Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of prilocaine and its combination with tramadol on anxiety and pain during nasal packing removal

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the effect of local usage of prilocaine and ıts combination with tramadol on the pain and anxiety levels of patients during nasal packing removal.

Methods

A total of 117 patients who were treated with the Merocel nasal packing after septoplasty were included in the study. Patients whose Merocel nasal packings infiltrated with prilocaine (P group), prilocaine combined with tramadol 1 mg/kg (P + T1 group), prilocaine combined with tramadol 2 mg/kg (P + T2 group), or normal saline solution (Control group) before nasal packing removal were compared for their pain, sedation, and anxiety related to this removal procedure. The visual analog scale (VAS), Ramsay sedation scale (RSS), and State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scale were assessed to evaluate the pain, sedation, and anxiety levels of the patients.

Results

Groups were found similar according to sex, age, and preoperative STAI scores. The VAS score was significantly lower in P, P + T1, and P + T2 than control group during nasal packing removal (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). However, state anxiety inventory (STAI-S) and RSS were found significantly improved only in P + T1 and P + T2 (STAI-S: p = 0.032, RSS: p = 0.002, STAI-S: p = 0.000, RSS: p < 0.001, respectively). In the comparison of P + T1 and P + T2, no significant difference was found in VAS, RSS, and STAI-S (p = 0.604, p = 0.154, and p = 0.264, respectively).

Conclusion

The combined infiltration of prilocaine and tramadol 1 mg/kg into the nasal packing is effective in reducing the pain and anxiety of patients during nasal packing removal

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ardehali MM, Bastaninejad S (2009) Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:1022–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.05.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Özbal Koç AE, Türkoğlu Babakurban S, Kibar SS et al (2016) A comparative study on nasal packing after septoplasty: does it matter in terms of patient comfort, bleeding, and crust or synechia formation? Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 26:152–158. https://doi.org/10.5606/kbbihtisas.2016.62444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Samad I, Stevens HE, Maloney A (1992) The efficacy of nasal septal surgery. J Otolaryngol 21:88–91 PMID: 1583714

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Karaaslan K, Yilmaz F, Gulcu N et al (2007) The effect of prilocaine and prilocaine plus meperidine infiltration on the pain during nasal packing removal. Rhinology 45:321–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811410660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Striebel HW, Koenigs D, Krämer J (1992) Postoperative pain management by intranasal demand-adapted fentanyl titration. Anesthesiology 77:281–285. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199208000-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Striebel HW, Pommerening J, Rieger A (1993) Intranasal fentanyl titration for postoperative pain management in an unselected population. Anaesthesia 48:753–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07583.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Helmers JH, Noorduin H, Van Peer A et al (1989) Comparison of intravenous and intranasal sufentanil absorption and sedation. Can J Anaesth 36:494–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03005373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Henderson JM, Brodsky DA, Fisher DM et al (1988) Pre-induction of anesthesia in pediatric patients with nasally administered sufentanil. Anesthesiology 68:671–675. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198805000-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Añez C, Rodriguez A, Rull M et al (2007) Intranasal tramadol versus intravenous tramadol in patients that have undergone a laparocopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 24:178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gönül O, Satılmış T, Bayram F et al (2015) Effect of submucosal application of tramadol on postoperative pain after third molar surgery. Head Face Med 11:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-015-0090-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Grond S, Sablotzki A (2004) Clinical pharmacology of tramadol. Clin Pharmacokinet 43:879–923. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200443130-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Klotz U (2003) Tramadol - the impact of its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties on the clinical management of pain. Arzneimittelforschung 53:681–687. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1299812

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Simsek T, Musaoglu I, Uluat A (2019) The effect of lidocaine and tramadol in nasal packs on pain after septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276:1663–1669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05306-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sahin C, Aras HI (2015) Effect on patient anxiety of lidocaine infiltration into nasal packing after septoplasty: prospective, controlled study. J Laryngol Otol 129:784–787. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215115001644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aykent R, Kocamanoğlu IS, Üstün E et al (2007) The reasons and evaluatıon of preoperative anxiety: a comparıson of APAIS and STAI scores. Türkiye Klinikleri J Anest Reanim 5:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tenenbaum G, Furst D, Weingarten G (1985) A statistical reevaluation of the STAI anxiety questionnaire. J Clin Psychol 41:239–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198503)41:2%3c239:AID-JCLP2270410218%3e3.0.CO;2-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dikmen PY, Aysevener EO, Aydınlar EI et al (2012) Relationship between pain and emotional state in patients undergoing electromyography. Arch Neuropsychiatry 49:48–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dayılar H, Oyur G, Kamer E et al (2017) Evaluation of anxiety levels of patients before colon surgery. Turk J Colorectal Dis 27:6–10. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjcd.26122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gencer ZK, Ozkiriş M, Gencer M et al (2013) Comparison of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, prilocaine and lidocaine in the management of pain and hemorrhage during nasal pack removal. A J Rhinol Allergy 27:423–425. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Apuhan T, Yildirim YS, Gulcu N et al (2011) The effect of prilocaine or levobupivacaine infiltration on pain during nasal packing removal. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145:418–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811410660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas DM, Tierney PA, Samuel D et al (1996) Audit of pain after nasal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78:380–382 PMID: 8712656

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Apuhan T, Kocoglu H, Gulcu N (2012) Comparison of lidocaine and levobupivacaine in transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy. Am J Rhinol Allergy 26:104–106. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hwang JH, Liu CM, Liu TC et al (2003) Sphenopalatine ganglion block before removal of nasal packing. Laryngoscope 113:1423–1424. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200308000-00030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuo MJ, Zeitoun H, Macnamara M et al (1995) The use of topical 5% lignocaine ointment for the relief of pain associated with post-operative nasal packing. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 20:357–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1995.tb00060.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tarradell R, Pol O, Farré M et al (1996) Respiratory and analgesic effects of meperidine and tramadol in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 18:211–218 PMID: 8738073

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study did not receive funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by KGT, EA, RGT, and HY. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KGT and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamil Gokce Tulaci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Balikesir University Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (Ethical committee approval number: 2019/71) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tulaci, K.G., Arslan, E., Tulaci, R.G. et al. Effect of prilocaine and its combination with tramadol on anxiety and pain during nasal packing removal. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277, 1385–1390 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05863-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05863-6

Keywords

Navigation