Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The contributions of (meta-)sedimentary or granitic orthogneissic sources to the Cenozoic Himalayan granites

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Cenozoic Himalayan leucogranites are generally regarded as the representative S-type granites, derived from partial melting of (meta-)sedimentary rocks in the Higher Himalayan Sequences. This interpretation is challenged by the increasing finding of abundant relict zircons with Cambrian–Ordovician ages in the granites. These ages are lacking in the assumed (meta-)sedimentary sources but are close to the formation timing of early Paleozoic granites (presently as orthogneisses) in the Himalaya. Therefore, it is unclear how the early Paleozoic relict zircons were incorporated into the granites and what the real sources of the Cenozoic Himalayan leucogranites are. This study presents U–Pb ages, trace-element, and Lu–Hf isotope compositions of zircon from both the Cenozoic granites and their country rocks (Paleozoic orthogneisses) from Kuday in the Sakya dome, central Himalaya. Our results indicate that the autocryst zircons from the gneiss samples formed at 494–499 Ma and display obvious negative correlations in the Hf–Ti, Hf–Th/U, and Hf–Eu/Eu* binary plots. Their εHf(420 Ma) values have relatively restricted variations of −7.2 to −0.5. In contrast, the early Paleozoic relict zircons from granites form scattered and contrasting fields in these binary plots with largely varied U–Pb ages (ca. 410–520 Ma) and εHf(420 Ma) values of −35.4 to + 6.7. These observations suggest that the autocryst zircons from gneisses are a cogenetic population and their compositional variations are controlled by crystallization differentiation, whereas the relict zircons from granites were probably originated from sedimentary rocks in which detrital grains were weathered from a variety of protoliths. We argue that the early Paleozoic relict zircon population was not incorporated into the Cenozoic granites by assimilation of the orthogneissic country rocks. This is supported by whole-rock Nd–Hf isotope analyses, which yield εNd(t) and εHf(t) values of −12.6 ~ −12.5 and of −10.4, respectively, for granites and of −8.8 ~ −8.1 and of −5.9, respectively, for orthogneisses (all calculated at 20 Ma). Furthermore, our compiled whole-rock Sr–Nd isotope data indicate that the Cenozoic Himalayan granites differ from the Paleozoic orthogneisses but overlap with the Himalayan (meta-)sedimentary rocks. Phase equilibrium modeling demonstrates that the Paleozoic orthogneisses are relatively infertile due to their low fractions of hydrous minerals and thus low bulk water contents as compared with the metapelites assuming no free fluid is present. Therefore, although the contribution of the Paleozoic orthogneisses cannot be totally precluded, the observed evidence suggests that they are not the main source components of the Cenozoic Himalayan granites. It is speculated that Ordovician and later sediments which can receive the weathered clasts of the early Paleozoic granites can act as the unrecognized sources of the Cenozoic granites. However, more work is required to characterize these sediments before drawing firm conclusions on the sources of these granites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data of this study is available in the Supplementary material.

References

  • Baral U, Lin D, Chamlagain D, Qasim M, Paudayal KN, Neupane B (2019a) Detrital zircon U-Pb ages, Hf isotopic constraints, and trace element analysis of Upper Cretaceous-Neogene sedimentary units in the Western Nepal Himalaya: Implications for provenance changes and India-Asia collision. Geol J 54:120–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Baral U, Lin D, Goswami TK, Sarma M, Qasim M, Bezbaruah D (2019b) Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology of a Cenozoic foreland basin in Northeast India: Implications for zircon provenance during the collision of the Indian and Asian plates. Terra Nova 31:18–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoli O (2021) Granite geochemistry is not diagnostic of the role of water in the source. Earth Planet Sci Lett 564:116927

    Google Scholar 

  • Blichert-Toft J (2008) The Hf isotopic composition of zircon reference material 91500. Chem Geol 253:252–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M (2013) Granite: From genesis to emplacement. Geol Soc Am Bull 125:1079–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao HW, Pe QM, Santosh M, Li GM, Zhang LK, Zhang XF, Zhang YH, Zou H, Dai ZW, Lin B, Tang L, Yu X (2022) Himalayan leucogranites: A review of geochemical and isotopic characteristics, timing of formation, genesis, and rare metal mineralization. Earth Sci Rev 234:104229

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawood PA, Johnson MRW, Nemchin AA (2007) Early palaeozoic orogenesis along the Indian margin of Gondwana: tectonic response to Gondwana assembly. Earth Planet Sci Lett 255:70–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell BW, White AJR (1974) Two contrasting granite types. Pac Geol 8:173–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Claiborne LL, Miller CF, Walker BA, Wooden JL, Mazdab FK, Bea F (2006) Tracking magmatic processes through Zr/Hf ratios in rocks and Hf and Ti zoning in zircons: an example from the Spirit Mountain batholith, Nevada. Mineral Mag 70:517–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Clift PD, Carter A, Jonell TN (2014) U-Pb dating of detrital zircon grains in the Paleocene Stumpata Formation, Tethyan Himalaya, Zanskar, India. J Asian Earth Sci 82:80–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins WJ, Huang H-Q, Bowden P, Kemp AIS (2020) Repeated S- I- A-type granite trilogy in the Lachlan Orogen, and geochemical contrasts with A-type granites in Nigeria: Implications for petrogenesis and tectonic discrimination. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, p 491

    Google Scholar 

  • Couzinié S, Bouilhol P, Laurant O, Marko L, Moyen J-F (2021) When zircon drowns: Elusive geochronological record of water-fluxed orthogneiss melting in the Velay dome (Massif Central, France). Lithos 384–385:105938

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCelles PG, Kapp P, Quade J, Gehrels GE (2011) Oligocene-Miocene Kailas basin, southwestern Tibet: Record of postcollisional upper-plate extension in the Indus-Yarlung suture zone. GSA Bull 123:1337–1362

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing RC, Haaker RF, Lutze W (1982) Leachability of zircon as a function of alpha dose. In: Lutze W (ed) scientific basis for radioactive waste management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 389–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing RC, Meldrum A, Wang LM, Weber WJ, Corrales LR (2003). Radiation effects in zircon. In: Hanchar JM, Hoskin PWO (Eds) Zircon. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 53, 387–425

  • Fuhrman ML, Lindsley DH (1988) Ternary-feldspar modeling and thermometry. Am Miner 73:201–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao LE, Zeng L, Asimow PD (2017) Contrasting geochemical signatures of fluid-absent versus fluid-fluxed melting of muscovite in metasedimentary sources: the Himalayan leucogranites. Geology 45:39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao LE, Zeng L, Hu G, Wang Y, Wang Q, Guo C, Hou K (2019) Early paleozoic magmatism along the northern margin of East Gondwana. Lithos 334–335:25–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao P, Zheng YF, Zhao ZF, Sun GC (2021) Source diversity in controlling the compositional diversity of the Cenozoic granites in the Tethyan Himalaya. Lithos 388–389:106072

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao P, Yakymchuk C, Zhang J, Yin C, Qian J, Li Y (2022) Preferential dissolution of uranium-rich zircon can bias the hafnium isotope compositions of granites. Geology 50:336–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrels GE, DeCelles PG, Ojha TP, Upreti BN (2006a) Geologic and U-Pb geochronologic evidence for early Paleozoic tectonism in the Dadeldhura thrust sheet, far-west Nepal Himalaya. J Asian Earth Sci 28:385–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrels GE, DeCelles PG, Ojha TP, Upreti BN (2006b) Geologic and U-Th-Pb geochronologic evidence for early Paleozoic tectonism in the Kathmandu thrust sheet, central Nepal Himalaya. Geol Soc America Bull 118:185–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrels G, Kapp P, DeCelles P, Pullen A, Blakey R, Weislogel A, Ding L, Guynn J, Martin A, McQuarrie N, Yin A (2011) Detrital zircon geochronology of pre-Tertiary strata in the Tibetan-Himalayan orogen. Tectonics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011TC002868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazner AF (2007) Thermal limitations on incorporation of wall rock into magma. Geology 35:319–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu HO, Sun H, Wang FY, Ge C, Zhou TF (2019) A new practical isobaric interference correction model for in situ Hf isotopic analysis using laser ablation-multi-collector-ICP-mass spectrometry of zircons with high Yb/Hf ratios. J Anal at Spectrom 34:1223–1232

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu DX, Zhang JJ, Lin C, Zheng JL, Feng L, Fan YS, Huang BY (2022) Petrogenesis of monzonites and leucogranites in the Ama Drime Massif: implications for sources and differentiation of Himalayan leucogranites. J Asian Earth Sci 237:105372

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo ZF, Wilson M (2012) The Himalayan leucogranites: Constraints on the nature of their crustal source region and geodynamic setting. Gondwana Res 22:360–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo L, Zhang HF, Harris N, Xu WC, Pan FB (2017) Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology, trace-element and Hf isotope geochemistry of the metasedimentary rocks in the Eastern Himalayan syntaxis: Tectonic and paleogeographic implications. Gondwana Res 41:207–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo R, Hu X, Garzanti W, Lai W, Yan B, Mark C (2020) How faithfully do the geochronological and geochemical signatures of detrital zircon, titanite, rutile and monazite record magmatic and metamorphic events? A case study from the Himalaya and Tibet. Earth Sci Rev 201:103082

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris NBW, Inger S (1992) Trace element modelling of pelite-derived granites. Contrib Miner Petrol 110:46–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris N, Massey J (1994) Decompression and anatexis of Himalayan metapelites. Tectonics 13:1537–1546

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris N, Vance D, Ayres M (2000) From sediment to granite: timescales of anatexis in the upper crust. Chem Geol 162:155–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland TJB, Powell R (2011) An improved and extended internally consistent thermodynamic dataset for phases of petrological interest, involving a new equation of state for solids. J Metamorph Geol 29:333–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson TN, Harris NBW, Warren CJ, Spencer CJ, Roberts NMW, Horstwood MSA, Parrish RR, EIMF (2017) The identification and significance of pure sediment-derived granites. Earth Planet Sci Lett 467:57–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson T, Harris N, Roberts N, Warren C, Hammond S, Spencer C, Parrish R (2020) Evolution of the melt source during protracted crustal anatexis; an example from the Bhutan Himalaya. Geology 48:87–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu XM, Garzanti E, Wang JG, Huang WT, An W, Webb A (2016) The timing of India-Asia collision onset – facts, theories, controversies. Earth Sci Rev 160:264–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji WQ, Wu FY, Liu XC, Liu ZC, Zhang C, Liu T, Wang JG, Paterson SR (2020) Pervasive Miocene melting of thickened crust from the Lhasa terrane to Himalaya, southern Tibet and its constraint on generation of Himalayan leucogranite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 278:137–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji M, Gao XY, Zheng YF (2022) Geochemical evidence for partial melting of progressively varied crustal sources for leucogranites during the Oligocene-Miocene in the Himalayan orogen. Chem Geol 589:120674

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannes W, Holtz F (1996) Petrogenesis and Experimental Petrology of Granitic Rocks. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, p 335

    Google Scholar 

  • King J, Harris N, Argles T, Parrish R, Charlier B, Sherlock S, Zhang HF (2007) First field evidence of southward ductile flow of asian crust beneath southern Tibet. Geology 35:727–730

    Google Scholar 

  • King J, Harris N, Argles T, Parrish R, Zhang HF (2011) Contribution of crustal anatexis to the tectonic evolution of indian crust beneath southern Tibet. Geol Soc Am Bull 123:218–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Knesel KM, Davidson JP (2002) Insights into collisional magmatism from isotopic fingerprints of melting reactions. Science 296:2206–2208

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn MJ (2014) Himalayan Metamorphism and its Tectonic Implications. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 42:381–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Fort P, Cuney M, Deniel C, France-Lanord C, Sheppard SMF, Upreti BN, Vidal P (1987) Crustal generation of the Himalayan leucogranites. Tectonophysics 134:39–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Whitehouse MJ (2007) Onset of mid-crustal extensional flow in southern Tibet: Evidence from U/Pb zircon ages. Geology 35:45–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, McClelland W, Wang Y, Blythe A, McWilliams M (2006) Oligocene-Miocene middle crustal flow in southern Tibet: geochronology of Mabja dome. In: Law RD, Searle MP, Godin L (eds) Channel flow, ductile extrusion and exhumation of lower-mid crust in continental collision zones, vol 268. Geological Society of London Special Publication, London, pp 445–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Li XH, Long WG, Li QL, Liu Y, Zheng YF, Yang YH, Chamberlain KR, Wan DF, Guo CH, Wang XC, Tao H (2010) Penglai zircon megacrysts: a potential new working reference material for microbeam determination of Hf–O isotopes and U-Pb age. Geostand Geoanal Res 34:117–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Li CF, Li XH, Li QL, Guo JH, Yang YH (2012) Rapid and precise determination of sr and nd isotopic ratios in geological samples from the same filament loading by thermal ionization mass spectrometry employing a single-step separation scheme. Anal Chim Acta 727:54–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Li XH, Tang GQ, Bing G, Yang YH, Hou KJ, Hu ZC, Li QL, Yu L, Li WX (2013) Qinghu zircon: a working reference for microbeam analysis of U-Pb age and Hf and O isotopes. Chin Sci Bull 58:4647–4654

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Tang S-H, Zhu X-K, Pan C-X (2017) production and certification of the reference material GSB 04-3258-2015 as a 143Nd/144Nd isotope ratio reference. Geostand Geoanal Res 41(2):255–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Ao S, Xiao W, Windley BF, Zhan M, Huang P (2020) Tectonic setting and provenance of Early Cretaceous strata in the footwall of Main Central Thrust, Eastern Nepal: Implications for the archipelago palaeogeography of the Neo-Tethys. Geol J 56:1958–1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin C, Zhang J, Wang X, Huang T, Zhang B, Fan Y (2021) Himalayan Miocene adakitic rocks, a case study of the Mayum pluton: Insights into geodynamic processes within the subducted indian continental lithosphere and Himalayan mid-Miocene tectonic regime transition. GSA Bull 133:591–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZC, Wu FY, Ji WQ, Wang JG, Liu CZ (2014) Petrogenesis of the Ramba leucogranite in the Tethyan Himalaya and constraints on the channel flow model. Lithos 208–209:118–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu XC, Wu FY, Yu LJ, Liu ZC, Ji WQ, Wang JG (2016) Emplacement age of leucogranite in the Kampa Dome, southern Tibet. Tectonophysics 667:163–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z-C, Wu F-Y, Qiu Z-L, Wang J-G. Liu X-C. Ji W-Q. Liu C-ZZ (2017) Leucogranite geochronological constraints on the termination of the South Tibetan Detachment in eastern Himalaya. Tectonophysics 721:106–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Zhu DC, Wang Q, Cawood PA, Stockli DF, Stockli LD, Lin C, Zhang JJ, Zhang LL, Zhao ZD (2022) Leucogranite records multiple collisional orogenies. Geophys Res Lett 49:e2021GL096817

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu XC, Wu FY, Kohn M, Liu ZC, Ji WQ, Wang JM, Yang L, He XS (2022b) Plutonic-subvolcanic connection of the Himalayan leucogranites: Insights from the Eocene Lhunze complex, southern Tibet. Lithos 434–435:106939

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Zhang G, Li H (2023) Detrital zircon, monazite and tourmaline reveal the magmatic and metamorphic history of the Himalayan orogen from Archean to present. Lithos 436–437:106949

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig KR (2011) Isoplot v. 4.15: a geochronological toolkit for microsoft excel. Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication 4, 75

  • Martin AJ (2017) A review of Himalayan stratigraphy, magmatism, and structure. Gondwana Res 49:42–80

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuarrie N, Long SP, Tobgay T, Nesbit JN, Gehresl G, Ducea MN (2013) Documenting basin scale, geometry and provenance through detrital geochemical data: lessons from the Neoproterozoic to Ordovician Lesser, Greater, and Tethyan Himalayan strata of Bhutan. Gondwana Res 23:1491–1510

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyen J-F, Janoušek V, Laurent O, Bachmann O, Jacob J-B, Farina F (2021) Crustal melting vs. fractionation of basaltic magmas: part 1, granites and paradigms. Lithos 402–403:106291

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee PK, Jain AK, Singhal S, Singha NB, Singh S, Kumud K (2019) U-Pb zircon ages and Sm-Nd isotopic characteristics of the Lesser and Great Himalayan sequences, Uttarakhand Himalaya, and their regional tectonic implications. Gondwana Res 75:282–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabelek PI (2019) Petrogenesis of leucogranites in collisional orogens. Geological Society, London, Special Publications SP491–2018–181

  • Neupane B, Zhao J, Allen CM, Ju Y, Baral U, Gyawali BR (2020) Provenance of Jurassic-Cretaceous Tethyan Himalayan sequences in the Thakkhola Section- Nepal, inferring pre-collisional tectonics of the central Himalaya. J Asian Earth Sci 192:104288

    Google Scholar 

  • Palin RM, Treloar PJ, Searle MP, Wald T, White RW, Mertz-Kraus R (2018) U-Pb monazite ages from the Pakistan Himalaya record pre-Himalayan Ordovician orogeny and Permian continental breakup. Geol Soc Am Bull 130:2047–2061

    Google Scholar 

  • Patiño Douce AE, Harris N (1998) Experimental constraints on Himalayan anatexis. J Petrol 39:689–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton C, Hellstrom J, Paul B, Woodhead J, Hergt J (2011) Iolite: Freeware for the visualisation and processing of mass spectrometric data. J Anal at Spectrom 26:2508

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwindinger M, Weinberg RF, Clos F (2019) Wet or dry? The difficulty of identifying the presence of water during crustal melting. J Metamorph Geol 37:339–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Sláma J, Košler J, Condon DJ, Crowley JL, Gerdes A, Hanchar JM, Horstwood MS, Morris GA, Nasdala L, Norberg N (2008) Plešovice zircon—a new natural reference material for U-Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis. Chem Geol 249:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer CJ, Harris RA, Dorais MJ (2012) Depositional provenance of the Himalayan metamorphic core of Garhwal region, India: constrained by U-Pb and Hf isotopes in zircons. Gondwana Res 22:26–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Kuiper KF, Tian Y, Li C, Gemignani L, Zhang Z, Wijbrans JR (2020) Impact of hydraulic sorting and weathering on mica provenance studies: an example from the Yangtze River. Chem Geol 532:119359

    Google Scholar 

  • Turzewski MD, Huntington KW, Licht A, Lang KA (2020) Provenance and erosional impact of Quaternary megafloods through the Yarlung-Tsangpo Gorge from zircon U-Pb geochronology of flood deposits, eastern Himalaya. Earth Planet Sci Lett 535:116113

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigneresse JL, Barbey P, Cuney M (1996) Rheological transitions during partial melting and crystallization with application to felsic magma segregation and transfer. J Petrol 37:1579–1600

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JG, Wu FY, Garzanti E, Hu XM, Ji WQ, Liu ZC, Liu XC (2016) Upper Triassic turbidites of the northern Tethyan Himalaya (Langjiexue Group): the terminal of a sediment-routing system sourced in the Gondwanide Orogen. Gondwana Res 34:84–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb AAG, Yin A, Harrison TM, Celerier J, Gehrels GE, Manning CE, Grove M (2011) Cenozoic tectonic history of the Himachal Himalaya (northwestern India) and its constraints on the formation mechanism of the Himalayan orogen. Geosphere 7:1013–1061

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb AAG, Yin A, Dubey CS (2012) U-Pb zircon geochronology of major lithologic units in the eastern Himalaya: Implications for the origin and assembly of Himalayan rocks. Geol Soc Am Bull 125:499–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb AAG, Guo H, Clift PD, Husson L, Müller T, Costantino D, Yin A, Xu Z, Cao H, Wang Q (2017) The Himalaya in 3D: slab dynamics controlled mountain building and monsoon intensification. Lithosphere 9:637–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg RF (2016) Himalayan leucogranites and migmatites: nature, timing and duration of anataxis. J Metamorph Geol 34:821–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg RF, Hasalová P (2015) Water-fluxed melting of the continental crust: a review. Lithos 212–215:158–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis D, Kieffer B, Maerschalk C, Barling J, Jong JD, Williams GA et al (2006) High-precision isotopic characterization of USGS reference materials by TIMS and MC-ICP-MS. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 7:139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis D, Kieffer B, Hanano D, Silva IN, Barling J, Pretorius W et al (2007) Hf isotope compositions of u.s. geological survey reference materials. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 8:57–77

    Google Scholar 

  • White RW, Powell R, Clarke GL (2002) The interpretation of reaction textures in Fe-rich metapelitic granulites of the Musgrave Block, central Australia: constraints from mineral equilibria calculations in the system K2O-FeO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O-TiO2-Fe2O3. J Metamorph Geol 20:41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • White RW, Powell R, Holland TJB, Johnson TE, Green ECR (2014) New mineral activity-composition relations for thermodynamic calculations in metapelitic systems. J Metamorph Geol 32:261–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedenbeck M, Alle P, Corfu F, Griffin WL, Meier M, Oberli F, Vonquadt A, Roddick JC, Speigel W (1995) Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, trace element and REE analyses. Geostand Newsl 19:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu FY, Liu XC, Liu ZC, Wang RC, Xie L, Wang JM, Ji WQ, Yang L, Liu C, Khanal GP, He SX (2020) Highly fractionated Himalayan leucogranites and associated rare-metal mineralization. Lithos 352–353:105319

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang H, Connolly JAD (2021) GeoPS: an interactive visual computing tool for thermodynamic modelling of phase equilibria. J Metamorph Geol 40:243–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin A (2006) Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogen as constrained by along-strike variation of structural geometry, exhumation history, and foreland sedimentation. Earth Sci Rev 76:1–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng LS, Gao LE, Xie KJ, Jing LZ (2011) Mid-Eocene high Sr/Y granites in the Northern Himalayan Gneiss Domes: Melting thickened lower continental crust. Earth Planet Sci Lett 303:251–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Hu ZC (2020) Estimation of isotopic reference values for pure materials and geological reference materials. At Spectrosc 41:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Harris N, Parrish R, Kelley S, Zhang L, Rogers N, Argles T, King J (2004) Causes and consequences of protracted melting of the mid-crust exposed in the North Himalayan antiform. Earth Planet Sci Lett 228:195–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Harris N, Parrish R, Zhang L, Zhao Z, Li D (2005) Geochemistry of North Himalayan leucogranites: regional comparison, petrogenesis and tectonic implications. Earth Sci 30:275–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y, Gao P (2021) The production of granitic magmas through crustal anatexis at convergent plate boundaries. Lithos 402–403:106232

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng YF, Wu FY (2018) The timing of continental collision between India and Asia. Science Bulletin 63:1649–1654

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Foundation of China (41973025, 92155306, and 42025204). P.G. is grateful to Lingsen Zeng, Li-E Gao, and Zhichao Liu for their beneficial discussion. We are grateful to Editor Daniela Rubatto for the handling work and Chris Spencer, Marcos García-Arias, and one anonymous reviewer for their insightful and constructive reviews.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China

    Peng Gao, Yan Wang, Changqing Yin & Jiahui Qian

  2. School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China

    Guo-Chao Sun

  3. Department of Earth Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa

    Matthew Jason Mayne

  4. Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Jian Zhang

Authors
  1. Peng Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guo-Chao Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthew Jason Mayne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Changqing Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jiahui Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Gao.

Additional information

Communicated by Daniela Rubatto.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 219 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, P., Wang, Y., Sun, GC. et al. The contributions of (meta-)sedimentary or granitic orthogneissic sources to the Cenozoic Himalayan granites. Contrib Mineral Petrol 178, 46 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-023-02027-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-023-02027-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation