Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative retrospective study: hypoglossofacial versus masseterofacial nerve anastomosis using Sunnybrook facial grading system

  • Head & Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of our study is to compare the functional results between two surgical techniques for reanimation of facial paralysis: hypoglossal-to-facial versus masseteric-to-facial nerve anastomosis.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of 13 patients treated for complete facial paralysis in two medical tertiary centers. The patients were classified into two groups. First group: masseteric-to-facial nerve anastomosis. Second group: hypoglossofacial nerve anastomosis. Sunnybrook facial grading system was used to evaluate the functional results. The mean scores were compared using Mann–Whitney test. The correlation between the age at surgery, the delay in time from the onset of the facial paralysis to the time of surgery and the results of Sunnybrook scores was studied using correlation and linear regression.

Results

No significant statistical difference was found between the mean of total score of the two groups (first group = 38 ± 4.898, second group = 37.83 ± 4.956). All the patients treated by hypoglossofacial nerve anastomosis presented with hemiglossal atrophy. We found slight superiority for the masseterofacial nerve anastomosis in dynamic movements, whereas at rest the hypoglossofacial anastomosis is slightly better. All the differences were not statistically significant. No correlation was found between the age at surgery (age range included 32–73 years) and post-operative results. No correlation was found between the delays up to 24 months from the onset of the facial paralysis and post-operative results.

Conclusion

Our study showed that both types of anastomosis are effective with comparable results. The masseterofacial nerve anastomosis is preferred when possible to avoid the hemiglossal atrophy and its complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leckenby J, Grobbelaar A (2013) Smile Restoration for Permanent Facial Paralysis. Arch Plastic Surg 40(5):633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Glicenstein J (2015) Histoire de la paralysie faciale. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthétique 60(5):347–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hammerschlag P (1999) Facial reanimation with jump interpositional graft hypoglossal facial anastomosis and hypoglossal facial anastomosis: Evolution in management of facial paralysis. Laryngoscope 109(S90):1–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McLaughlin CR (1953) Surgical support in permanent facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 11(4):302–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Love JG (1951) Nerve anastomosis in the treatment of facial paralysis: Special consideration of the etiologic role of total removal of tumors of the acoustic nere. AMA Arch Surg 62(3):379–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirsh L, Murtagh F (1978) Spinofacial anastomosis. Acta Neurochir 40(3–4):285–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fernandez E, Doglietto F, Ciampini A, Lauretti L (2007) Hypoglossal-facial anastomosis. J Neurosurg 107(1):244–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sawamura Y, Abe H (1997) Hypoglossal—facial nerve side-to-end anastomosis for preservation of hypoglossal function: Results of delayed treatment with a new technique. J Neurosurg 86(2):203–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Manni J, Beurskens C, van de Velde C, Stokroos R (2001) Reanimation of the paralyzed face by indirect hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis. Am J Surg 182(3):268–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Atlas M, Lowinger D (1997) A new technique for hypoglossal-facial nerve repair. Laryngoscope 107(7):984–991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yetiser S, Karapinar U (2007) Hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis: a meta-analytic study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 116(7):542–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sleilati F, Nasr M, Stephan H, Asmar Z, Hokayem N (2010) Treating facial nerve palsy by true termino-lateral hypoglossal–facial nerve anastomosis. J Plastic Reconstr Aesth Surg 63(11):1807–1812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Klebuc M (2011) Facial reanimation using the masseter-to-facial nerve transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(5):1909–1915

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang W, Yang C, Li Q, Li W, Yang X, Zhang Y (2014) Masseter-to-facial nerve transfer: a highly effective technique for facial reanimation after acoustic neuroma resection. Ann Plast Surg 73:S63–S69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hardy R, Perret G, Meyers R (1957) Phrenicofacial nerve anastomosis for facial paralysis. J Neurosurg 14(4):400–404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Perret G (1967) Results of phrenicofacial nerve anastomosis for facial paralysis. Arch Surg 94(4):505–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Körte W, Bernhardt M (1903) Ein Fall von Nervenpfropfung: Des Nervus facialis auf den Nervus hypoglossus. DMW 29(17):293–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. May M (2000) Nerve substitution techniques: XII-VII hook-up, XII-VII jump graft, and cross-face graft. The facial nerve. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme, pp 611–634

  19. Okochi M, Ueda K, Okochi H, Asai E, Sakaba T, Kajikawa A (2015) Facial reanimation using hypoglossal-facial neurorrhaphy with end-to-side coaptation between the jump interpositional nerve graft and hypoglossal nerve: outcome and duration of preoperative paralysis. Microsurgery 36(6):460–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Venail F, Sabatier P, Mondain M, Segniarbieux F, Leipp C, Uziel A (2009) Outcomes and complications of direct end-to-side facial-hypoglossal nerve anastomosis according to the modified May technique. J Neurosurg 110(4):786–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sood S, Anthony R, Homer J, Van Hille P, Fenwick J (2000) Hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis: assessment of clinical results and patient benefit for facial nerve palsy following acoustic neuroma excision. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 25(3):219–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Biglioli F, Colombo V, Rabbiosi D et al (2017) Masseteric–facial nerve neurorrhaphy: Results of a case series. J Neurosurg 126(1):312–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Klebuc M (2015) The evolving role of the masseter-to-facial (V–VII) nerve transfer for rehabilitation of the paralyzed face. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthétique 60(5):436–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fournier H, Denis F, Papon X, Hentati N, Mercier P (1997) An anatomical study of the motor distribution of the mandibular nerve for a masseteric-facial anastomosis to restore facial function. Surg Radiol Anat 19(4):241–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brenner E, Schoeller T (1998) Masseteric nerve: a possible donor for facial nerve anastomosis? Clin Anat 11(6):396–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bermudez L, Nieto L (2004) Masseteric-facial nerve anastomosis: case report. J Reconstr Microsurg 21(01):25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Biglioli F, Frigerio A, Colombo V et al (2012) Masseteric–facial nerve anastomosis for early facial reanimation. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 40(2):149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sforza C, Frigerio A, Mapelli A et al (2012) Facial movement before and after masseteric-facial nerves anastomosis: a three-dimensional optoelectronic pilot study. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 40(5):473–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bianchi B, Ferri A, Ferrari S, Copelli C, Salvagni L, Sesenna E (2014) The masseteric nerve: a versatile power source in facial animation techniques. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52(3):264–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brener MJ, Neely JG (2004) Approaches to grading facial nerve function. Semin Plastic Surg 18(1):13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. House JW (1983) Facial nerve grading systems. Laryngoscope 93(8):1056–1069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brackmann D, Barrs D (1984) Assessing recovery of facial function following acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 92(1):88–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. House J, Brackmann D (1985) Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 93(2):146–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ross B, Fradet G, Nedzelski J (1996) Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114(3):380–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Neely J, Cherian N, Dickerson C, Nedzelski J (2010) Sunnybrook facial grading system: reliability and criteria for grading. Laryngoscope 120(5):1038–1045

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wei-Li H, Ross B, Nedzelski J (2001) Reliability of the Sunnybrook facial grading system by novice users. The J Otolaryngol 30(04):208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kanerva M, Poussa T, Pitkäranta A (2006) Sunnybrook and House-Brackmann facial grading systems: intrarater repeatability and interrater agreement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135(6):865–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hontanilla B, Marré D (2012) Comparison of hemihypoglossal nerve versus masseteric nerve transpositions in the rehabilitation of short-term facial paralysis using the facial Clima evaluating system. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5):662e–672e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Socolovsky M, Martins R, di Masi G, Bonilla G, Siqueira M (2016) Treatment of complete facial palsy in adults: Comparative study between direct hemihypoglossal-facial neurorrhaphy, hemihypoglossal-facial neurorrhaphy with grafts, and masseter to facial nerve transfer. Acta Neurochir 158(5):945–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, Facial Plastic and Cervicofacial Surgery, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 5 place d’Arsonval, 69437, Lyon Cedex 03, France

    Nasser M. Altamami & Delphine Vertu-Ciolino

  2. Department of Otolaryngology, and Otoneurosurgery, South of Lyon Hospital Center, Lyon, France

    Sandra Zaouche

Authors
  1. Nasser M. Altamami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandra Zaouche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Delphine Vertu-Ciolino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delphine Vertu-Ciolino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors (Nasser Al Tamami, Sandra Zaouche, and Delphine Vertu-Ciolino) have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altamami, N.M., Zaouche, S. & Vertu-Ciolino, D. A comparative retrospective study: hypoglossofacial versus masseterofacial nerve anastomosis using Sunnybrook facial grading system. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276, 209–216 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5186-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5186-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation