Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Refractive, corneal and ocular residual astigmatism: distribution in a German population and age-dependency - the Gutenberg health study

  • Refractive Surgery
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Worldwide, the most frequent cause of visual impairment is uncorrected refractive error. This analysis focused on the distribution and associations of refractive, corneal and ocular residual astigmatism.

Methods

As part of the Gutenberg Health study, a population-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the general population of Germany. A comprehensive ophthalmological examination including refraction, tonometry, and Scheimpflug imaging of the anterior cornea (Pachycam) was performed. In addition to the magnitude and type (with-the-rule, against-the-rule, oblique) of the refractive or corneal astigmatism, we calculated the vector components (J0, J45) of both astigmatisms and calculated the ocular residual astigmatism. We performed multiple quantile regression analysis to evaluate the factors associated with refractive, corneal and ocular residual astigmatisms.

Results

A total of 13,558 subjects (49% female) with a mean age of 54.0 years (range 35–74 years) were included in this study. The prevalence of refractive astigmatism (>1.0D) was 13.0% in right eyes and 12.0% in left eyes, and 85% of these subjects wore spectacles. The distribution of refractive astigmatism showed a two-peak distribution with high astigmatism for with-the-rule and against-the-rule astigmatism. The associated factors were corneal curvature, age and sex for the different astigmatisms (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

We analyzed the prevalence of different astigmatisms within a European population. We confirmed a shift with aging from with-the-rule to against-the-rule astigmatism to refractive and corneal astigmatism. Astigmatism has a large impact on visual perception; more than 85% of people with astigmatism over one diopter wore glasses for distance vision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP (2012) Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 96:614–618. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng CY, Hsu WM, Liu JH, Tsai SY, Chou P (2003) Refractive errors in an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:4630–4638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolfram C, Hohn R, Kottler U, Wild P, Blettner M, Buhren J, Pfeiffer N, Mirshahi A (2014) Prevalence of refractive errors in the European adult population: the Gutenberg health study (GHS). Br J Ophthalmol 98:857–861. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Trindade F, Oliveira A, Frasson M (1997) Benefit of against-the-rule astigmatism to uncorrected near acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:82–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Verzella F, Calossi A (1993) Multifocal effect of against-the-rule myopic astigmatism in pseudophakic eyes. Refract Corneal Surg 9:58–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kobashi H, Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Kawamorita T, Uozato H (2012) Effect of axis orientation on visual performance in astigmatic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1352–1359. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanfilippo PG, Yazar S, Kearns L, Sherwin JC, Hewitt AW, Mackey DA (2015) Distribution of astigmatism as a function of age in an Australian population. Acta Ophthalmol doi. doi:10.1111/aos.12644

  8. Liu YC, Chou P, Wojciechowski R, Lin PY, Liu CJ, Chen SJ, Liu JH, Hsu WM, Cheng CY (2011) Power vector analysis of refractive, corneal, and internal astigmatism in an elderly Chinese population: the Shihpai eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:9651–9657. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leung TW, Lam AK, Deng L, Kee CS (2012) Characteristics of astigmatism as a function of age in a Hong Kong clinical population. Optom Vis Sci 89:984–992. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31825da156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hohn R, Kottler U, Peto T, Blettner M, Munzel T, Blankenberg S, Lackner KJ, Beutel M, Wild PS, Pfeiffer N (2015) The ophthalmic branch of the Gutenberg health study: study design, cohort profile and self-reported diseases. PLoS One 10:e0120476. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120476

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D (1997) Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci 74:367–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Statistisches Bundesamt (2016) GENESIS-Online Datenbank. Ergebnisse auf Grundlage des Zensus 2011, Wiesbaden. https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online;jsessionid=2AACC96482E846FFEDD35D7DD5069560.tomcat_GO_2_3?sequenz=suche&selectionname=Bevölkerung. Accessed 25 May 2015

  13. Attebo K, Ivers RQ, Mitchell P (1999) Refractive errors in an older population: the Blue Mountains eye study. Ophthalmology 106:1066–1072. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90251-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Asano K, Nomura H, Iwano M, Ando F, Niino N, Shimokata H, Miyake Y (2005) Relationship between astigmatism and aging in middle-aged and elderly Japanese. Jpn J Ophthalmol 49:127–133. doi:10.1007/s10384-004-0152-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Yekta A, Jafarzadehpur E, Emamian MH, Shariati M, Fotouhi A (2012) High prevalence of astigmatism in the 40- to 64-year-old population of Shahroud, Iran. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 40:247–254. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02635.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alpins NA (1997) New method of targeting vectors to treat astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 23:65–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lopes MC, Hysi PG, Verhoeven VJ, Macgregor S, Hewitt AW, Montgomery GW, Cumberland P, Vingerling JR, Young TL, van Duijn CM, Oostra B, Uitterlinden AG, Rahi JS, Mackey DA, Klaver CC, Andrew T, Hammond CJ (2013) Identification of a candidate gene for astigmatism. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:1260–1267. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fan Q, Zhou X, Khor CC, Cheng CY, Goh LK, Sim X, Tay WT, Li YJ, Ong RT, Suo C, Cornes B, Ikram MK, Chia KS, Seielstad M, Liu J, Vithana E, Young TL, Tai ES, Wong TY, Aung T, Teo YY, Saw SM (2011) Genome-wide meta-analysis of five Asian cohorts identifies PDGFRA as a susceptibility locus for corneal astigmatism. PLoS Genet 7:e1002402. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Simpson CL, Wojciechowski R, Oexle K, Murgia F, Portas L, Li X, Verhoeven VJ, Vitart V, Schache M, Hosseini SM, Hysi PG, Raffel LJ, Cotch MF, Chew E, Klein BE, Klein R, Wong TY, van Duijn CM, Mitchell P, Saw SM, Fossarello M, Wang JJ, Polasek O, Campbell H, Rudan I, Oostra BA, Uitterlinden AG, Hofman A, Rivadeneira F, Amin N, Karssen LC, Vingerling JR, Doring A, Bettecken T, Bencic G, Gieger C, Wichmann HE, Wilson JF, Venturini C, Fleck B, Cumberland PM, Rahi JS, Hammond CJ, Hayward C, Wright AF, Paterson AD, Baird PN, Klaver CC, Rotter JI, Pirastu M, Meitinger T, Bailey-Wilson JE, Stambolian D (2014) Genome-wide meta-analysis of myopia and hyperopia provides evidence for replication of 11 loci. PLoS One 9:e107110. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107110

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Karl-Georg Schuster.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has a conflict of interest with the study.

Financial support

“The Gutenberg Health Study is funded through the government of Rheinland-Pfalz („Stiftung Rheinland-Pfalz für Innovation“, contract AZ 961-386261/733), the research programs “Wissen schafft Zukunft” and “Center for Translational Vascular Biology (CTVB)” of the Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, and its contract with Boehringer Ingelheim, PHILIPS Medical Systems and Novartis Pharma, including an unrestricted grant for the Gutenberg Health Study. PSW and KAP are funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF 01EO1003). Funders were involved in the development of the study design as scientific consultants. However, they played no role in data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Informed consent

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the state chamber of physicians of Rhineland-Palatinate and by local and federal data safety commissioners. In accord with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to entering the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schuster, A.KG., Pfeiffer, N., Schulz, A. et al. Refractive, corneal and ocular residual astigmatism: distribution in a German population and age-dependency - the Gutenberg health study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255, 2493–2501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3775-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3775-x

Keywords

Navigation