Abstract
Radiotherapy associated with cetuximab (Cet-RT) is an alternative treatment to platinum-based chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (LAHNC). Reviews suggest that the use of cetuximab is associated with poorer tolerance in patients unfit for chemotherapy than in pivotal trial. We retrospectively studied patients first treated by Cet-RT for LAHNC presenting contraindications to chemoradiotherapy. Objectives were treated population description, acute tolerance, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and 3-month clinical response. Eighty-eight patients were included. Treatment was completed without delay for 43 patients. Grade 3–4 acute toxicity was described in 44.3%: mucositis (n = 20), radiodermatitis (n = 25) folliculitis (n = 10), and anaphylaxis (n = 6). Fourteen patients died during treatment. Median PFS and OS were 6.3 and 18.7 months, respectively. We confirm that Cet-RT tolerance in unfit patients is poorer than that in trials. Survival data illustrate patients’ frailty and suggest that balanced use of Cet-RT is required in this population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Calais G, Alfonsi M, Bardet E, Sire C, Germain T, Bergerot P et al (1999) Randomized trial of radiation therapy versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for advanced-stage oropharynx carcinoma. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 91(24):2081–6
Pignon J-P, le Maître A, Maillard E, Bourhis J, MACH-NC Collaborative Group (2009) Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 92(1):4–14
Bonner JA, Raisch KP, Trummell HQ, Robert F, Meredith RF, Spencer SA et al (2000) Enhanced apoptosis with combination C225/radiation treatment serves as the impetus for clinical investigation in head and neck cancers. J Clin Oncol 18(suppl_1):47s–53s
Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin DM, Cohen RB et al (2006) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 354(6):567–78
Magrini SM, Buglione M, Corvò R, Pirtoli L, Paiar F, Ponticelli P et al (2016) Cetuximab and radiotherapy versus cisplatin and radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer: a randomized phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 34(5):427–35
Petrelli F, Coinu A, Riboldi V, Borgonovo K, Ghilardi M, Cabiddu M et al (2014) Concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy or cetuximab with radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. Oral Oncol 50(11):1041–8
Walsh L, Gillham C, Dunne M, Fraser I, Hollywood D, Armstrong J et al (2011) Toxicity of cetuximab versus cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LAHNSCC). Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 98(1):38–41
Riaz N, Sherman E, Koutcher L, Shapiro L, Katabi N, Zhang Z et al (2016) Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus cetuximab for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Clin Oncol 39(1):27–31
Peddi P, Shi R, Nair B, Ampil F, Mills GM, Jafri SH (2015) Cisplatin, cetuximab, and radiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer: a retrospective review. Clin Med Insights Oncol 9:1–7
Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, Weber R, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-tân PF et al (2010) Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 363(1):24–35
Vermorken JB, Psyrri A, Mesía R, Peyrade F, Beier F, de Blas B et al (2014) Impact of tumor HPV status on outcome in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck receiving chemotherapy with or without cetuximab: retrospective analysis of the phase III EXTREME trial. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO 25(4):801–7
Ou D, Levy A, Blanchard P, Nguyen F, Garberis I, Casiraghi O et al (2016) Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin or cetuximab for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: does human papilloma virus play a role? Oral Oncol 59:50–7
Pryor DI, Porceddu SV, Burmeister BH, Guminski A, Thomson DB, Shepherdson K et al (2009) Enhanced toxicity with concurrent cetuximab and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 90(2):172–6
Koutcher L, Sherman E, Fury M, Wolden S, Zhang Z, Mo Q et al (2011) Concurrent cisplatin and radiation versus cetuximab and radiation for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81(4):915–22
Kurokawa M, Watanabe Nemoto M, Harada R, Kobayashi H, Horikoshi T, Kanazawa A et al (2015) Initial experience of radiotherapy plus cetuximab for Japanese head and neck cancer patients. J Radiat Res 56(5):849–55
Denis F, Garaud P, Bardet E, Alfonsi M, Sire C, Germain T et al (2004) Final results of the 94–01 French head and neck oncology and radiotherapy group randomized trial comparing radiotherapy alone with concomitant radiochemotherapy in advanced-stage oropharynx carcinoma. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 22(1):69–76
Levy A, Blanchard P, Bellefqih S, Brahimi N, Guigay J, Janot F et al (2014) Concurrent use of cisplatin or cetuximab with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Strahlenther Onkol 190(9):823–31
Lord HK, Junor E, Ironside J (2008) Cetuximab is effective, but more toxic than reported in the Bonner trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 20(1):96
Giro C, Berger B, Bölke E, Ciernik IF, Duprez F, Locati L et al (2009) High rate of severe radiation dermatitis during radiation therapy with concurrent cetuximab in head and neck cancer: results of a survey in EORTC institutes. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 90(2):166–71
Okano S, Yoshino T, Fujii M, Onozawa Y, Kodaira T, Fujii H et al (2013) Phase II study of cetuximab plus concomitant boost radiotherapy in Japanese patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Jpn J Clin Oncol 43(5):476–82
Koutcher LD, Wolden S, Lee N (2009) Severe radiation dermatitis in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with concurrent radiation and cetuximab. Am J Clin Oncol 32(5):472–6
Falk AT, Hébert C, Tran A, Chand M-E, Leysalle A, Thariat J et al (2016) Radiotherapy for elderly patients and cetuximab, a monocentric study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(2):1061–5
Lefebvre JL, Pointreau Y, Rolland F, Alfonsi M, Baudoux A, Sire C et al (2013) Induction chemotherapy followed by either chemoradiotherapy or bioradiotherapy for larynx preservation: the TREMPLIN randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 31(7):853–9
Grandvuillemin A, Disson-Dautriche A, Miremont-Salamé G, Fourrier-Reglat A, Sgro C (2013) Réseau des Centres Régionaux de Pharmacovigilance Français. Cetuximab infusion reactions: French pharmacovigilance database analysis. J Oncol Pharm Pract Off Publ Int Soc Oncol Pharm Pract 19(2):130–7
Mariotte D, Dupont B, Gervais R, Galais M-P, Laroche D, Tranchant A et al (2011) Anti-cetuximab IgE ELISA for identification of patients at a high risk of cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis. MAbs 3(4):396–401
Skladowski K, Law MG, Maciejewski B, Steel GG (1994) Planned and unplanned gaps in radiotherapy: the importance of gap position and gap duration. Radiother Oncol 30(2):109–20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist.
Funding
No funding has been received for this study.
Ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rambeau, A., Gervais, R., De Raucourt, D. et al. Retrospective evaluation of concomitant cetuximab and radiotherapy tolerance for locoregional advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treatment in patients unfit for platinum-based chemotherapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 2883–2889 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4550-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4550-7