Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High-intensity interval training in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1: a randomized clinical trial

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that high-intensity training (HIT) is a time-efficient exercise strategy to improve fitness. HIT has never been explored in neuromuscular diseases, likely because it may seem counterintuitive. A single session of high-intensity exercise has been studied without signs of muscle damage in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 (FSHD1). We aimed to determine whether HIT is safe and effective in FSHD1 in a randomized, controlled parallel study. Untrained adults with genetically verified FSHD1 (n = 13) able to perform cycle-ergometer exercise were randomized to 8 weeks of supervised HIT (n = 6) (3 × 10-min cycle-ergometer-HIT/week) or 8 weeks of usual care (n = 7). Following this, all participants performed 8 weeks of unsupervised HIT (3 × 10-min cycle-ergometer-HIT/week). Primary outcome was fitness, maximal oxygen uptake/min/kg body weight. Furthermore, workload, 6-min walk distance, 5-time sit-to-stand time, muscle strength, and daily activity levels were measured. Pain, fatigue, and plasma-CK were monitored. Twelve patients completed the randomized part of the study. Plasma-CK levels and pain scores were unaffected by HIT. Supervised HIT improved fitness (3.3 ml O2/min/kg, CI 1.2–5.5, P < 0.01, n = 6, NNT = 1.4). Unsupervised HIT also improved fitness (2.0 ml O2/min/kg, CI 0.1–3.9, P = 0.04, n = 4). There was no training effect on other outcomes. Patients preferred HIT over strength and moderate-intensity aerobic training. It may seem counterintuitive to perform HIT in muscular dystrophies, but this RCT shows that regular HIT is safe, efficacious, and well liked by moderately affected patients with FSHD1, which suggests that HIT is a feasible method for rehabilitating patients with FSHD1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tawil R, van der Maarel SM, Tapscott SJ (2014) Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy: the path to consensus on pathophysiology. Skelet Muscle 4:12. doi:10.1186/2044-5040-4-12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dahlqvist JR, Vissing CR, Thomsen C, Vissing J (2014) Severe paraspinal muscle involvement in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Neurology 83:1178–1183. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Horlings CGC, Munneke M, Bickerstaffe A et al (2009) Epidemiology and pathophysiology of falls in facioscapulohumeral disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80:1357–1363. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2009.173534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Petrof BJ (1998) The molecular basis of activity-induced muscle injury in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Mol Cell Biochem 179:111–124. doi:10.1023/A:1006812004945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Olsen DB, Ørngreen MC, Vissing J (2005) Aerobic training improves exercise performance in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Neurology 64:1064–1066. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000150584.45055.27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Voet N, Bleijenberg G, Hendriks J et al (2014) Both aerobic exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy reduce chronic fatigue in FSHD: an RCT. Neurology 83:1914–1922. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Janssen B, Voet N, Geurts A et al (2016) Quantitative MRI reveals decelerated fatty infiltration in muscles of active FSHD patients. Neurology. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002640

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andersen G, Prahm KP, Dahlqvist JR et al (2015) Aerobic training and postexercise protein in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: RCT study. Neurology 85:396–403. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van der Kooi EL, Kalkman JS, Lindeman E et al (2007) Effects of training and albuterol on pain and fatigue in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. J Neurol 254:931–940. doi:10.1007/s00415-006-0432-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersen G, Ørngreen MC, Preisler N et al (2015) Protein-carbohydrate supplements improve muscle protein balance in muscular dystrophy patients after endurance exercise: a placebo-controlled crossover study. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 308:R123–R130. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00321.2014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Colson SS, Benchortane M, Tanant V et al (2010) Neuromuscular electrical stimulation training: a safe and effective treatment for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:697–702. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Kooi EL, Vogels OJM, van Asseldonk RJGP et al (2004) Strength training and albuterol in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Neurology 63:702–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gillen JB, Gibala MJ (2014) Is high-intensity interval training a time-efficient exercise strategy to improve health and fitness? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Physiol Appliquée Nutr Métabolisme 39:409–412. doi:10.1139/apnm-2013-0187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gunnarsson TP, Bangsbo J (2012) The 10-20-30 training concept improves performance and health profile in moderately trained runners. J Appl Physiol Bethesda Md 1985 113:16–24. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00334.2012

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Andersen SP, Sveen M-L, Hansen RS et al (2013) Creatine kinase response to high-intensity aerobic exercise in adult-onset muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 48:897–901. doi:10.1002/mus.23846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamperti C, Fabbri G, Vercelli L et al (2010) A standardized clinical evaluation of patients affected by facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: The FSHD clinical score. Muscle Nerve 42:213–217. doi:10.1002/mus.21671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M et al (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1381–1395. doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brinkmann JR (1994) Comparison of a hand-held and fixed dynamometer in measuring strength of patients with neuromuscular disease. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 19:100–104. doi:10.2519/jospt.1994.19.2.100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bankolé L-C, Millet GY, Temesi J et al (2016) Safety and efficacy of a 6-month home-based exercise program in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e4497. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000004497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eichinger K, Heatwole C, Heininger S et al (2016) Validity of the six minute walk test in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. doi:10.1002/mus.25251

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gliemann L, Gunnarsson TP, Hellsten Y, Bangsbo J (2015) 10-20-30 training increases performance and lowers blood pressure and VEGF in runners. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25:e479–e489. doi:10.1111/sms.12356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Søren P. Andersen MSc, Human Physiology University of Copenhagen, for his help with designing the training program. Dr. Andersen contributed to the design of study, analysis, acquisition and interpretation of data, and drafting the manuscript. Dr. Heje contributed to the design of study, analysis, acquisition of data, and critical revision of the manuscript. Buch BSc contributed to the analysis, acquisition of data, and critical revision of the manuscript. Dr. Vissing contributed to the design of study, interpretation of data, and critical revision of the manuscript. We thank Aase and Einar Danielsens Foundation, Augustinus Foundation, and AP Moeller Foundation for financial support. Dr. Andersen reports no disclosure. Dr. Heje reports no disclosure. Buch BSc reports no disclosure. Dr. Vissing has received research and travel support and speaker honoraria from Genzyme/Sanofi and Ultragenyx Pharmaceuticals, and has acted as consultant on advisory boards for Genzyme/Sanofi, Sarepta, Lundbeck, Ultragenyx Pharmaceuticals, NOVO Nordisk and Alexion Pharmaceuticals within the last 3 years.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grete Andersen.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki declaration of 1964, approved by the Ethics Committee of Copenhagen (H-4-2014-035), and all participants gave informed written consent to participate prior inclusion in the study.

Additional information

Statistical analyses were conducted by Grete Andersen, MD with advice from the Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andersen, G., Heje, K., Buch, A.E. et al. High-intensity interval training in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurol 264, 1099–1106 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8497-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8497-9

Keywords

Navigation