Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

DNA strand break dependence on Tris and arginine scavenger concentrations under ultra-soft X-ray irradiation: the contribution of secondary arginine radicals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we used a bench-top cold-cathode ultra-soft X-ray (USX) generator to expose aqueous DNA plasmid solutions to low-LET radiation under various scavenging conditions. Single- and double-strand breaks were assessed using classic gel electrophoresis quantification of linear, circular and supercoiled plasmid DNA topologies. With their very low penetration range in water, USX can only interact with matter up to short distances, of the order of 50 μm. We validated a stirring procedure which makes it possible to expose 100 µL of aqueous samples (2 mm thick). The scavenging of OH radicals by Tris buffer was studied at ambient temperature under aerobic conditions and compared to data gathered in the literature. A very good agreement was found with the rare data dealing with DNA plasmid exposed to Al Kα photons at low temperature (T ≤ 277 K), which therefore validated the experimental procedure. The yields for DNA single-strand breaks determined during this study enabled the ratio of indirect to direct effects to be determined at 96.2 %, in good agreement with the value of 97.7 % stemming from a study based on γ-ray irradiation of frozen solutions of plasmid DNA. Then, arginine was used both to create a “biological-like” chemical environment around the DNA plasmids and as an OH radical scavenger, in vitro. Although arginine has a greater scavenging (protecting) power than Tris, surprisingly, it led to higher rates of strand breakage. Based on the specific binding modes of arginine to DNA, we suggest that the side effects observed are due to the presence of arginine near to, but also inside, the DNA double helix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ebert M, Keene JP, Swallow AJ, Baxendale JH (eds) (1965) Pulse radiolysis. Academic Press, London, pp 151–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyer JP, Schillaci ME, Raju MR (1989) Measurement of the G-value for 1.5 keV X-rays. Int J Radiat Biol 56(6):885–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulford J (2000) Quantification of complex and damage by ionising radiation: an experimental and theoretical approach. Dissertation, University of Brunel

  • Fulford J, Bonner P, Goodhead DT, Hill MA, O’Neill P (1999) Experimental determination of the dependence of OH radical yield on photon energy: a comparison with theoretical simulations. J Phys Chem A 103:11345–11349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulford J, Nikjoo H, Goodhead DT, O’Neill P (2001) Yields of SSB and DSB induced in DNA by AlK ultrasoft X-rays and α-particles: comparison of experimental and simulated yields. Int J Radiat Biol 77(10):1053–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhead DT, Thacker J (1977) Inactivation and mutation of cultured mammalian cells by aluminium characteristic ultra-soft X-rays. I. Properties of aluminium X-rays and preliminary experiments with Chinese hamster cells. Int J Radiat Biol 31(6):541–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Groetz J-E, Ounoughi N, Mavon C, Belafrites A, Fromm M (2014) Conception and realization of a parallel-plate free-air ionization chamber for the absolute dosimetry of an ultrasoft X-ray beam. Rev Sci Instrum. doi:10.1063/1.4890817

    Google Scholar 

  • Hada M, Sutherland BM (2006) Spectrum of complex DNA damages depends on the incident radiation. Radiat Res 165(2):223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks M, Gebicki JM (1986) Rate constants for reaction of hydroxyl radicals with Tris. Tricine and Hepes buffers. FEBS Lett 199(1):92–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkins PS, Fairman MP, O’Neill P (1996) Rejoining of gamma radiation-induced single-strand breaks in plasmid DNA by human cell extracts: dependence on the concentration of the hydroxyl radical scavenger, Tris. Radiat Res 145(1):24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAEA Training Course Series 42 (2010) Radiation biology: a handbook for teachers and students. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  • ICRU Report 17 (1970) Radiation dosimetry: X-rays generated at a potential of 5–150 kV. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements

  • Ito T, Morimoto S, Fujita S-I, Nishimoto S-I (2009) Radical intermediates generated in the reactions of l-arginine with hydroxyl radical and sulfate radical anion: a pulse radiolysis study. Radiat Phys Chem 78(4):256–260

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SP, Bartek J (2009) The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 461(7267):1071–1078

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson KH, Radulescu I, Rydberg B, Stenerlöw B (2008) Repair of radiation-induced heat-labile sites is independent of DNA-PKcs, XRCC1 and PARP. Radiat Res 169(5):506–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kejnovský E, Kypr J (1993) Tris buffer protects DNA backbone against breakage upon irradiation with ultraviolet light. Gen Physiol Biophys 12(4):317–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimczak U, Ludwig DC, Mark F, Rettberg P, Schulte-Frohlinde D (1993) Irradiation of plasmid and phage DNA in water-alcohol mixtures: strand breaks and lethal damage as a function of scavenger concentration. Int J Radiat Biol 64(5):497–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong F, Wang X, Ni M, Sui L, Zhao K (2010) The influence of DNA concentration in the experiment of DNA damage induced by 7Li ions and gamma-rays. Health 2(8):962–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krisch RE, Flick MB, Trumbore CN (1991) Radiation chemical mechanisms of single- and double-strand break formation in irradiated SV40 DNA. Radiat Res 126(2):251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krynicki K, Green CD, Sawyer DW (1978) Pressure and temperature dependence of self-diffusion in water. Faraday Discuss Chem Soc 66:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupperman A (1967) Diffusion model of the radiation chemistry of aqueous solutions. In: Silini G (ed) Radiation research. North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam, pp 212–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwatra D, Venugopal A, Anant S (2013) Nanoparticles in radiation therapy: a summary of various approaches to enhance radiosensitization in cancer. Trans Cancer Res 2(4):330–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee M, Urata SM, Aguilera JA, Perry CC, Milligan JR (2012) Modeling the influence of histone proteins on the sensitivity of DNA to ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 177(2):152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung MKK, Chow JCL, Chithrani BD, Lee MJG, Oms B, Jaffray DA (2011) Irradiation of gold nanoparticles by x-rays: Monte Carlo simulation of dose enhancements and the spatial properties of the secondary electrons production. Med Phys 38(2):624–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Messow U (2000) Diffusion-controlled adsorption kinetics at the air/solution interface. Colloid Polym Sci 278(2):124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luscombe NM, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM (2001) Amino acid–base interactions: a three-dimensional analysis of protein–DNA interactions at an atomic level. Nucl Acids Res 29(13):2860–2874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manchester KL (1996) Use of UV methods for measurement of protein and nucleic acid concentrations. Biotech 20(6):968–970

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson LO, Johansson KA, Svensson H (1982) Ferrous sulphate dosimeter for control of ionozation chambre dosimetry of electron and 60Co gamma beams. Acta Radiol Oncol 21(2):139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan JR, Ward JF (1994) Yield of single-strand breaks due to attack on DNA by radical scavenger-derived radicals. Radiat Res 137(3):295–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan JR, Aguilera JA, Ward JF (1993) Variation of single-strand break yield with scavenger concentration for plasmid DNA irradiated in aqueous solution. Radiat Res 133(2):151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mönig J, Chapman R, Asmus KD (1985) Effect of the protonation state of the amino group on the.cntdot.OH radical induced decarboxylation of amino acids in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem 89(14):3139–3144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morimoto S, Ito T, Fujita S-I, Nishimoto S-I (2008) A pulse radiolysis study on the reactions of hydroxyl radical and sulfate radical anion with guanidine derivatives in aqueous solution. Chem Phys Lett 461(4–6):300–304

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Nikjoo H, Goodhead DT, Charlton DE, Paretzke HG (1989) Energy deposition in small cylindrical targets by ultrasoft X-rays. Phys Med Biol 34(6):691–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikjoo H, O’Neill P, Goodhead DT, Terrissol M (1997) Computational modelling of low-energy electron-induced DNA damage by early physical and chemical events. Int J Radiat Biol 71(5):467–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nukuna BN, Goshe MB, Anderson VE (2001) Sites of hydroxyl radical reaction with amino acids identified by 2H NMR detection of induced 1H/2H exchange. J Am Chem Soc 123(6):1208–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ounoughi N, Mavon C, Belafrites A, Groetz J-E, Fromm M (2013) Beam characterization of a lab bench cold cathode ultra-soft X-ray generator. Nucl Instrum Methods B. doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2013.04.050

    Google Scholar 

  • Polo SE, Jackson SP (2011) Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications. Genes Dev 25(5):409–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purkayastha S, Milligan JR, Bernhard WA (2007) On the chemical yield of base lesions, strand breaks, and clustered damage generated in plasmid DNA by the direct effect of X rays. Radiat Res 168(3):357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju MR, Carpenter SG, Chmielewski JJ, Schillaci ME, Wilder ME, Freyer JP, Johnson NF, Schor PL, Sebring RJ, Goodhead DT (1987) Radiobiology of ultrasoft X rays. I. Cultured hamster cells (V79). Radiat Res 110(3):396–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roots R, Okada S (1975) Estimation of life times and diffusion distances of radicals involved in X-ray-induced DNA strand breaks or killing of mammalian cells. Radiat Res 64:306–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma KKK, Milligan JR, Bernhard WA (2008) Multiplicity of DNA single-strand breaks produced in pUC18 exposed to the direct effects of ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 170(2):156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpatyi VA, Gennady Z (2006) Radiation chemistry of biopolymers. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shiina T, Watanabe R, Shiraishi I, Suzuki M, Sugaya Y, Fujii K, Yokoya A (2013) Induction of DNA damage, including abasic sites, in plasmid DNA by carbon ion and X-ray irradiation. Radiat Environ Biophys 52(1):99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimobayashi SF, Iwaki T, Mori T, Yoshikawa K (2013) Probability of double-strand breaks in genome-sized DNA by γ-ray decreases markedly as the DNA concentration increases. J Chem Phys. doi:10.1063/1.4802993

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqi MA, Bothe E (1987) Single- and double-strand break formation in DNA irradiated in aqueous solution: dependence on dose and OH radical scavenger concentration. Radiat Res 112(3):449–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinks JWT, Woods RJ (1990) Water and inorganic aqueous systems, introduction to radiation chemistry. Wiley, New York, p 243

    Google Scholar 

  • Spotheim-Maurizot M, Davídková M (2011) Radiation damage to DNA in DNA–protein complexes. Mutat Res 711(1–2):41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spotheim-Maurizot M, Charlier M, Sabattier R (1990) DNA radiolysis by fast neutrons. Int J Radiat Biol 57(2):301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spotheim-Maurizot M, Franchet J, Sabattier R, Charlier M (1991) DNA radiolysis by fast neutrons. II oxygen, thiols and ionic strength effects. Int J Radiat Biol 59(6):1313–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton J, Taucher-Scholz G, Schneider M, Heilmann J, Kraft G (1993) Protection of DNA from high LET radiation by two OH radical scavengers, tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane and 2-mercaptoethanol. Radiat Environ Biophys 32:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stellwagen NC, Bossi A, Gelfi C, Righetti PG (2000) DNA and buffers: are there any noninteracting, neutral pH buffers. Anal Biochem 287(1):167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenerlöw B, Karlsson KH, Cooper B, Rydberg B (2003) Measurement of prompt DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells without including heat-labile sites: results for cells deficient in nonhomologous end joining. Radiat Res 159(4):502–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stypczyńska A, Ptasińska S, Bahnev B, Bowden M, Braithwaite NSJ, Mason NJ (2010) DNA strand scission induced by a non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma jet. Chem Phys Lett 500(4):313–317

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stypczyńska A, Nixon T, Mason N (2014) X-ray radiation of poly-l-arginine hydrochloride and multilayered DNA-coatings. Eur Phys J D. doi:10.1140/epjd/e2014-40845-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland BM, Bennett PV, Sidorkina O, Laval J (2000) Clustered DNA damages induced in isolated DNA and in human cells by low doses of ionizing radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(1):103–108

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Terato H, Tanaka R, Nakaarai Y, Nohara T, Doi Y, Iwai S, Hirayama R, Furusawa Y, Ide H (2008) Quantitative analysis of isolated and clustered DNA damage induced by gamma-rays, carbon ion beams, and iron ion beams. J Radiat Res 49(2):133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomita H, Kai M, Kusama T, Aoki Y (1995) Strand break formation in plasmid DNA irradiated in aqueous solution: effect of medium temperature and hydroxyl radical scavenger concentration. J Radiat Res 36(1):46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uehara S, Nikjoo H (2006) Monte carlo simulation of water radiolysis for low-energy charged particles. J Radiat Res 47(1):69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Sonntag C (1987) The chemical basis for radiation biology. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vondraśěk J, Mason PE, Heyda J, Collins KD, Jungwirth P (2009) The molecular origin of like-charge arginine-arginine pairing in water. J Phys Chem B 113(27):9041–9045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe R, Usami N, Kobayaschi K (1995) Oxidation yield of the ferrous ion in a Fricke solution irradiated with monochromatic synchrotron soft X-rays in the 1.8–10 keV region. Int J Radiat Biol 68(2):113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiying Z (2009) EPR, ENDOR and DFT studies on X-irradiated single crystals of l-Lysine monohydrochloride monohydrate and l-Arginine monohydrocloride monohydrate.Dissertation, University of Georgia

  • Yokoya A, Fujii K, Ushigome T, Shikazono N, Urushibara A, Watanabe R (2006) Yields of strand breaks and base lesions induced by soft X-rays in plasmid DNA. Radiat Prot Dosim 122(1–4):86–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokoya A, Shikazono N, Fujii K, Urushibara A, Akamatsu K, Watanabe R (2008) DNA damage induced by the direct effect of radiation. Radiat Phys Chem 77(10–12):1280–1285

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the PROFAS (French–Algerian Collaboration program) for the financial Grant allocated to M. Souici in order to work during 18 months in our laboratory in France. We are particularly indebted to Dr. Peter Winterton (Toulouse University, France) for correcting and improving the language of the present article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Fromm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Souici, M., Khalil, T.T., Boulanouar, O. et al. DNA strand break dependence on Tris and arginine scavenger concentrations under ultra-soft X-ray irradiation: the contribution of secondary arginine radicals. Radiat Environ Biophys 55, 215–228 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-016-0642-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-016-0642-9

Keywords

Navigation