Skip to main content
Log in

Attentional focus does not impact locomotor–respiratory coupling in trained runners

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to explore relationships between attentional strategies and LRC, running economy, perceived exertion, and dyspnea.

Methods

25 endurance-trained males (\( \dot{\text V}\)O2max = 68.2 ± 4.7 mL kg−1 min−1) ran for 5 min each at two different submaximal speeds, during which LRC and oxygen consumption (\( \dot{\text V}\)O2) were measured. The degree of LRC was calculated as the percentage of breaths occurring during the same decile of the step cycle. Attentional focus was assessed at the end of exercise using an Attentional Focusing Questionnaire, with subscales for association, dissociation, and distress.

Results

We found no significant relationships between attentional focus measures and LRC. However, dissociation scores were positively correlated with \( \dot{\text V}\)O2 (r = 0.404), as well as  %\( \dot{\text V}\)O2max (r = 0.474), at the slower running speed. Distress scores were the only attentional focus subscale related to perceived exertion and dyspnea (r = 0.378 to 0.654).

Conclusion

These findings suggest attentional focus is not driving the high levels of LRC seen in trained endurance athletes but may relate to running economy and perceptual responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, AS. The data are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.

Abbreviations

AFQ:

Attentional Focusing Questionnaire

CI:

Confidence interval

DYS:

Ratings of dyspnea

LRC:

Locomotor–respiratory coupling

RE:

Running economy

RPE:

Ratings of perceived exertion

\( \dot{\text V}\) E :

Minute ventilation

\( \dot{\text V}\)O2 :

Oxygen consumption

\( \dot{\text V}\)O2max :

Maximal oxygen consumption

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by an Indiana University School of Public Health Student Research Grant and a University Graduate School Grant-in-Aid of Doctoral Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AS, TF, and RF conceived and designed the research. AS, JS, and TF conducted experiments. AS and JS analyzed data. AS, JS, and TL wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abigail S. L. Stickford.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Ethics approval

Protocols and procedures used in testing were approved by the local Institutional Review Board.

Consent to participate

All subjects provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

The authors grant the publisher permission to publish the work contained herein.

Additional information

Communicated by Susan Hopkins.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stickford, A.S.L., Stickford, J.L., Fulton, T.J. et al. Attentional focus does not impact locomotor–respiratory coupling in trained runners. Eur J Appl Physiol 120, 2477–2486 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04475-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04475-6

Keywords

Navigation