bridgewater J, Chau I et al (2015) Bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX-6 or FOLFOXIRI in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer: the OLIVIA multinational randomised phase II trial. Ann Oncol 26:702–708. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reddy SK, Morse MA, Hurwitz HI et al (2008) Addition of bevacizumab to irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemotherapy regimens does not increase morbidity after resection of colorectal liver metastases. J Am Coll Surg 206:96–106. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. D’Angelica M, Kornprat P, Gonen M et al (2006) Lack of evidence for increased operative morbidity after hepatectomy with perioperative use of bevacizumab: a matched case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol 14:759–765. doi:10.1245/s10434-006-9074-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rubbia-Brandt L, Lauwers GY, Wang H et al (2010) Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and nodular regenerative hyperplasia are frequent oxaliplatin-associated liver lesions and partially prevented by bevacizumab in patients with hepatic colorectal metastasis. Histopathology 56:430–439. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03511.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kesmodel SB, Ellis LM, Lin E et al (2008) Preoperative bevacizumab does not significantly increase postoperative complication rates in patients undergoing hepatic surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Clin Oncol 26:5254–5260. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.17.7857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Li D-B, Ye F, Wu X-R et al (2013) Preoperative administration of bevacizumab is safe for patients with colorectal liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol WJG 19:761–768. doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i5.761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Viganò L, Capussotti L, De Rosa G et al (2013) Liver resection for colorectal metastases after chemotherapy: impact of chemotherapy-related liver injuries, pathological tumor response, and micrometastases on long-term survival. Ann Surg 258:731–740 . discussion 741–742 doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a6183e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Robinson SM, Wilson CH, Burt AD et al (2012) Chemotherapy-associated liver injury in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:4287–4299. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2438-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Rubbia-Brandt L, Audard V, Sartoretti P et al (2004) Severe hepatic sinusoidal obstruction associated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO 15:460–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kishi Y, Zorzi D, Contreras CM et al (2010) Extended preoperative chemotherapy does not improve pathologic response and increases postoperative liver insufficiency after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 17:2870–2876. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-1166-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mahfud M, Breitenstein S, El-Badry AM et al (2010) Impact of preoperative bevacizumab on complications after resection of colorectal liver metastases: case-matched control study. World J Surg 34:92–100. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0251-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Deleve LD, Wang X, Tsai J et al (2003) Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (veno-occlusive disease) in the rat is prevented by matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. Gastroenterology 125:882–890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang H, Keiser JA (1998) Vascular endothelial growth factor upregulates the expression of matrix metalloproteinases in vascular smooth muscle cells: role of flt-1. Circ Res 83:832–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Karoui M, Penna C, Amin-Hashem M et al (2006) Influence of preoperative chemotherapy on the risk of major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 243:1–7. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000193603.26265.c3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Mayo SC, Pulitano C, Marques H et al (2013) Surgical management of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: a multicenter international analysis. J Am Coll Surg 216:707–718. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Mokart D, Giaoui E, Barbier L et al (2016) Postoperative sepsis in cancer patients undergoing major elective digestive surgery is associated with increased long-term mortality. J Crit Care 31:48–53. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.10.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Krarup P-M, Nordholm-Carstensen A, Jorgensen LN, Harling H (2014) Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer: a Nationwide cohort study. Ann Surg 259:930–938. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a6f2fc

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nagai S, Fujii T, Kodera Y et al (2011) Recurrence pattern and prognosis of pancreatic cancer after pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg Oncol 18:2329–2337. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1604-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. van der Gaag NA, Harmsen K, Eshuis WJ et al (2014) Pancreatoduodenectomy associated complications influence cancer recurrence and time interval to death. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol 40:551–558. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2013.12.012

    Google Scholar 

  48. Markar S, Gronnier C, Duhamel A et al (2015) The impact of severe anastomotic leak on long-term survival and cancer recurrence after surgical resection for esophageal malignancy. Ann Surg 262:972–980. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Blazer DG, Kishi Y, Maru DM et al (2008) Pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy: a new outcome end point after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 26:5344–5351. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.17.5299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Chun Y, Vauthey J, Boonsirikamchai P et al (2009) Association of computed tomography morphologic criteria with pathologic response and survival in patients treated with bevacizumab for colorectal liver metastases. JAMA 302:2338–2344. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

DB and LS performed the study concept and design. YM performed the acquisition of data. DB, MR, and LS analyzed and interpreted the data. DB and LS drafted the manuscript. AL, KB, MR, and BM critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. DB and MR participated in the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Sulpice.

Ethics declarations

Funding

There was no financial support for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required but the clinical data were retrospectively collected from a liver resection database and analyzed after institutional review board approval was obtained.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Table 1

Univariate and multivariate analysis of Clavien ≥3 risk factors after liver resection for colorectal metastasis following chemotherapy in the propensity score-matched population (DOCX 67 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Liver resection and postoperative outcome details in patients with a combined colorectal resection compared to patient without. (DOCX 74 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bergeat, D., Rayar, M., Mouchel, Y. et al. Preoperative bevacizumab and surgery for colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402, 57–67 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1551-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1551-3

Keywords

Navigation