Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of tumor location on lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Data evaluating the risk of lymph node metastasis depending upon the location of the primary tumor are limited in patients with T1 colorectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the impact of tumor location on lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients who underwent an oncologic resection with curative intent for T1 adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum between January 1997 and October 2014 were assessed. Exclusion criteria were distant organ metastases, previous or concurrent cancer, past history of surgical or medical cancer treatment, preoperative chemoradiation, and patients with inflammatory bowel disease or polyposis syndromes.

Results

Out of 232 (56 % male) patients fulfilling the study criteria, 24 (10 %) had lymph node metastasis. Age (65 vs 61 years, p = 0.1), gender (55 vs 63 % male, p = 0.5), tumor size (2 vs 2 cm, p = 0.49), and lymphovascular invasion (5 vs 8 %, p = 0.46) were not associated with lymph node metastasis. While there was no statistical significance (p = 0.2), lymph node positivity was higher in rectal cancer (14 %, n = 11/79) compared to colon cancer (9 %, n = 13/153).

Conclusions

Although it was not statistically significant, lymph node positivity varies based on tumor location of T1 colorectal adenocarcinoma regardless of fundamental tumor characteristics including size, differentiation, and lymphovascular invasion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nascimbeni R, Burgart LJ, Nivatvongs S, Larson DR (2002) Risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 45:200–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morson BC, Bussey HJ (1970) Predisposing causes of intestinal cancer. Curr Probl Surg 1–46

  3. Tanaka S, Haruma K, Teixeira CR et al (1995) Endoscopic treatment of submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma with special reference to risk factors for lymph node metastasis. J Gastroenterol 30:710–717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sakuragi M, Togashi K, Konishi F et al (2003) Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in T1 stage colorectal carcinomas. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1626–1632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong SL (2009) Lymph node counts and survival rates after resection for colon and rectal cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res 3:S33–S35

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Okuyama T, Oya M, Ishikawa H (2002) Budding as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 45:628–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rasheed S, Bowley DM, Aziz O et al (2008) Can depth of tumour invasion predict lymph node positivity in patients undergoing resection for early rectal cancer? A comparative study between T1 and T2 cancers. Color Dis 10:231–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sjo OH, Lunde OC, Nygaard K et al (2008) Tumour location is a prognostic factor for survival in colonic cancer patients. Color Dis 10:33–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kawachi H, Eishi Y, Ueno H et al (2015) A three-tier classification system based on the depth of submucosal invasion and budding/sprouting can improve the treatment strategy for T1 colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. Mod Pathol 28:872–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan S, Goh V, Tam E et al (2012) Perfusion CT assessment of the colon and rectum: feasibility of quantification of bowel wall perfusion and vascularization. Eur J Radiol 81:821–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitajima K, Fujimori T, Fujii S et al (2004) Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study. J Gastroenterol 39:534–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Morita T et al (2011) Characteristics of recurrence after curative resection for T1 colorectal cancer: Japanese multicenter study. J Gastroenterol 46:203–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhangu A, Brown G, Nicholls RJ et al (2013) Survival outcome of local excision versus radical resection of colon or rectal carcinoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population-based study. Ann Surg 258:563–565

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Doornebosch PG, Gosselink MP, Neijenhuis PA et al (2008) Impact of transanal endoscopic microsurgery on functional outcome and quality of life. Int J Color Dis 23:709–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SW, Garrett KA, Shin JH et al (2013) Dynamic article: long-term outcomes of patients undergoing combined endolaparoscopic surgery for benign colon polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 56:869–873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gorgun IE, Aytac E, Costedio MM et al (2014) Transanal endoscopic surgery using a single access port: a practical tool in the surgeon’s toybox. Surg Endosc 28:1034–1038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van den Boezem PB, Kruyt PM, Stommel MW et al (2011) Transanal single-port surgery for the resection of large polyps. Dig Surg 28:412–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lim SB, Yu CS, Jang SJ et al (2010) Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in sporadic colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53:377–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Minsky BD, Mies C, Rich TA et al (1989) Lymphatic vessel invasion is an independent prognostic factor for survival in colorectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17:311–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wada H, Shiozawa M, Katayama K et al (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of histopathological predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol 2015 [Epub ahead of print]

  21. Kikuchi R, Takano M, Takagi K et al (1995) Management of early invasive colorectal cancer. Risk of recurrence and clinical guidelines. Dis Colon Rectum 38:1286–1295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Akagi Y, Adachi Y, Kinugasa T et al (2013) Lymph node evaluation and survival in colorectal cancer: review of population-based, prospective studies. Anticancer Res 33:2839–2847

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zong L, Chen P, Wang DX (2014) Death decoy receptor overexpression and increased malignancy risk in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 21(20):4440–4445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Storli KE, Søndenaa K, Bukholm IR, Nesvik I, Bru T, Furnes B, Hjelmeland B, Iversen KB, Eide GE (2011) Overall survival after resection for colon cancer in a national cohort study was adversely affected by TNM stage, lymph node ratio, gender, and old age. Int J Color Dis 26:1299–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was a poster presentation at the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Annual Meeting, May 30–June 3, 2015, Boston, MA. This study was supported by the Ed and Joey Story Endowed Chair in Colorectal Surgery. Erman Aytac is an assistant professor of surgery at the Acibadem University School of Medicine in Istanbul, Turkey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hermann Kessler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aytac, E., Gorgun, E., Costedio, M.M. et al. Impact of tumor location on lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401, 627–632 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1452-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1452-x

Keywords

Navigation