Skip to main content
Log in

Self-selected speeds and metabolic cost of longboard skateboarding

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine self-selected speeds, metabolic rate, and gross metabolic cost during longboard skateboarding.

Methods

We measured overground speed and metabolic rate while 15 experienced longboarders traveled at their self-selected slow, typical and fast speeds.

Results

Mean longboarding speeds were 3.7, 4.5 and 5.1 m s−1, during slow, typical and fast trials, respectively. Mean rates of oxygen consumption were 24.1, 29.1 and 37.2 ml kg−1 min−1 and mean rates of energy expenditure were 33.5, 41.8 and 52.7 kJ min−1 at the slow, typical and fast speeds, respectively. At typical speeds, average intensity was ~8.5 METs. There was a significant positive relationship between oxygen consumption and energy expenditure versus speed (R 2 = 0.69 (P < 0.001), and R 2 = 0.78 (P < 0.001), respectively). The gross metabolic cost was ~2.2 J kg−1 m−1 at the typical speed, greater than that reported for cycling and ~50 % smaller than that of walking.

Conclusion

These results suggest that longboarding is a novel form of physical activity that elicits vigorous intensity, yet is economical compared to walking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACSM:

American College of Sport Medicine

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

GPS:

Global positioning system

Hz:

Hertz

J:

Joules

kg:

Kilogram

km:

Kilometer

kJ:

Kilojoule

MET:

Metabolic equivalent

m:

Meter

min:

Minute

ml:

Milliliters

MPH:

Miles per hour

s:

Second

SEE:

Standard error of the estimate

References

  • American College of Sports Medicine (2006) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 7th edn. Appendix D. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

  • Bellizzi MJ, King KA, Cushman SK, Weyand PG (1998) Does the application of ground force set the energetic cost of cross-country skiing? J Appl Physiol 85:1736–1743

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein MH, Bornstein BH (1976) The pace of life. Nature 259:557–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockway J (1987) Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 41(6):463–471

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Browning RC, Baker EA, Herron JA, Kram R (2006) Effects of obesity and sex on the energetic cost and preferred speed of walking. J Appl Physiol 100:390–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke E (2002) Serious cycling. In: Human kinetics, 2nd edn. Champaign, IL, pp 28–35

  • di Prampero P (1986) The energy cost of human locomotion on land and in water. Int J Sports Med 7:55–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dill J (2009) Bicycling for transportation and health: the role of infrastructure: the role of the infrastructure. J Public Health Policy 30(Suppl 1):S95–S110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Formenti F, Ardigò LP, Minetti AE (2005) Human locomotion on snow: determinants of economy and speed of skiing across the ages. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 272:1561–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank LD (2000) Land use and transportation interaction implications on public health and quality life. J Plan Educa Res 20:6–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank LD, Engelke PO (2001) The built environment and human activity patterns: exploring the impacts of urban form on public health. J Plan Lit 16(2):202–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetzler RK, Hunt I, Stickley CD, Kimura IF (2011) Selected metabolic responses to skateboarding. Res Q Exerc Sport 82(4):788–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inman VT, Ralston HJ, Todd F (1994) Human locomotion. In: Rose J, Gamble JG (eds) Human walking, 2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 2–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger J, Ham SA, Berrigan D, Ballard-Barbash R (2008) Prevalence of transportation and leisure walking among U.S. adults. Prev Med 47(3):329–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme B, Jakobsen V, Hetland S, Smith G (2005) Ski skating technique and physiological responses across slopes and speeds. Eur J Appl Physiol 95:205–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin PE, Rothstein DE, Larish DD (1992) Effects of age and physical activity status on the speed-aerobic demand relationship of walking. J Appl Physiol 73(1):200–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melanson EL, Freedson PS, Webb R, Jungbluth S, Kozlowski N (1996) Exercise responses to running and in-line skating at self-selected paces. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28(2):247–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minetti AE, Pinkerton J, Zamparo P (2001) From bipedalism to bicyclism: evolution in energetics and biomechanics of historic bicycles. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 268:1351–1360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oja P, Vuori I, Paronen O (1998) Daily walking and cycling to work: their utility as health-enhancing physical activity. Patient Educ Couns 33:S87–S94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston HJ (1958) Energy-speed relation and optimal speed during level walking. Arbeitsphysiologie 17(4):277–283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rey-López JP, Vicente-Rodríguez G, Biosca M, Moreno LA (2008) Sedentary behaviour and obesity development in children and adolescents. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 18(3):242–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosdahl H, Gullstrand L, Salier-Eriksson J, Johansson P, Schantz P (2010) Evaluation of the oxycon mobile metabolic system against the Douglas bag method. Eur J Appl Physiol 109(2):159–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenson J, Heliams DB, Maloney SK, Withers PC, Lloyd DG, Fournier PA (2007) Reappraisal of the comparative cost of human locomotion using gait-specific allometric analyses. J Exp Biol 210(pt 20):3513–3524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD (2003) Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med 25(2):80–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sallis JF, Frank LD, Saelens BE, Kraft MK (2004) Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research. Trans Res Part A Policy Pract 38(4):249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker VA (1975) The energetic cost of moving about: walking and running are extremely inefficient forms of locomotion. Much greater efficiency is achieved by birds, fish and bicyclists. Am Sci 63(4):413–419

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from AEND Industries.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

This experiment complies with the current laws of the United States of America.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond C. Browning.

Additional information

Communicated by Guido Ferretti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Board, W.J., Browning, R.C. Self-selected speeds and metabolic cost of longboard skateboarding. Eur J Appl Physiol 114, 2381–2386 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-2959-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-2959-x

Keywords

Navigation