Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic factors of postoperative seizure outcome in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and normal magnetic resonance imaging

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To retrospectively analyse a single-centre consecutive surgical series of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and negative MRI. To identify factors associated with postoperative seizure outcome among several presurgical, surgical and postsurgical variables.

Methods

Clinical records of 866 patients who received temporal lobe resections and with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were retrospectively searched for MRI-negative cases. Anamnestic, clinical, neurophysiological, surgical, histopathological and postsurgical data were collected. Seizure outcome was categorised as favourable (Engel’s class I) and unfavourable (Engel’s classes II–IV). Uni- and multivariate statistical analysis was performed to identify variables having a significant association with seizure outcome.

Results

Forty-eight patients matched the inclusion criteria. 26 (54.1%) patients required invasive EEG evaluation with Stereo-electro-encephalography (SEEG) before surgery. Histological evaluation was unremarkable in 34 cases (70.8%), revealed focal cortical dysplasias in 13 cases and hippocampal sclerosis in 2. 28 (58.3%) patients were in Engel’s class I after a mean follow-up of 82 months (SD ± 74; range 12–252). Multivariate analysis indicated auditory aura, contralateral diffusion of the discharge at Video-EEG monitoring and use of 18F-FDG PET as variables independently associated with seizure outcome.

Conclusion

Carefully selected patients with MRI-negative TLE can be good candidates for surgery. Surgery should be considered with caution in patients with clinical features of neocortical seizure onset and contralateral propagation of the discharge. Use of 18F-FDG PET may be helpful to improve SEEG and surgical strategies. The presented data help in optimising the selection of patients with MRI-negative TLE with good chances to benefit from surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TLE:

Temporal lobe epilepsy

VEEG:

Video-electro-encephalography

EZ:

Epileptogenic zone

FS:

Febrile seizures

SEEG:

STEREO-electro-encephalography

HS:

Hippocampal sclerosis

APOS:

Acute postoperative seizures

FCD:

Focal cortical dysplasias

References

  1. Téllez-Zenteno JF, Hernández-Ronquillo L (2012) A review of the epidemiology of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res Treat 2012:630853. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/630853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Engel J Jr, McDermott MP, Wiebe S et al (2012) Early surgical therapy for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: a randomized trial. JAMA 307:922–930. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Engel J Jr, Wiebe S, French J et al (2003) Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; American Epilepsy Society; American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, in association with the American Epilepsy Society and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Neurology 60:538–547. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000055086.35806.2D

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP et al (2001) Effectiveness efficiency of surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy study group. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med 345:311–318. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200108023450501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blümcke I, Spreafico R, Haaker G et al (2017) Histopathological findings in brain tissue obtained during epilepsy surgery. N Engl J Med 377:1648–1656. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1703784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Muhlhofer W, Tan YL, Mueller SG et al (2017) MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy—what do we know? Epilepsia 58:727–742. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1703784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Téllez-Zenteno JF, Hernández-Ronquillo L, Moien-Afshari F et al (2010) Surgical outcomes in lesional and non-lesional epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res 89:310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.02.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krucoff MO, Chan AY, Harward SC et al (2017) Rates and predictors of success and failure in repeat epilepsy surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Epilepsia 58:2133–2142. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13920

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Carne RP, Brien TJO, Kilpatrick CJ et al (2004) MRI-negative PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy: a distinct surgically remediable syndrome. Brain 127:2276–2285. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. LoPinto-Khoury C, Sperling M, Skidmore C et al (2012) Surgical outcome in PET-positive, MRI-negative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 53:342–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03359.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Capraz IY, Kurt G, Akdemir O et al (2015) Surgical outcome in patients with MRI-negative, PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy. Seizure 29:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2015.03.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Burkholder D, Sulc V, Hoffman E et al (2014) Interictal scalp electroencephalography and intraoperative electrocorticography in magnetic resonance imaging-negative temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. JAMA Neurol 71:702–709. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.585

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Vale FL, Effio E, Arredondo N et al (2012) Efficacy of temporal lobe surgery for epilepsy in patients with negative MRI for mesial temporal lobe sclerosis. J Clin Neurosci 19:101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2011.08.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fong J, Jehi L, Najm I et al (2011) Seizure outcome and its predictors after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery in patients with normal MRI. Epilepsia 52:1393–1401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03091.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith A, Sani S, Kanner A et al (2011) Medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy in patients with normal MRI: surgical outcome in twenty-one consecutive patients. Seizure 20:475–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2011.02.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kogias E, Altenmüller DM, Klingler JH et al (2018) Histopathology of 3 Tesla MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsies. J Clin Neurosci 47:273–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.10.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee R, Hoogsc M, Burkholder D et al (2014) Outcome of intracranial electroencephalography monitoring and surgery in magnetic resonance imaging-negative temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 108:937–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ivanovic J, Larsson PG, Østby Y et al (2017) Seizure outcomes of temporal lobe epilepsy surgery in patients with normal MRI and without specific histopathology. Acta Neurochir 159:757–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3127-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang PF, Pei JS, Zhang HJ (2014) Long-term epilepsy surgery outcomes in patients with PET-positive, MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 41:91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Steinhoff BJ, So NK, Lim S et al (1995) Ictal scalp EEG in temporal lobe epilepsy with unitemporal versus bitemporal interic tal epileptiform discharges. Neurology 45(5):889–896. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.45.5.889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schulz R, Lüders HO, Hoppe M et al (2000) Interictal EEG and ictal scalp EEG propagation are highly predictive of surgical outcome in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 41(5):564–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00210.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cossu M, Cardinale F, Colombo N et al (2005) Stereoelectroencephalography in the presurgical evaluation of children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. J Neurosurg 103:333–343. https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2005.103.4.0333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Blümcke I, Aronica E, Miyata H et al (2016) International recommendation for a comprehensive neuropathologic workup of epilepsy surgery brain tissue: a consensus task force report from the ILAE commission on diagnostic methods. Epilepsia 57:348–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Blümcke I, Thom M, Aronica E et al (2011) The clinicopathologic spectrum of focal cortical dysplasias: a consensus classification proposed by an ad hoc task force of the ILAE diagnostic methods commission. Epilepsia 52:158–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02777.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Blümcke I, Thom M, Aronica E et al (2013) International consensus classification of hippocampal sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy: a task force report from the ILAE commission on diagnostic methods. Epilepsia 54:1315–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Engel J Jr, Van Ness PC, Rasmussen TB et al (1993) Outcome with respect to epileptic seizures. In: Engel J Jr (ed) Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. Raven Press, New York, pp 609–621

  27. Dupont S, Samson Y, Nguyen-Michel VH et al (2015) Are auras a reliable clinical indicator in medial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis? Eur J Neurol 22(9):1310–1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12747

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferrari-Marinho T, Caboclo LOSF, Marinho MM et al (2012) Auras in temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis: relation to seizure focus laterality and post surgical outcome. Epilepsy Behav 24:120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.03.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Asadi-Pooya AA, Nei M, Sharan A et al (2016) Auras in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and mesial temporal sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 364:24–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.03.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Asadi-Pooya AA, Wyeth D, Nei M et al (2017) Postsurgical outcome in patients with auditory auras and drug-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 66:49–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.10.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Radhakrishnan A, Menon RN, Chandran A et al (2018) Do auras predict seizure outcome after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery? Epilepsy Res 147:109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang F, Liu X, Pan S et al (2013) Electroclinical characteristics of posterior lateral temporal epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 26(1):126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.09.036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ataoğlu EE, Yıldırım I, Bilir E (2015) An evaluation of lateralizing signs in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 47:115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dupont S, Samson Y, Nguyen-Michel VH et al (2015) Lateralizing value of semiology in medial temporal lobe epilepsy. Acta Neurol Scand 132(6):401–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. No YJ, Zavanone C, Bielle F et al (2017) Medial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis is a distinctive syndrome. J Neurol. 264(5):875–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8441-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Barba C, Barbati G, Minotti L et al (2007) Ictal clinical and scalp-EEG findings differentiating temporal lobe epilepsies from temporal 'plus' epilepsies. Brain 130:1957–1967. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Barba C, Rheims S, Minotti L et al (2016) Temporal plus epilepsy is a major determinant of temporal lobe surgery failures. Brain 139:444–451. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Thompson SA, Alexopoulos A, Bingaman W et al (2015) Auditory aura in frontal opercular epilepsy: sounds from afar. Epileptic Disord 17(2):150–155. https://doi.org/10.1684/epd.2015.0742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pugnaghi M, Meletti S, Castana L et al (2011) Features of somatosensory manifestations induced by intracranial electrical stimulations of the human insula. Clin Neurophysiol 122(10):2049–2058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2011.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mazzola L, Mauguière F, Isnard J (2017) Electrical Stimulations of the Human Insula: Their Contribution to the Ictal Semiology of Insular Seizures. J Clin Neurophysiol 34(4):307–314. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang Y, Zhou W, Wang S et al (2019) The roles of subdivisions of human insula in emotion perception and auditory processing. Cereb Cortex 29(2):517–528. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Freri E, Matricardi S, Gozzo F et al (2017) Perisylvian, including insular, childhood epilepsy: presurgical workup and surgical outcome. Epilepsia 58(8):1360–1369. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cui Z, Wang Q, Gao Y et al (2017) Dynamic correlations between intrinsic connectivity and extrinsic connectivity of the auditory cortex in humans. Front Hum Neurosci 11:407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00407

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Tatum IV, Benbadis S, Hussain A et al (2008) Ictal EEG remains the prominent predictor of seizure-free outcome after temporal lobectomy in epileptic patients with normal brain MRI. Seizure 17:631–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2008.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pataraia E, Lurger S, Serles W et al (1998) Ictal scalp EEG in unilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 39:608–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01429.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Malter MP, Bahrenberg C, Niehusmann P et al (2016) Features of scalp EEG in unilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy due to hippocampal sclerosis: determining factors and predictive value for epilepsy surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 127(2):1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.06.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Monnerat BZ, Velasco TR, Assirati JA Jr et al (2013) On the prognostic value of ictal EEG patterns in temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: a cohort study. Seizure 22(4):287–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2013.01.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee SA, Yim SB, Lim YM et al (2006) Factors predicting seizure outcome of anterior temporal lobectomy for patients with mesial temporal sclerosis. Seizure 15(6):397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2006.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sirin NG, Gurses C, Bebek N et al (2013) A quadruple examination of ictal EEG patterns in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis: onset, propagation, later significant pattern, and termination. J Clin Neurophysiol 30:329–338. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0b013e31829d7482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. McIntosh AM, Kalnins RM, Mitchell LA et al (2004) Temporal lobectomy: long-term seizure outcome, late recurrence and risks for seizure recurrence. Brain 127:2018–2030. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Jeha LE, Najm IM, Bingaman WE, et al (2006) Predictors of outcome after temporal lobectomy for the treatment of intractable epilepsy. Neurology 66(12):1938–1940. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000219810.71010.9b

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bone B, Fogarasi A, Schulz R et al (2012) Secondarily generalized seizures in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 53(5):817–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03435.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Chassoux F, Navarro V, Catenoix H et al (2018) Planning and management of SEEG (2017) Neurophysiol Clin 48(1):25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2017.11.007

  54. Salvato G, Scarpa P, Francione S et al (2016) Declarative long-term memory and the mesial temporal lobe: Insights from a 5-year postsurgery follow-up study on refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 64:102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.08.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Suresh S, Sweet J, Fastenau P et al (2015) Temporal lobe epilepsy in patients with nonlesional MRI and normal memory: an SEEG study. J Neurosurg 123:1368–1374. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.1.JNS141811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kuba R, Tyrlikova I, Chrastina J et al (2011) "MRI-negative PET-positive" temporal lobe epilepsy: invasive EEG findings, histopathology, and postoperative outcomes. Epilepsy Behav 22:537–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.08.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Luther N, Rubens E, Sethi N et al (2011) The value of intraoperative electrocorticography in surgical decision making for temporal lobe epilepsy with normal MRI. Epilepsia 52:941–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03061.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Bell M, Rao S, So E et al (2009) Epilepsy surgery outcomes in temporal lobe epilepsy with a normal MRI. Epilepsia 50:2053–2060. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02079.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Najm IM, Sarnat HB, Blümcke I (2018) Review: the international consensus classification of focal cortical dysplasia—a critical update 2018. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 44:18–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/nan.12462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang ZI, Alexopoulos A, Jones S et al (2013) The pathology of magnetic-resonance-imaging-negative epilepsy. Mod Pathol 26:1051–1058. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2013.52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Fauser S, Essang C, Altenmuller DM et al (2013) Is there evidence for clinical differences related to the new classification of temporal lobe cortical dysplasia? Epilepsia 54(5):909–917. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valeria Mariani.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The study has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 68 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mariani, V., Revay, M., D’Orio, P. et al. Prognostic factors of postoperative seizure outcome in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and normal magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurol 266, 2144–2156 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09394-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09394-x

Keywords

Navigation