Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of neuropsychological outcome and “quality of life” after glioma surgery

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Extended tumour resection is imperative to improve the outcome of glioma patients but also carries the risk of increasing morbidity and thus, potentially, of decreasing the patient’s quality of life (QOL). In this pilot study, we evaluated how postoperative neurological and neuropsychological alterations impacted on QOL in patients who underwent glioma resection.

Methods

Twenty-two patients were included in this study and tested at three different time points, i.e. 1 day before surgery (t1), on the day of discharge (t2) and 3 months following surgery (T3). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, Addenbrook’s Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) and a comprehensive battery of established tests were used to assess neurological and neuropsychological profiles. QOL and subjectively experienced health condition were ascertained through the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC-QLQ C30) and EORTC-QLQ BN20 questionnaires.

Results

Postoperatively, 5/22 patients worsened and 5/22 patients improved neurologically. Depending on the neuropsychological test, up to 57.1 % of patients experienced deterioration of some sort of neuropsychological function. Most of these functions, however, recovered during the extended observation period (3 months). There was no correlation between QOL and a patient’s neurological or neuropsychological condition.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that extended tumour resection is not necessarily linked to a loss in QOL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T et al (2006) Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 7:392–401. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70665-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Duffau H (2012) The challenge to remove diffuse low-grade gliomas while preserving brain functions. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:569–574. doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1275-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanai N, Berger MS (2008) Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery 62:753–764. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000318159.21731.cf, discussion 264–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanai N, Mirzadeh Z, Berger MS (2008) Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection. N Engl J Med 358:18–27. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa067819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yordanova YN, Moritz-Gasser S, Duffau H (2011) Awake surgery for WHO Grade II gliomas within “noneloquent” areas in the left dominant hemisphere: toward a “supratotal” resection. Clin Article J Neurosurg 115:232–239. doi:10.3171/2011.3.JNS101333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reardon DA, Galanis E, DeGroot JF et al (2011) Clinical trial end points for high-grade glioma: the evolving landscape. Neuro-Oncology 13:353–361. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noq203

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Santini B, Talacchi A, Squintani G et al (2012) Cognitive outcome after awake surgery for tumors in language areas. J Neurooncol 108:319–326. doi:10.1007/s11060-012-0817-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fayers PM, Hopwood P, Harvey A et al (1997) Quality of life assessment in clinical trials—guidelines and a checklist for protocol writers: the U.K. Medical Research Council experience. MRC Cancer Trials Office. Eur J Cancer 33:20–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer U, Arnold M, Nedeltchev K et al (2005) NIHSS score and arteriographic findings in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 36:2121–2125. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000182099.04994.fc

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berger K, Weltermann B, Kolominsky-Rabas P et al (1999) The reliability of stroke scales. The german version of NIHSS, ESS and Rankin scales. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 67:81–93. doi:10.1055/s-2007-993985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bak TH, Mioshi E (2007) A cognitive bedside assessment beyond the MMSE: the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination. Pract Neurol 7:245–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fayers P, Bottomley A, EORTC Quality of Life Group, Quality of Life Unit (2002) Quality of life research within the EORTC-the EORTC QLQ-C30. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Eur J Cancer 38(Suppl 4):S125–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bjordal K, de Graeff A, Fayers PM et al (2000) A 12 country field study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) in head and neck patients. EORTC Quality of Life Group. Eur J Cancer 36:1796–1807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Scott NW, Fayers PM, Bottomley A et al (2006) Comparing translations of the EORTC QLQ-C30 using differential item functioning analyses. Qual Life Res 15:1103–1115. doi:10.1007/s11136-006-0040-x, discussion 1117–1120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng J, Zhang X, Liu B-L (2009) Health-related quality of life in patients with high-grade glioma. Neuro-Oncology 11:41–50. doi:10.1215/15228517-2008-050

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng J, Liu B, Zhang X et al (2010) Health-related quality of life in glioma patients in China. BMC Cancer 10:305. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-10-305

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

Study conception and design: RA, BC, JW, TB, LV, AU

Acquisition of data: RA, JW, TB, LV

Analysis and interpretation of data: RA, BC, JW, TB, LV, AU

Drafting of manuscript: RA, BC, JW, TB, LV, AU

Critical revision of manuscript: RA, BC, JW, TB, LV, AU

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rezvan Ahmadi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Julia Wolf and Benito Campos contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolf, J., Campos, B., Bruckner, T. et al. Evaluation of neuropsychological outcome and “quality of life” after glioma surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401, 541–549 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1403-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1403-6

Keywords

Navigation