Skip to main content
Log in

Platelet function/reactivity testing and prediction of risk of recurrent vascular events and outcomes after TIA or ischaemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of ex vivo ‘high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR)’ and its relationship with recurrent vascular events/outcomes in patients with ischaemic cerebrovascular disease (CVD) is unclear.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for completed manuscripts until May 2019 on TIA/ischaemic stroke patients, ≥ 18 years, treated with commonly-prescribed antiplatelet therapy, who had platelet function/reactivity testing and prospective follow-up data on recurrent stroke/TIA, myocardial infarction, vascular death or other cerebrovascular outcomes. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Primary outcome was the composite risk of recurrent stroke/TIA, myocardial infarction or vascular death. Secondary outcomes were recurrent stroke/TIA, severe stroke (NIHSS > 16) or disability/impairment (modified Rankin scale ≥ 3) during follow-up.

Results

Antiplatelet–HTPR prevalence was 3–65% with aspirin, 8–56% with clopidogrel and 1.8–35% with aspirin–clopidogrel therapy. Twenty studies (4989 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. There was a higher risk of the composite primary outcome (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.90–4.51) and recurrent ischaemic stroke/TIA (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.51–3.91) in patients with vs. those without ‘antiplatelet–HTPR’ on any antiplatelet regimen. These risks were also more than twofold higher in patients with vs. those without ‘aspirin–HTPR’ and ‘dual antiplatelet–HTPR’, respectively. Clopidogrel–HTPR status did not significantly predict outcomes, but the number of eligible studies was small. The risk of severe stroke was higher in those with vs. without antiplatelet–HTPR (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.00–7.01).

Discussion

Antiplatelet–HTPR may predict risks of recurrent vascular events/outcomes in CVD patients. Given the heterogeneity between studies, further prospective, multi-centre studies are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnston SC, Easton JD, Farrant M, Barsan W, Conwit RA, Elm JJ, Kim AS, Lindblad AS, Palesch YY, Clinical Research Collaboration NETTN (2018) Clopidogrel and aspirin in acute ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA. N Engl J Med 379(3):215–225. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pan Y, Elm JJ, Li H, Easton JD, Wang Y, Farrant M, Meng X, Kim AS, Zhao X, Meurer WJ, Liu L, Dietrich D, Wang Y, Johnston SC (2019) Outcomes associated with clopidogrel-aspirin use in minor stroke or transient ischemic attack: a pooled analysis of clopidogrel in high-risk patients with acute non-disabling cerebrovascular events (CHANCE) and Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) Trials. JAMA Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2531

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rothwell PM, Buchan A, Johnston SC (2006) Recent advances in management of transient ischaemic attacks and minor ischaemic strokes. Lancet Neurol 5(4):323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70408-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Collins FS, Varmus H (2015) A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med 372(9):793–795. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1500523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Krasopoulos G, Brister SJ, Beattie WS, Buchanan MR (2008) Aspirin “resistance” and risk of cardiovascular morbidity: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 336(7637):195–198. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39430.529549.BE

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bennett D, Yan B, Macgregor L, Eccleston D, Davis SM (2008) A pilot study of resistance to aspirin in stroke patients. J Clin Neurosci 15(11):1204–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2008.01.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grotemeyer KH, Scharafinski HW, Husstedt IW (1993) Two-year follow-up of aspirin responder and aspirin non responder. A pilot-study including 180 post-stroke patients. Thromb Res 71(5):397–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eikelboom JW, Hirsh J, Weitz JI, Johnston M, Yi Q, Yusuf S (2002) Aspirin-resistant thromboxane biosynthesis and the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. Circulation 105(14):1650–1655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gum PA, Kottke-Marchant K, Welsh PA, White J, Topol EJ (2003) A prospective, blinded determination of the natural history of aspirin resistance among stable patients with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 41(6):961–965

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mason PJ, Jacobs AK, Freedman JE (2005) Aspirin resistance and atherothrombotic disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(6):986–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aradi D, Komocsi A, Vorobcsuk A, Rideg O, Tokes-Fuzesi M, Magyarlaki T, Horvath IG, Serebruany VL (2010) Prognostic significance of high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity after percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J 160(3):543–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Combescure C, Fontana P, Mallouk N, Berdague P, Labruyere C, Barazer I, Gris JC, Laporte S, Fabbro-Peray P, Reny JL, Clopidogrel Vascular, Vascular IEM-aSG (2010) Clinical implications of clopidogrel non-response in cardiovascular patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 8(5):923–933. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03809.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sofi F, Marcucci R, Gori AM, Giusti B, Abbate R, Gensini GF (2010) Clopidogrel non-responsiveness and risk of cardiovascular morbidity. An updated meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 103(4):841–848. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH09-06-0418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pettersen AA, Seljeflot I, Abdelnoor M, Arnesen H (2012) High On-aspirin platelet reactivity and clinical outcome in patients with stable coronary artery disease: results From ASCET (Aspirin Nonresponsiveness and Clopidogrel Endpoint Trial). J Am Heart Assoc 1(3):e000703. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.000703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Reny JL, Berdague P, Poncet A, Barazer I, Nolli S, Fabbro-Peray P, Schved JF, Bounameaux H, Mach F, de Moerloose P, Fontana P, Antiplatelet Drug R, Ischemic Events Study G (2012) Antiplatelet drug response status does not predict recurrent ischemic events in stable cardiovascular patients: results of the Antiplatelet Drug Resistances and Ischemic Events study. Circulation 125(25):3201–3210. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.085464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brar SS, ten Berg J, Marcucci R, Price MJ, Valgimigli M, Kim HS, Patti G, Breet NJ, DiSciascio G, Cuisset T, Dangas G (2011) Impact of platelet reactivity on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. A collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(19):1945–1954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Collet JP, Cuisset T, Range G, Cayla G, Elhadad S, Pouillot C, Henry P, Motreff P, Carrie D, Boueri Z, Belle L, Van Belle E, Rousseau H, Aubry P, Monsegu J, Sabouret P, O’Connor SA, Abtan J, Kerneis M, Saint-Etienne C, Barthelemy O, Beygui F, Silvain J, Vicaut E, Montalescot G, Investigators A (2012) Bedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for coronary stenting. N Engl J Med 367(22):2100–2109. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1209979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Price MJ, Berger PB, Teirstein PS, Tanguay JF, Angiolillo DJ, Spriggs D, Puri S, Robbins M, Garratt KN, Bertrand OF, Stillabower ME, Aragon JR, Kandzari DE, Stinis CT, Lee MS, Manoukian SV, Cannon CP, Schork NJ, Topol EJ, Investigators G (2011) Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function testing after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GRAVITAS randomized trial. JAMA 305(11):1097–1105. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aradi D, Komocsi A, Price MJ, Cuisset T, Ari H, Hazarbasanov D, Trenk D, Sibbing D, Valgimigli M, Bonello L, Tailored Antiplatelet Treatment Study C (2013) Efficacy and safety of intensified antiplatelet therapy on the basis of platelet reactivity testing in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 167(5):2140–2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aradi D, Gross L, Trenk D, Geisler T, Merkely B, Kiss RG, Komocsi A, Dezsi CA, Ruzsa Z, Ungi I, Rizas KD, May AE, Mugge A, Zeiher AM, Holdt L, Huber K, Neumann FJ, Koltowski L, Huczek Z, Hadamitzky M, Massberg S, Sibbing D (2019) Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel and clopidogrel: a pre-specified exploratory analysis from the TROPICAL-ACS trial. Eur Heart J 40(24):1942–1951. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE 3rd (1993) Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 24(1):35–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lim ST, Coughlan CA, Murphy SJ, Fernandez-Cadenas I, Montaner J, Thijs V, Marquardt L, McCabe DJ (2015) Platelet function testing in transient ischaemic attack and ischaemic stroke: a comprehensive systematic review of the literature. Platelets 26(5):402–412. https://doi.org/10.3109/09537104.2015.1049139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fiolaki A, Katsanos AH, Kyritsis AP, Papadaki S, Kosmidou M, Moschonas IC, Tselepis AD, Giannopoulos S (2017) High on treatment platelet reactivity to aspirin and clopidogrel in ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 376:112–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2017.03.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DGP, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Simon T, Danchin N (2017) Clinical impact of pharmacogenomics of clopidogrel in stroke. Circulation 135(1):34–37. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Y, Zhao X, Lin J, Li H, Johnston SC, Lin Y, Pan Y, Liu L, Wang D, Wang C, Meng X, Xu J, Wang Y, investigators C (2016) Association between cyp2c19 loss-of-function allele status and efficacy of clopidogrel for risk reduction among patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. JAMA 316(1):70–78. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.8662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tobin WO, Kinsella JA, Coughlan T, Collins DR, O’Neill D, Murphy RP, Egan B, Tierney S, Feeley TM, McCabe DJ (2013) High on-treatment platelet reactivity on commonly prescribed antiplatelet agents following transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke: results from the Trinity Antiplatelet Responsiveness (TRAP) study. Eur J Neurol 20(2):344–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03861.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tobin WO, Kinsella JA, Collins DR, Coughlan T, O’Neill D, Egan B, Tierney S, Feeley TM, Murphy RP, McCabe DJ (2011) Enhanced ex vivo inhibition of platelet function following addition of dipyridamole to aspirin after transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke: first results from the TRinity AntiPlatelet responsiveness (TrAP) study. Br J Haematol 152(5):640–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08539.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Grau AJ, Reiners S, Lichy C, Buggle F, Ruf A (2003) Platelet function under aspirin, clopidogrel, and both after ischemic stroke: a case-crossover study. Stroke 34(4):849–854. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000064326.65899.AC

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Serebruany VL, Malinin AI, Pokov AN, Hanley DF (2008) Antiplatelet profiles of the fixed-dose combination of extended-release dipyridamole and low-dose aspirin compared with clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients with type 2 diabetes and a history of transient ischemic attack: a randomized, single-blind, 30-day trial. Clin Ther 30(2):249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.02.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Raman S, Jilma B (2004) Time lag in platelet function inhibition by clopidogrel in stroke patients as measured by PFA-100. J Thromb Haemost 2(12):2278–2279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.01046.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Serebruany VL, Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Malinin AI, Bhatt DL, Topol EJ (2005) Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 45(2):246–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Serebruany VL, Malinin AI, Ziai W, Pokov AN, Bhatt DL, Alberts MJ, Hanley DF (2005) Effects of clopidogrel and aspirin in combination versus aspirin alone on platelet activation and major receptor expression in patients after recent ischemic stroke: for the Plavix Use for Treatment of Stroke (PLUTO-Stroke) trial. Stroke 36(10):2289–2292. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000181081.09262.e1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Serebruany VL, Malinin AI, Sane DC, Jilma B, Takserman A, Atar D, Hennekens CH (2004) Magnitude and time course of platelet inhibition with Aggrenox and Aspirin in patients after ischemic stroke: the AGgrenox versus Aspirin Therapy Evaluation (AGATE) trial. Eur J Pharmacol 499(3):315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.07.114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savovic J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hrobjartsson A, Kirkham J, Juni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schunemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. McCabe DJ, Harrison P, Mackie IJ, Sidhu PS, Lawrie AS, Purdy G, Machin SJ, Brown MM (2005) Assessment of the antiplatelet effects of low to medium dose aspirin in the early and late phases after ischaemic stroke and TIA. Platelets 16(5):269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537100400020567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Helgason CM, Tortorice KL, Winkler SR, Penney DW, Schuler JJ, McClelland TJ, Brace LD (1993) Aspirin response and failure in cerebral infarction. Stroke 24(3):345–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Meves SH, Overbeck U, Endres HG, Krogias C, Neubauer H (2012) Dose-dependent effect of early antiplatelet therapy in acute ischaemic stroke. Thromb Haemost 107(1):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH11-06-0436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Han Y, Lv HH, Liu X, Dong Q, Yang XL, Li SX, Wu S, Jiang JM, Luo Z, Zhu DS, Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Guan YT, Xu JF (2015) Influence of genetic polymorphisms on clopidogrel response and clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke CYP2C19 genotype on clopidogrel response. CNS Neurosci Ther 21(9):692–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.12426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Jia DM, Chen ZB, Zhang MJ, Yang WJ, Jin JL, Xia YQ, Zhang CL, Shao Y, Chen C, Xu Y (2013) CYP2C19 polymorphisms and antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel in acute ischemic stroke in China. Stroke 44(6):1717–1719. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yi X, Lin J, Wang Y, Zhou Q, Wang C, Cheng W, Chi L (2016) Association of cytochrome P450 genetic variants with clopidogrel resistance and outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. J Atheroscler Thromb 23(10):1188–1200. https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.33290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lin J, Han Z, Wang C, Yi X, Chai Z, Zhou Q, Huang R (2018) Dual therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin prevents early neurological deterioration in ischemic stroke patients carrying CYP2C19*2 reduced-function alleles. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 74(9):1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2468-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Alberts MJ, Bergman DL, Molner E, Jovanovic BD, Ushiwata I, Teruya J (2004) Antiplatelet effect of aspirin in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 35(1):175–178. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000106763.46123.F6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jover E, Rodriguez JM, Bernal A, Arroyo AB, Iniesta JA, Guiu IS, Martinez C, Vicente V, Lozano ML, Rivera J (2014) High on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease: assessment of prevalence and stability over time using four platelet function tests. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 25(6):604–611. https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000000118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration (2002) Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 324(7329):71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang Y, Chen W, Lin Y, Meng X, Chen G, Wang Z, Wu J, Wang D, Li J, Cao Y, Xu Y, Zhang G, Li X, Pan Y, Li H, Zhao X, Liu L, Lin J, Dong K, Jing J, Johnston SC, Wang D, Wang Y, Group PPS (2019) Ticagrelor plus aspirin versus clopidogrel plus aspirin for platelet reactivity in patients with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack: open label, blinded endpoint, randomised controlled phase II trial. BMJ 365:l2211. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2211

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Schwammenthal Y, Tsabari R, Shenkman B, Schwartz R, Matetzky S, Lubetsky A, Orion D, Israeli-Korn S, Chapman J, Savion N, Varon D, Tanne D (2008) Aspirin responsiveness in acute brain ischaemia: association with stroke severity and clinical outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis 25(4):355–361. https://doi.org/10.1159/000118382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Englyst NA, Horsfield G, Kwan J, Byrne CD (2008) Aspirin resistance is more common in lacunar strokes than embolic strokes and is related to stroke severity. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 28(6):1196–1203. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2008.9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bugnicourt JM, Roussel B, Garcia PY, Canaple S, Lamy C, Godefroy O (2011) Aspirin non-responder status and early neurological deterioration: a prospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 113(3):196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.11.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lai PT, Chen SY, Lee YS, Ho YP, Chiang YY, Hsu HY (2012) Relationship between acute stroke outcome, aspirin resistance, and humoral factors. J Chin Med Assoc 75(10):513–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2012.07.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Coignion C, Poli M, Sagnier S, Freyburger G, Renou P, Debruxelles S, Rouanet F, Sibon I (2015) Interest of antiplatelet drug testing after an acute ischemic stroke. Eur Neurol 74(3–4):135–139. https://doi.org/10.1159/000438722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zheng AS, Churilov L, Colley RE, Goh C, Davis SM, Yan B (2013) Association of aspirin resistance with increased stroke severity and infarct size. JAMA Neurol 70(2):208–213. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kim JT, Heo SH, Lee JS, Choi MJ, Choi KH, Nam TS, Lee SH, Park MS, Kim BC, Kim MK, Cho KH (2015) Aspirin resistance in the acute stages of acute ischemic stroke is associated with the development of new ischemic lesions. PLoS One 10(4):e0120743. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Grosser T, Fries S, Lawson JA, Kapoor SC, Grant GR, FitzGerald GA (2013) Drug resistance and pseudoresistance: an unintended consequence of enteric coating aspirin. Circulation 127(3):377–385. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.117283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bhatt DL, Grosser T, Dong JF, Logan D, Jeske W, Angiolillo DJ, Frelinger AL 3rd, Lei L, Liang J, Moore JE, Cryer B, Marathi U (2017) Enteric coating and aspirin nonresponsiveness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 69(6):603–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All collaborators qualified for authorship because they either contributed to the study concept (STL, SJXM, VT, JM, LM, PMB, GAF, DC, CIP, PAB, JD, DJHM), study design (STL, VT, SJXM, PMB, IFC, PJK, DJW, RP, LZ, DJHM), data acquisition (STL, SYL, VT, IFC, DJHM) or data analysis (STL, SYL, VT, CO, LZ, DJHM), and all critically-appraised the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Funding

Dr. Lim’s research was funded by The Meath Foundation, The Irish Institute of Clinical Neuroscience/Novartis Ireland Fellowship Grant, The Vascular Neurology Research Foundation Ireland, the Irish Heart Foundation Stroke Prevention Bursary programme, and by an unrestricted educational grant from Biogen Idec, Ireland. Dr. Murphy’s research was funded by the Trinity College Dublin Innovation Bursary, The Meath Foundation, Joint Irish Institute of Clinical Neuroscience/Merck Serono Fellowship in Neuroscience Grant, The Vascular Neurology Research Foundation Ireland, and by an unrestricted educational grant from Bayer HealthCare, Ireland and Verum Diagnostica, GmbH. Dr Offiah’s Research is funded by The Meath Foundation and The Vascular Neurology Research Foundation Ireland and by an unrestricted educational grant from SINNOWA Medical Science & Technology Co., China. Prof Thijs’ research is supported by The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, which acknowledges support from the Victorian Government and funding from an Operational Infrastructure Support Grant. Prof Prodan’s research is supported by a United States Department of Veterans Affairs Merit Award (1I01CX000340). Prof Kelly is supported by grants from the Health Research Board Ireland. Prof Barber is supported by grants from the Canadian Institute of Health Research and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Prof Werring receives research support from the Stroke Association and the British Heart Foundation. Prof Thijs has received personal fees for lectures and consulting fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS/Pfizer and Amgen. Prof. Bath is a Stroke Association Professor of Stroke Medicine and NIHR Senior Investigator, a non-executive Director of ‘Platelet Solutions Ltd.®, and owns 3 shares; he has received personal fees for consulting from DiaMedica, Moleac, Nestle, Sanofi and Phagenesis. Prof Werring has received honoraria for consulting and lectures from Bayer and Portola, and for consulting from Alnylam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominick J. H. McCabe.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, we state that there are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

These data were collated as part of a systematic review and meta-analysis, our Local Research Ethics Committee (LREC) hospital guidelines indicate that formal LREC approval for such a study is not required. However, all data were securely stored in electronic format and no individual patient could be identified from the data contained within. The study and analyses were conducted in accordance with best ethical practice and supervised by experienced Consultants who are International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP)-certified.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1072 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, S.T., Thijs, V., Murphy, S.J.X. et al. Platelet function/reactivity testing and prediction of risk of recurrent vascular events and outcomes after TIA or ischaemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol 267, 3021–3037 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09932-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09932-y

Keywords

Navigation