Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A prospective investigation of predictive parameters for post-surgical recurrences in sinonasal polyposis

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Even after appropriate surgical therapy, a significant number of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) experience recurrences. The end-point of this prospective study was to apply univariate and multivariate statistical models to identify clinical, pathological, and laboratory variables that could predict CRSwNP recurrence after endoscopic sinus surgery. The study enrolled 143 patients between 2010 and 2013, who were all treated by the same surgeon for CRSwNP. Twenty-one patients developed recurrent polyposis. The recurrence rate was significantly higher for the eosinophilic than for the non-eosinophilic type (p = 0.020). Among the patients who developed a recurrence, the disease-free interval was significantly shorter for those with eosinophilic-type polyposis (p = 0.003). Univariate statistical analysis disclosed significant associations between CRSwNP recurrence and age (p = 0.035), allergy (p = 0.014), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (p = 0.01). The multivariate model showed that only histological evidence of the eosinophilic type of CRSwNP retained an independent prognostic significance in relation to recurrent polyposis (p = 0.033). Judging from our results, it is reasonable to consider both stricter follow-up protocols and postoperative adjuvant medical treatments for patients with a histological diagnosis of eosinophilic-type CRSwNP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Babeto E, De Freitas Calmon M, Scarin Provazzi PJ et al (2010) Gene expression analysis reveals novel altered genes in nasal polyps. Mol Med Rep 3:485–490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Orlandi RR, Smith TL, Marple BF et al (2014) Update on evidence-based reviews with recommendations in adult chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 4(Suppl 1):S1–S15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J et al (2012) European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. Rhinol Suppl (23):3 (preceding table of contents, 1–298)

  4. Hopkins C, Browne JP, Slack R et al (2006) The national comparative audit of surgery for nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis. Clin Otolarygol 31:390–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gelardi M, Fiorella R, Fiorella ML et al (2009) Nasal sinus polyposis: clinical cytological grading and prognostic index of relapse. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 23:181–188

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meltzer EO, Hamilos DL, Hadley JA et al (2006) Rhinosinusitis: developing guidance for clinical trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol 118(5 Suppl):S17–S61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stjärne P, Olsson P, Alenius M (2009) Use of mometasone furoate to prevent polyp relapse after endoscopic sinus surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135:296–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Zele T, Gevaert P, Holtappels G et al (2010) Oral steroids and doxycycline: two different approaches to treat nasal polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol 125:1069–1076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA et al (2013) 2012 revised international chapel hill consensus conference nomenclature of vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum 65:1–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tezer I, Celebi Erdivanli O, Sanli A, Aydin S (2013) Could cellular proliferation be a predictive index for the relapse of nasal polyposis and down-regulated by nasal steroid treatment? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65(Suppl 2):329–332

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Katz MH (2003) Multivariable analysis: a primer for readers of medical research. Ann Intern Med 138:644–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Katz MH (1999) Introduction. In: Katz MH (ed) Multivariate analysis: a practical guide for clinicians. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  13. Albu S, Tomescu E, Mexca Z et al (2004) Recurrence rates in endonasal surgery for polyposis. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 58:79–86

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ottaviano G, Cappellesso R, Mylonakis I et al (2015) Endoglin (CD105) expression in sinonasal polyposis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. doi:10.1007/s00405-014-3456-x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaldenbach T, Schäfer D, Gosepath J et al (1999) Significance of eosinophilic granulocytes in relation to allergy and aspirin intolerance in patients with sinusitis polyposa. Laryngorhinootologie 78:429–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tosun F, Arslan HH, Karslioglu Y et al (2010) Relationship between postoperative recurrence rate and eosinophil density of nasal polyps. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119:455–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakayama T, Yoshikawa M, Asaka D et al (2011) Mucosal eosinophilia and recurrence of nasal polyps—new classification of chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 49:392–396

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vlaminck S, Vauterin T, Hellings PW et al (2014) The importance of local eosinophilia in the surgical outcome of chronic rhinosinusitis: a 3-year prospective observational study. Am J Rhinol Allergy 28:260–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mendelsohn D, Jeremic G, Wright ED, Rotenberg BW (2011) Revision rates after endoscopic sinus surgery: a recurrence analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 120:162–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Zele T, Holtappels G, Gevaert P, Bachert C (2014) Differences in initial immunoprofiles between recurrent and nonrecurrent chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Am J Rhinol Allergy 28:192–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Frances Coburn for correcting the English version of this paper. This study was partly supported by Grant No. 60A07-8983/13 (A. Martini) from the University of Padova, Italy.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Brescia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brescia, G., Marioni, G., Franchella, S. et al. A prospective investigation of predictive parameters for post-surgical recurrences in sinonasal polyposis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 655–660 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3598-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3598-5

Keywords

Navigation