Abstract
Combining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences that permit the determination of vestibular nerve angulation (NA = change of nerve caliber or direction), structural nerve integrity via diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and exclusion of endolymphatic hydrops (ELH) via delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the inner ear (iMRI) could increase the diagnostic accuracy in patients with vestibular paroxysmia (VP). Thirty-six participants were examined, 18 with VP (52.6 ± 18.1 years) and 18 age-matched with normal vestibulocochlear testing (NP 50.3 ± 16.5 years). This study investigated whether (i) NA, (ii) DTI changes, or (iii) ELH occur in VP, and (iv) to what extent said parameters relate. Methods included vestibulocochlear testing and MRI data analyses for neurovascular compression (NVC) and NA verification, DTI and ELS quantification. As a result, (i) NA increased NVC specificity. (ii) DTI structural integrity was reduced on the side affected by VP (p < 0.05). (iii) 61.1% VP showed mild ELH and higher asymmetry indices than NP (p > 0.05). (iv) “Disease duration” and “total number of attacks” correlated with the decreased structural integrity of the affected nerve in DTI (p < 0.001). NVC distance within the nerve’s root-entry zone correlated with nerve function (Roh = 0.72, p < 0.001), nerve integrity loss (Roh = − 0.638, p < 0.001), and ELS volume (Roh = − 0.604, p < 0.001) in VP. In conclusion, this study is the first to link eighth cranial nerve function, microstructure, and ELS changes in VP to clinical features and increased vulnerability of NVC in the root-entry zone. Combined MRI with NVC or NA verification, DTI and ELS quantification increased the diagnostic accuracy at group-level but did not suffice to diagnose VP on a single-subject level due to individual variability and lack of diagnostic specificity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Vestibular paroxysmia (VP) is a rare cause of short episodic vertigo with or without auditory and vegetative symptoms [1]. The assumed mechanism is ephaptic discharges induced by demyelination with succeeding hyperexcitability through neurovascular compression (NVC) in the root-entry and transition zone of the eighth cranial nerve [2,3,4]. Diagnostic criteria for VP, as defined by the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society, are mostly based on patient history [5]. However, due to symptom variability caused partly by an affection of different audiovestibular parts of the eighth cranial nerve, diagnosis is only considered definitive when responsive to carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine.
Clinical and neurophysiological parameters vary in VP. Patients can exhibit signs of mild to moderate unilateral nerve failure [6, 7], excitation [8, 9], both [10, 11], or no dysfunction [12] in audiovestibular testing during attack-free intervals. Therefore, a combination of neurophysiological and imaging techniques is recommended to determine the affected side and the degree of damage associated with VP [6]. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of vascular compression are not VP-specific or predictive for the affected side because they are also observed in about 30% of healthy asymptomatic subjects [6, 10]. Moreover, 7 Tesla T1 structural MRI detected no abnormalities within the VP vestibular nerve in six patients underlining that VP symptoms are not a sign of nerve hypofunction [13].
The question was whether an MR imaging approach tailored to VP could improve the overall predictive diagnostic value in VP. Therefore, the combination of three sequences permits the determination of vestibular nerve angulation, structural nerve integrity via diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and non-invasive quantification of the endolymphatic space (ELS) by delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the inner ear (iMRI) were used. Nerve angulation/distortion (NA) was proposed to be a more specific imaging feature than NVC [14]. In addition, DTI revealed significantly lower anisotropy and higher apparent diffusion coefficient in the affected trigeminal root in trigeminal neuralgia than healthy controls [15]. Furthermore, iMRI is developing into a standard clinical tool to investigate a possible endolymphatic hydrops (ELH) as a cause of episodic vertigo, such as in Ménière’s disease [16, 17] and vestibular migraine [18, 19]. Against this background, the study investigated the following aspects:
-
(i)
Can nerve angulation/distortion improve the NVC informative value in VP?
-
(ii)
Are there measurable structural differences in the affected eighth cranial nerve in VP?
-
(iii)
Does ELH play a role in VP?
-
(iv)
To what extent are clinical, diagnostic, and MRI VP parameters related?
Materials and methods
Setting and institutional review board approval
All data were acquired at the Interdisciplinary German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ) and the Neurology Department of the Munich University Hospital (LMU) between 2018 and 2020. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained before the initiation of the study (no. 641-15). Furthermore, all participants provided informed oral and written consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki before inclusion in the study.
Study population
Thirty-six consecutive participants, 18 patients with vestibular paroxysmia (VP) and 18 age-matched participants with normal vestibulocochlear testing (NP), underwent MR imaging with sequences that permit determination of vestibular nerve angulation, structural nerve integrity via diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and delayed intravenous gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) for exclusion or verification of ELH. Diagnosis of VP was based on the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society 2016 [5]. Therefore, MRI results were excluded from the diagnostic classification. NP were inpatients of the Neurology Department without symptoms or underlying pathologies of the vestibulocochlear system that underwent MRI with a contrast agent as part of their diagnostic workup and agreed to undergo additional iMRI sequences after 4 h. Ethical considerations did not allow us to include healthy volunteers without a medical indication for an iMRI with a contrast agent (see limitations for more information). NP underwent audiovestibular testing to confirm the soundness of their peripheral inner ear end-organs. The reasons for their admission to the clinic included movement disorders (n = 4), epilepsy (n = 3), optic neuritis (n = 2), polyneuropathy (n = 2), headache (n = 2), idiopathic facial nerve palsy (n = 1), viral meningitis (n = 1), subdural hematoma (n = 1), spinal inflammatory lesion (n = 1), and decompensated esophoria (n = 1). The laterality quotient for right-handedness was assessed with the ten-item inventory of the Edinburgh test [20]. Inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 85 years (VP, NP) and normal audiovestibular testing to confirm the soundness of their peripheral end-organs and the central vestibular system (NP, see “Measurement of the auditory, semicircular canal and otolith functions”). Exclusion criteria for NP were current cochlear or vestibular disorders, a positive history of vertigo-, balance-, or hearing disorders, as well as any MR-related contraindications [21], poor image quality, or missing MR sequences for NP and VP.
Measurement of the auditory, semicircular canal and otolith functions
Diagnostic workup included a thorough neurological workup (e.g., history-taking, clinical examination), neuro-orthoptic assessment [e.g., Frenzel glasses, fundus photography and adjustments of the subjective visual vertical (SVV)], video-oculography (VOG) during caloric and head impulse testing (HIT), as well as ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (o/cVEMPs), and pure tone audiometry (PTA).
A tilt of the SVV is a sensitive sign of an acute graviceptive vestibular tone imbalance. SVV was assessed with the subject sitting upright in front of a half-spherical dome with the head fixed on a chin rest [22]. A mean deviation of > 2.5° from the true vertical was considered a pathological tilt of SVV [22].
The impairment of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in higher frequencies was measured by HIT [23] using high-frame-rate VOG with EyeSeeCam ([24], EyeSeeTech, Munich, Germany). A median gain during head impulses < 0.6 (eye velocity in °/s divided by head velocity in °/s) was considered a pathological VOR [25]. Furthermore, semicircular canal responsiveness in lower frequencies was performed for both ears with 30° cold and 44° warm water. Vestibular paresis was defined as > 25% asymmetry between the right- and left-sided responses [26] or the sum of the maximal peak velocities of the slow phase caloric-induced nystagmus for stimulation with warm and cold water on each side < 25°/sec [27]. The caloric asymmetry index (AIC) was calculated based on the slow-phase velocity of the caloric nystagmus:\({AI}_{C }[\%] =\frac{({R}_{33^\circ }+{R}_{44^\circ })-({L}_{33^\circ }+{L}_{44^\circ })}{({R}_{33^\circ }+{R}_{44^\circ })+({L}_{33^\circ }+{L}_{44^\circ })}\times 100.\)
Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are short-latency, mainly otolith-driven vestibular reflexes elicited by air-conducted sound (ACS), bone-conducted vibration, or galvanic vestibular stimulation and recorded from the contralateral inferior oblique eye muscle (ocular or oVEMPs) or the ipsilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle (cervical or cVEMPs). VEMPs were recorded with the Eclipse platform (Interacoustics, Middelfart, Denmark) as described previously [28, 29]. VEMP responses that were discernible from background noise were included in the analysis. Furthermore, only the asymmetry index (AIO/CV) of VEMP amplitudes and latencies were analyzed to avoid bias by examiners [30]. Amplitude side difference ≥ 50% was considered pathological.
For cochlear function and acoustic processing, acoustically evoked potentials (AEP) and pure-tone audiometry (PTA) by air conduction at 250 Hz–8.0 kHz were performed. PTA was based on both ears' four-tone average (arithmetic mean) of the thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz. Hearing loss was defined as PTA > 25 dB [31]. In all tests, the contralateral ear was masked by adequate noise. All audiometric equipment is regularly recalibrated (every 6 months) according to the local university equipment standard.
Nomenclature
In the following, “ipsilateral” refers to the clinically leading side (or affected side) and “contralateral” to the opposite side (or non-affected side). The definition of the “clinically leading side (or affected side)” was based on clinical and neurophysiological findings. Side–defining signs were clear patterns of unilateral loss of audiovestibular function [10]. In the case of patients presenting without a leading clinical side, a pseudorandom number generator [“Mersenne Twister” algorithm [31], uniform distribution] was used to generate a random number between 1 (= minimum value) and 9 (= maximum value). Even numbers meant “left side = ipsilateral side,” and uneven numbers indicated “right = ipsilateral side.” “Vertigo” pertains to attacks of spontaneous spinning or non-spinning vertigo with a duration of less than 1 min, stereotyped phenomenology in a particular patient that fits the criteria of VP [5], and is not better accounted for by another diagnosis.
MR imaging approach tailored to VP
MR imaging in this study used combined sequences to investigate the peripheral vestibular system in VP (see Fig. 1). Particular emphasis was put on the presence of neurovascular compression (NVC) and structural DTI tractography quantification along the intracisternal course of the eighth cranial nerve. Another focus included the volumetric quantification of the endolymphatic space (ELS) within the membranous and bony labyrinth of the audiovestibular end-organ.
Data acquisition
Four hours after intravenous injection of a standard dose (0.1 mmol/kg body weight) of gadobutrol (Gadovist®, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany), MR imaging (MRI) data were acquired in a whole-body 3 Tesla MRI scanner (Magnetom Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a 20-channel head coil.
A high-resolution, strongly T2-weighted, spin-echo 3D-SPACE (three-dimensional sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolutions) sequence delineated the total inner ear fluid space from the surrounding bone. A T2-weighted 3D-FLAIR (three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) sequence was used to differentiate endolymph from perilymph within the total fluid space (TFS). The 3D-FLAIR sequence had the following parameters: TR 6000 ms; TE 134 ms; TI 2240 ms; FA 180°; FOV 160 × 160 mm2; 36 slices; base resolution 320; averages 1; slice thickness 0.5 mm. The 3D-SPACE sequence had the following parameters: TR 1000 ms; TE 133 ms; FA 100°; FOV 192 × 192 mm2; 56 slices; base resolution 384; averages 4; slice thickness of 0.5. According to a previously reported method [32], ELS was observed on the 3D-FLAIR images as enlarged negative-signal spaces inside the labyrinth.
T1 and DTI structural sequences were used to localize and quantify the vestibular nerve. T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE) sequences had the following parameters: FOV 256 mm; isotropic spatial resolution of 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm3; TE 2.07 ms; TR = 1900 ms; number of slices 160. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences were measured with the following parameters: 64 directions; 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0 mm3 isotropic voxels; TE = 95 ms; TR = 9600 ms, bipolar diffusion scheme; b values = 0 and 1000 s/mm2.
Data analyses
Neurovascular compression and nerve angulation of the eighth cranial nerve
The vestibulocochlear (eighth cranial) nerve was examined using a double oblique reformat of the 3D-SPACE data, with the sagittal plane set in a modified glabellomeatal line and the coronal plane set in line with the vestibulocochlear nerve as suggested by [14]. An experienced head and neck radiologist (BEW) and two neurologists (EK, VK), blinded to the clinical diagnosis, assessed the data. If discrepancies arose, a consensus was reached by discussion. Neurovascular compression (NVC) was defined as a lack of a detectable layer of cerebrospinal fluid between the eighth cranial nerve and any surrounding blood vessel, as proposed by reference [10]. All identified vessels were followed to their origin and classified anatomically. It was classified as an artery (vein) if retraceable to a major arterial (venous) vessel. NVC between the point of entry (PE: point of entry for afferent fibers, point of exit for efferent fibers into/out of the brainstem) and the beginning of the internal auditory canal (IAC) were called ‘cisternal,’ NVC within the IAC ‘meatal.’ Nerve angulation (NA) was defined as a change in direction or caliber of the vestibulocochlear nerve at the point of contact, as proposed previously [14]. VP patients had been diagnosed before MRI acquisition based on the clinical diagnostic criteria.
Quantitative structural DTI assessment of the eighth cranial nerve
DTI preprocessing included noise correction using MRTRIX3 [33,34,35]. T1-MPRAGE volume was manually cropped using 3D-SLICER version 4.10.2 [36]. Automated brain extraction was performed with FSL BET [37]. An artificial b0 volume was created using SynB0 [38] and used for geometric and susceptibility artifact correction using FSL Topup [39] and Eddy [40]. After bias field correction using ANTS [41], a reference b0 was extracted from the geometrically corrected diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The preprocessed DWI was interpolated to a voxel size of 1 mm3 using MRTRIX3. A two-step-registration with 12 degrees of freedom was performed using the BRAINSFIT module included in 3D-Slicer, with (j) coregistration of the T1-MPRAGE (moving image) and the reference b0 (fixed image) and.”j) coregistration of the high-resolution 3D-SPACE (moving image) and the registered T1-MPRAGE* (fixed image). Finally, a fusion volume of b0 and registered 3D-SPACE was created using MRTRIX3.
DTI tractography and tract-specific analyses were performed using DSI-Studio ([42], http://dsi-studio.labsolver.org/). First, an automatic quality control routine checked the b-table to ensure its accuracy [38]. Next, the diffusion tensor was calculated. A deterministic fiber tracking algorithm [43] was used with augmented tracking strategies [44] to improve reproducibility. A spherical seed region was placed at the IAC on the b0-SPACE fusion volume; a spherical ending region was placed at the root-entry zone of the eighth cranial nerve at the pontocerebellar angle. The threshold settings were as follows: anisotropy threshold: 0.5–0.7 Otsu’s threshold, change threshold: 20%, angular threshold: 15–90 degrees, step size: 0.5–1.5 voxels. Tracks shorter than 15 mm or longer than 150 mm were discarded. After 500 tracts were calculated, fiber tracking was automatically terminated. Based on this first approximation, the vestibulocochlear nerve was selected based on the following criteria: (k) anatomically plausible direction, (kk) brainstem entry at the pontocerebellar angle, and (kkk) visual correlation with the course of the nerve in the b0-SPACE fusion volume. After identifying the nerve, the tracts were manually adjusted to remove unwanted fibers inside the brainstem, e.g., the vestibulospinal tract. The generated tracts for the eighth cranial nerves on both sides were stretched to an equal length, allowing analysis of DTI parameters along the course of the tract. A regression kernel size of 2.0 was used.
DTI indices over fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) were investigated in the following three ways: (l) Average tensor map approach: The average DTI indices of the entire vestibular nerve (VN) were used as a surrogate marker for the overall VN integrity. (ll) Localized tensor map approach: Fiber tracts were assessed in 100 1% subsegments. The entire length (between PE and IAC) of each subject’s VN fiber was 100%. In combination with the affected side, the calculation of the NVC subsegment [%] = \(\frac{\mathrm{PE to NVC }[\mathrm{mm}]}{\mathrm{PE to IAC }[\mathrm{mm}]}\times 100\) enabled a localized NVC-specific assessment of VN. (lll) Successive differences tensor map approach: The 100 generated 1% subsegments were transformed into statistical summary parameters (SSP) to reduce the statistical testing and extract relevant features. SSP assessing the “overall” effects of VP vs. NP included the “mean”, “median”, “standard deviation”, and “interquartile range” across all 100 generated 1% steps, i.e., treating each part of the nerve similarly to every other part, as though each segment were a random manifestation of one overall effect. Furthermore, the deviations along the nerve were assessed via statistics of successive differences of first (1st) and second (2nd) order. Successive differences of 1st order are the differences between every two adjacent values of the 100 generated 1% steps divided by the first value to get a percentage. The 2nd order is the repetition of the process using the generated 99 differences of the 1st order step. The statistical parameters then calculated were the mean of the squared differences (MSSD) and the mean of the absolute differences (MASD). Note that the squared differences allow a more substantial weighting of large deviations even if few, while the absolute differences do not weigh the larger deviations more strongly than many small ones. Therefore, the mean squared successive differences (MSSD: 1st order; MS2SD: 2nd order), and the mean absolute successive differences (MASD: 1st order; MA2SD: 2nd order) were calculated as a measure of the relative influence of larger deviations. Due to the use of successive differences, SSPs treat local parts of effectively 2 (1st order) and 4 (2nd order) segments of the nerve as though they are realizations of a random process related to successive local deteriorations of the nerve. Differential entropy [45] was calculated using the 15, 27, and 50 nearest neighbors. SSP allows us to assess the “disorderedness” of the whole nerve and the successive differences. Each of these parameter classes was grouped into collections, such as “central tendencies” (mean and median), “dispersions” (standard deviation and interquartile range), “successive differences 1st order” (MSSD, MASD, and MSSD/MASD), “successive differences 2nd order” (MS2SD, MA2SD, and MS2SD/MA2SD fraction), “raw entropy” and “successive difference entropy''. SSP group differences were assessed using principal component analysis (PCA) using MATLAB’s built-in pca.m in the statistics and machine learning toolbox. SSP correlations to chosen clinical parameters (such as “disease duration”, “total number of attacks”, “the average length of the attack”, and “the number of attacks in the last three months”) were tested by projection into latent space (PLS, [46,47,48]).
Semi-quantitative visual grading and 3D-quantification of the endolymphatic space
Semi-quantitative (SQ) visual grading of the endolymphatic space (ELS) was performed independently by an experienced head and neck radiologist (BEW) and two neurologists (JG, VK) who were blinded to the clinical patient data. The ELS’s characterization in the vestibulum and cochlea was based on previously described criteria [49].
3D-quantification of the ELS consisted of three steps: first, segmentation of the total fluid space (TFS) was based on IE-Vnet [50], a recently proposed and pre-trained volumetric deep learning algorithm with V-net architecture that was deployed via the TOMAAT module [51] in a 3D–Slicer toolbox (version 4.11 [36]). Second, ELS and perilymphatic space (PS) were differentiated within the TFS using Volumetric Local Thresholding (VOLT; [52]) with ImageJ Fiji [53], the “Fuzzy and artificial neural networks image processing toolbox” [54], and the “MorphoLibJ Toolbox” [55]. The resulting 3D volume included classification into two different compartments (ELS and PS), examined at cutoff 6. Third, measurements were performed using the ‘Analyze Regions (3D)’ plugin of the “MorpholibJ Toolbox” [55]. The method is described in more detail in previous publications [52].
ELS symmetry between both inner ears was assessed using two parameters: Absolute ELS side difference, where \(\Delta =|{\mathrm{ELS}}_{i}-{\mathrm{ELS}}_{c}|\), and ELSi is the 3D-quantification of the ipsilateral ELS and ELSc of the contralateral ELS in mm3. Normalized ELS side difference, with an asymmetry index, \(\mathrm{AI} [\%]=\frac{({\mathrm{ELS}}_{i}-{\mathrm{ELS}}_{c})}{({\mathrm{ELS}}_{i} +{\mathrm{ELS}}_{c})}\times 100\), where the value is independent of the individual TFS.
Statistics and validation parameters
Analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) or using self-written scripts in MATLAB, version 7.19.0 (R2019b), including the “Statistics and Machine Learning” toolbox provided with MATLAB (Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc). Categorical values are reported as the number of cases that fit the category/number of patients in the examined group [%]; ordinal or scalar values are presented as (mean ± standard deviation).
NVC and ELS parameter
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for multiple comparisons, which was post-hoc Bonferroni-corrected for multiple testing, was used for scalar (ELS volumetric quantification result, clinical diagnostic raw data) and ordinal (ELH semi-quantitative visual scoring result) values. Group differences were assessed between all VP vs. NP and definite VP vs. NP. Linear agreement between parameter pairs was calculated for each method separately using the two-sided Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Results were reported at a significance level of p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, corrected for multiple comparisons.
DTI parameter
DTI continuous data types were assessed for differences in “central tendency “(e.g., average or median) and “dispersion” (e.g., variance) between groups (VP vs. NP). The group differences were assessed using the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for differences in medians between the groups and via the Brown–Forsythe test for group differences in variance of the two groups via the median absolute deviation. The collections named above (“central tendencies”, “dispersions”, “successive differences 1st order”, “successive differences 2nd order”, “raw entropy,” and “successive difference entropy”) were aggregated into single variables using principal component analysis (PCA) and choosing only the most significant principal component score as the representation of the collection for group difference assessment. The group differences were assessed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for differences in “medians” between the groups and via the Brown–Forsythe test for group differences in variance of the two groups via the “median absolute deviation”. The correlation of the “collections’’ to disease parameters, such as “disease duration”, “number of attacks”, “average duration of attacks”, and “number of attacks in the three months prior to examination”, was assessed via projection to latent space PLS analog to previous work [47, 48, 56]. In addition, rank-correlations were assessed as the input matrix for the singular value decomposition, which contained scores with ranks correlated to disease parameters. To test these correlations, we use permutation testing as suggested in the previous work [48], using 1000 permutations of the disease parameter in question and counting each correlation more significant than the reference (unpermuted) correlation as a failure of the test, setting the p-value of the test as the number of failures divided by the total number of permutations, i.e., p < 0.001.
Interparametric correlations
Correlations between clinical and diagnostic features, NVC distances [mm], structural DTI quantifications, and ELS volumes were assessed with a PLS approach (analog to “Interparametric correlations”). Results were reported at correlation coefficient > 0.5 for all measures and significant in 1000 permutation tests, i.e., p < 0.001.
Results
Clinical syndrome and treatment in VP patients
Eighteen VP patients (6 females; aged 28–84 years, mean age 52.6 ± 18.1 years; 17 right-handed (RH), one left-handed (LH)] and 18 age-matched NP (13 females; aged 25–78 years, mean age 50.3 ± 16.5 years; 18 RH) were included in the study. VP patients could be further divided into ten definite (dVP, three females; aged 29–61 years, mean age 52.5 ± 8.8 years; 10 RH) and eight probable VP patients (pVP, four females; aged 49–77 years, mean age 63.6 ± 8.9 years; 7 RH, 1 LH). A detailed description of the VP groups’ symptomatology with accompanying complaints and signs, duration of attacks and disorder, and therapeutic success are given in Table 1.
Eleven patients were treated with carbamazepine (5 dVP: minimal dose 200 mg/d, maximal dose 600 mg/d; 6pVP: minimal dose 200 mg/d, maximal dose 800 mg/d), 3 patients were treated with lacosamide (2 dVP, 1 pVP: 100 mg/d) and 2 patients received oxcarbazepine (1 dVP, 1 pVP: 900 mg/day). Two patients received a combination of lacosamide (2 dVP: minimal dose 100 mg/d, maximal dose 300 mg/d) with either carbamazepine (200 mg/d) or oxcarbazepine (900 mg/dl).
Clinical examination and neurophysiological testing
In 8/18 VP patients (44.4%; dVP: 3/10, 30%; pVP: 5/8, 62.5%), the neurophysiological testing pattern was unremarkable. 7/18 VP patients (38.9%; dVP: 5/10, 50%; pVP: 2/8, 25%) showed a clear pattern of unilateral reduction of audiovestibular function. The remaining 3/18 VP patients (16.7%; dVP: 2/10, 20%; pVP: 1/8, 12.5%) revealed complex neurophysiological patterns representing decreased as well as increased eighth cranial nerve function, that is, a combination of nerve lesion (= hypofunction) and nerve irrigation (= hyperexcitability) within the same side. Beyond that, no significant group differences or correlations with clinical parameters were found. A detailed description of the clinical and neurophysiological results is given in Table 2.
MR imaging approach tailored to VP
Neurovascular compression (NVC) and nerve angulation (NA) (aim i)
In 15/18 VP patients (83.3%; dVP: 8/10, 80%; pVP: 7/8, 87.5%) and 10/18 NP (55.6%), a NVC between the eighth cranial nerve and a blood vessel was detected. The contacts were documented between the nerve and the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA; VP: 10/15, NP: 10/10), the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA; 2/15 VP), the superior cerebellar artery (SCA; 1/15 VP), and the vertebral artery (VA; 1/15 VP). In another patient, the NVC was between a vein and the nerve. The VP mean distance between the PE and the NVC was 6.1 ± 2.8 mm (range 1.5–9.6 mm; dVP 6.2 ± 3.1 mm, range 1.8–9.6 mm; pVP 6.0 ± 2.7 mm, range 1.5–9.5 mm), the mean VP diameter of the compressing vessels was 0.7 ± 0.1 mm (dVP 0.7 ± 0.1 mm, range 0.6–0.8 mm; pVP 0.8 ± 0.1 mm, range 0.6–1.0 mm). The NP mean distance between PE and NVC was 6.6 ± 4.3 mm (range 1.3–14.2 mm), between NVC and IAC 9.7 ± 1.3 mm (range 7.8–11.9 mm), and the mean NP diameter 0.8 ± 0.3 mm (range 0.5–1.3 mm). NA at the contact site was seen in 8/15 NVC (53.3%; dVP: 6/8, 75%; pVP: 2/7, 28.5%). In comparison, NA was only seen in 2/10 NVC (20%) in NP.
In 6/18 VP patients (33.3%; dVP: 1/10, 10%; pVP: 5/8, 62.5%), the neurophysiological testing pattern and course of the nerve were unremarkable. Clinical side and NVC were found to correspond in 3/18 VP (16.7%, dVP 3/10, 30%), contradictory in 3/18 VP (16.7%; dVP 2/10, 20%, pVP 1/8, 12.5%), or inconclusive in 6/18 VP (33.3%; dVP 4/10, 40%, pVP 2/8, 25%). A detailed description of the NVC results can be seen in Table 3.
DTI tractography of the vestibular nerve (aim ii, aim iv)
Average (l) and localized (ll) tensor map approaches showed no significant differences or correlations. However, within the successive difference map approach (lll), the most significant group differences (VP vs. NP) were found for the 1st order successive difference aggregated data collections (1st principal component). This means that in the overall effect along the whole nerve (between PE and IAC), VP showed a higher difference between the ipsilateral and contralateral nerve than NP, where both sides were similar. This supports the theory that there is a measurable structural difference in the affected nerve compared to the non-affected nerve in VP. An overview can be seen in Table 4. Here, VP and NP differed significantly in their DTI parameter median difference (Δ in FA, RD, AD, MD) between the ipsilateral and contralateral side of the 1st order successive difference data (MSSD, p < 0.05, corrected for multiple testing). The aggregated data for the ipsilateral and the difference between the ipsilateral vs. contralateral side and the average (mean) are shown in Fig. 2A.
PLS correlations between the disease parameters “disease duration” and “total number of attacks” and the 1st order of successive differences were significant at p < 0.001 (no failures in 1000 permutation tests) with an r-squared of 0.596. The scatter plot of the ranked “disease duration” data and ranks of the 1st order successive difference PLS scores with an overlayed trendline can be viewed in Fig. 2B.
Endolymphatic space (ELS) characterization (aim iii)
Following a 3-point ordinal scale [57], semi-quantitative ELS (sqELS) classification showed no evidence of endolymphatic hydrops (ELH) in either VP or NP. However, in a 4-point ordinal scale [49], a mild ELH (grade 1) was discernible in 11/18 patients (VP 61.1%, dVP 5/10, 50%; pVP 6/8, 75%). This means that the extent of ELH was low. ELH was most pronounced on the ipsilateral side and in definite VP patients (VP: \(sq{ELS}_{ipsi}^{VP}\): grade 0.4 \(\pm\) 0.6, range 0–1.5; dVP: \(sq{ELS}_{ipsi}^{dVP}\): grade 0.5 \(\pm\) 0.6, range 0–1.5; pVP:\(sq{ELS}_{ipsi}^{pVP}\): grade 0.4 \(\pm\) 0.6, range 0–1.5). This pattern was mirrored in the volumetric ELS (vELS) quantification (VP: \(v{ELS}_{ipsi}^{VP}\): 9.6 \(\pm\) 4.2 mm3, range 4.7–17.9 mm3; dVP: \(v{ELS}_{ipsi}^{dVP}\): 10.2 \(\pm\) 4.6 mm3, range 5.2–17.9 mm3; pVP:\(v{ELS}_{ipsi}^{pVP}\): 8.7 \(\pm\) 3.7 mm3, range 4.7–15.4 mm3). In comparison, 5/18 NP (27.8%) showed a mild ELH with an altogether lower mean semiquantitative and volumetric ELS quantification (\(sq{ELS}_{mean}^{NP}\): grade 0.2 \(\pm\) 0.4, range 0–1; \(v{ELS}_{mean}^{NP}\): 8.9 \(\pm\) 2.5 mm3, range 5.2–13.9 mm3). VP and NP differed significantly regarding the extent of the asymmetry index of the inner ear and vestibulum volume (p < 0.05, ANOVA, corrected for multiple testing). Definite VP and NP, on the other hand, differed significantly regarding the extent of the asymmetry index of the vestibulum volume and difference in volume between ipsi- and contralateral side (p < 0.05, ANOVA, corrected for multiple testing). No correlations were found between electrophysiological data or degree of ELH and disease duration or number of attacks. A detailed description of the ELS results can be seen in Table 5.
Clinical side and ELS quantification lateralization were inconclusive in 13/18 VP (72.2%; dVP 8/10, 80%; pVP 5/8, 62.5%), and found to correspond in 3/18 VP (16.7%, dVP 1/10, 10%; pVP 2/8, 25%). In 2/18 VP patients (11.1%; dVP 1/10, 10%; pVP 1/8, 12.5%), the neurophysiological testing pattern and ELS were unremarkable. NVC side and ELS quantification lateralization were inconclusive in 12/18 VP (66.6%; dVP 7/10, 70%, pVP 5/8, 62.5%), contradictory in 3/18 VP (16.7%; dVP 2/10, 20%; pVP 1/8, 12.5%), found to correspond in 2/18 VP (11.1%; pVP 2/8, 25%), or normal in 1/18 (5.6%; dVP 1/10, 10%).
Interparametric correlations (aim iv)
The distance between PE and NVC (PE-to-NVC [mm]) correlated with audiovestibular function, i.e., neurophysiological testing (Roh 0.72, p < 0.001), structural nerve integrity, i.e., DTI SSPs (Roh − 6.638, p < 0.001), and inner ear ELS (Roh − 6.604, p < 0.001). Scatter plots with trendlines are shown in Fig. 3.
Discussion
The current study focused on a detailed characterization of structures affecting the cisternal part of the eighth cranial nerve to increase the diagnostic value of MRI in patients with vestibular paroxysmia (VP) using an MR imaging approach tailored to VP. The high-resolution MRI sequences were used to determine neurovascular compression (NVC) and nerve angulation/distortion (NA), structural nerve integrity via diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and in-vivo non-invasive verification of endolymphatic hydrops (ELH). The findings were the following: 1. Previously established evidence on the typical clinical and heterogenous diagnostic picture could be confirmed. 2. Nerve angulation (NA) increases NVC diagnostic specificity in VP (aim i); 3. DTI showed structural differences in the affected vestibular nerve in VP at group-level (p < 0.05), (aim ii); 4. Endolymphatic space (ELS) asymmetry index was mildly but significantly increased at group-level (p < 0.05), (aim iii); 5. “Disease duration” and “total number of attacks” correlated positively with DTI, i.e., with structural nerve integrity (Roh = 0.594, p < 0.001), (aim iv); 6. Distance between PE (point of entry/exit for afferent/efferent fibers out of/into the brainstem) and NVC (“PE-to-NVC”) correlated positively with audiovestibular function (Roh = − 0.72, p < 0.001) and negatively with structural nerve integrity (Roh = − 0.638, p < 0.001), or volume of the inner ear ELS (Roh = − 0.604, p < 0.001), (aim iv). At the group level, there were significant differences between VP participants and NP. In sum, the predictive value of MRI is increased. However, on a single-subject level, the methodology’s specificity is insufficient to diagnose VP.
In the following, we discuss these findings compared to previously published VP studies and the significance of dedicated VP MRI to quantify ELS and vestibular nerve structural integrity, its clinical implications, and recommendations for future studies and methodical limitations.
Confirmation of previously established VP evidence (aim i)
VP pathophysiology seems to be best explained by a “dual”, i.e., combined peripheral and central pathology [10]. While NVC is a necessary factor for the development of clinical symptoms [58,59,60], a central cranial nerve nuclei pathology with increased excitability or even a dysfunction at the level of thalamic-cortical projections, as well as on a cortical level with a reduced inhibitory projection to the cranial nerve nuclei develop [61, 62]. Furthermore, additional unknown factors are thought to play a role [63].
This study’s clinical and diagnostic results mirror the clinical picture of this vestibular NVC syndrome. The current VP cohort was characterized by the typical monomorphic clinical syndrome [2,3,4] and accompanied by a heterogeneous [12, 64] diagnostic neurophysiological picture (25–50% unremarkable, 33–45% pattern of reduction of audiovestibular function [6, 12], 17–30% complex neurophysiological pattern representing decreased as well as increased nerve function [8, 9, 11] as a combination of nerve lesion and nerve irrigation within the same side [10]). NVC was found in 83.3% of the current study and occurred along the whole intracisternal part of the nerve, particularly within the root entry and transition zone. Meatal NVC is rarer but did also occur. Most frequently, the compressing vessel could be attributed to the AICA (75%), but other vessels, such as the vertebral artery (VA, 10%), PICA (5%), or a vein (10%), are possible [10]. This was also true in the current study (AICA 66.7%, PICA 13.3%, VA 6.7%, SCA 6.7%, vein 6.7%). However, vascular loops as normal variants without clinical symptoms were found in about 25–30% (and in our control group about 50%) [65]. As an additional feature, NA increased NVC's specificity in VP [14]. Fittingly, they were 3:1 more frequent in VP than in NP and 2:1 more frequent in definite VP than in probable VP of our study.
Structural abnormalities of the vestibular nerve revealed by DTI (aim ii)
NVC syndromes entail a local peripheral nerve compression. It, therefore, seems reasonable to assume a DTI structural correlation in the affected nerve of VP patients. The current study found measurable DTI structural differences in the median difference between the affected and non-affected side of the first order successive difference data of the eighth cranial nerve in VP at group level (p < 0.05; Fig. 2A) that correlated with “disease duration” and “total number of attacks” (p < 0.001; Fig. 2B). Nevertheless, the average and localized tensor map approaches were not successful. Different factors could play a role here. One reason may be the low sensitivity of the method. In the future, this could be resolved by choosing high spatial resolution nerve-specific DTI over whole-brain DTI [66], specialized vestibular nerve DWI acquisition strategies for each subsegment [67], and optimized protocols concerning resolution, phase encoding [68], or the number of b-shells [69]. Another reason may be that although local compression of the peripheral nerve by the peripheral NVC is necessary for developing the clinical symptoms, the microstructural lesion does not remain local or is less pronounced than expected. A 7 Tesla T1-sequence with and without contrast agent in 6 VP patients showed no structural abnormalities [13]. Beyond that, to the best of our knowledge, nothing has been published on structural nerve abnormalities in VP.
In contrast, many studies exist on MR structural nerve abnormalities in the trigeminal NVC syndrome, trigeminal neuralgia (TiN), a disease with similar underlying pathophysiology [70]. The results were inhomogeneous, too. Some DTI studies showed microstructural alterations in fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) values between affected and non-affected TiN sides [71,72,73] that could be used for postoperative longitudinal control [74]. However, other studies showed no correlation between DTI parameters and clinical symptoms, such as illness duration or severity of compression [75].
Mild ELH in VP discernible (aim iii)
Following the 4-point ordinal scale, semi-quantitative classification of the ELS for the vestibulum and cochlea [49, 76], volumetric quantification in the current study disclosed a mild yet significantly increased asymmetry index of the inner ear and vestibulum when compared to NP. These findings are overlooked by a part of the 3-point ordinal scale ELH classification of the vestibulum [77]. This can be explained by the fact that these classifications were calibrated on patients with Ménière’s disease when ELH was viewed as pathognomonic to MD, which tends to have a larger ELH [17]. Fittingly and further underlying its pathophysiological relevance, varying degrees of ELH are also nearly universally present in post-mortem human temporal bone [78, 79] and iMRI studies on subjects with a history of MD [16, 18, 19, 32]. However, in-vivo iMRI studies also showed a relatively high prevalence in the healthy population (via iMRI [80], as well as in post-mortem studies [81]) and in patients with other vestibular disorders such as vestibular migraine [18, 19], vestibular schwannoma [82], or bilateral vestibulopathy [83]. Consequently, ELH is being re-evaluated as a non-pathognomonic phenomenon that should not directly indicate MD [84]. In this context, finer graduation in the lower ELH grades is useful not to overlook milder cases of ELH, be it in a 3-point ordinal scale [57] or a 4-point ordinal scale ELH classification of the vestibulum [49].
With respect to the current study, VP seems to be another vestibular disorder that can entail mild ELH. Although nonspecific, this finding may be one of several parameters that help diagnose the affected side (view Fig. 3). ELH has been tied to many pathophysiological theories, such as post-viral autoimmune mechanisms, anatomic or vascular abnormalities affecting endolymph resorption, and different factors relating to water homeostasis [85,86,87]. The pathogenetic mechanism for higher inner ear ELS volumes in VP seems to be related to the NVC lying in the root entry zone of the intracisternal part of the eighth cranial nerve (p < 0.001). The nerve compression might then lead to a disturbance in the inner ear fluid homeostasis, either directly or via a central pathology inducing hyperexcitability within the cranial nerve nuclei or reduced inhibitory projection to the cranial nerve nuclei.
Interparametric analyses corroborate NVC syndrome (aim iv)
The nearer the NVC was to the PE, the poorer audiovestibular function (p < 0.001) and nerve structural integrity (p < 0.001), and the larger inner ear ELS (p < 0.001) were. The intracisternal part of the eighth nerve starts covered by central myelin (i.e., oligodendrocytes, also called root entry zone), then 6–15 mm as measured from the PE [88] oligodendrocytes change into Schwann cells [89], which is called the transition zone. The present interparametric analyses corroborate the pathophysiological theory [2, 10] that the intracisternal part of the eighth cranial nerve covered by central myelin (i.e., oligodendrocytes) seems to be particularly vulnerable for deficits induced by NVC and that the NVC seems to be a necessary precondition factor to develop VP.
Clinical implications and recommendations for future studies
In VP, no “vestibular” symptom has a precise meaning in topology or nosology [1], which makes corroborating evidence from quantifiable features all the more critical. The current VP study should be understood as a proof-of-concept study for using MR imaging tailored to VP as a complementary clinical tool to investigate the vestibular end organ. On a single-subject level, MRI tailored to VP can deliver additional quantifiable features for diagnosing VP. Especially the verification of NA and mild ELH can increase the overall predictive value of MRI. Nevertheless, the specificity of the methodology is not yet sufficient to diagnose VP by MR imaging.
The improvement of the MR sequences, especially DTI (as mentioned in “Mild ELH in VP discernible, (aim iii)”), holds potential. This study’s sequence acquisition parameters represent a compromise between novel technical possibilities, resolution, and reasonable scan time while enabling a wide range of clinical applications. Novel MR neurography imaging techniques might prove helpful for the investigation of the structural integrity of the vestibular nerve, such as high-resolution isotropic [90], driven equilibrium (drive) [91], or 3D cranial nerve [92] MR imaging. In addition, similar to trigeminal nerve analyses, atlas-based segmentation might prove helpful [93]. Another approach to improve the MRI investigation of the neurovascular compression site could be the addition of magnetic resonance subtraction [94]. Furthermore, techniques beyond DTI tractography might unlock the mesoscopic potential of diffusion-weighted imaging [95]. Another aspect would be to investigate the structural and functional connectivity and disturbances in cortical networks since there also seems to be a central aspect in the pathophysiology of VP.
Methodological limitations
Two major limitations of the current study need to be considered: First, the limited number of subjects included, and second, the circumstance that iMRI imaging for the control group (NP) could only be done in patients with other (neurological) pathologies that did not affect the peripheral or central vestibulocochlear systems. First, given the variation in symptomatology, a higher number of VP participants would be desirable. If possible, 20 participants per clinical pattern should be included. Second, influences of the NP’s underlying neurological pathologies on the ELS appeared unlikely (view inclusion and exclusion criteria, Sect. 2.2.) but cannot entirely be excluded. However, ethical considerations did not allow us to include healthy volunteers without a medical indication for an iMRI with contrast agent. The decision to avoid unnecessary contrast agent application was based on prior findings of signal intensity increases in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on T1-weighted MR images after applying MR contrast agents that are still under investigation [96,97,98]. Third, the study lacks histological confirmation of endolymphatic hydrops since the in-vivo acquisition of histological specimens is currently not possible.
Conclusion
This study is the first to link eighth cranial nerve function, microstructure, and endolymphatic space changes in VP patients to clinical features and neurovascular compression in the root-entry zone (correlation coefficient > 0.5, p < 0.001). Significant differences were reached at group level (ANOVA, p < 0.05, corrected for multiple testing). However, moderate specificity of MR NVC and NA evidence, DTI quantification, or ELH verification means they do not suffice to diagnose VP on a single-subject level.
Abbreviations
- 3D:
-
Three-dimensional
- AD:
-
Axial diffusivity
- AEP:
-
Auditory evoked potential
- AI:
-
Asymmetry index
- AICA:
-
Anterior inferior cerebellar artery
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- Δ:
-
Side difference
- DTI:
-
Diffusion tensor imaging
- dVP:
-
Definite vestibular paroxysmia
- DWI:
-
Diffusion-weighted imaging
- ELH:
-
Endolymphatic hydrops
- ELS:
-
Endolymphatic space
- FA:
-
Fractional anisotropy
- FLAIR:
-
Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery
- NP:
-
Participants with normal vestibulocochlear testing
- HIT:
-
Head-impulse test
- IAC:
-
Internal auditory canal
- IE-Vnet:
-
Inner ear Vnet
- iMRI:
-
Delayed intravenous gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the inner ear
- LH:
-
Left-handed
- MASD:
-
Mean of the absolute differences of the first (1st) order
- MA2SD:
-
Mean of the absolute differences of the second (2nd) order
- MD:
-
Mean diffusivity
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- MSSD:
-
Mean of the squared differences of the 1st order
- MS2SD:
-
Mean of the squared differences of the 2nd order
- NA:
-
Nerve angulation
- NVC:
-
Neurovascular compression
- PCA:
-
Principal component analysis
- PE:
-
Point of entry/exit for afferent/efferent fibers out of/into the brainstem
- PICA:
-
Posterior inferior cerebellar artery
- PS:
-
Perilymphatic space
- PLS:
-
Projection into latent space
- PTA:
-
Pure tone audiometry
- pVP:
-
Probable vestibular paroxysmia
- RD:
-
Radial diffusivity
- RH:
-
Right-handed
- SCA:
-
Superior cerebellar artery
- SPN:
-
Spontaneous nystagmus
- SPACE:
-
Sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions
- SSP:
-
Statistical summary parameter
- SVV:
-
Subjective visual vertical
- TFS:
-
Total fluid space
- TN:
-
Triggered nystagmus
- TiN:
-
Trigeminal neuralgia
- VA:
-
Vertebral artery
- VM:
-
Vestibular migraine
- VN:
-
Vestibular nerve
- VOG:
-
Video-oculography
- VP:
-
Vestibular paroxysmia
References
Brandt T, Dieterich M, Strupp M (2013) Vertigo and dizziness: common complaints, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, London
Brandt T, Dieterich M (1994) Vestibular paroxysmia: vascular compression of the eighth nerve? Lancet 343:798–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91879-1
Jannetta PJ, Møller MB, Møller AR (1984) Disabling positional vertigo. N Engl J Med 310:1700–1705. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198406283102604
Møller MB, Møller AR (1990) Vascular compression syndrome of the eighth nerve. Clinical correlations and surgical findings. Neurol Clin 8:421–439
Strupp M, Lopez-Escamez JA, Kim J-S et al (2016) Vestibular paroxysmia: diagnostic criteria. J Vestib Res 26:409–415. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-160589
Hüfner K, Barresi D, Glaser M et al (2008) Vestibular paroxysmia: diagnostic features and medical treatment. Neurology 71:1006–1014. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000326594.91291.f8
Straube A, Büttner U, Brandt T (1994) Recurrent attacks with skew deviation, torsional nystagmus, and contraction of the left frontalis muscle. Neurology 44:177–178. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.44.1.177
Jannetta PJ (1975) Neurovascular cross-compression in patients with hyperactive dysfunction symptoms of the eighth cranial nerve. Surg Forum 26:467–469
Strupp M, Planck JH, Arbusow V et al (2000) Rotational vertebral artery occlusion syndrome with vertigo due to “labyrinthine excitation.” Neurology 54:1376–1379. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.54.6.1376
Best C, Gawehn J, Krämer HH et al (2013) MRI and neurophysiology in vestibular paroxysmia: contradiction and correlation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84:1349–1356. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-305513
Arbusow V, Strupp M, Dieterich M et al (1998) Alternating episodes of vestibular nerve excitation and failure. Neurology 51:1480–1483. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.51.5.1480
Ryu H, Yamamoto S, Sugiyama K, Nozue M (1998) Neurovascular compression syndrome of the eighth cranial nerve. What are the most reliable diagnostic signs? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140:1279–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010050250
Rommer PS, Wiest G, Kronnerwetter C et al (2015) 7-Tesla MRI demonstrates absence of structural lesions in patients with vestibular paroxysmia. Front Neuroanat 9:81. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2015.00081
Sivarasan N, Touska P, Murdin L, Connor S (2019) MRI findings in vestibular paroxysmia—an observational study. J Vestib Res 29:137–145. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-190661
Leal PRL, Roch JA, Hermier M et al (2011) Structural abnormalities of the trigeminal root revealed by diffusion tensor imaging in patients with trigeminal neuralgia caused by neurovascular compression: a prospective, double-blind, controlled study. Pain 152:2357–2364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.06.029
Boegle R, Gerb J, Kierig E et al (2021) Intravenous delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the endolymphatic space: a methodological comparative study. Front Neurol 12:647296. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.647296
Nakashima T, Pyykkö I, Arroll MA et al (2016) Meniere’s disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2:16028. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.28
Oh S-Y, Dieterich M, Lee BN et al (2021) Endolymphatic hydrops in patients with vestibular migraine and concurrent Meniere’s disease. Front Neurol 12:594481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.594481
Nakada T, Yoshida T, Suga K et al (2014) Endolymphatic space size in patients with vestibular migraine and Ménière’s disease. J Neurol 261:2079–2084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7458-9
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Dill T (2008) Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging. Heart 94:943–948. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.125039
Dieterich M, Brandt T (1993) Ocular torsion and tilt of subjective visual vertical are sensitive brainstem signs. Ann Neurol 33:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410330311
Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS (1988) A clinical sign of canal paresis. Arch Neurol 45:737–739. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1988.00520310043015
Schneider E, Villgrattner T, Vockeroth J et al (2009) EyeSeeCam: an eye movement-driven head camera for the examination of natural visual exploration. Ann NY Acad Sci 1164:461–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03858.x
Strupp M, Kim J-S, Murofushi T et al (2017) Bilateral vestibulopathy: diagnostic criteria consensus document of the classification committee of the Bárány society. J Vestib Res 27:177–189. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-170619
Jongkees LB, Maas JP, Philipszoon AJ (1962) Clinical nystagmography. A detailed study of electro-nystagmography in 341 patients with vertigo. Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel) 24:65–93
Agrawal Y, Van de Berg R, Wuyts F et al (2019) Presbyvestibulopathy: diagnostic criteria consensus document of the classification committee of the Bárány Society. J Vestib Res 29:161–170. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-190672
Dlugaiczyk J, Habs M, Dieterich M (2020) Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in vestibular migraine and Menière’s disease: cVEMPs make the difference. J Neurol 267:169–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09902-4
Curthoys IS, Dlugaiczyk J (2020) Physiology, clinical evidence and diagnostic relevance of sound-induced and vibration-induced vestibular stimulation. Curr Opin Neurol 33:126–135. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000770
Ertl M, Boegle R, Kirsch V, Dieterich M (2016) On the impact of examiners on latencies and amplitudes in cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials evaluated over a large sample (N = 1038). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:317–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3510-3
Matsumoto M, Nishimura T (1998) Mersenne twister: a 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul 8:3–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/272991.272995
Naganawa S, Yamazaki M, Kawai H et al (2010) Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops in Ménière’s disease with single-dose intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media using heavily T(2)-weighted 3D-FLAIR. Magn Reson Med Sci 9:237–242. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.9.237
Tournier J-D, Smith R, Raffelt D et al (2019) MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation. Neuroimage 202:116137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137
Veraart J, Novikov DS, Christiaens D et al (2016) Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory. Neuroimage 142:394–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.016
Cordero-Grande L, Christiaens D, Hutter J et al (2019) Complex diffusion-weighted image estimation via matrix recovery under general noise models. Neuroimage 200:391–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.039
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J et al (2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001
Smith SM (2002) Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 17:143–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10062
Schilling KG, Blaber J, Huo Y et al (2019) Synthesized b0 for diffusion distortion correction (Synb0-DisCo). Magn Reson Imaging 64:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.008
Andersson JLR, Skare S, Ashburner J (2003) How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 20:870–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7
Andersson JLR, Graham MS, Drobnjak I et al (2018) Susceptibility-induced distortion that varies due to motion: correction in diffusion MR without acquiring additional data. Neuroimage 171:277–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.040
Tustison N, Avants B, Cook P et al (2010) N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:1310–1320. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2010.2046908
Maier-Hein KH, Neher PF, Houde J-C et al (2017) The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography. Nat Commun 8:1349. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01285-x
Yeh F-C, Verstynen TD, Wang Y et al (2013) Deterministic diffusion fiber tracking improved by quantitative anisotropy. PLoS ONE 8:e80713. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080713
Yeh F-C (2020) Shape analysis of the human association pathways. Neuroimage 223:117329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117329
Berrett TB, Samworth RJ, Yuan M (2019) Efficient multivariate entropy estimation via k-nearest neighbour distances. Ann Statist. https://doi.org/10.1214/18-AOS1688
McIntosh AR, Lobaugh NJ (2004) Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances. Neuroimage 23:S250–S263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.020
McIntosh AR, Bookstein FL, Haxby JV, Grady CL (1996) Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares. Neuroimage 3:143–157. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1996.0016
Cyran CAM, Boegle R, Stephan T et al (2016) Age-related decline in functional connectivity of the vestibular cortical network. Brain Struct Funct 221:1443–1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0983-6
Boegle R, Gerb J, Kierig E et al (2021) Intravenous delayed Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the endolymphatic space: A methodical comparative study. Front Neurol https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.647296
Ahmadi S-A, Frei J, Vivar G et al (2022) IE-Vnet: deep learning-based segmentation of the inner ear’s total fluid space. Front Neurol 13:663200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.663200
Milletari F, Frei J, Aboulatta M et al (2019) Cloud deployment of high-resolution medical image analysis with TOMAAT. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 23:969–977. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2018.2885214
Gerb J, Ahmadi SA, Kierig E et al (2020) VOLT: a novel open-source pipeline for automatic segmentation of endolymphatic space in inner ear MRI. J Neurol 267:185–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10062-8
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019
Nizamutdinov V (2015) Neural network and fuzzy logic based plugins for imagej
Legland D, Arganda-Carreras I, Andrey P (2016) MorphoLibJ: integrated library and plugins for mathematical morphology with ImageJ. Bioinformatics 32:3532–3534. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw413
Garrett DD, Kovacevic N, McIntosh AR, Grady CL (2011) The importance of being variable. J Neurosci 31:4496–4503. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5641-10.2011
Nakashima T, Naganawa S, Pyykko I et al (2009) Grading of endolymphatic hydrops using magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480902729827
Gardner WJ (1966) Cross talk–the paradoxical transmission of a nerve impulse. Arch Neurol 14:149–156. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1966.00470080033005
Nielsen VK (1984) Pathophysiology of hemifacial spasm: I. Ephaptic transmission and ectopic excitation. Neurology 34:418–426. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.34.4.418
Granit R, Leksell L, Skoglund CR (1944) Fibre interaction in injured or compressed region of nerve. Brain 67:125–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/67.2.125
Esteban A, Molina-Negro P (1986) Primary hemifacial spasm: a neurophysiological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49:58–63. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.49.1.58
Ishikawa M, Ohira T, Namiki J et al (1997) Electrophysiological investigation of hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression: F waves of the facial muscles, blink reflexes, and abnormal muscle responses. J Neurosurg 86:654–661. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1997.86.4.0654
Møller AR (1999) Vascular compression of cranial nerves: II: pathophysiology. Neurol Res 21:439–443
Bergsneider M, Becker DP (1995) Vascular compression syndrome of the vestibular nerve: a critical analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112:118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0194-5998(95)70310-1
Teh CS-L, Noordiana SH, Shamini S, Prepageran N (2021) Vascular loops: the innocent bystander for vestibular Paroxysmia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894211037211
Danyluk H, Sankar T, Beaulieu C (2021) High spatial resolution nerve-specific DTI protocol outperforms whole-brain DTI protocol for imaging the trigeminal nerve in healthy individuals. NMR Biomed 34:e4427. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4427
Xie G, Zhang F, Leung L et al (2020) Anatomical assessment of trigeminal nerve tractography using diffusion MRI: a comparison of acquisition b-values and single- and multi-fiber tracking strategies. Neuroimage Clin 25:102160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102160
Cheng J, Basser PJ (2018) Director Field Analysis (DFA): exploring local white matter geometric structure in diffusion MRI. Med Image Anal 43:112–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.10.003
Jeurissen B, Tournier J-D, Dhollander T et al (2014) Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage 103:411–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.061
Jannetta PJ (1981) Cranial nerve vascular compression syndromes (other than tic douloureux and hemifacial spasm). Clin Neurosurg 28:445–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/neurosurgery/28.cn_suppl_1.445
Chai W, You C, Zhang W et al (2019) Diffusion tensor imaging of microstructural alterations in the trigeminal nerve due to neurovascular contact/compression. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 161:1407–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03851-2
DeSouza DD, Hodaie M, Davis KD (2016) Structural magnetic resonance imaging can identify trigeminal system abnormalities in classical trigeminal neuralgia. Front Neuroanat 10:95. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2016.00095
Zhang Y, Mao Z, Cui Z et al (2018) Diffusion tensor imaging of axonal and myelin changes in classical trigeminal neuralgia. World Neurosurg 112:e597–e607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.095
Wu M, Qiu J, Jiang X et al (2020) Diffusion tensor imaging reveals microstructural alteration of the trigeminal nerve root in classical trigeminal neuralgia without neurovascular compression and correlation with outcome after internal neurolysis. Magn Reson Imaging 71:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2020.05.006
Lutz J, Thon N, Stahl R et al (2016) Microstructural alterations in trigeminal neuralgia determined by diffusion tensor imaging are independent of symptom duration, severity, and type of neurovascular conflict. J Neurosurg 124:823–830. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.2.JNS142587
Kirsch V, Becker-Bense S, Berman A et al (2018) Transient endolymphatic hydrops after an attack of vestibular migraine: a longitudinal single case study. J Neurol 265:51–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-8870-3
Baráth K, Schuknecht B, Naldi AM et al (2014) Detection and grading of endolymphatic hydrops in Menière disease using MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 35:1387–1392. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3856
Rauch SD, Merchant SN, Thedinger BA (1989) Meniere’s syndrome and endolymphatic hydrops. Double-blind temporal bone study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 98:873–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348948909801108
Fraysse BG, Alonso A, House WF (1980) Menière’s disease and endolymphatic hydrops: clinical-histopathological correlations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 89:2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894800896s201
Ito T, Inui H, Miyasaka T et al (2019) Endolymphatic volume in patients with meniere’s disease and healthy controls: three-dimensional analysis with magnetic resonance imaging. Laryngoscope 4:653–658. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.313
Brantberg K, Trees N, Baloh RW (2005) Migraine-associated vertigo. Acta Otolaryngol 125:276–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480510003165
Eliezer M, Poillon G, Maquet C et al (2019) Sensorineural hearing loss in patients with vestibular schwannoma correlates with the presence of utricular hydrops as diagnosed on heavily T2-weighted MRI. Diagn Interv Imaging 100:259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2019.01.006
Eliezer M, Hautefort C, Van Nechel C et al (2020) Electrophysiological and inner ear MRI findings in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277:1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05829-8
van der Lubbe MFJA, Vaidyanathan A, Van Rompaey V et al (2020) The “hype” of hydrops in classifying vestibular disorders: a narrative review. J Neurol 267:197–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10278-8
Salt AN, Plontke SK (2010) Endolymphatic hydrops: pathophysiology and experimental models. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 43:971–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2010.05.007
Ishiyama G, Lopez IA, Ishiyama P et al (2017) The blood labyrinthine barrier in the human normal and Meniere’s disease macula utricle. Sci Rep 7:253. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00330-5
Møller MN, Kirkeby S, Cayé-Thomasen P (2017) Innate immune defense in the inner ear—mucines are expressed by the human endolymphatic sac. J Anat 230:297–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12559
Lang J (1982) Anatomy, length and blood vessel relations of “central” and “peripheral” paths of intracisternal cranial nerves. Zentralbl Neurochir 43:217–258
De Ridder D, Møller A, Verlooy J et al (2002) Is the root entry/exit zone important in microvascular compression syndromes? Neurosurgery 51:427–434. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200208000-00023
Wen J, Desai NS, Jeffery D et al (2018) High-resolution isotropic three-dimensional MR imaging of the extraforaminal segments of the cranial nerves. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 26:101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2017.08.007
Ciftci E, Anik Y, Arslan A et al (2004) Driven equilibrium (drive) MR imaging of the cranial nerves V-VIII: comparison with the T2-weighted 3D TSE sequence. Eur J Radiol 51:234–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.10.019
Van der Cruyssen F, Croonenborghs T-M, Hermans R et al (2021) 3D cranial nerve imaging, a novel MR neurography technique using black-blood STIR TSE with a pseudo steady-state sweep and motion-sensitized driven equilibrium pulse for the visualization of the extraforaminal cranial nerve branches. Am J Neuroradiol 42:578–580. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6904
Zhang F, Xie G, Leung L et al (2020) Creation of a novel trigeminal tractography atlas for automated trigeminal nerve identification. Neuroimage 220:117063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117063
Liao Z, Zou L, Peng W et al (2021) Improving the accuracy of pre-operative evaluation of neurovascular conflict in trigeminal neuralgia using magnetic resonance subtraction. Neuroradiology 63:295–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02624-4
Novikov DS, Fieremans E, Jespersen SN, Kiselev VG (2019) Quantifying brain microstructure with diffusion MRI: theory and parameter estimation. NMR Biomed 32:e3998. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3998
Adin ME, Kleinberg L, Vaidya D et al (2015) Hyperintense dentate nuclei on T1-weighted MRI: relation to repeat gadolinium administration. Am J Neuroradiol 36:1859–1865. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4378
Moser FG, Watterson CT, Weiss S et al (2018) High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: comparison between gadobutrol and linear gadolinium-based contrast agents. Am J Neuroradiol 39:421–426. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5538
Errante Y, Cirimele V, Mallio CA et al (2014) Progressive increase of T1 signal intensity of the dentate nucleus on unenhanced magnetic resonance images is associated with cumulative doses of intravenously administered gadodiamide in patients with normal renal function, suggesting dechelation. Invest Radiol 49:685–690. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000072
Acknowledgements
We thank K. Göttlinger for copyediting the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was partially funded by the German Foundation of Neurology (Deutsche Stiftung Neurologie, DSN), Verein zur Förderung von Wissenschaft und Forschung an der Medizinischen Fakultät der LMU (Association for the Promotion of Science and Research at the LMU Medical Faculty), and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Grant 01 EO 0901) via the German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ, grant number 01 EO 1401).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EK, JG, acquisition, and analysis of the data, drafting the manuscript; RB, BEW, conception, and design of the study, analysis of the data, drafting the manuscript; MD, conception, and design of the study, drafting the manuscript, providing funding; VK, conception, and design of the study, acquisition, and analysis of the data, drafting the manuscript, providing funding.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kierig, E., Gerb, J., Boegle, R. et al. Vestibular paroxysmia entails vestibular nerve function, microstructure and endolymphatic space changes linked to root-entry zone neurovascular compression. J Neurol 270, 82–100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11399-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11399-y