Abstract
Great auricular nerve (GAN) is frequently sacrificed during parotid surgery. GAN preservation during parotidectomy is advised to avoid complications such as sensitive disorders, but debate still exists. In this study, our experience is reported on the matter. From a cohort of 173 parotidectomies carried out in the period 2005–2010, we studied 60 patients: 20 patients in which we preserved only the posterior branch of GAN (group A), 20 patients in which we preserved also the lobular branch (group B) and 20 patients in which the main trunk of GAN was sectioned (group C); we evaluated tactile sensitivity in all the skin supplied by GAN at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Group B is the best in terms of loss and recovery of sensitivity after 1-year post-surgery, followed closely by group A, on the contrary group C confirmed to be the worst. Results suggest that saving as many branches of the GAN as possible during parotid surgery could be useful for reducing hypo-dysesthesia. Preserving posterior and lobular branches of the GAN, when possible, improves the sensitivity of the preauricular area with better quality of life for the patient.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hu J, Ye W, Zheng J et al (2010) The feasibility and significance of preservation of the lobular branch of the great auricular nerve in parotidectomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39(7):684–689
Min HJ, Lee HS, Lee YS et al (2007) Is it necessary to preserve the posterior branch of the great auricular nerve in parotidectomy? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137(4):636–641
Biglioli F, D’Orto O, Bozzetti A et al (2002) Function of the great auricular nerve following surgery for benign parotid disorders. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 30(5):308–317
Yokoshima K, Nakamizo M, Ozu C et al (2004) Significance of preserving the posterior branch of the great auricular nerve in parotidectomy. J Nihon Med Sch 71(5):323–327
Brown AM, Wake MJ (1990) Accidental full thickness burn of the ear lobe following division of the great auricular nerve at parotidectomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28(3):178–179
Ferreria JL, Mauriño N, Michael E et al (1990) Surgery of the parotid region: a new approach. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(8):803–807
Brown JS, Ord RA (1989) Preserving the great auricular nerve in parotid surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27(6):459–466
Christensen NR, Parotidectomy Jacobsen SD (1997) Preserving the posterior branch of the great auricular nerve. J Laryngol Otol 111(6):556–559
Porter MJ, Wood SJ (1997) Preservation of the great auricular nerve during parotidectomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 22(3):251–253
Sand T, Becser N (1998) Neurophysiological and anatomical variability of the greater auricular nerve. Acta Neurol Scan 98(5):333–339
George M, Karkos PD, Dwivedi RC, Leong SC, Kim D, Repanos C (2014) Preservation of greater auricular nerve during parotidectomy: sensation, quality of life, and morbidity issues. A systematic review. Head Neck 36(4):603–608
Conflict of interest
Antonio Moretti and co-authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moretti, A., Citraro, L., Petrucci, A.G. et al. Great auricular nerve preservation in parotid surgery: rationale and long-term results insights. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 3515–3520 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3342-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3342-6