Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sub-Tenon’s capsule triamcinolone acetonide injection to prevent brolucizumab-associated intraocular inflammation

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy of sub-Tenon’s capsule triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) injections for preventing development of intraocular inflammation (IOI) related to intravitreal injection (IVI) of brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Methods

Consecutive patients with nAMD treated with brolucizumab IVIs were studied retrospectively. All eyes treated with brolucizumab in the clinic were switched from another anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent. After the fourth case of IOI related to brolucizumab IVI, all eyes treated with brolucizumab received a STTA injection. The patients were divided into two groups: brolucizumab alone and brolucizumab combined with a STTA injection.

Results

Forty-four eyes (44 patients) treated with at least one brolucizumab IVI were studied: 14 eyes received brolucizumab IVI alone and 30 eyes received the combination therapy. IOI related to brolucizumab IVIs developed in four (28.6%) of 14 eyes in the brolucizumab group; IOI was severe in one eye, moderate in two eyes, and mild in one eye according to the HAWK and HARRIER trial definition; IOI did not develop in the 30 eyes that received combination therapy, the difference of which reached significance (p = 0.012). Regarding combination therapy, the intraocular pressure in three (10%) eyes increased to 22 to about 26 mmHg after the STTA injection and returned to normal range within 2 months without medication; no cataracts developed during this short mean follow-up period follow-up period of 7.1 ± 0.4 months.

Conclusion

The results indicated the possible preventative effect of a STTA injection on development of brolucizumab-associated IOI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Markham A (2019) Brolucizumab: first approval. Drugs 79:1997–2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-019-01231-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dugel PU, Jaffe GJ, Sallstig P et al (2017) Brolucizumab versus aflibercept in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized trial. Ophthalmology 124:1296–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Holz FG, Dugel PU, Weissgerber G et al (2016) Single-chain anti-body fragment VEGF inhibitor RTH258 for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized controlled study. Ophthalmology 123:1080–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dugel PU, Koh A, Ogura Y et al (2020) HAWK and HARRIER: Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-masked trials of brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 127:72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haug SJ, Hien DL, Uludag G, et al (2020) Retinal arterial occlusive vasculitis following intravitreal brolucizumab administration. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100680

  6. Jain A, Chea S, Matsumiya W, et al (2020) Severe vision secondary to retinal arteriolar occlusions after multiple intravitreal brolucizumab administrations. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100687

  7. Witkin AJ, Hahn P, Murray TG et al (2020) Occlusive retinal vasculitis following intravitreal brolucizumab. J Vitreoretin Dis 4:269–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/2474126420930863

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Baumal CR, Spaide RF, Vajzovic L et al (2020) Retinal vasculitis and intraocular inflammation after intravitreal injection of brolucizumab. Ophthalmology 127:1345–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.04.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Monés J, Srivastava SK, Jaffe GJ et al (2021) Risk of inflammation, retinal vasculitis, and retinal occlusion related events with brolucizumab.Post hoc review of HAWK and HARRIER. Ophthalmology 128:1050–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prenner JL, Halperin LS, Rycroft C et al (2015) Disease burden in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration: findings from a time-and-motion study. Am J Ophthalmol 160:725–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.06.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bulirsch LM, Saβmanshausen M, Nadal J, et al (2021) Short-term real-world outcomes following intravitreal brolucizmab for neovascular AMD: SHIFY study. Br J Ophthalmol; https://bjo.bmj.com/content/bjophthalmol/early/2021/06/08/bjophthalmol-2020-318672.full.pdf

  12. Hikichi T (2021) Three Japanese cases of intraocular inflammation after intravitreal brolucizumab injections in one clinic. Jpn J Ophthalmol 65:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-021-00819-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Singer M, Albini TA, Seres A et al (2022) Clinical characteristics and outcomes of eyes with intraocular inflammation after brolucizumab: post hoc analysis of HAWK and HARRIER. Ophthalmol Retina 6:97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2021.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ogura Y, Jaffe GJ, Cheung CMG, et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in Japanese participants of HAWK. Br J Ophthalmol; https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319090

  15. Matsumoto H, Hoshino J, Mukai R et al (2021) Short-term outcomes of intravitreal brolucizumab for treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration with type 1 choroidal neovascularization. Sci Rep 11:6759. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86014-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Enríquez AB, Baumal CR, Crane AM, et al (2021) Early experience with brolucizumab treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol 139:441–448; https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/2776731

  17. Sharma A, Kumar N, Parachuri N et al (2021) Brolucizumab-related retinal vasculitis: emerging disconnect between clinical trials and real world. Eye (Lond) 35:1292–1294. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01227-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baumal CR (2022) Risk factors for intraocular inflammation after brolucizumab treatment. JAMA Ophthalmol 140:28–29. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.4586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kovacs K, Wagley S, Quirk MT et al (2021) Pharmacokinetic study of vitreous and serum concentrations of triamcinolone acetonide after posterior sub-Tenon’s injection. Am J Ophthalmol 153:939–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Arie Y, Miyai H, Suzuki A et al (2020) Comparative study on pharmacokinetics and toxicity of intravitreal and sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in ocular tissues. Int J Ophthalmol 13:1864–71. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2020.12.04

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cellini M, Pazzaglia A, Zamparini E, et al (2008) Intravitreal vs. subtenon triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of diabetic cystoid macular edema. BMC Ophthalmol 8 5 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-8-5

  22. Thomas ER, Wang J, Ege E et al (2006) Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide concentration after subtenon injection. Am J Ophthalmol 142:860–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.05.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Inoue M, Takeda K, Morita K et al (2004) Vitreous concentrations of triamcinolone acetonide in human eyes after intravitreal or subtenon injection. Am J Ophthalmol 138:1046–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.05.028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma A, Kumar N, Parachuri N et al (2021) Brolucizumab-foreseeable workflow in the current scenario. Eye (Lond) 35:1548–1550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01324-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Verma LK, Vivek MB, Kumar A et al (2004) A prospective controlled trial to evaluate the adjunctive role of posterior subtenon triamcinolone in the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 20:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1089/1080768041725308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Athanasiadis Y, Tsatsos M, Sharma A et al (2013) Subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide in the management of ocular inflammatory disease. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 29:516–522. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2012.0208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Okada AA, Wakabayashi T, Morimura Y et al (2003) Trans-Tenon’s retrobulbar triamcinolone infusion for the treatment of uveitis. Br J Ophthalmol 87:968–971. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.8.968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Luo DW, Zhu BJ, Zheng Z et al (2014) Subtenon vs intravitreal triamcinolone injection in diabetic macular edema, a prospective study in Chinese population. Pak J Med Sci 30:749–54. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.304.4810

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Qi HP, Bi S, Wei SQ et al (2012) Intravitreal versus subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection for diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Eye Res 37:1136–47. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2012.705412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Abd El-Razik AH, El-Sayed S, Ellakwa AA, et al (2014) Intravitreal versus subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema. Menoufia Med J 27:636; https://www.mmj.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-2098;year=2014;volume=27;issue=4;spage=636;epage=642;aulast=El-Sayed

  31. Inatani M, Iwao K, Kawaji T et al (2008) Intraocular pressure elevation after injection of triamcinolone acetonide: a multicenter retrospective case-control study. Am J Ophthalmol 145:676–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Maeda Y, Ishikawa H, Nishikawa H et al (2019) Intraocular pressure elevation after subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection; multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan. PLoS ONE 14:e0226118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ogura Y, Shimura M, Iida T et al (2019) Triamcinolone acetonide (WP-0508ST) for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmologica 241:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1159/000492135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kataoka K, Horiguchi E, Kawano K et al (2021) Three cases of brolucizumab-associated retinal vasculitis treated with systemic and local steroid therapy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 65:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-021-00818-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TH was involved in conception, design, acquisition of data, analysis, drafting, and revising the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taiichi Hikichi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Sapporo Medical Association, Sapporo, Japan.

Conflict interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hikichi, T. Sub-Tenon’s capsule triamcinolone acetonide injection to prevent brolucizumab-associated intraocular inflammation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260, 2529–2535 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05611-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05611-y

Keywords

Navigation