Skip to main content
Log in

Spirometry in laryngotracheal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the changes in spirometry parameters or indices after relieving laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) in adult patients.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO databases was conducted for assessing changes in spirometry values after endoscopic balloon dilatation of LTS in adults. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Relevant data, such as changes in mean spirometry values between preoperative and postoperative interventions, and findings of receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for predicting the need for surgical intervention, were extracted.

Results

Ten studies including 330 patients overall met the inclusion criteria. Significant improvements were observed from preoperative to postoperative mean values of different spirometry parameters and indices. The overall mean differences in peak expiratory flow (ΔPEF), expiratory disproportion index (ΔEDI), and peak inspiratory flow (ΔPIF) were 2.26 L/s (95% CI 2.14–2.38), 27.94 s (95% CI 26.36–29.52), and 1.21 L/s (95% CI 0.95–1.47), respectively. ΔPEF and ΔPIF values increased, while ΔEDI decreased. In predicting the need for surgical intervention, EDI had the highest sensitivity (88%), and forced expiratory volume per second/forced vital capacity had the highest specificity (85%).

Conclusion

Spirometry is a valuable tool for assessing patients with LTS. PEF, EDI, and PIF were the most commonly reported spirometry parameters that significantly improved after airway stenosis was relieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Carpenter DJ, Ferrante S, Bakos SR, Clary MS, Gelbard AH, Daniero JJ (2019) Utility of routine spirometry measures for surveillance of idiopathic subglottic stenosis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145:21–26. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crosby T, McWhorter A, McDaniel L, Kunduk M, Adkins L (2021) Predicting need for surgery in recurrent laryngotracheal stenosis using changes in spirometry. Laryngoscope 131:2199–2203. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nouraei SA, Nouraei SM, Patel A et al (2013) Diagnosis of laryngotracheal stenosis from routine pulmonary physiology using the expiratory disproportion index. Laryngoscope 123:3099–3104. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maldonado F, Loiselle A, Depew ZS et al (2014) Idiopathic subglottic stenosis: an evolving therapeutic algorithm. Laryngoscope 124:498–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alrabiah A, Almohanna S, Aljasser A et al (2022) Utility of spirometry values for evaluating tracheal stenosis patients before and after balloon dilation. Ear Nose Throat J 101:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561320936968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosow DE, Barbarite E (2016) Review of adult laryngotracheal stenosis: pathogenesis, management, and outcomes. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 24:489–493. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith MM, Cotton RT (2018) Diagnosis and manage ment of laryngotracheal stenosis. Expert Rev Respir Med 12:709–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2018.1495564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tie K, Buckmire RA, Shah RN (2020) The role of Spirometry and Dyspnea Index in the management of subglottic stenosis. Laryngoscope 130:2760–2766. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Monnier P, Dikkers FG, Eckel H et al (2015) Preoperative assessment and classification of benign laryngotracheal stenosis: a consensus paper of the European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:2885–2896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3635-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Curley FJ (1997) Dyspnea. In: Irwin RS, Curley FJ, Grossman RF (eds) Diagnosis and treatment of symptoms of the respiratory tract. Futura Publishing Company Inc, Armonk, pp 55–111

    Google Scholar 

  11. Empey DW (1972) Assessment of upper airways obstruction. Br Med J 3:503–505. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.3.5825.503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller RD, Hyatt RE (1973) Evaluation of obstructing lesions of the trachea and larynx by flow-volume loops. Am Rev Respir Dis 108:475–481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdullah A, Alrabiah A, Habib SS et al (2019) The value of spirometry in subglottic stenosis. Ear Nose Throat J 98:98–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561318823309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ntouniadakis E, Sundh J, von Beckerath M (2022) Monitoring adult subglottic stenosis with Spirometry and Dyspnea Index: a novel approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 167:517–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/01945998211060817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (2021) Study quality assessment tools. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Accessed 1 November 2022.

  17. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kraft SM, Sykes K, Palmer A, Schindler J (2015) Using pulmonary function data to assess outcomes in the endoscopic management of subglottic stenosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 124:137–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489414548915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park M, Tie K, Davis H, Hall J, Buckmire RA, Shah RN (2023) Can the remote use of a peak flow meter predict severity of subglottic stenosis and surgical timing? Laryngoscope 133:628–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.30257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alrabiah A, Alsayed A, Aljasser A et al (2021) Effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate on laryngotracheal stenosis after balloon dilation: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278:1505–1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06622-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yung KC, Chang J, Courey MS (2020) A randomized controlled trial of adjuvant mitomycin-c in endoscopic surgery for laryngotracheal stenosis. Laryngoscope 130:706–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanchez-Guerrero J, Guerlain J, Samaha S, Burgess A, Lacau St Guily J, Périé S (2018) Upper airway obstruction assessment: peak inspiratory flow and clinical COPD Questionnaire. Clin Otolaryngol 43:1303–1311. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to convey special thanks to Editage (www.editage.com) for the English language editing of this manuscript.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waleed Alshareef.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alshareef, W., Almutairi, N., Sindi, A. et al. Spirometry in laryngotracheal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 4783–4792 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08159-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08159-7

Keywords

Navigation