Abstract
Purpose
Our aim was to investigate tissue volumes measured by MRI segmentation of the entire 3rd molar for prediction of a sub-adult being older than 18 years.
Material and method
We used a 1.5-T MR scanner with a customized high-resolution single T2 sequence acquisition with 0.37 mm iso-voxels. Two dental cotton rolls drawn with water stabilized the bite and delineated teeth from oral air. Segmentation of the different tooth tissue volumes was performed using SliceOmatic (Tomovision©). Linear regression was used to analyze the association between mathematical transformation outcomes of the tissue volumes, age, and sex. Performance of different transformation outcomes and tooth combinations were assessed based on the p value of the age variable, combined or separated for each sex depending on the selected model. The predictive probability of being older than 18 years was obtained by a Bayesian approach.
Results
We included 67 volunteers (F/M: 45/22), range 14–24 years, median age 18 years. The transformation outcome (pulp + predentine)/total volume for upper 3rd molars had the strongest association with age (p = 3.4 × 10−9).
Conclusion
MRI segmentation of tooth tissue volumes might prove useful in the prediction of age older than 18 years in sub-adults.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Several legal issues necessitate determination of an individual’s age either because the given age is doubtful or the chronological age is withheld or unknown. The age of a perpetrator or a victim may affect sentencing. Even in sports, age estimation has become necessary in order to avoid fraud, maintain fairness, and protect the health of athletes [1].
Depending on the situation, different age limits are applicable, ranging from 12 to 21 years. However, age estimation is most frequently applied in asylum cases, where those aged younger than 18 years may have certain rights [2, 3]. According to the definition of UN, “A child means every human being below the age of eighteen years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier” [3].
Age estimation of children is normally performed by some kind of grading or measurements of the development from childhood to an adult fully grown person. Growth and development are measured by height, weight, sexual maturity, dental and skeletal development, and psychological maturations, all traits are with normal biological variation [4].
Skeletal age estimation in children and sub-adults are commonly graded from the development and closure of the bony metaphysis. The atlas with radiographs of hand/wrist development by Greulich and Pyle was published in 1959 to document the normal skeletal development of children with known age. Since then, this atlas has been the most common method for skeletal age estimation by plain radiograph [5, 6]. However, the validation of this reversed application of the atlas has shown 95% prediction intervals of around 4 years after 10 years of age [7].
In dental age estimation of sub-adults, the 3rd molars are most frequently used as it is the last tooth to complete development. Staging of the 3rd molars, according to Demirjian et al., has the best scientific documentation [8, 9].
Several radiological modalities have been applied in age estimation, most notably plain radiography, orthopantomogram (OPG), computed tomography (CT), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
The first paper of skeletal MRI in age estimation was published in 1992 and dental MRI in 2015 [10,11,12]. In recent years, MRI has gained momentum, since radiation-free procedures are preferable, especially in children and sub-adults [13].
The International Olympic Committee acknowledged the importance of MRI for age estimation in sports in their 2010 consensus paper [1, 14].
Although no consensus exists on the choice of method, some studies report improved precision of age estimates by a combination of two or more independent physical traits, and this is recommended for legal purposes [15, 16]. BioAlder, which is built on large, global datasets, is one of few tools complying with this recommendation by combining grading of mandibular left 3rd molar on OPG, and left hand/wrist bones on radiographs according to Greulich and Pyle [5, 8, 13, 17].
Measurements of molar tissue have been explored as a possible means of increasing precision of dental age estimates compared to staging according to Demirjian [8]. OPG, CBCT, and MRI have been employed, but measurements have mostly been linear and only included the tooth crown, and not including tissue volumes of the entire molar due to the complex root anatomy [18,19,20]. The anatomy of 3rd molars has been described as unpredictable, where one root has unusual morphology, with the number of root canals varying from one to six [20].
Hence, there might be an added value of measuring volumes of the entire molar, and apply different combinations of measurements from the four quadrants. To our knowledge, this has not been done previously.
Our aim was to investigate the entire 3rd molar’s tissue volumes by MRI segmentation for prediction of a sub-adult being older than 18 years old.
Material and method
The study was approved by the Data Protection Officer (PVO), Oslo University Hospital, and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [21]. All participants signed a declaration of consent, and those who were younger than 17 years got approval from parents or legal guardians.
Participants
We enrolled 99 healthy volunteers. The age (in days) and sex of the participants was registered. Inclusion criteria were age from 14 to 24 years with no contraindications according to the MRI check list from The Norwegian Directorate of Health 2017.
The participants were recruited from sports clubs and universities in the period 2018–2021. The median age was 18 years. Female (F):65, male (M):34.
MRI acquisition
All MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5-T scanner (Avantofit, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using a bilateral surface coil (Head Neck 20 and Flex Small 4 used in combination).
Our acquisition had a scan time of 5 min and 4 s and yielded 0.37 mm iso-voxels, in which a volume of 1 ml (roughly equivalent to one tooth) consists of 20,000 voxels.
Scan parameters are displayed in Table 1.
Bite material
Two cotton rolls size 2 filled with 2 ml of water were placed bilaterally between the molars in order to displace air for better delineation of the teeth, and to stabilize the bite, as shown in Fig. 1a.
Segmentation
The MRI examinations were separated into upper (maxillary) and lower (mandibular) teeth. Semi-automated segmentation of three different tooth tissues of the 3rd molars, 18 (upper right), 28 (upper left), 38 (lower left), and 48 (lower right), was performed using SliceOmatic Tomovision©, Canada.
Dentine, enamel, and cementum could not be differentiated based on T2 signal intensity in our MRI sequence. These tissues were segmented collectively and are referred to as hard tooth tissue. Segmentation of three tooth tissues pulp, predentine, and hard tooth tissue, was performed on axial images based on T2 signal intensity thresholding, as shown in Fig. 1b–h. Lower and upper thresholds were set at 0 and 63 for hard tooth tissue, 64 and 100 for predentine, and ≥ 101 for pulp, which we previously experienced to match these tissues on tooth ground sections. In order to agree on the teeth delineation and separation from surrounding tissues, a ground truth segmentation was established for the first five participants by two experienced forensic dentists and an experienced head and neck radiologist in consensus. The apical end of a root was defined as the point where tooth hard tissue could be identified on at least two sides, and segmentation was not performed beyond this point.
The volume of each segmented tooth tissue was calculated in ml.
Statistical analyses
The association between explanatory variables (age and sex) and response variables (the three tooth tissue volumes, pulp, predentine, and hard tooth tissue) were analyzed with linear regression models. We used the natural logarithm (ln) of the tooth tissue volumes in order to achieve linearity and simplify the statistical analysis.
Transformation and Pearson correlation coefficient
In order to find the best response variable, we explored four different transformations of the tooth tissues, resulting in 10 outcomes as shown in Table 2.
The 10 outcomes were assessed with Pearson correlation. Overlapping transformations were defined as R ≥ 0.999. Outcomes 2a and 2b overlapped with 3a and 3b, and outcome 2c overlapped with 4a. Hence, outcomes 2a–c were deemed redundant and not included in further statistical analysis.
Regression analysis exploration
A large number of regression models were explored incorporating the seven remaining transformation outcomes, different combinations of the four 3rd molars, different models of age and sex, and different weighting of model variance.
Selection of models of age and sex and variance weighting
Age was always included as an exploratory variable in the regression model. The variable sex was incorporated into the model in five different ways: (i) sex not considered; (ii) different intercepts for sex; (iii) different age slopes for sex (but common intercept); (iv) different age slopes and intercept for sex; (v) separate model for the two sexes (same as iv but also different variance).
We also explored three different weighting of the variance models: either as constant (default = 1), age or (1/age).
Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to select the model type for sex and variance weighting.
Selection of tooth combinations and transformation outcomes
The 3rd molars were analyzed separately, and as the average in the following seven combinations: (18 and 28), (38 and 48), (18 and 48), (28 and 38), (18 and 38), (28 and 48), and (18, 28, 38, and 48).
Performance of the transformation outcomes and tooth combinations were based on the p value of the age variable, common or separate for each sex depending on the selected model.
The best transformation outcome and tooth combination were selected based on lowest p values. The p value incorporates both the steepness of the slope and data variation. The lower the p value, the better the method is for age prediction.
Age prediction by Bayesian approach
The selected best performing model from the exploration was used for age prediction.
We used a Bayesian approach to describe the uncertainty of an individual’s age [22, 23]. A prior uniform age distribution was defined from 14.0 to 23.0 years.
Posterior distribution of age after applying Bayes theorem for the transformation outcome, in each selected tooth combination was used to estimate the probability for being older than 18 years, in each sex.
The analysis was conducted using R v4.0.2. The regression model was performed using the lm and predict functions.
Results
From the 99 enrolled volunteers, 32 were excluded due to missing 3rd molars (n = 4), tooth unsuitable for segmentation (n = 15), movement artifacts (n = 7), and incorrect use of the dental cotton rolls (n = 6).
After exclusion, we had 67 volunteers, 45 females, 22 males, with median age 18 years (range 14–24 years). The age distribution is shown Fig. 2.
Tooth tissue volumes
The median volumes of hard tooth tissue, pulp, and predentine were as follows: 0.712, 0.052, and 0.016 ml for females and 0.788, 0.065, and 0.02 ml for males. The distribution is shown in Fig. 3.
Selected model
Transformation outcome 4a, (pulp + predentine)/total, performed best. Applied to this transformation outcome, the best tooth combination was the upper 3rd molars for both sexes (p = 3.4 × 10−9). For this selection, the regression model with the sum of age and sex, as intercept and the variance weighting as ratio equals 1/age performed best.
Estimated age trend with 95% confidence interval for this model, which was selected for age prediction, as shown in Fig. 4. This model is henceforth referred to as “the selected model.”
Best single 3rd molar was tooth 18 in males (p = 1.0 × 10−7) followed tooth 28 in females (p = 1.9 × 10−7). However, these teeth were not selected for further analysis.
Age prediction by Bayesian approach
Four hypothetical observations were placed in uniform intervals between the actual minimum and maximum observations. For the selected model, these hypothetical observations were used as examples to illustrate the probability of an individual being older than 18 years.
The age expectation with 95% prediction interval (2SD) for the individual based variation conditioned on age as shown in Fig. 5a, b.
In males, these four hypothetical observations were 0.068, 0.085, 0.11, and 0.13 giving 97%, 87%, 47%, and 16% possibility of being older than 18 years, as shown in Fig. 5c.
In females, these four hypothetical observations were 0.067, 0.082, 0.099, and 0.12 giving 95%, 78%, 44%, and 17% possibility of being older than 18 years, as shown in Fig. 5d.
Discussion
In this study, we have developed a dedicated in vivo MRI protocol for the 3rd molars with high spatial resolution and short acquisition time and a method for segmentation of the entire tooth volumes, with three tooth tissues hard tooth tissue, pulp and predentine. Further, we have shown a very strong correlation between tooth tissue development and age and established a model to predict the probability of being older than 18 years.
MRI
To our knowledge, 1.5-T MRI has not been used in dental age estimation before, and our study shows that such acquisitions may be used for tooth tissue segmentation. While previous studies have used a 3-T MRI [24,25,26,27] and focused on apical closure of the 3rd molar root or linear measurements, we used segmentation to measure tooth tissue volumes.
A previous study has proposed 6:30 min as a clinically acceptable acquisition time [28]. Our single-sequence high-resolution acquisition with 0.37 mm iso-voxels had an acquisition time of 5 min 4 s. Hence, with a shorter acquisition time, we accomplished a comparable resolution to previous studies using 0.33 × 0.33 × 2 mm3 T2 FSE or 0.59 × 0.59 × 1 mm3 T1 3D FSE. A further increase in resolution to 0.3 mm iso-voxels would have increased the scan time to 7 min 13 s [26]. We used dental cotton rolls filled with water to displace air for better delineation of the teeth and to stabilize the bite while previous studies have performed MRI with or without a bite bar [26].
Segmentation
Although dentine, enamel, and cementum cannot be distinguished on regular MRI acquisitions, we have shown that a distinction can be made between tooth hard tissue, predentine, and pulp, and used in segmentation of the whole 3rd molar teeth. We did not histologically confirm the tissue segmentations in this cohort, but we have previously experienced that the tissue volumes segmented with this method correspond to hard tooth tissue, predentine, and pulp on ground sections. Further, the strong correlation with age confirm that the segmentations correspond to developing tissues.
Two studies including extracted teeth, using a 9.4-T ultrashort echo time MRI, managed to determine pulp cavity volume, but the field of view and spatial resolution had to be adjusted for each different type of tooth [29, 30].
Other studies using CBCT on 1st and 2nd molars have set the pulp chamber floor as the “cut off plane” and excluded the roots [18]. Volume of the coronal tooth pulp chamber was calculated in order to avoid the complex multi-rooted system.
Results
Teeth are appropriate for age prediction since their age related changes are highly resistant to time, environmental, hormonal, nutritional, and physical impact [31]. Dentine, which surrounds the pulp, is continuously deposited throughout life. The pulp volume is decreasing with advancing age [11]. Once the tooth is fully formed, the size of the tooth does not change. The pulp ratio has been shown to be an appropriate variable in age estimation [32].
The 3rd molars are the only teeth still developing after 16 years of age and most have completed their development in the early twenties. Epiphyseal gaps of hand/wrist bones close around the age of 18 years, the clavicles at 21 years [27]. This support why 3rd molars can be important in estimating the age to be older or younger than 18 years [15].
Although a previous study reported that the maxillary 2nd molar was best suited for age estimation based on pulp chamber/cavity volume [18], we decided to focus on the 3rd molars, since this molar presents the greatest variation in morphology and development [20, 33]. Using 3D imaging, which presented the entire tooth, we found that the upper molars performed best. This is interesting since the upper molars have been studied less with conventional 2D images like OPG, since they are frequently angulated and/or superimposed on adjacent structures [34].
Admittedly, our method is vulnerable to agenesis of one or more of the 3rd molars. The rate of which ranges from 5 to 56% in different studies, and being more frequent in the maxilla and among females [35]. When there is agenesis of one or more 3rd molars, delays in development must be considered, and our results may not be valid in this group [36].
Combinations with other anatomical sites (other teeth, hand, and clavicle) may reduce the problems caused by missing 3rd molars [27].
Transformation outcome
We explored four different transformations of the tooth tissues, resulting in 10 outcomes. Of these, the ratio of (pulp + predentine)/total had the strongest correlation with age. This applied to each sex separately and pooled. This result is difficult to compare to previous studies that have used other modalities, segmentation of the crown only, linear measurements, tooth contours or root closure [24,25,26,27]. We have not been able to identify any in vivo studies using tissue volumes from the entire tooth.
Sex
Males had the best results in our study compared to females in the pulp chamber study [18]. Another study using pulp chamber volume of the upper 2nd molars had best results in males compared to females [33].
Including sex for age estimations should be recommended and it is in agreement with other studies [18, 33, 37, 38]. This is in contrast to some studies where other teeth were studied and concluded that sex made no difference [39, 40].
Statistical analysis
In contrast to regression analysis which frequently overestimates young individuals and underestimates elderly [41], the Bayesian model optimize the evidence evaluation [42].
The Bayesian approach also avoids the age mimicry issue [22, 23] but requires the specification of a prior age distribution. We set the lowest age prior to 14 years since the 3rd molar is not suitable for measurements below this age, and our youngest participant was almost 15 years old.
The lower age prior in this study was given by 3rd molar development, while the upper prior was a matter of choice. Increasing the upper prior of the model will increase the risk of falsely classifying a person as older than 18 years. Conversely, decreasing the upper prior will increase the risk of falsely classifying a person as younger than 18 years. In our study, the upper prior was set at 23 years, while BioAlder set the upper prior at 20.5 years for dental assessment.
Limitations
This study may have few participants, and there is limited ethnic variation in the study population, and the total absence of caries imply a limited variation in socioeconomic status. It is uncertain how the model will perform in other ethnic groups [43]. Although we have shown a strong association between 3rd molar tissue volumes and age, our results have not been validated by an independent cohort. Whether our method may contribute to narrowing the prediction intervals for chronological age, alone or in combination with other teeth or measurements like DNA methylation [44], remains to be seen.
Conclusion
MRI segmentation of tooth tissue volumes might prove useful in the prediction of age older than 18 years in sub-adults.
Data availability
All data was registered, including data that was deleted or changed. Anonymized data was exported for statistical calculations. After database lock, the data was saved according to current regulation.
Abbreviations
- AIC:
-
Akaike information criterion
- CBCT:
-
Cone beam computed tomography
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- DCNN:
-
Deep convolutional neural network
- FOV:
-
Field of view
- FSE:
-
Fast spin echo
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- OPG:
-
Orthopantomogram
- TE:
-
Echo time
- TR:
-
Repetition time
- TSE:
-
Turbo spin echo
- T2:
-
Transverse relaxation time
- 18:
-
Upper right 3rd molar
- 28:
-
Upper left 3rd molar
- 38:
-
Lower left 3rd molar
- 48:
-
Lower right 3rd molar
References
Timme M, Steinacker JM, Schmeling A (2016) Age estimation in competitive sports. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1456-7
<easo-practical-guide-on-age-assesment-v3–2018.pdf>. https://doi.org/10.2847/236187
United Nations (1989) General A (1989) Convention on the Rights of the Child. Annu Rev Popul Law 16(95):485–501
Liversidge HM, Buckberry J, Marquez-Grant N (2015) Age estimation. Ann Hum Biol 42(4):299–301. https://doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2015.1089627
Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist, 2nd edn. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Dahlberg PS, Mosdol A, Ding Y et al (2019) A systematic review of the agreement between chronological age and skeletal age based on the Greulich and Pyle atlas. Eur Radiol 29:2936–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5718-2
Chaumoitre K, Saliba-Serre B, Adalian P, Signoli M, Leonetti G, Panuel M (2017) Forensic use of the Greulich and Pyle atlas: prediction intervals and relevance. Eur Radiol 27(3):1032–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4466-4
Demirjian AGH, Tanner JM (1973) A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 45:211–227
Rolseth V, Mosdol A, Dalberg PS et al (2017) Demirjian’s Development Stages on Wisdom Teeth for Estimation of Chronological Age: A Systematic Review. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
Baumann PWT, Merkens H, Boldt J, Petrovic A, Urschler M, Kirnbauer B, Jakse N, Scheurer E (2015) Dental age estimation of living persons: Comparison of MRI with OPG. Forensic Sci Int 253:76–80
Bjork MB, Kvaal SI (2018) CT and MR imaging used in age estimation: a systematic review. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1(36):14–25
De Tobel J, Bauwens J, Parmentier GIL, Franco A, Pauwels NS, Verstraete KL, Thevissen PW (2020) Magnetic resonance imaging for forensic age estimation in living children and young adults: a systematic review. Pediatr Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04709-x
Muller LSO, Offiah A, Adamsbaum C, Barber I, Di Paolo PL, Humphries P, Shelmerdine S, De Horatio LT, Toma P, Treguier C, Rosendahl K (2019) Bone age for chronological age determination - statement of the European Society of Paediatric Radiology musculoskeletal task force group. Pediatr Radiol 49(7):979–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04379-4
Engebretsen L, Steffen K, Bahr R, Broderick C, Dvorak J, Janarv PM, Johnson A, Leglise M, Mamisch TC, McKay D, Micheli L, Schamasch P, Singh GD, Stafford DE, Steen H (2010) The International Olympic Committee Consensus statement on age determination in high-level young athletes. Br J Sports Med 44(7):476–484. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2010.073122
Schmeling A, Grundmann C, Fuhrmann A, Kaatsch HJ, Knell B, Ramsthaler F, Reisinger W, Riepert T, Ritz-Timme S, Rosing FW, Rotzscher K, Geserick G (2008) Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med 122(6):457–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0254-2
Bassed RBBC, Drummer OH (2011) Age estimation using CT imaging of the third molar tooth, the medial clavicular epiphysis, and the spheno-occipital synchondrosis: a multifactorial approach. Forensic Sci Int 212:273.e271-273.e275
Bleka O, Rolseth V, Dahlberg PS, Saade A, Saade M, Bachs L (2018) BioAlder: a tool for assessing chronological age based on two radiological methods. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1959-5
Ge Z-p, Yang P, Li G, Zhang J-z, Ma X-c (2016) Age estimation based on pulp cavity/chamber volume of 13 types of tooth from cone beam computed tomography images. Int J Legal Med 130(4):1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1384-6
Kvaal SI, Kolltveit KM, Thomsen IO, Solheim T (1995) Age estimation of adults from dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 74(3):175–185
Sidow SJ, West LA, Liewehr FR, Loushine RJ (2000) Root canal morphology of human maxillary and mandibular third molars. J Endodont 26(11):675–678. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200011000-00011
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects (2013). Jama 310 (20):2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Bleka O, Wisloff T, Dahlberg PS, Rolseth V, Egeland T (2018) Advancing estimation of chronological age by utilizing available evidence based on two radiographical methods. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1848-y
Boldsen JL, Milner GR, Konigsberg LW, Wood JW, Hoppa RD, Vaupel JW (2002) Transition analysis: a new method for estimating age from skeletons. In: R. D. Hoppa JWV (ed) Paleodemography: Age Distributions from Skeletal Samples. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 73-106
Neumayer B, Lesch A, Thaler F, Widek T, Tschauner S, De Tobel J, Ehammer T, Kirnbauer B, Boldt J, van Wijk M, Stollberger R, Urschler M (2019) The four-minute approach revisited: accelerating MRI-based multi-factorial age estimation. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02231-w
Guo YOA, Ottow C, Schmidt S, Schulz R, Heindel W, Pfeiffer H, Vieth V, Schmeling A (2015) Dental age estimation in living individuals using 3.0 T MRI of lower third molars. Int J Legal Med 129:1265–1270
De Tobel J, Parmentier GIL, Phlypo I, Descamps B, Neyt S, Van De Velde WL, Politis C, Verstraete KL, Thevissen PW (2019) Magnetic resonance imaging of third molars in forensic age estimation: comparison of the Ghent and Graz protocols focusing on apical closure. Int J Legal Med 133(2):583–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1905-6
Stern D, Payer C, Giuliani N, Urschler M (2019) Automatic age estimation and majority age classification from multi-factorial MRI data. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 23(4):1392–1403. https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2018.2869606
Nasel C, Gahleitner A, Breitenseher M, Czerny C, Solar P, Imhof H (1998) Dental MR tomography of the mandible. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22(3):498–502
Timme M, Borkert J, Nagelmann N, Streeter A, Karch A, Schmeling A (2021) Age-dependent decrease in dental pulp cavity volume as a feature for age assessment: a comparative in vitro study using 9.4-T UTE-MRI and CBCT 3D imaging. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02603-1
Timme M, Borkert J, Nagelmann N, Schmeling A (2020) Evaluation of secondary dentin formation for forensic age assessment by means of semi-automatic segmented ultrahigh field 9.4 T UTE MRI datasets. Int J Legal Med 134(6):2283–2288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02425-7
Liversidge HM (2015) Controversies in age estimation from developing teeth. Ann Hum Biol 42(4):397–406. https://doi.org/10.3109/03014460.2015.1044468
Kvaal SI, Koppang HS, Solheim T (1994) Relationship between age and deposit of peritubular dentine. Gerodontology 11(2):93–98
Helmy MA, Osama M, Elhindawy MM, Mowafey B (2020) Volume analysis of second molar pulp chamber using cone beam computed tomography for age estimation in Egyptian adults. J Forensic Odontostomatol 3(38):25–34
Cantekin K, Sekerci A, Buyuk SK (2013) Dental computed tomographic imaging as age estimation: morphological analysis of the third molar of a group of Turkish population. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 34:357–362
Carter K, Worthington S (2015) Morphologic and demographic predictors of third molar agenesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 94(7):886–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515581644
Lebbe A, Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M, Thevissen P, Verdonck A, Fieuws S, Willems G (2017) Dental development in patients with agenesis. Int J Legal Med 131(2):537–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1450-0
Porto LV, da Silva C, Neto J, Anjos Pontual AD, Catunda RQ (2015) Evaluation of volumetric changes of teeth in a Brazilian population by using cone beam computed tomography. J Forensic Leg Med 36:4–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.07.007
Agematsu H, Someda H, Hashimoto M, Matsunaga S, Abe S, Kim HJ, Koyama T, Naito H, Ishida R, Ide Y (2010) Three-dimensional observation of decrease in pulp cavity volume using micro-CT: age related change. The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College 51:1–6
Asif MK, Nambiar P, Mani SA, Ibrahim NB, Khan IM, Lokman NB (2019) Dental age estimation in Malaysian adults based on volumetric analysis of pulp/tooth ratio using CBCT data. Leg Med (Tokyo) 36:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2018.10.005
Gulsahi A, Kulah CK, Bakirarar B, Gulen O, Kamburoglu K (2018) Age estimation based on pulp/tooth volume ratio measured on cone-beam CT images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 47(1):20170239. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170239
Aykroyd RG, Lucy D, Pollard AM, Solheim T (1997) Technical note: regression analysis in adult age estimation. Am J Phys Anthropol 104(2):259–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199710)104:2%3c259::aid-ajpa11%3e3.0.co;2-z
Sironi E, Taroni F, Baldinotti C, Nardi C, Norelli GA, Gallidabino M, Pinchi V (2018) Age estimation by assessment of pulp chamber volume: a Bayesian network for the evaluation of dental evidence. Int J Legal Med 132(4):1125–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1733-0
Liversidge HM, Peariasamy K, Folayan MO, Adeniyi AO, Ngom PI, Mikami Y, Shimada Y, Kuroe K, Tvete IF, Kvaal SI (2017) A radiographic study of the mandibular third molar root development in different ethnic groups. J Forensic Odontostomatol 35(2):97–108
Shi L, Jiang F, Ouyang F, Zhang J, Wang Z, Shen X (2018) DNA methylation markers in combination with skeletal and dental ages to improve age estimation in children. Forensic Sci Int Genet 33:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.11.005
Acknowledgements
Tone Elise Døli Orheim physicist, Oslo University Hospital, for participating in development of the MR parameters.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Oslo (incl Oslo University Hospital) Open access funding provided by University of Oslo (including Oslo University Hospital).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This study included healthy volunteers for MRI examinations of the molars and along with the data collection, participants consented for use of their data for academic research including publications if the anonymity was maintained.
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the Data Protection Officer (PVO), Oslo University Hospital, and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent
All participants signed a declaration of consent, and those who were younger than 17 years got approval from parents or legal guardians.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bjørk, M.B., Kvaal, S.I., Bleka, Ø. et al. Age prediction in sub-adults based on MRI segmentation of 3rd molar tissue volumes. Int J Legal Med 137, 753–763 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-02977-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-02977-4