Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Baseline clinical features predict visual outcome in young patients with central retinal vein occlusion

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate prognostic factors in young patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

Methods

Retrospective case series. CRVO patients aged ≤ 50 and follow-up ≥ 6 months were enrolled. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and last visit were documented. Severity of retinopathy was graded by comparing to standard photos. Prognostic factors associated with visual outcome at 6 months were evaluated by multiple linear regression models.

Results

A total of 73 eyes from 69 patients with mean age 37.6 ± 8.5 were enrolled. Forty-seven (68%) patients were male. The mean follow-up duration was 25.9 ± 23.0 months. LogMAR BCVA improved from 0.979 ± 0.785 at baseline to 0.594 ± 0.748 at the 6 months (p < 0.001) and CRT improved from 475 ± 222 μm to 299 ± 104 μm (p < 0.001). Forty-eight (66%) eyes required anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment. The mean number of injections was 2.25 ± 1.41 in the first 6 months and 75% of eyes received ≦ 3 injections during the clinical course. The baseline BCVA (coefficient 0.518, p < 0.001), grade of retinal hemorrhage (coefficient 0.230, p = 0.006), grade of retinal venous engorgement (coefficient 0.238, p = 0.011), grade of optic disc edema (coefficient − 0.226, p = 0.005), and diabetes mellitus (coefficient 0.264, p = 0.047) were the independent factors associated with visual outcome at 6 months.

Conclusions

Baseline clinical features are useful for the prediction of visual outcome at 6 months in young CRVO patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the involvement of human participants and the regulation of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Institutional Review Board, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Rogers S, McIntosh RL, Cheung N, Lim L, Wang JJ, Mitchell P et al (2010) International eye disease C: the prevalence of retinal vein occlusion: pooled data from population studies from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Ophthalmology 117:313–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohner EM, Cappin JM (1974) Do medical conditions have an influence on central retinal vein occlusions? Proc R Soc Med 67:1052–1054

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Walters RF, Spalton DJ (1990) Central retinal vein occlusion in people aged 40 years or less: a review of 17 patients. Br J Ophthalmol 74:30–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hayreh SS, Podhajsky PA, Zimmerman MB (2011) Natural history of visual outcome in central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 118:119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindsell LB, Lai MM, Fine HF (2015) Current concepts in managing retinal vein occlusion in young patients. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 46:695–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rothman AL, Thomas AS, Khan K, Fekrat S (2019) Central retinal vein occlusion in young individuals: a comparison of risk factors and clinical outcomes. Retina 39:1917–1924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuo JZ, Lai CC, Ong FS, Shih CP, Yeung L, Chen TL et al (2010) Central retinal vein occlusion in a young Chinese population: risk factors and associated morbidity and mortality. Retina 30:479–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Recchia FM, Carvalho-Recchia CA, Hassan TS (2004) Clinical course of younger patients with central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 122:317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wittstrom E (2017) Central retinal vein occlusion in younger Swedish adults: case reports and review of the literature open. Ophthalmol J 11:89–102

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brown DM, Campochiaro PA, Singh RP, Li Z, Gray S, Saroj N et al (2010) Ranibizumab for macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion: six-month primary end point results of a phase III study. Ophthalmology 117:1124–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holz FG, Roider J, Ogura Y, Korobelnik JF, Simader C, Groetzbach G et al (2013) VEGF trap-eye for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: 6-month results of the phase III GALILEO study. Br J Ophthalmol 97:278–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bressler SB, Edwards AR, Andreoli CM, Edwards PA, Glassman AR, Jaffe GJ et al (2015) Reproducibility of Optovue RTVue optical coherence tomography retinal thickness measurements and conversion to equivalent Zeiss stratus metrics in diabetic macular edema. Transl Vis Sci Technol 4:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB (2015) Fundus changes in central retinal vein occlusion. Retina 35:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Korobelnik JF, Holz FG, Roider J, Ogura Y, Simader C, Schmidt-Erfurth U et al (2014) Intravitreal aflibercept injection for macular edema resulting from central retinal vein occlusion: one-year results of the phase 3 GALILEO study. Ophthalmology 121:202–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Campochiaro PA, Brown DM, Awh CC, Lee SY, Gray S, Saroj N et al (2011) Sustained benefits from ranibizumab for macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion: twelve-month outcomes of a phase III study. Ophthalmology 118:2041–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Campochiaro PA, Bhisitkul RB, Shapiro H, Rubio RG (2013) Vascular endothelial growth factor promotes progressive retinal nonperfusion in patients with retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 120:795–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group (1997) Natural history and clinical management of central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 115:486–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Muraoka Y, Uji A, Tsujikawa A, Murakami T, Ooto S, Suzuma K et al (2017) Association between retinal hemorrhagic patterns and perfusion status in eyes with acute central retinal vein occlusion. Retina 37:500–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yasuda S, Kachi S, Kondo M, Ueno S, Kaneko H, Terasaki H (2015) Significant correlation between retinal venous tortuosity and aqueous vascular endothelial growth factor concentration in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion. PLoS One 10:e0134267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayreh SS (1972) Optic disc vasculitis. Br J Ophthalmol 56:652–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lonn LI, Hoyt WF (1966) Papillophlebitis: a cause of protracted yet benign optic disc edema. Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon 45:62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fong AC, Schatz H, McDonald HR, Burton TC, Maberley AL, Joffe L et al (1992) Central retinal vein occlusion in young adults (papillophlebitis). Retina 12:3–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Beaumont PE, Kang HK (2000) Pattern of vascular nonperfusion in retinal venous occlusions occurring within the optic nerve with and without optic nerve head swelling. Arch Ophthalmol 118:1357–1363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hayreh SS, van Heuven WA, Hayreh MS (1978) Experimental retinal vascular occlusion. I Pathogenesis of central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 96:311–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hayreh SS (1965) Occlusion of the central retinal vessels. Br J Ophthalmol 49:626–645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Santiago JG, Walia S, Sun JK, Cavallerano JD, Haddad ZA, Aiello LP et al (2014) Influence of diabetes and diabetes type on anatomic and visual outcomes following central rein vein occlusion. Eye (London, England) 28:259–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sinawat S, Bunyavee C, Ratanapakorn T, Sinawat S, Laovirojjanakul W, Yospaiboon Y (2017) Systemic abnormalities associated with retinal vein occlusion in young patients. Clin Ophthalmol 11:441–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuhli-Hattenbach C, Scharrer I, Lüchtenberg M, Hattenbach LO (2010) Coagulation disorders and the risk of retinal vein occlusion. Thromb Haemost 103:299–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bremond-Gignac D, Daruich A, Gallet M, Menoud PA, Nowomiejska K, Rejdak R et al (2019) Central retinal vein occlusion in otherwise healthy children and adolescents: association with multigenetic variants of thrombophilia. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002563

  30. Kuhli-Hattenbach C, Hellstern P, Nägler DK, Kohnen T, Hattenbach LO (2017) Prothrombin polymorphism A19911G, factor V HR2 haplotype A4070G, and plasminogen activator-inhibitor-1 polymorphism 4G/5G and the risk of retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmic Genet 38:413–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu Q, Lahey JM, Karlen R, Stewart JM (2018) Laboratory evaluation of hypercoagulable states in patients with central retinal vein occlusion who are less than 56 years of age. Retina 38:1175–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Larsen M, Waldstein SM, Boscia F, Gerding H, Mones J, Tadayoni R et al (2016) Individualized ranibizumab regimen driven by stabilization criteria for central retinal vein occlusion: twelve-month results of the CRYSTAL study. Ophthalmology 123:1101–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Blanc J, Deschasse C, Kodjikian L, Dot C, Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher C (2018) Safety and long-term efficacy of repeated dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of cystoid macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion with or without a switch to anti-VEGF agents: a 3-year experience. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256:1441–1448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chiquet C, Dupuy C, Bron AM, Aptel F, Straub M, Isaico R et al (2015) Intravitreal dexamethasone implant versus anti-VEGF injection for treatment-naïve patients with retinal vein occlusion and macular edema: a 12-month follow-up study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253:2095–2102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ding X, Li J, Hu X, Yu S, Pan J, Tang S (2011) Prospective study of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide versus bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion. Retina 31:838–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ozkok A, Saleh OA, Sigford DK, Heroman JW, Schaal S (2015) THE OMAR STUDY: comparison of ozurdex and triamcinolone acetonide for refractory cystoid macular edema in retinal vein occlusion. Retina 35:1393–1400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Evans K, Wishart PK, McGalliard JN (1993) Neovascular complications after central retinal vein occlusion. Eye (London, England) 7(Pt 4):520–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rong AJ, Swaminathan SS, Vanner EA, Parrish RK 2nd (2019) Predictors of neovascular glaucoma in central retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 204:62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Brown DM, Wykoff CC, Wong TP, Mariani AF, Croft DE, Schuetzle KL et al (2014) Ranibizumab in preproliferative (ischemic) central retinal vein occlusion: the rubeosis anti-VEGF (RAVE) trial. Retina 34:1728–1735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chan CK, Ip MS, Vanveldhuisen PC, Oden NL, Scott IU, Tolentino MJ et al (2011) SCORE study report #11: incidences of neovascular events in eyes with retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 118:1364–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ryu CL, Elfersy A, Desai U, Hessburg T, Edwards P, Gao H (2014) The effect of antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy on the development of neovascular glaucoma after central retinal vein occlusion: a retrospective analysis. J Ophthalmol 2014:317694

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Chi-Chun Lai, Wei-Chi Wu, Yih-Shiou Hwang, Kuan-Jen Chen, Nan-Kai Wang, Tun-Lu Chen, Jerry Chien-Chieh Huang, Laura Liu, and Ling Yeung. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Yeo-Yang Koh and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Yeung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB No.: 201600907B0) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was waived by the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB No.: 201600907B0).

Consent for publication

Informed consent was waived by the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB No.: 201600907B0).

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koh, YY., Lai, CC., Wu, WC. et al. Baseline clinical features predict visual outcome in young patients with central retinal vein occlusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258, 1367–1377 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04679-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04679-8

Keywords

Navigation