Skip to main content
Log in

No-cutting remodelling intra-pharyngeal surgery can avoid CPAP in selected OSA patients: myth or reality?

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Oropharyngeal surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) has evolved from a radical excision of “redundant” soft tissue for the enlargment of the airway to a minimally invasive reconstruction to fulfill both preservation of pharyngeal function and improvement of sleep apnea. Recently, Alianza surgical technique has been successfully introduced as a new, non-resective procedure aimed to treat concentric pharyngeal collapse at the velum using Barbed Sutures. The aim of this study was to show the effectiveness and safety of Alianza technique as standalone surgical treatment in selected patients with moderate-severe OSA and concentric pharyngeal collapse that refused or did not tolerate Continuous Positive Airway Pressure therapy.

Materials and methods

Effectiveness of the surgical procedure was assessed by means of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Home Sleep Test, and a 0–10 snoring VAS.

Results

At the end of our selection process, 26 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 52.7 ± 9.2 years, that undergone Alianza tecnique. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean post-operative apnea–hypopnea indexes (34.1 ± 11.5–16.3 ± 10.3; p  <0.01), mean oxygen desaturation index (29.0 ± 14.5–13.1 ± 9.2; p < 0.01), and mean ESS scores (12.1 ± 5.8 and 5.8 ± 4.4; p < 0.01).There was also a significant decrease in mean post-operative snoring VAS scores (7.85 ± 1.23 vs 3.2 ± 1.7, p < 0.01). There were no major complications.

Conclusions

Our preliminary results suggest that Alianza technique is a safe and repeatable surgery. Further studies on a larger scale are needed to confirm these encouraging data supporting the role of Alianza alone or in OSA multilevel surgery in selected OSA patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chiu FH, Chen CY, Lee JC, Hsu YS (2021) Effect of modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty without tonsillectomy on obstructive sleep apnea: polysomnographic outcome and correlation with drug-induced sleep endoscopy. Nat Sci Sleep 13:11–19. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S286203

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Michael F, Ofer J (2018) Sleep apnea and snoring 2nd edition surgical and non-surgical therapy. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li H-Y et al (2019) Intrapharyngeal surgery with integrated treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Biomed J 42(2):84. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BJ.2019.02.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mantovani M, Minetti A, Torretta S, Pincherle A, Tassone G, Pignataro L (2013) The ‘Barbed Roman Blinds’ technique: a step forward. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 33(2):128

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mantovani M, Carioli D, Torretta S, Rinaldi V, Ibba T, Pignataro L (2017) Barbed snore surgery for concentric collapse at the velum: the Alianza technique. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg 45(11):1794–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yalamanchali S, Farajian V, Hamilton C, Pott TR, Samuelson CG, Friedman M (2013) Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea by peripheral arterial tonometry: meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139(12):1343–1350. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMAOTO.2013.5338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moffa A et al (2020) Different barbed pharyngoplasty techniques for retropalatal collapse in obstructive sleep apnea patients: a systematic review. Sleep Breath 24(3):1115–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-020-02088-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Casale M, Moffa A, Pignataro L, Rinaldi V (2021) Palatopharyngeus muscle in pharyngoplasty surgery for OSAS: cut or not to cut? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278(7):2657–2658. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00405-021-06761-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gulotta G et al (2021) Barbed suture extrusion and exposure in palatoplasty for OSA: what does it mean? Am J Otolaryngol 42(4):102994. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJOTO.2021.102994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman M, Salapatas AM, Bonzelaar LB (2017) Updated friedman staging system for obstructive sleep apnea. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 80:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1159/000470859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vicini C et al (2015) Barbed reposition pharyngoplasty (BRP) for OSAHS: a feasibility, safety, efficacy and teachability pilot study. ‘We are on the giant’s shoulders.’ Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(10):3065–3070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3628-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Apodaca PM, Llatas MC, Gras MV, Galofre JD (2020) Improving surgical results in velopharyngeal surgery: our experience in the last decade. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 71(4):197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OTORRI.2019.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sundman J, Browaldh N, Fehrm J, Friberg D (2021) Eight-year follow-up of modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope 131(1):E307–E313. https://doi.org/10.1002/LARY.28960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Moffa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on sleep apnea syndrome. Guest editors: Manuele Casale, Rinaldi Vittorio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Casale, M., Moffa, A., Giorgi, L. et al. No-cutting remodelling intra-pharyngeal surgery can avoid CPAP in selected OSA patients: myth or reality?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 279, 5039–5045 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07261-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07261-6

Keywords

Navigation