Skip to main content
Log in

Long term results of glass ionomer ossiculoplasty

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 05 May 2024

Abstract

Objective

To analyze and compare the early and late post-operative results of glass ionomer bone cement (GIBC) used in ossiculoplasty.

Methods

The pre-operative, early post-operative (3 months) and late post-operative (> 2 years) audiometric findings, namely the pure-tone average (PTA), bone conduction threshold (BCT) and air–bone gap (ABG) of 40 patients who underwent GIBC ossiculoplasty for different etiologies were analyzed. Early and late results were compared. Also, the patients were grouped in terms of prognostic factors and applied ossiculoplasty techniques, and the results were compared between the groups.

Results

There were statistically significant improvements in the pure-tone average and air–bone gap of the patients in the early post-operative period (PTA from 59.60 ± 15.95 to 40.37 ± 17.83 and ABG from 37.12 ± 11.18 to 19.78 ± 10.41, p < 0.001 for both). There were no statistically significant changes in any of the audiometric parameters in the late post-operative period (PTA from 40.37 ± 17.83 to 39.79 ± 17.91, ABG from 19.78 ± 10.41 to 19.32 ± 9.60, BCT from 17.99 ± 12.71 to 18.31 ± 13.99, p > 0.05 for all). Presence of tympanosclerosis was found to be the only prognostic factor to affect the outcome.

Conclusion

GIBC is a safe and reliable material for ossiculoplasty, which maintains its ability to conduct sound in the long-term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The study data is not available in an open data repository.

References

  1. Gary Jackson C, Kaylie DM, Glasscock ME, Strasnick B (2010) Chapter 12—tympanoplasty—undersurface graft technique: postauricular approach. In: Brackmann DE, Shelton C, Arriaga MA (eds) Otologic surgery, 3rd edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 149–160

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Javia LR, Ruckenstein MJ (2006) Ossiculoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 39(6):1177–1189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mudhol R, Naragund A, Shruthi V (2013) Ossiculoplasty: revisited. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65(3):451–454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Babighian G (1992) Use of a glass ionomer cement in otological surgery. A preliminary report. J Laryngol Otol 106(11):954–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tange R (1996) Repair of the ossicular chain with an ionomer cement by an inadequate incus after prior stapes surgery for otosclerosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 253(4):313–315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wegner I, van den Berg JW, Smit AL, Grolman W (2015) Systematic review of the use of bone cement in ossicular chain reconstruction and revision stapes surgery. Laryngoscope 125(1):227–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Monsell EM, Balkany TA, Gates GA, Goldenberg RA, Meyerhoff WL, House JW. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the diagnosis and evaluation of therapy in Meniere’s disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;113:181-185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sennaroglu L, Gungor V, Atay G, Ozer S (2015) Manubrio-stapedioplasty: new surgical technique for malleus and incus fixation due to tympanosclerosis. J Laryngol Otol 129(6):587–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gurgel RK, Jackler RK, Dobie RA, Popelka GR (2012) A new standardized format for reporting hearing outcome in clinical trials. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147(5):803–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gungor V, Atay G, Bajin MD, Yarali M, Sarac S, Sennaroglu L (2016) Comparison of various bone cement ossiculoplasty techniques and functional results. Acta Otolaryngol 136(9):883–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall A, Rytzner C (1957) Stapedectomy and autotransplantation of ossicles. Acta Otolaryngol 47(4):318–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bauer M (2000) Ossiculoplasty: autogenous bone grafts, 34 years experience. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 25(4):257–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miman MC, Aydın NE, Öncel S, Özturan O, Erdem T (2002) Autoclaving the ossicles provides safe autografts in cholesteatoma. Auris Nasus Larynx 29(2):133–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin AD, Harner SG (2004) Ossicular reconstruction with titanium prosthesis. Laryngoscope 114(1):61–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahanty S, Maiti AB, Naskar S, Das SK, Mandal S, Karmakar M (2015) A comparative study of outcome of ossiculoplasty using cartilage graft, bone and different alloplasts in chronic otitis media. Indian J Otol 21(2):144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Watson GJ, da Cruz M (2018) Reporting in stapes surgery: are we following the guidelines? J Laryngol Otol 132(6):479–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalcioglu MT, Tan M, Fleerakkers J (2013) The use of bone cement for ossicular chain defects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(11):2849–2855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kupperman D, Tange R (1997) Long-term results of glass ionomer cement, Ionocem, in the middle ear of the rat. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 51(1):27–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kupperman D, Tange RA (2001) Ionomeric cement in the human middle ear cavity: long-term results of 23 cases. Laryngoscope 111(2):306–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Edizer DT, Durna YM, Hamit B, Demirhan H, Yigit O (2016) Malleus to stapes bone cement rebridging ossiculoplasty: why don’t we perform frequently? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 125(6):445–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Demir B, Binnetoglu A, Sahin A, Derinsu U, Batman Ç (2019) Long-term outcomes of ossiculoplasty using bone cement. J Laryngol Otol 133(8):658–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ho K-Y, Tsai S-M, Chai C-Y, Wang H-M (2010) Clinical analysis of intratympanic tympanosclerosis: etiology, ossicular chain findings, and hearing results of surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 130(3):370–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalcıoğlu MT, Yılmaz U (2017) Should bone cement be used only in limited ossicular chain defects? J Int Adv Otol 13(1):149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Renard J, Felten D, Bequet D (1994) Post-otoneurosurgery aluminium encephalopathy. Lancet 344(8914):63–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kum RO, Kulacoglu S (2017) Effects of glass ionomer cement on facial nerve: a clinical and histopathologic evaluation. Acta Otolaryngol 137(8):814–817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oğuzhan Katar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katar, O., Kılıç, S., Bajin, M.D. et al. Long term results of glass ionomer ossiculoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 281, 171–179 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08120-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08120-8

Keywords

Navigation