Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Validation of the COMPLES Score for Differentiating Between Tuberculous Effusions with Low Pleural pH or Glucose and Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions

  • Published:
Lung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The frequency of “complicated” pleural effusions (CPE) (i.e., pleural fluid pH ≤ 7.2 and/or glucose ≤60 mg/dL) of tuberculous origin (CTPE) is not well reported. This study aims to quantify their prevalence, and develop a score to differentiate CTPE from complicated parapneumonic effusions (CPPE).

Methods

Retrospective analysis of databases from three Spanish hospitals which included patients with CTPE and CPPE. Forty percent of the study population served to generate a scoring system (COMPLES, COMplicated PLeural Effusion Score) that was further validated in the remaining 60 %.

Results

During the study period (1992–2015) 549 patients were diagnosed with tuberculous effusions and 434 parapneumonic effusions, of whom 25 and 64 %, respectively, had CPE. COMPLES was based on the combination of pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA), the percentage of mononuclear cells (MNC %), pH, and age. The cutoff values and assigned scores were: ADA (<46 IU/L [0 points], 46–100 IU/L [4 points], ≥100 IU/L [6 points]), MNC % (<10 % [0 points], 10–50 [3 points], >50 [8 points]), pH (<7.07 [0 points], 7.07–7.20 [3 points], >7.20 [5 points]), and age (≥30 [0 points], <30 years [3 points]). A sum of 12 or more points had 97 % sensitivity, 92 % specificity, likelihood ratio positive 12.3, likelihood ratio negative 0.03, and area under the curve of 0.947 for identifying CTPE versus CPPE in the validation set.

Conclusions

CPE is not an unusual presentation of tuberculosis. A simple new scoring system provides a reliable tool for differentiating between CTPE and CPPE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADA:

Adenosine deaminase

AUC:

Area under curve

CI:

Confidence interval

COMPLES:

Complicated pleural effusion score

CPE:

Complicated pleural effusion

CPPE:

Complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion

CTPE:

Complicated tuberculous pleural effusion

IFN:

Interferon

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

LR:

Likelihood ratio

MNC %:

Percentage of mononuclear cells

NAAT:

Nucleic acid amplification test

NCTPE:

Noncomplicated tuberculous pleural effusion

ROC:

Receiving operating characteristics

TPE:

Tuberculous pleural effusion

References

  1. Valdes L, Alvarez D, Valle JM, Pose A, San JE (1996) The etiology of pleural effusions in an area with high incidence of tuberculosis. Chest 109:158–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Porcel JM, Esquerda A, Vives M, Bielsa S (2014) Etiology of pleural effusions: analysis of more than 3,000 consecutive thoracenteses. Arch Bronconeumol 2014:161–165

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sahn SA, Huggins JT, San Jose ME, varez-Dobano JM, Valdes L (2013) Can tuberculous pleural effusions be diagnosed by pleural fluid analysis alone? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2013:787–793

  4. Porcel JM, Palma R, Valdes L, Bielsa S, San-Jose E, Esquerda A (2013) Xpert(R) MTB/RIF in pleural fluid for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2013:1217–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin CM, Lin SM, Chung FT, Lin HC, Lee KY, Huang CD, Kuo CH, Liu CY, Wang CH, Kuo HP (2012) Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for diagnosing tuberculous pleurisy—a diagnostic accuracy study. PLoS ONE 2012:e44842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liang QL, Shi HZ, Wang K, Qin SM, Qin XJ (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of adenosine deaminase in tuberculous pleurisy: a meta-analysis. Respir Med 102:744–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Greco S, Girardi E, Masciangelo R, Capoccetta GB, Saltini C (2003) Adenosine deaminase and interferon gamma measurements for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy: a meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 7:777–786

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goto M, Noguchi Y, Koyama H, Hira K, Shimbo T, Fukui T (2003) Diagnostic value of adenosine deaminase in tuberculous pleural effusion: a meta-analysis. Ann Clin Biochem 40:4–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang J, Shi HZ, Liang QL, Qin SM, Qin XJ (2007) Diagnostic value of interferon-gamma in tuberculous pleurisy: a metaanalysis. Chest 131:1133–1141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin MT, Wang JY, Yu CJ, Lee LN, Yang PC (2009) Mycobacterium tuberculosis and polymorphonuclear pleural effusion: incidence and clinical pointers. Respir Med 103:820–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirsch A, Ruffie P, Nebut M, Bignon J, Chretien J (1979) Pleural effusion: laboratory tests in 300 cases. Thorax 34:106–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Colice GL, Curtis A, Deslauriers J, Heffner J, Light R, Littenberg B, Sahn S, Weinstein RA, Yusen RD (2000) Medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions: an evidence-based guideline. Chest 118:1158–1171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davies HE, Davies RJ, Davies CW (2010) Management of pleural infection in adults: Br Thorac Soc Pleural Dis Guideline. Thorax 65:Suppl-53

  14. Jolobe OM (2001) Atypical tuberculous pleural effusions. Eur J Intern Med 22:456–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Porcel JM (2011) Pearls and myths in pleural fluid analysis. Respirology 2011:44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krenke R, Safianowska A, Paplinska M, Nasilowski J, Dmowska-Sobstyl B, Bogacka-Zatorska E, Jaworski A, Chazan R (2008) Pleural fluid adenosine deaminase and interferon gamma as diagnostic tools in tuberculosis pleurisy. J Physiol Pharmacol 59:Suppl-60

  17. Porcel JM (2009) Tuberculous pleural effusion. Lung 187:263–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Burgess LJ, Maritz FJ, Le R, Taljaard JJ (1996) Combined use of pleural adenosine deaminase with lymphocyte/neutrophil ratio. Increased specificity for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis. Chest 109:414–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DeOliveria HG, Rossatto ER, Prolla JC (1994) Pleural fluid adenosine deaminase and lymphochyte proportion: clinical uselfulness in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Cytopathology 5:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Garcia-Zamalloa A, Taboada-Gomez J (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of Adenosine deaminase and lymphocyte proportion in pleural fluid for Tuberculous pleurisy in different prevalence scenarios. PLoS ONE 7:e38729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee YC, Rogers JT, Rodriguez RM, Miller KD, Light RW (2001) Adenosine deaminase levels in nontuberculous lymphocytic pleural effusions. Chest 120:356–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Porcel JM, Vives M (2002) Adenosine deaminase levels in nontuberculous lymphocytic pleural effusions. Chest 121:1379–1380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jimenez CD, Diaz NG, Perez-Rodriguez E, Light RW (2003) Diagnostic value of adenosine deaminase in nontuberculous lymphocytic pleural effusions. Eur Respir J 21:220–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Burgess LJ, Maritz FJ, Le R, Taljaard JJ (1995) Use of adenosine deaminase as a diagnostic tool for tuberculous pleurisy. Thorax 50:672–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Valdes L, San JE, varez Dobano JM, Golpe A, Valle JM, Penela P, Gonzalez Barcala FJ (2009) Diagnostic value of interleukin-12 p40 in tuberculous pleural effusions. Eur Respir J 33:816–820

  26. Chang HK, Eun KM, Sung HP, Yong IH, Seung HJ, Yong BP, Cheol HK, Kim D-G, Myung GL, In GH, Jung K-S (2009) Usefulness of the pleural fluid adenosine deaminase with lymphocyte/neutrophil ratio in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy for a region of intermediate prevalence of tuberculosis. Tuberc Respir Dis 66:437–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Villena V, Lopez EA, Echave-Sustaeta J, Alvarez MC, Martin EP (2002) Prospective study of 1,000 consecutive patients with pleural effusion. Etiology of the effusion and characteristics of the patients. Arch Bronconeumol 38:21–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. World Health Organization (2016) Tuberculosis country profiles, 2015. http://www.who.int/tb/country/data/profiles/en/. Accessed 24 March 2016

  29. Working group for multicenter research project on tuberculosis (PMIT) (1999) Tuberculosis in Spain: PMIT results. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Ramiro González for his assistance with the microbiological database in the Ponferrada cohort.

Authors’ Contributions

L.C-G: Development of the study concept and study design, analysis and interpretation of data, statistical analysis, study selection for systematic review, extract data from studies and metaanalysis, drafting the manuscript, generating figures, and final approval of manuscript. C.P-G, D.A, PR.D-S-G: Acquisition of clinical data (Ponferrada), study selection for systematic review, discussing the content and figures, revising the draft, and final approval of manuscript. J.M.P, S.B: Development of study design, acquisition of clinical data (Lleida), analysis and interpretation of data, discussing the content and figures, revising the draft, and final approval of manuscript. A.G-Z, J.T-G: Development of study design, acquisition of clinical data (Mendaro), analysis and interpretation of data, discussing the content and figures, revising the draft, and final approval of manuscript. MA.A-F: Development of the study concept, discussing the content and figures, revising the draft, and final approval of manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Corral-Gudino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 38 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corral-Gudino, L., García-Zamalloa, A., Prada-González, C. et al. Development and Validation of the COMPLES Score for Differentiating Between Tuberculous Effusions with Low Pleural pH or Glucose and Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions. Lung 194, 847–854 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-016-9923-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-016-9923-y

Keywords

Navigation