Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Flap-sparing canaloplasty: a modified approach to Schlemm’s canal

  • Glaucoma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To present a modified surgical technique for canaloplasty with the Stegmann Canal Expander obviating the need for lamellar scleral dissection.

Methods

After limbal peritomy of the conjunctiva, the sclera is not dissected in the classic lamellar fashion with superficial and deep scleral flaps but is successively ‘scratched’ down by radial incision until Schlemm’s canal (SC) is opened (trench cut). Following canal opening and viscodilation with a microcannula and sodium hyaluronidate, one Stegmann Canal Expander is implanted on either side of the canal ostia and the scleral incision is closed watertight.

Results

Twenty-seven eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) were consecutively operated on using this modified technique. In all eyes, SC was successively opened, but exposure of the choroid and rupture of trabeculo-Descemet’s membrane with iris prolapse or filtering blebs were not found. Adverse events included trimming of the expander in one eye for incomplete implantation during surgery, and transient microhyphaema in five eyes post-surgery. Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 31.9 mmHg ± 6.0 (SD) before surgery and 14.0 mmHg ± 2.5 (SD) 6 months and 15.2 mmHg ± 1.95 (SD) 12 months after surgery.

Conclusions

The flap-sparing, trench-cut incision technique may reduce the risk of complications in canaloplasty with the Stegmann Canal Expander while effectively lowering IOP in POAG patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kozlov VI, Bagrov SN, Anisimova SY (1990) Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy with collagen. Eye Microsurgery 3:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fedorov SN, Ioffe DI, Ronkina TI (1982) Glaucoma surgery - deep sclerectomy. Vestn oftalmol 6–10

  3. Stegmann R (1995) Visco-canalostomy: a new surgical technique for open angle glaucoma. An Inst Barraquer, Spain 25:229–232

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smit BA, Johnstone MA (2002) Effects of viscoelastic injection into Schlemm’s canal in primate and human eyes: potential relevance to viscocanalostomy. Ophthalmology 109:786–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grieshaber MC, Grieshaber HR, Stegmann R (2016) A new expander for Schlemm canal surgery in primary open-angle glaucoma-interim clinical results. J Glaucoma 25:657–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grieshaber MC (2017) Viscocanalostomy and canaloplasty: ab externo Schlemm’s canal surgery. Dev Ophthalmol 59:113–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grieshaber MC, Stegmann R, Grieshaber HR, Meyer P (2015) Novel device for expanding Schlemm’s canal: a morphological study: implantation of the Stegmann Canal Expander following viscodilation of Schlemm’s canal resulted in permanent expansion of the canal lumen and distension of the trabecular meshwork without complications. Br J Ophthalmol 99:875–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grieshaber MC (2018) Stegmann Canal Expander for canaloplasty: a novel technique. Eur J Ophthalmol 28(4):472–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roy S, Mermoud A (2017) Deep sclerectomy. Dev Ophthalmol 59:36–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grieshaber MC, Pienaar A, Olivier J, Stegmann R (2009) Channelography: imaging of the aqueous outflow pathway with flexible microcatheter and fluorescein in canaloplasty. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 226:245–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grieshaber MC, Pienaar A, Olivier J, Stegmann R (2010) Clinical evaluation of the aqueous outflow system in primary open-angle glaucoma for canaloplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:1498–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias C. Grieshaber.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author RS has received research grants from Ophthalmos GmbH. Author RS and MCG have intellectual property rights (patents). Author AP declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grieshaber, M.C., Pienaar, A. & Stegmann, R. Flap-sparing canaloplasty: a modified approach to Schlemm’s canal. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257, 1729–1732 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04329-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04329-8

Keywords

Navigation