Skip to main content
Log in

Different autism measures targeting different severity levels in children with autism spectrum disorder

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 28 October 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

The Childhood Autism Rating Scale™, Second Edition (CARS™-2) and Social Responsiveness Scale™, Second Edition (SRS™-2) are two measures for identifying autism symptoms. The CARS™-2 has two versions: Standard (CARS-ST) and High-Functioning (CARS-HF). To better understand their properties, this study aimed to investigate: (1) the associations among the CARS-ST, CARS-HF and the SRS™-2, and (2) the severity consistency between the CARS-ST and the CARS-HF. A sample of 125 children with autism spectrum disorder was recruited (mean age: 80.98 months, SD = 16.08). Based on Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI), children were divided into two groups: low severity level of autism spectrum disorder (LSL-ASD: VCI ≥ 80) and high severity level of autism spectrum disorder (HSL-ASD: VCI < 80). All children were evaluated with the CARS-ST and the SRS™-2, and the HF group, with the CARS-HF as well. In the LSL group, the CARS-ST and the CARS-HF had high correlation (r = 0.852, p < .001). Both versions had small to moderate correlations with the SRS™-2 (r = 0.130–0.491). In the HSL group, no significant correlations were found between the CARS-ST and SRS™-2 (p > .05). The CARS-HF and the CARS-ST had low severity consistency (Kappa = 0.376, p < .01). The CARS-ST and the CARS-HF had high correlations but low severity consistency. Different correlation patterns were found between the CARS™-2 and the SRS™-2 in the LSL and HSL groups. The results should help clinicians better understand the properties of the measures and choose appropriate measures when assessing autism symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [KLC], upon reasonable request.

Change history

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (2022) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edition, text revision. American Psychiatric Association, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Visser JC, Rommelse NNJ, Lappenschaar M, Servatius-Oosterling IJ, Greven CU, Buitelaar JK (2017) Variation in the early trajectories of autism symptoms is related to the development of language, cognition, and behavior problems. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 56:659–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.05.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schopler E, van Bourgondien ME, Wellman GJ, Love SR (2010) Childhood Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition (CARS-2). Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  4. Constantino JN, Gruber CP (2012) Social responsiveness scale (SRS). Western Psychological Services, Torrance

    Google Scholar 

  5. Constantino JN, Gruber CP (2012) Social responsiveness scale, second edition (SRS-2): manual. Western Psychological Services, Torrance

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reszka SS, Boyd BA, McBee M, Hume KA, Odom SL (2014) Brief report: concurrent validity of autism symptom severity measures. J Autism Dev Disord 44:466–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1879-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen KL, Lin CH, Yu TY, Huang CY, Chen YD (2018) Differences Between the Childhood Autism Rating Scale and the Social Responsiveness Scale in assessing symptoms of children with autistic spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 48:3191–3198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3585-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chun J, Bong G, Han JH, Oh M, Yoo HJ (2021) Validation of social responsiveness scale for Korean preschool children with autism. Psychiatry Invest 18:831–840. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2021.0182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirmayer LJ, Rousseau C, Eric Jarvis G, Guzder J (2015) The cultural context of clinical assessment. In: Allan T, Jerald K, Jeffrey AL, Michael B, Michelle BR (eds) Psychiatry, 4th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 56–70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gau SSF, Liu LT, Wu YY, Chiu YN, Tsai WC (2013) Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the social responsiveness scale. Res Autism Spectr Disord 7:349–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wechsler D (2014) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 5th edn. Pearson, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wechsler D (2012) Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence, 4th edn. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hemedan N, Maharmeh L (2022) The Psychometric Proprieties of the Jordanian Version of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition (CARS2-HF). Dirasat Hum Soc Sci 49:561–572. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v49i2.1814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Akoury-Dirani L, Alameddine M, Salamoun M (2013) Validation of the Lebanese Childhood Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition–High Functioning Version. Res Autism Spectr Disord 7:1332–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Triandis HC (1989) The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychol Rev 96:506–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.506

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants in the study, and also the doctors and therapists in the hospitals for referral of the participants. The study was supported by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, R.O.C. (MOST 111-2628-B-006-021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CYH: analysis of data, drafting the manuscript, reviewing and editing. KSC: conception, reviewing and editing; GYL: conception, reviewing editing; CHL: conception, reviewing and editing; KLC: conception and design of the study, acquisition and analysis of data, drafting the manuscript, reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuan-Lin Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

The original online version of this article was revised: To correct the error in author name.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, CY., Chen, KS., Lee, KY. et al. Different autism measures targeting different severity levels in children with autism spectrum disorder. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 274, 27–33 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-023-01673-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-023-01673-z

Keywords

Navigation