Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The expression and significance of Epac1 and Epac2 in the inner ear of guinea pigs

  • OTOLOGY
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To detect the expression of Epac1 and Epac2 in the inner ear of guinea pigs and its association with microcirculation in the inner ear.

Methods

The temporal bones of 30 healthy red-eye guinea pigs (60 ears) weighing 200–350 g were collected, then the surrounding bone wall of the cochlea was removed under a dissection microscope. Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and Western blot were used to detect mRNA and protein expression, respectively, of Epac1 and Epac2 in the inner ear and to compare their expression in heart, liver, kidney, intestine, and lung tissues. The specimens of the cochlea included the stria vascularis, basilar membrane, saccule, and utricles isolated under a microscope to detect the localization of Epac1 and Epac2 proteins in various parts of the inner ear through immunofluorescence staining.

Results

The RT-qPCR and Western blot results showed that Epac1 mRNA was universally expressed in the inner ear, heart, liver, kidneys, intestines, and lungs, and was highly expressed in the liver, kidneys, and intestines (p < 0.05 vs heart, liver, kidney, intestine; p > 0.05 vs lung). Epac2 mRNA was expressed in the inner ear and heart, but not in the liver, kidneys, intestines, or lungs (p < 0.05 vs Heart). Epac1 and Epac2 proteins were both expressed in the inner ear, heart, liver, kidneys, intestines, and lungs. The relative expression of Epac1 proteins in the inner ear was significantly different from the liver, kidneys, intestines, and lungs (p < 0.05). The relative expression of Epac2 proteins in the inner ear was significantly different from the liver, kidneys, and lungs (p < 0.05), but not from the heart (p = 0.127) or intestines (p = 0.274). Immunofluorescence staining observed under confocal microscopy indicated that Epac1 and Epac2 proteins were expressed in the stria vascularis, basilar membrane, saccule, and utricles of the inner ear. They were expressed in maginal cells, intermediate cells, and basal cells of the stria vascularis, and highly expressed in capillary endothelial cells.

Conclusions

Epac1 and Epac2 mRNA and proteins were both expressed in the inner ear of guinea pigs and evenly expressed in the spiral ganglion, basilar membrane, saccule, and utricles. However, their expression in capillary endothelial cells of the stria vascularis was more obvious, suggesting that cyclic adenosine monophosphate–Epac1 signaling may play an important role in maintaining the function of the blood–labyrinth barrier and regulating the stability of microcirculation in the inner ear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Takumida M et al (2012) Localization of aquaporins 1, 2, and 3 and vasopressin type 2 receptor in the mouse inner ear. Acta Otolaryngol 132(8):807

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Li X et al (2014) Observation of permeability of blood–labyrinth barrier during cytomegalovirus-induced hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78(7):995–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yao X, Rarey KE (1996) Localization of the mineralocorticoid receptor in rat cochlear tissue. Acta Otolaryngol 116(3):493–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. (2010) Expression and translocation of aquaporin-2 in the endolymphatic sac in patients with Meniere's disease. J Neuroendocrinol 22(11):1157–1164

  5. Banerjee U, Cheng X (2015) Exchange protein directly activated by cAMP encoded by the mammalian rapgef3 gene: structure, function and therapeutics. Gene 570(2):157–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. De-Rooij J et al (1998) Epac is a Rap1 guanine-nucleotide-exchange factor directly activated by cyclic AMP. Nature 396(6710):474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bos JL (2003) Epac: a new cAMP target and new avenues in cAMP research. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4(9):733–738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pannekoek WJ et al (2011) Epac1 and PDZ-GEF cooperate in Rap1 mediated endothelial junction control. Cell Signal 23(12):2056–2064

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Murtazina R et al (2007) Tissue-specific regulation of sodium/proton exchanger isoform 3 activity in Na(+)/H(+) exchanger regulatory factor 1 (NHERF1) null mice. cAMP inhibition is differentially dependent on NHERF1 and exchange protein directly activated by cAMP in ileum versus p. J Biol Chem 282(34):25141–25151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yip KP (2006) Epac-mediated Ca2+ mobilization and exocytosis in inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol 291(4):882–890

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laroche-Joubert N et al (2002) Protein kinase A-independent activation of ERK and H, K-ATPase by cAMP in native kidney cells—role of Epac I. J Biol Chem 277(21):18598–18604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spindler V et al (2011) Ultrastructural analysis reveals cAMP-dependent enhancement of microvascular endothelial barrier functions via Rac1-mediated reorganization of intercellular junctions. Am J Pathol 178(5):2424–2436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. (2020) Epac1 null mice have nephrogenic diabetes insipidus with deficient corticopapillary osmotic gradient and weaker collecting duct tight junctions. Acta Physiologica 229(1)

  14. Yuan Y et al (2019) Epac agonist improves barrier function in iPSC-derived endothelial colony forming cells for whole organ tissue engineering. Biomaterials 200:25–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawasaki H et al (1999) A family of cAMP-binding proteins that directly activate Rap1. Science 282(5397):2275–2279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Robichaux WG, Cheng X (2018) Intracellular cAMP sensor EPAC: physiology, pathophysiology, and therapeutics development. Physiol Rev 98(2):919–1053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Birukova AA et al (2007) Prostaglandins PGE(2) and PGI(2) promote endothelial barrier enhancement via PKA- and Epac1/Rap1-dependent Rac activation. Exp Cell Res 313(11):2504–2520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kooistra MRH et al (2005) Epac1 regulates integrity of endothelial cell junctions through VE-cadherin. FEBS Lett 579(22):4966–4972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rampers Ad SN et al (2010) Cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase 4D (PDE4D) tethers EPAC1 in a vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-Cad)-based signaling complex and controls cAMP-mediated vascular permeability. J Biol Chem 285(44):33614–33622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sehrawat S et al (2008) Role of Epac1, an exchange factor for Rap GTPases, in endothelial microtubule dynamics and barrier function. Mol Biol Cell 19(3):1261–1270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramos et al (2018) The Epac-Rap1 pathway prevents and reverses cytokine-induced retinal vascular permeability. Biol Chem 293(2):717–730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kopperud RK et al (2017) Increased microvascular permeability in mice lacking Epac1 (Rapgef3). Acta Physiol 219:441–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cuínas A et al (2016) Activation of PKA and Epac proteins by cyclic AMP depletes intracellular calcium stores and reduces calcium availability for vasoconstriction. Life Sci 155:102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xla B et al (2020) Gadolinium-enhanced MRI reveals dynamic development of endolymphatic hydrops in Ménière’s disease. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 86(2):165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

(1) The Development Projects For Science and Technology of Chinese Medicine of Jiangsu Province (N202009). (2) Key R & D Plan (Social Development) Project of Xuzhou Science and Technology Bureau (KC20067). (3) Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (SJCX20_0930). (4) National Natural Science Foundation of China, 81570917, 81600802, 81771009. The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuanyi Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Li, Y., Liu, W. et al. The expression and significance of Epac1 and Epac2 in the inner ear of guinea pigs. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279, 5207–5214 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07380-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07380-0

Keywords

Navigation