Skip to main content
Log in

Risk of solid cancer in the offspring of female workers of the Mayak nuclear facility in the Southern Urals, Russian Federation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of cancer risk following in utero exposure to ionizing radiation are limited in number, particularly for adult-onset cancers, and the evidence is unclear. In the present study, the risk of solid cancer incidence following in utero radiation exposure is examined among 8466 offspring of female nuclear workers at one of the largest nuclear facilities (Mayak Production Association) in the Russian Federation. Poisson regression methods were used to estimate excess relative risks (ERRs) per Gray (Gy). Mother’s uterine gamma dose served as a surrogate for fetal gamma dose. During 277,002 person-years of follow-up (1948–2009), there were 177 first primary solid cancers excluding non-melanoma skin cancers. Estimated in utero gamma and plutonium doses exceeded zero for 41 and 23 % of offspring, respectively. Of the 177 solid cancers, 66 occurred among individuals with some in utero exposure to gamma radiation and 53 among those with estimated plutonium exposures. There was no indication of a statistically significantly increased risk of solid cancer incidence from in utero gamma exposure (linear ERR/Gy −1.0; upper 95 % confidence limit 0.5). This result was unchanged after accounting for subsequent occupational exposure. Plutonium doses were estimated but were too low to obtain meaningful risk estimates. Thus, in this cohort in utero radiation exposure was not associated with solid cancer risk. This is consistent with an earlier report of mortality in the cohort, but is based on twice as many cases and less susceptible to biases inherent in mortality analyses. Given the relatively young age of the cohort with respect to cancer, continued follow-up should be done as the number of cancer cases increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bithell JF, Stewart AM (1975) Pre-natal irradiation and childhood malignancy: a review of British data from the Oxford Survey. Br J Cancer 31:271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunch KJ, Muirhead CR, Draper GJ, Hunter N, Kendall GM, O’Hagan JA, Phillipson MA, Vincent TJ, Zhang W (2009) Cancer in the offspring of female radiation workers: a record linkage study. Br J Cancer 100:213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delongchamp RR, Mabuchi K, Yoshimoto Y, Preston DL (1997) Cancer mortality among atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children. Radiat Res 147:385–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter N, Kuznetsova IS, Labutina EV, Harrison JD (2013) Solid cancer incidence other than lung, liver and bone in Mayak workers: 1948-2004. Br J Cancer 109:1989–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IARC (2012) A review of human carcinogens: radiation. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol 100 D

  • ICRP (2001) Doses to the embryo and fetus from intakes of radionuclides by the mother. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 31:19–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICRP (2003) Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). ICRP publication 90. Ann ICRP 33(1–2):5–206

  • ICRP (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 37(2–4):1–332

  • Johnson KJ, Alexander BH, Doody MM, Sigurdson AJ, Linet MS, Spector LG, Hoffbeck W, Simon SL, Weinstock RM, Ross JA (2008) Childhood cancer in the offspring born in 1921–1984 to US radiologic technologists. Br J Cancer 99:545–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khokhryakov VV, Khokhryakov VF, Suslova KG, Vostrotin VV, Vvedensky VE, Sokolova AB, Krahenbuhl MP, Birchall A, Miller SC, Schadilov AE, Ephimov AV (2013) Mayak worker dosimetry system 2008 (MWDS-2008): assessment of internal dose from measurement results of plutonium activity in urine. Health Phys 104:366–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshurnikova NA, Shilnikova NS, Okatenko PV, Kreslov VV, Bolotnikova MG, Sokolnikov ME, Khokhriakov VF, Suslova KG, Vassilenko EK, Romanov SA (1999) Characteristics of the cohort of workers at the Mayak nuclear complex. Radiat Res 152:352–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshurnikova NA, Gilbert ES, Shilnikova NS, Sokolnikov M, Preston DL, Kreisheimer M, Ron E, Okatenko P, Romanov SA (2002a) Studies on the Mayak nuclear workers: health effects. Radiat Environ Biophys 41:29–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshurnikova NA, Mushkacheva GS, Shilnikova NS, Rabinovich EI, Petrushkina NP, Hall P, Bolotnikova MG, Preston DL, Ron E (2002b) Studies on the Ozyorsk population: health effects. Radiat Environ Biophys 41:37–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labutina EV, Kuznetsova IS, Hunter N, Harrison J, Koshurnikova NA (2013) Radiation risk of malignant neoplasms in organs of main deposition for plutonium in the cohort of Mayak workers with regard to histological types. Health Phys 105:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leggett RW, Eckerman KF, Khokhryakov VF, Suslova KG, Krahenbuhl MP, Miller SC (2005) Mayak worker study: an improved biokinetic model for reconstructing doses from internally deposited plutonium. Radiat Res 164:111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard MR, Shagina NB, Tolstykh EI, Degteva MO, Fell TP, Bolch WE (2015a) Fetal organ dosimetry for the Techa River and Ozyorsk offspring cohorts, part 1: a Urals-based series of fetal computational phantoms. Radiat Environ Biophys 54:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard MR, Shagina NB, Tolstykh EI, Degteva MO, Fell TP, Bolch WE (2015b) Fetal organ dosimetry for the Techa River and Ozyorsk Offspring Cohorts, part 2: radionuclide S values for fetal self-dose and maternal cross-dose. Radiat Environ Biophys 54:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (US) (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: Beir VII Phase 2. National Academies Press; Washington, DC: Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Level of Ionizing Radiation

  • Preston DL, Lubin JH, Pierce DA, McConney ME (1993) EPICURE user’s guide. In: Hirosoft International Corporation (ed) Seattle, WA

  • Preston DL, Cullings H, Suyama A, Funamoto S, Nishi N, Soda M, Mabuchi K, Kodama K, Kasagi F, Shore RE (2008) Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:428–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaraman P, Simpson J, Neta G, de Berrington GA, Ansell P, Linet MS, Ron E, Roman E (2011) Early life exposure to diagnostic radiation and ultrasound scans and risk of childhood cancer: case-control study. Brit Med J 342:d472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray JG, Schull MJ, Urquia ML, You JJ, Guttmann A, Vermeulen MJ (2010) Major radiodiagnostic imaging in pregnancy and the risk of childhood malignancy: a population-based cohort study in Ontario. PLoS Med 7:e1000337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonfeld SJ, Tsareva YV, Preston DL, Okatenko PV, Gilbert ES, Ron E, Sokolnikov ME, Koshurnikova NA (2012) Cancer mortality following in utero exposure among offspring of female Mayak Worker Cohort members. Radiat Res 178:160–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Rath R, Hammer GP, Blettner M (2008) Are pre- or postnatal diagnostic X-rays a risk factor for childhood cancer? A systematic review. Radiat Environ Biophys 47:301–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smetanin M, Vasilenko EK, Lyubarskaya I, Knyazev V, Gorelov M, Scherpelz RI, Fix JJ (2007a) Mayak film dosimeter response studies, part II: response models. Health Phys 93:231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smetanin M, Vasilenko EK, Scherpelz RI (2007b) Mayak film dosimeter response studies, part III: application to worker dose assessment. Health Phys 93:239–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolnikov M, Preston D, Gilbert E, Schonfeld S, Koshurnikova N (2015) Radiation effects on mortality from solid cancers other than lung, liver, and bone cancer in the Mayak worker cohort: 1948–2008. PLoS ONE 10:e0117784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2006) Volume I: report to the general assembly. Scientific Annexes A and B

  • Vasilenko EK, Khokhryakov VF, Miller SC, Fix JJ, Eckerman K, Choe DO, Gorelov M, Khokhryakov VV, Knyasev V, Krahenbuhl MP, Scherpelz RI, Smetanin M, Suslova K, Vostrotin V (2007a) Mayak worker dosimetry study: an overview. Health Phys 93:190–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilenko EK, Knyazev V, Gorelov M, Smetanin M, Scherpelz RI, Fix JJ (2007b) Mayak film dosimeter response studies, part I: measurements. Health Phys 93:220–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vostrotin VV, Fell TP, Smith TJ, Romanov SA (2014) Retrospective estimation of Plutonium-239 doses from transfer to the fetus for Mayak PA workers. Int J Radiat Biol 90:1036–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakeford R, Little MP (2003) Risk coefficients for childhood cancer after intrauterine irradiation: a review. Int J Radiat Biol 79:293–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We very much appreciate the support and assistance of Sergey Romanov, Director of the Southern Urals Biophysics Institute, and the support of the many Soviet and Russian scientists, technicians, and administrative officials who helped collect, maintain, and review the data over the years. We thank John Harrison and Richard Haylock for the SOLO project coordination, and we further like to thank Alexander Akleyev, Director of the Urals Research Center of Radiation Medicine, for his distinguished leadership of the SOLO work package in which this work was performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Schüz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

This work was part of the SOLO project (Epidemiological Studies of Exposed Southern Urals Populations) funded by the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (Grant Agreement Number 249675). The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

The project was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Southern Urals Biophysics Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsareva, Y., Deltour, I., Sokolnikov, M. et al. Risk of solid cancer in the offspring of female workers of the Mayak nuclear facility in the Southern Urals, Russian Federation. Radiat Environ Biophys 55, 291–297 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-016-0650-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-016-0650-9

Keywords

Navigation