Skip to main content
Log in

Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to self-regulated and imposed submaximal arm–leg ergometry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study compared cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to exercise using self-regulated and imposed power outputs distributed between the arms and legs.

Methods

Ten males (age 21.7 ± 3.4 years) initially undertook incremental arm-crank ergometry (ACE) and cycle ergometry (CYC) tests to volitional exhaustion to determine peak power output (Wpeak). Two subsequent tests involved 20-min combined arm–leg ergometry (ALE) trials, using imposed and self-regulated protocols, both of which aimed to elicit an exercising heart rate of 160 beats min−1. During the imposed trial, arm and leg intensity were set at 40% of each ergometer-specific Wpeak. During the self-regulated trial, participants were asked to self-regulate cadence and resistance to achieve the target heart rate. Heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake (\(\dot {V}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}\)), pulmonary ventilation (\({\dot {V}_{\text{E}}}\)), and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded continuously.

Results

As expected, there were no differences between imposed and self-regulated trials for HR, \(\dot {V}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}\), and \({\dot {V}_{\text{E}}}\) (all P ≥ 0.05). However, central RPE and local RPE for the arms were lower during self-regulated compared imposed trials (P ≤ 0.05). Lower RPE during the self-regulated trial was related to preferential adjustments in how the arms (33 ± 5% Wpeak) and legs (46 ± 5% Wpeak) contributed to the exercise intensity.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that despite similar metabolic and cardiovascular strain elicited by imposed and self-regulated ALE, the latter was perceived to be less strenuous, which is related to participants doing more work with the legs and less work with the arms to achieve the target intensity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALE:

Arm–leg ergometry

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

ACE:

Arm-crank ergometry

CYC:

Cycle ergometry

d :

Cohen’s d effect sizes

HR:

Heart rate

RER:

Respiratory exchange ratio

RPEC :

Central rating of perceived exertion

RPEARMS :

Ratings of perceived exertion for arm musculature

RPELEGS :

Ratings of perceived exertion for leg musculature

\({\dot {V}_{\text{E}}}\) :

Pulmonary ventilation

\(\dot {V}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}\) :

Oxygen uptake

\(\dot {V}{{\text{O}}_{{\text{2peak}}}}\) :

Peak oxygen uptake

W peak :

Peak power output

References

  • Astrand PO, Saltin B (1961) Maximal oxygen uptake and heart rate in various types of muscular activity. J Appl Physiol 16(6):977–981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh U, Kanstrup IL, Ekblom B (1976) Maximal oxygen uptake during exercise with various combinations of arm and leg work. J Appl Physiol 41(2):191–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borg GA (1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14(5):377–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley J, Eston R (2006) Ratings of perceived exertion. In: Winter ME, Jones AM, Davison RR, Bromley PD, Mercer T (eds) Sport and exercise physiology testing guidelines. Sport and exercise physiology testing guidelines: the British association of sport and exercise sciences guide, vol I: sport testing. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eston RG, Brodie DA (1986) Responses to arm and leg ergometry. Br J Sports Med 20(1):4–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gleser MA, Horstman DH, Mello RP (1974) The effect on VO2 max of adding arm work to maximal leg work. Med Sci Sports Exerc 6(2):104–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutin B, Ang KE, Torrey K (1988) Cardiorespiratory and subjective responses to incremental and constant load ergometry with arms and legs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69(7):510–513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan RD, Gettman LR, Upton SJ, Duncan JJ, Cummings JM (1983) Cardiorespiratory responses to arm, leg, and combined arm and leg work on an air-braked ergometer. J Cardiac Rehabil 3:689–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman FC, Connors MC, Gault JA, Hagerman GR, Polinski WJ (1978) Energy expenditure during simulated rowing. J Appl Physiol 45(1):87–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haile L, Gallagher M, Robertson RJ (2015) Self-selected versus imposed exercise intensities. In: Perceived exertion laboratory manual. Springer, New York, pp 163–177

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hill MW, Goss-Sampson M, Duncan MJ, Price MJ (2014) The effects of maximal and submaximal arm crank ergometry and cycle ergometry on postural sway. Eur J Sport Sci 14(8):782–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman MD, Kassay KM, Zeni AI, Clifford PS (1996) Does the amount of exercising muscle alter the aerobic demand of dynamic exercise? Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 74(6):541–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kravitz L, Robergs RA, Heyward VH, Wagner DR, Powers K (1997) Exercise mode and gender comparisons of energy expenditure at self-selected intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29(8):1028–1035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mier CM, Feito Y (2006) Metabolic cost of stride rate, resistance, and combined use of arms and legs on the elliptical trainer. Res Q Exerc Sport 77(4):507–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagle FJ, Richie JP, Giese MD (1984) VO2max responses in separate and combined arm and leg air-braked ergometer exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 16(6):563–566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt G, Rose EA, Burgess WM (2006) The psychological and physiological responses of sedentary individuals to prescribed and preferred intensity exercise. Br J Health Psychol 11:39–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reybrouck T, Heigenhauser GF, Faulkner JA (1975) Limitations to maximum oxygen uptake in arms, leg, and combined arm-leg ergometry. J Appl Physiol 38(5):774–779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto M, Tazoe T, Nakajima T, Endoh T, Shiozawa S, Komiyama T (2007) Voluntary changes in leg cadence modulate arm cadence during simultaneous arm and leg cycling. Exp Brain Res 176(1):188–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto M, Tazoe T, Nakajima T, Endoh T, Komiyama T (2014) Leg automaticity is stronger than arm automaticity during simultaneous arm and leg cycling. Neurosci Let 564:62–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sawka MN (1986) Physiology of upper body exercise. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 14(1):175–212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Secher NH, Ruberg-Larsen N, Binkhorst RA, Bonde-Petersen F (1974) Maximal oxygen uptake during arm cranking and combined arm plus leg exercise. J Appl Physiol 36(5):515–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Secher NH, Clausen JP, Klausen K, Noer I, Trap-Jensen J (1977) Central and regional circulatory effects of adding arm exercise to leg exercise. Acta Physiol 100(3):288–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg J, Astrand P-O, Ekblom B, Royce J, Saltin B (1967) Hemodynamic responses to work with different muscle groups, sitting and supine. J Appl Physiol 22:61–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeni AI, Hoffman MD, Clifford PS (1996) Energy expenditure with indoor exercise machines. Jama 275(18):1424–1427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MH, MPr, and CT conceived and designed research. MH, CT, and MPu conducted experiments. MH wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathew Hill.

Additional information

Communicated by Keith Phillip George.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hill, M., Talbot, C., Puddiford, M. et al. Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to self-regulated and imposed submaximal arm–leg ergometry. Eur J Appl Physiol 118, 1011–1019 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3838-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3838-7

Keywords

Navigation