Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the efficacy of sub-Tenon’s capsule triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) injections for preventing development of intraocular inflammation (IOI) related to intravitreal injection (IVI) of brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
Methods
Consecutive patients with nAMD treated with brolucizumab IVIs were studied retrospectively. All eyes treated with brolucizumab in the clinic were switched from another anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent. After the fourth case of IOI related to brolucizumab IVI, all eyes treated with brolucizumab received a STTA injection. The patients were divided into two groups: brolucizumab alone and brolucizumab combined with a STTA injection.
Results
Forty-four eyes (44 patients) treated with at least one brolucizumab IVI were studied: 14 eyes received brolucizumab IVI alone and 30 eyes received the combination therapy. IOI related to brolucizumab IVIs developed in four (28.6%) of 14 eyes in the brolucizumab group; IOI was severe in one eye, moderate in two eyes, and mild in one eye according to the HAWK and HARRIER trial definition; IOI did not develop in the 30 eyes that received combination therapy, the difference of which reached significance (p = 0.012). Regarding combination therapy, the intraocular pressure in three (10%) eyes increased to 22 to about 26 mmHg after the STTA injection and returned to normal range within 2 months without medication; no cataracts developed during this short mean follow-up period follow-up period of 7.1 ± 0.4 months.
Conclusion
The results indicated the possible preventative effect of a STTA injection on development of brolucizumab-associated IOI.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Markham A (2019) Brolucizumab: first approval. Drugs 79:1997–2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-019-01231-9
Dugel PU, Jaffe GJ, Sallstig P et al (2017) Brolucizumab versus aflibercept in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized trial. Ophthalmology 124:1296–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.057
Holz FG, Dugel PU, Weissgerber G et al (2016) Single-chain anti-body fragment VEGF inhibitor RTH258 for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized controlled study. Ophthalmology 123:1080–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.030
Dugel PU, Koh A, Ogura Y et al (2020) HAWK and HARRIER: Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-masked trials of brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 127:72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.017
Haug SJ, Hien DL, Uludag G, et al (2020) Retinal arterial occlusive vasculitis following intravitreal brolucizumab administration. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100680
Jain A, Chea S, Matsumiya W, et al (2020) Severe vision secondary to retinal arteriolar occlusions after multiple intravitreal brolucizumab administrations. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100687
Witkin AJ, Hahn P, Murray TG et al (2020) Occlusive retinal vasculitis following intravitreal brolucizumab. J Vitreoretin Dis 4:269–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/2474126420930863
Baumal CR, Spaide RF, Vajzovic L et al (2020) Retinal vasculitis and intraocular inflammation after intravitreal injection of brolucizumab. Ophthalmology 127:1345–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.04.017
Monés J, Srivastava SK, Jaffe GJ et al (2021) Risk of inflammation, retinal vasculitis, and retinal occlusion related events with brolucizumab.Post hoc review of HAWK and HARRIER. Ophthalmology 128:1050–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.11.011
Prenner JL, Halperin LS, Rycroft C et al (2015) Disease burden in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration: findings from a time-and-motion study. Am J Ophthalmol 160:725–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.06.023
Bulirsch LM, Saβmanshausen M, Nadal J, et al (2021) Short-term real-world outcomes following intravitreal brolucizmab for neovascular AMD: SHIFY study. Br J Ophthalmol; https://bjo.bmj.com/content/bjophthalmol/early/2021/06/08/bjophthalmol-2020-318672.full.pdf
Hikichi T (2021) Three Japanese cases of intraocular inflammation after intravitreal brolucizumab injections in one clinic. Jpn J Ophthalmol 65:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-021-00819-7
Singer M, Albini TA, Seres A et al (2022) Clinical characteristics and outcomes of eyes with intraocular inflammation after brolucizumab: post hoc analysis of HAWK and HARRIER. Ophthalmol Retina 6:97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2021.05.003
Ogura Y, Jaffe GJ, Cheung CMG, et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in Japanese participants of HAWK. Br J Ophthalmol; https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319090
Matsumoto H, Hoshino J, Mukai R et al (2021) Short-term outcomes of intravitreal brolucizumab for treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration with type 1 choroidal neovascularization. Sci Rep 11:6759. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86014-7
Enríquez AB, Baumal CR, Crane AM, et al (2021) Early experience with brolucizumab treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol 139:441–448; https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/2776731
Sharma A, Kumar N, Parachuri N et al (2021) Brolucizumab-related retinal vasculitis: emerging disconnect between clinical trials and real world. Eye (Lond) 35:1292–1294. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01227-w
Baumal CR (2022) Risk factors for intraocular inflammation after brolucizumab treatment. JAMA Ophthalmol 140:28–29. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.4586
Kovacs K, Wagley S, Quirk MT et al (2021) Pharmacokinetic study of vitreous and serum concentrations of triamcinolone acetonide after posterior sub-Tenon’s injection. Am J Ophthalmol 153:939–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.021
Arie Y, Miyai H, Suzuki A et al (2020) Comparative study on pharmacokinetics and toxicity of intravitreal and sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in ocular tissues. Int J Ophthalmol 13:1864–71. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2020.12.04
Cellini M, Pazzaglia A, Zamparini E, et al (2008) Intravitreal vs. subtenon triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of diabetic cystoid macular edema. BMC Ophthalmol 8 5 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-8-5
Thomas ER, Wang J, Ege E et al (2006) Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide concentration after subtenon injection. Am J Ophthalmol 142:860–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.05.023
Inoue M, Takeda K, Morita K et al (2004) Vitreous concentrations of triamcinolone acetonide in human eyes after intravitreal or subtenon injection. Am J Ophthalmol 138:1046–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.05.028
Sharma A, Kumar N, Parachuri N et al (2021) Brolucizumab-foreseeable workflow in the current scenario. Eye (Lond) 35:1548–1550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01324-w
Verma LK, Vivek MB, Kumar A et al (2004) A prospective controlled trial to evaluate the adjunctive role of posterior subtenon triamcinolone in the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 20:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1089/1080768041725308
Athanasiadis Y, Tsatsos M, Sharma A et al (2013) Subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide in the management of ocular inflammatory disease. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 29:516–522. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2012.0208
Okada AA, Wakabayashi T, Morimura Y et al (2003) Trans-Tenon’s retrobulbar triamcinolone infusion for the treatment of uveitis. Br J Ophthalmol 87:968–971. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.8.968
Luo DW, Zhu BJ, Zheng Z et al (2014) Subtenon vs intravitreal triamcinolone injection in diabetic macular edema, a prospective study in Chinese population. Pak J Med Sci 30:749–54. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.304.4810
Qi HP, Bi S, Wei SQ et al (2012) Intravitreal versus subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection for diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Eye Res 37:1136–47. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2012.705412
Abd El-Razik AH, El-Sayed S, Ellakwa AA, et al (2014) Intravitreal versus subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema. Menoufia Med J 27:636; https://www.mmj.eg.net/article.asp?issn=1110-2098;year=2014;volume=27;issue=4;spage=636;epage=642;aulast=El-Sayed
Inatani M, Iwao K, Kawaji T et al (2008) Intraocular pressure elevation after injection of triamcinolone acetonide: a multicenter retrospective case-control study. Am J Ophthalmol 145:676–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.010
Maeda Y, Ishikawa H, Nishikawa H et al (2019) Intraocular pressure elevation after subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection; multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan. PLoS ONE 14:e0226118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226118
Ogura Y, Shimura M, Iida T et al (2019) Triamcinolone acetonide (WP-0508ST) for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmologica 241:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1159/000492135
Kataoka K, Horiguchi E, Kawano K et al (2021) Three cases of brolucizumab-associated retinal vasculitis treated with systemic and local steroid therapy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 65:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-021-00818-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TH was involved in conception, design, acquisition of data, analysis, drafting, and revising the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Sapporo Medical Association, Sapporo, Japan.
Conflict interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hikichi, T. Sub-Tenon’s capsule triamcinolone acetonide injection to prevent brolucizumab-associated intraocular inflammation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260, 2529–2535 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05611-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05611-y