Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Expanding the clinical spectrum of STIP1 homology and U-box containing protein 1-associated ataxia

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

STUB1 has been first associated with autosomal recessive (SCAR16, MIM# 615768) and later with dominant forms of ataxia (SCA48, MIM# 618093). Pathogenic variations in STUB1 are now considered a frequent cause of cerebellar ataxia.

Objective

We aimed to improve the clinical, radiological, and molecular delineation of SCAR16 and SCA48.

Methods

Retrospective collection of patients with SCAR16 or SCA48 diagnosed in three French genetic centers (Montpellier, Strasbourg and Nancy).

Results

Here, we report four SCAR16 and nine SCA48 patients from two SCAR16 and five SCA48 unrelated French families. All presented with slowly progressive cerebellar ataxia. Additional findings included cognitive decline, dystonia, parkinsonism and swallowing difficulties. The age at onset was highly variable, ranging from 14 to 76 years. Brain MRI showed marked cerebellar atrophy in all patients. Phenotypic findings associated with STUB1 pathogenic variations cover a broad spectrum, ranging from isolated slowly progressive ataxia to severe encephalopathy, and include extrapyramidal features. We described five new pathogenic variations, two previously reported pathogenic variations, and two rare variants of unknown significance in association with STUB1-related disorders. We also report the first pathogenic variation associated with both dominant and recessive forms of inheritance (SCAR16 and SCA48).

Conclusion

Even though differences are observed between the recessive and dominant forms, it appears that a continuum exists between these two entities. While adding new symptoms associated with STUB1 pathogenic variations, we insist on the difficulty of genetic counselling in STUB1-related pathologies. Finally, we underscore the usefulness of DAT-scan as an additional clue for diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marelli C et al (2016) Mini-exome coupled to read-depth based copy number variation analysis in patients with inherited ataxias. Hum Mutat 37(12):1340–1353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Renaud M et al (2018) Clinical, biomarker, and molecular delineations and genotype-phenotype correlations of ataxia with oculomotor apraxia Type 1. JAMA Neurol 75(4):495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Renaud M et al (2014) Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia type 3 due to ANO10 mutations: delineation and genotype-phenotype correlation study. JAMA Neurol 71(10):1305–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anheim M, Tranchant C, Koenig M (2012) The autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxias. N Engl J Med 366(7):636–646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Renaud M et al (2017) A recessive ataxia diagnosis algorithm for the next generation sequencing era. Ann Neurol 82(6):892–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gebus O et al (2017) Deciphering the causes of sporadic late-onset cerebellar ataxias: a prospective study with implications for diagnostic work. J Neurol 264(6):1118–1126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mallaret M et al (2016) Validation of a clinical practice-based algorithm for the diagnosis of autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxias based on NGS identified cases. J Neurol 263(7):1314–1322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Coutelier M et al (2017) A panel study on patients with dominant cerebellar ataxia highlights the frequency of channelopathies. Brain 140(6):1579–1594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shi Y et al (2013) Identification of CHIP as a novel causative gene for autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia. PLoS ONE 8(12):e81884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Min JN et al (2008) CHIP deficiency decreases longevity, with accelerated aging phenotypes accompanied by altered protein quality control. Mol Cell Biol 28(12):4018–4025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hayer SN et al (2017) STUB1/CHIP mutations cause Gordon Holmes syndrome as part of a widespread multisystemic neurodegeneration: evidence from four novel mutations. Orphanet J Rare Dis 12(1):31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Genis D et al (2018) Heterozygous STUB1 mutation causes familial ataxia with cognitive affective syndrome (SCA48). Neurology 91(21):e1988–e1998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. De Michele G et al (2019) Spinocerebellar ataxia 48 presenting with ataxia associated with cognitive, psychiatric, and extrapyramidal features: a report of two Italian families. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 65:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Palvadeau R et al (2020) Cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome preceding ataxia associated with complex extrapyramidal features in a Turkish SCA48 family. Neurogenetics 21(1):51–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mol MO et al (2020) Clinical and pathologic phenotype of a large family with heterozygous STUB1 mutation. Neurol Genet 6(3):e417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Roux T et al (2020) Clinical, neuropathological, and genetic characterization of STUB1 variants in cerebellar ataxias: a frequent cause of predominant cognitive impairment. Genet Med

  17. De Michele G et al (2020) Spinocerebellar ataxia type 48: last but not least. Neurol Sci 41(9):2423–2432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Anheim M et al (2010) Epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical and molecular study of a cohort of 102 patients affected with autosomal recessive progressive cerebellar ataxia from Alsace, Eastern France: implications for clinical management. Neurogenetics 11(1):1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmitz-Hübsch T et al (2006) Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale. Neurology 66(11):1717–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Montaut S et al (2018) Assessment of a targeted gene panel for identification of genes associated with movement disorders. JAMA Neurol 75(10):1234–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oussalah A et al (2020) Population and evolutionary genetics of the PAH locus to uncover overdominance and adaptive mechanisms in phenylketonuria: results from a multiethnic study. EBioMedicine 51:102623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiedemann A et al (2020) Mutations in MTHFR and POLG impaired activity of the mitochondrial respiratory chain in 46-year-old twins with spastic paraparesis. J Hum Genet 65(2):91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Renard E et al (2019) Exome sequencing of cases with neural tube defects identifies candidate genes involved in one-carbon/vitamin B12 metabolisms and Sonic Hedgehog pathway. Hum Genet 138(7):703–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H (2010) ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 38(16):e164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chiu HH et al (2020) Clinical and genetic characterization of autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia type 16 (SCAR16) in Taiwan. Cerebellum 19(4):544–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Synofzik M et al (2014) Phenotype and frequency of STUB1 mutations: next-generation screenings in Caucasian ataxia and spastic paraplegia cohorts. Orphanet J Rare Dis 9:57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Depondt C et al (2014) Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia of adult onset due to STUB1 mutations 82(19):1749–1750

  28. Heimdal K et al (2014) STUB1 mutations in autosomal recessive ataxias—evidence for mutation-specific clinical heterogeneity. Orphanet J Rare Dis 9:146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bettencourt C et al (2015) Clinical and neuropathological features of spastic ataxia in a spanish family with novel compound heterozygous mutations in STUB1. Cerebellum 14(3):378–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gazulla J et al (2018) Inaugural cognitive decline, late disease onset and novel STUB1 variants in SCAR16. Neurol Sci 39(12):2231–2233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kawarai T et al (2016) Choreoathetosis, dystonia, and myoclonus in 3 siblings with autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia Type 16. JAMA Neurol 73(7):888–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Madrigal SC et al (2019) Changes in protein function underlie the disease spectrum in patients with CHIP mutations. J Biol Chem 294(50):19236–19245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lieto M et al (2020) The complex phenotype of spinocerebellar ataxia type 48 in eight unrelated Italian families. Eur J Neurol 27(3):498–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cocozza S, Santorelli FM, De Michele G (2020) STUB1-related ataxias: a challenging diagnosis. Mov Disord Clin Pract 7(6):733–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen DH et al (2020) Heterozygous STUB1 missense variants cause ataxia, cognitive decline, and STUB1 mislocalization. Neurol Genet 6(2):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nicita F et al (2019) Heterozygous missense variants of SPTBN2 are a frequent cause of congenital cerebellar ataxia. Clin Genet 96(2):169–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nemani T et al (2020) KIF1A-related disorders in children: a wide spectrum of central and peripheral nervous system involvement. J Peripher Nerv Syst 25(2):117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Coarelli G et al (2019) Loss of paraplegin drives spasticity rather than ataxia in a cohort of 241 patients with SPG7. Neurology 92(23):e2679–e2690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank David Baux and Olivier Ardouin for bioinformatics support, Karine Choquet for careful reading and Véronique Braun and Antoine Verger for fruitful discussion.

Funding

This work was in part supported by a grant from the French “Connaitre les Syndromes Cerebelleux” (CSC) association.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Michel Koenig or Mathilde Renaud.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all individuals contributing a blood sample for molecular investigations and the local ethics committees approved the study. A distinct consent form was also signed if videos were recorded.

Consent for publication

The final manuscript has been read and approved by all authors who accepted full responsibility for the design and undertaking of the original article. They had access to the data and controlled the decision to publish.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

415_2020_10348_MOESM1_ESM.png

Figure S1. Electro-encephalogram anomalies. (A) Patient 1. (1) EEE during wakefulness. Slow background activity around 6Hz, bilaterally. (2) Sharp waves with sometimes triphasic aspect over bilateral suprasylvian areas, mostly on the right side. (3) Periods of several minutes of rhythmic theta activity (4hz) in bilateral frontotemporal areas (4) At the photic stimulation, short EEG activation with appearance of a rhythmic theta background activity (6hz) in the posterior electrodes followed by a delta range slow activity over frontotemporal areas. (B) Patient 2. Right posterior temporo-parieto-occipital fast epileptiform discharge, involving in a second step the entire right hemisphere, then followed by contralateral involvement with fast epileptiform discharge in the left frontocentral and posterior temporoparietal occipital areas. At the end of the ictal discharge, presence of diffuse bilateral slowing (PNG 2330 kb)

415_2020_10348_MOESM2_ESM.png

Figure S2. DAT-scan showing dopaminergic impairment. (A) Patient 4. Moderate impairment of predominantly presynaptic dopaminergic pathways (B) Patient 5. Diffuse impairment of presynaptic dopaminergic pathways. (C) Patient 10. Marked dopaminergic alteration. (PNG 3071 kb)

Video 1 to 3. SCAR16 patient (Patient 1). Video 1: Moderate, but still intelligible, cerebellar dysarthria. Moderate head tremor. (MP4 4012 kb)

Video 2: Cerebellar oculomotor abnormalities: saccadic pursuit and horizontal nystagmus. (MP4 6129 kb)

Video 3: Dystonia of the upper limbs (mainly hands and fingers). Dysmetria during the nose-finger test. (MP4 10483 kb)

Video 4. SCA48 patient (Patient 6). Patient confined to wheelchair, unable to walk, even with support. Extrapyramidal signs: rigidity, akinesia. Rest and action tremor on upper limbs. (MP4 39560 kb)

Video 5. SCA48 patient (Patient 6). Patient confined to wheelchair, unable to walk, even with support. Extrapyramidal signs: rigidity, akinesia. Rest and action tremor on upper limbs. (MP4 10007 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ravel, JM., Benkirane, M., Calmels, N. et al. Expanding the clinical spectrum of STIP1 homology and U-box containing protein 1-associated ataxia. J Neurol 268, 1927–1937 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10348-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10348-x

Keywords

Navigation